You can't deny it. Anarcho-Capitalism is the perfect system

...

...

not an argument

>implying it's not anarco-fascism

...

Take your pills.

Well, you are sort of winning. The corporate globalist future we are all looking at is the result of a complete monopoly by a small group of hooknosed businessmen.
They will own us all, every territory, and every spec of dust.

We're just skipping the anarcho-part and going straight to the feudalist despot-part.

not an argument

not an argument

>not Anarcho-Socialism
come the fuck on

Not an argument

...

100% pure autism

Not an argument

not an argument

10th degree jewery is innately bad and needs no argument to refute

Not an argument

I don't deny it. It is absolutely perfect. And in a system like that, people like Seth Rich wouldnt have been murdered for telling the truth/politics.

...

Not a rebuttle

not an argument

Not an argument.

>implying it's not bronze age nationalism

>anarco-fascism
with a dash of global nationalism right?

Not making an argument. I am all for anarcho-capitalism/voluntaryism.

Not an argument

>Anarcho-Capitalism
There is no such thing. I keep telling you. When will you listen?

I ironically believe the an cap meme.

it's not a system silly
it's just the absence of institutionalized violence

Not an argument.

We already live in anarchy.

Yes, there is. It just hasnt been implemented yet. Fuck all this globalist commie fascist black lives matter shit. (Because they don't)

Unironically*

Damn gook phone

Not an argument

not an argument

Why would you want to live in a "country" where the state is just plain gone ?

What guides a country towards prosperity is having a strong leading head that gives the country the best opportunities to grow.

Also, Anarcho-capitalism will be the beginning of tyranny of corporation. nothing will stop corporations to do anything they want, except the "free" market, top fucking kek.

You sound like anarcho-egoist. Lets go mate in the woods.

AnFash is just a restrictive covenant within a larger AnCap system. It's not contradictory at all--you are allowed to agree to a contract that implies restrictions in order to live in, say, a huwhite ethnostate in a larger AnCap society.

except that it's actually not a system; a system implies some sort of state

Apologies for saying not an argument.

Not an argument.

not an argument

fuck i just go meme'd

Anarchocapitalism starts out from defeating surrounding states for a grain of sovereignty where freedom can be preserved with serious means.

It can be done by force nor diplomacy, but the opportunities are there on the global economy decline due to the 'everything bubble' thanks to monetarism and poltards.

anarcho-primitivism >>>

civilisation was a mistake and agriculture doomed us all.

This. There will be day when I can finally buy my catgirls with bitcoins.

1: What guides a country towards prosperity is its people being allowed to manifest an organic state with a leader who actually represents them, but who mostly gets out of their way in times of peace and allows them to conduct business. "The State" as an institution divorced from the will of its people is a pure hindrance to prosperity.

2: Nothing stops the fucking corporations now, idiot, they already rule every country in the western world. It is a corrupt (Jewish) State which FACILITATES corporations to form an oligarchy where they can simply assign themselves as much lucre from the people as they desire.

It was literally an argument.

Not an argument.

Anarcho anything is juvenile fad culture that never seems to go away.

Kids tend to happen, then you need to take a bath, get a haircut, get a job, and start attending PTA meetings.

Not an argument.

how would anarcho socialism even work?
aren't they contradictory?

not an argument

how many dollars does it take to build roads in an AnCap society and to whom does the road belong to?

1. Yes, the problem is that it only happens in a perfect world.

2. Well, maybe it is because we're all living (the western world) under libertarianism ?

We need to give power to the state, but with real leader and not fat nosed cunt that only cares about their glory/wealth,

I mean, what's the point of debating about something that will never happens and in the case it ever does, will just bring more shit everywhere ?

not an argument

...

Yes, this shit is just completely retarded

The main idea behind anarchy is having no private property, which opposes capitalism's main idea of having a strong sense of private property.

not an argument

>not an argument

GJ posting 9 FUCKING TIMES without posting an argument your own damned self

Not an argument.

Ancaps were the spoiled kids who never wanted to share. And they still are.

...

actually it is an argument.

premise: The NAP is valid as it is a direct result of First Principles
premise: Moral theories, like ALL theories, must be universal
premise: all humans belong to the same moral category due to the absence of biological criteria that justify creating separate moral categories for people who wear costumes

argument: The application of the NAP and government is mutually exclusive

why are 'arguments' against almost always about roads or nukes?

Ill have to check it out but i believe in negative liberty/natrual rights

theyre just memeing my dude

not an argument

rly makes you think

Ancap and libertarians are either nonwhite or have nonwhite relatives.
You faggots are scared of siciety because you aren't part of it.

Easy. Gold/silver/magic internet money. The roads would belong to the property owner.

I see the retards have been posting while I was sleeping

Shut up faggot you are not entitled to the fruits of my labour you commie.

Anarcho-egoism is basically just realising that goverment is a spook therefore it does not exist and world is your oyster.

thanks for the meme people

Not an argument.

>Non-Aggression
>Physical Removal
Wew lad

not a banana

Yes I can, I'm doing it right now.

Capitalism cannot exist, and never did, without the state.

It looks like the founder of egoism, stirner, did not believe in negative rights tho.

Ill read up and i agree the government is a spook

sorry im from austria we don't have humor

not an argument

then KYS now

why do the mods keep allowing blatant slide threads lijk this to exist? i mean arent they supposed to be cleaning up the place?

You will come to understand the importance of a safety net too, dumb child.

S O M A L I A
O
M
A
L
I
A

...

kek
pwned.

I'm not sure if Stirner was founder of egoism, but he was edgy faggot, my I kinda like him still.

What do you guys think of based Bill Whittle?

Is he red pilled?

Nigger warlords/pirates is just anarchy. Ancap must somehow enforce/respect the NAP

Not an argument.

I love this meme

You would take nigger cock inside your anus if your goverment ordered it and you would thank it for it.

...

Got any recommeded literature?

There is a profound lack of arguments in this thread.

No thanks. Keep your fantasies to yourself.

sAgE

...

I'm busy with my studies so I don't have time to read political and philosophical literature as much as I would love, but here is some I found on pol

You cannot have a proper debate when the topic is rubbish. Post a rubbish topic, get a rubbish thread.
Understand?