Jewish Tricks in the Pacific

Wtf was the war in the Pacific all about?
>Japan builds up massive war machine
>Proceeds to rape, pillage and generally act like massive douchebags in China, Korea and hundreds of islands in the Pacific for no apparent reason
>This REEEE behavior is enabled by imported American oil
>Hitler admires Japan's can-do attitude and racial purity so he forms an alliance with them
>US imposes oil embargo on Japan, which is essentially a declaration of war under the circumstances at the time
>Japan feels it has no choice but to attack Pearl Harbor and the Philippines
>US now has justification to join the war, which (((Roosevelt))) badly wanted

I can totally believe we initiated a false flag because, reality. I'm having trouble blaming our Satanic, debt-loving friends for this though, because this plot seems too based on faith. Here's where I'm struggling to connect the semitic dots...

>Absence of US aircraft carriers at Pearl Harbor
How could anyone (any jew) predict that these ships were about to rewrite the rules of naval warfare and preserving them meant ensuring victory?

>Allowing the rest of the entire Pacific Fleet to be destroyed
Why? It only takes a small attack to initiate a false flag (See: Gulf of Tonkin).

>Hitler will declare was on US for declaring war on Japan
I'm sorry? The merchants knew this how? I don't think they were invited to the German high command's strategy sessions

Also, why were the Japs considered to be bad goys in the first place? Wouldn't Schlomo Goldsteinowitz prefer the US to commit it's full strength to defeating Hitler?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=x8OmxI2AYV8
history.com/this-day-in-history/united-states-freezes-japanese-assets
twitter.com/AnonBabble

are you having a seizure?

>britain does all the fighting in Burma, Siam, etc - all the relevant parts of the theatre
>US bleeds itself on some irrelevant fucking islands because they're too chickenshit to ever do anything without total air cover even after they sink the Japanese pacific fleet

being this dumb.

then explain please?

Not everything is a Jewish conspiracy.

>How could anyone (any jew) predict that these ships were about to rewrite the rules of naval warfare and preserving them meant ensuring victory?
Because it WAS known. American military strategists analyzed the astounding power of naval air in europe, notably the Battle of Taranto and I guess sinking of the Bismarck. Elements within the navy I assume wanted to destroy the big ships so that faction would be weakened and the navy didn't have to revolve around battleship doctrine.

>Why? It only takes a small attack to initiate a false flag (See: Gulf of Tonkin).
The anti-war sentiment shouldn't be underestimated. At that time germans were sinking american supply ships every week. Hundreds of americans were dying and still they didn't want to go to war. It had to be huge, a spectacle. However this wasn't our first false flag, see the beginning of the spanish-american war where we blew up a ship (we seem to love doing this). However in that point of history we were gunning for a fight so just needed an excuse, not ww2.

>I'm sorry? The merchants knew this how? I don't think they were invited to the German high command's strategy sessions
If Hitler didn't, US Congress would. Its almost certain

>Also, why were the Japs considered to be bad goys in the first place? Wouldn't Schlomo Goldsteinowitz prefer the US to commit it's full strength to defeating Hitler?
Yes, thats why USA adopted the "Europe first" strategy. Japan was of distant secondary importance. Shlomo wanted Hitler gone and japan's only crime was that they were helping the aryans

Agreed, but it makes sense in Europe. Roosevelt definitely wanted to fight in Europe and help the UK with the Lend-Lease act. If he wanted to fight in Europe why would he use being attacked by Japan as an excuse to do it? Why wouldn't he want to commit his full strength to that fight?

>Absence of US Carriers at PH
They were out practicing maneuvers at the time and not in port. Part of the entire goal was to sink the US carrier fleet at port.

>Pacific Fleet destroyed
None of this was a false flag you fanny bandit. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor to force the US out of the Pacific so the Japanese could conquer all of SE Asia with no resistance from any major power. England tried to use some gunboat diplomacy with Force Z and got bfto.

>Something about Jews
It was public knowledge at the time that Fascist German and Imperial Japan were
allies.

saged, and Christ almighty you're a dumbass. Read a book sometime.

>>US imposes oil embargo on Japan, which is essentially a declaration of war under the circumstances at the time
>>Japan feels it has no choice but to attack Pearl Harbor and the Philippines
Weeb defenders gtfo
Those gook bastards are the only ones who got what they truly deserved in ww2.

>If Hitler didn't, US Congress would. Its almost certain
Believable.

>Shlomo wanted Hitler gone and japan's only crime was that they were helping the aryans
They weren't really helping the aryans, though. Were they? I didn't think there was much to that alliance. Was there help so important to Hitler that it was worth using half of our military might against?

You try to fit evidence to theory, rather than shifting your theory to accomodate the evidence.

Roosevelt and the Jews around him needed pearl harbour to jolt the public into supporting the inevitable war V Germany. So yeah, they knew the Japs were going to be forced to attack, and welcomed it. Japan had zero chance of victory regardless of the damage done to the fleet, if anything the more damage the better since it would increase public support for war. You had also basically declared war V Germany already through your policies and would of officially declared war eventually anyway, Hitler just wanted the last word in before history. Thus your "Europe first" policy with the Japs an after thought

>You try to fit evidence to theory, rather than shifting your theory to accomodate the evidence.
Absolutely. You kind of have to when you people destroy half the evidence and rewrite history.

Not a week defender and agree they got what they deserved

Redpill yourself on why the war started in Europe and you might question why it started in the Pacific

>Only white people can be imperialists

This makes sense. You need shock value to convince people to support the war. Just seems like a huge waste of resources that otherwise would've been used in Europe

um no sweetie

The US knew about the attack and let it happen

Thats why no Aircraft Carriers were there

And of all the ships that were sunk at PH, all but 2 were redrudged, or whatever its called and repaired for combat

youtube.com/watch?v=x8OmxI2AYV8

Australia were monitoring the pacific and warned the USA of the threat heading towards them in advance of Pearl Harbour.
They knew it was coming and did "nothing" (funny how all the ships there were mothballed with skeleton crews)

Which you can prove by fitting evidence to the theory.

Kind of circular there, mate.

>fitting evidence to the theory when that evidence has been destroyed, and historical events are simply made up and pounded into our children's heads in school.
Totally.

Patton had a pretty good grasp of what was going on during that time.

The War between Imperial Japan and the United States was inevitable, and the only part of ww2 that was justified. The US was basically an imperial power at the same time in the South Pacific, Japan was expanding into our territory. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some kikery going on behind the scenes with Roosevelt in accelerating it, however.

Someone doesn't understand how resources and supply lines work.

Patton, being a hothead, has only himself to blame for being the center of the media circus. But of course it's all about da jooz

Fore sure. You can't hit one of your soldiers then complain about bad press. He usually had it coming. Not the point of that pic though.

What? You can't beat up a malingering coward who refuses to fight in the middle of a battle? That's basic shit, good on Patton for doing it himself. That one Jewish soldier probably wrote his cousin at the New York Times and tried to get revenge. There were (and are) so few Jews in the military that he was probably the only one for 500 miles and he still couldn't bring himself to fight to (supposedly) save his own people. Patton should have shot him.

Agree with everything you said, but he should've known that he was getting himself into trouble. People who name the jew publicly are just and correct, but if you reveal your power level you get destroyed in the public sphere.

Jesus Christ, its fucking disgusting how the "jews" control countries

These are Asian Mongrels thats just adopted Judaism to take advantage of Christians

And people say the fact that they've been kicked out of 100 countries makes them victims

>Stopping oil trading to prevent Chinese genocide
>This is a declaration of war

How autistic are you OP?

Those "random islands" kept the slant eyes busy while you fucks got to jack off kangeroos

This goes back to the Russo-Japanese war 40 years earlier where Japan completely BTFO Russia but T. Roosevelt cucked Japan by overseeing and interfering with the peace agreement to let Russia off way easy, with the intent of keeping Japan dependent on American oil by denying them territories (especially Sakhalin) rich in oil resources.

You should google before posting, you lowest common denominator /poltard

He slapped two guys, neither of them were Jewish afaik. Both had served for a while and had seen battle. One was delirious with malaria, the other one was broken by shell shock. Patton even chimped out and pulled a pistol on one of them.

Hey dickhead

You're fucking welcome

>one step away fro emu domination

FFS

I thought about making this point in the OP but didn't because the jews didn't own Russia until 1917

>On July 24, Tokyo decided to strengthen its position in terms of its invasion of China by moving through Southeast Asia. Given that France had long occupied parts of the region, and Germany, a Japanese ally, now controlled most of France through Petain’s puppet government, France “agreed” to the occupation of its Indo-China colonies. Japan followed up by occupying Cam Ranh naval base, 800 miles from the Philippines, where Americans had troops, and the British base at Singapore.

>President Roosevelt swung into action by freezing all Japanese assets in America. Britain and the Dutch East Indies followed suit. The result: Japan lost access to three-fourths of its overseas trade and 88 percent of its imported oil. Japan’s oil reserves were only sufficient to last three years, and only half that time if it went to war and consumed fuel at a more frenzied pace. Japan’s immediate response was to occupy Saigon, again with Vichy France’s acquiescence. If Japan could gain control of Southeast Asia, including Malaya, it could also control the region’s rubber and tin production—a serious blow to the West, which imported such materials from the East. Japan was now faced with a dilemma: back off of its occupation of Southeast Asia and hope the oil embargo would be eased—or seize the oil and further antagonize the West, even into war.

history.com/this-day-in-history/united-states-freezes-japanese-assets

It's not about race with the Jews. It's always been about The followers of Christ. At least according to actual history. The Jewish merchant class would usually dominate the Christian populations of towns, or countries, threw money lending, or buying a Christian politician to write a special tax policy. Peddling was a common Jewish trade. Eventually the christians realize that the Jews are fucking with them, through their monopoly on mercantilism of all sorts. So then they got there dumb fucking asses kicked out of Christian settlements. It's happened 100's of times in Europe, since Christ died at the hands of the Jewish merchants, that he basically undermined, repeatedly. He wasn't a trained scholar, but he had the knowledge and intelligence of the most well educated man of the time, yet he was a carpenter. That's what really pissed them off. He fucked with the Jewish elites merchant power, and they killed him. He also had followers, because the shit he actually said was so truthful. Weather he actually performed any miracles is unprovable. But he obviously was very profound, to still be remembered today. The last time Jews were kicked out for Jewry happened in England. Jews were only let back into England during the end of the 1700's. Even today there are only 300,000 Jews in England. This has been a long standing war. We are only now fighting back, with Donald Trump, but they will get booted from power again. And probably be annexed to a small country, like they always have. Although they should not be allowed Israel. It's most sacred to Christians. As it's where Christ died and Christianity began. They should be booted back to the caucus mountains.

By relevant parts do you mean the places britain was obligated to fight? The japs surendered to an american general, on an american ship, and were then occupied by an american force, which is there to this day.
Dont feel bad about your irrelevancy.

He didnt use Japan to do it. Hitler declared war on the US, just another one of hitlers short sighted mistakes. WW2 is filled with shitty strategic decisions made by hitler alone after refusing council from his military leaders. The guy wasnt a strategic genius, he was charismatic.

>not about race but about the followers of Christ
Europeans were the only group to mount an effective opposition to them, though

See: If Japan conquered the "relevant parts" the lack of US oil wouldn't have had the desired effect

So Roosevelt let them attack Pearl Harbor because he knew Hitler would make that mistake?