Why does Sup Forums not seem to believe in tolerance as a virtue?

Why does Sup Forums not seem to believe in tolerance as a virtue?

because it's not

Why?

The slope is slippery

You need to make the case for it being a virtue. Things are not virtuous by default.

Because tolerance is not a virtue.

Temperance
Justice
Prudence
Fortitude

those are virtues.

An argument could be made that tolerance is an aspect of the true virtues, as it takes a measure of fortitude and temperance to deal with people that you personally cannot stand.

>prove that X is not Y
That's not how it works. Why do you seem to believe that tolerance is a virtue? Let's watch you fail.

tolerance is basically another word for sloth

knowing what needs to be done but not doing it

As I suspected.
Tolerance is a lesser aspect of Fortitude.

You don't want tolerance.
You want acceptance.
The first step to an honest dialog is for you to stop lying.

You mean tolerance for other people's opinions or points of view, or do you mean some other kind of tolerance?

Why do you consider tolerance a virtue? What should be tolerated and to what extent?

...

It is treating other people well as opposed to treating them poorly. Loving thy neighbor and all that shit, as the Sky-Jew would say. I'm an atheist *tips fedora* but tolerance does seem to be promoted by most religions.

Survival is slavery .

I'm accepted already. I'm a straight cisgender (I don't care for that word but it's applicable) white male.

Tolerance of vice is no virtue.

Also: Lurk moar faggot new fag.

Tolerance is counter intuitive to morality. People act out because they crave discipline, not because they lack it.

Tolerance for people who are different from you, in general. Other races, religions, sexual orientations, etc.

> treating other people well as opposed to treating them poorly
What makes you think "treating other people well" is, in and of itself, inherently a virtue?

Because tolerance is a disbelief in your own ideals.

/Thread

Do unto others as you would have others do unto you, to borrow from the Sky-Jew again. Not honestly sure if this was yours or if it was added in Christianity, but I appreciate being treated well by others, and I know others appreciate being treated well by me. So I don't know why my default behavior would be to do otherwise.

This quote is not an argument.

Prove you treat other people well.

Or are you holding other people to a standard that you cannot even live up to?

>muh bible quotes
That's not much of an argument. If treating people will is inherently a virtue, then treating bad people well is a virtue.

Why do you consider treating bad people well to be a virtue?

Tolerance is the reason that there are Trucks of Peace plowing through the streets and people that are already proven to be terrorists are still free to do what pleases them. Tolerance is the reason for declining birth rates since being homosexual or any other of your Lgbt-Mental retardations is not seen as an abnormality anymore.

Being tolerant is what is fucking us over right now

>tolerance for people who are trying to rob you, kill you, steal your country, rape your children, drug and mutilate your children, destroy your culture, and ruin everything you and your people have worked for
i'm fine with intolerance thanks

That's right, it can't be argued with

Do you understand that some things aren't tolerable?

I don't know how to prove that on here, but I do my best. It doesn't really matter though. All it would mean if I didn't treat people well would be that I'm a dick. It wouldn't change anything about what's right and wrong.
Do we mean bad people as in people who do shit like steal and rape and kill, or just bad people as in people who don't look like you or believe as you do?

Like non-Christian religions and gay buttsex, or...?

Patience is a virtue
Fortitude is a virtue
Temperance is a virtue

Taking it up the ass from people who hate you is not a virtue.

Should not/must not be tolerated would be a better way of putting it.

what the fuck are you talking about? these things are perfectly tolerable.

>Do we mean bad people as in X or Y
It doesn't matter. Do you believe that treating those whom _you_ consider to be bad people is a virtue? If so, why?

Nobody here gives a shit about either of those.
you know what we are referring to as "intolerable"
You're just posting noise

Tolerance just for the sake of it is depravity

This. Fucking liberals have this stupid mental gymnastics crap (we can't tolerate the intolerant!) without ever realizing that it invalidates their own assumptions.

>you know what we are referring to as "intolerable"
No Hiro, I don't.
They are? I think so, but I didn't think you guys did.

You know what religion explicitly promotes intolerance? Islam. That makes it incompatible with other world religions. Tolerating intolerance is not virtuous.

It very much does matter, you point-and-oven-dodger

I mostly just ignore bad people and avoid them tbqhwy.

>I mostly just ignore bad people and avoid them
You didn't answer the question. Do you consider it a virtue to treat those people well? If so, why?

Islam is faggotry but on an individual basis, they're just people.

>white male
you are hated globally and everyone wants what you have. they choose to ignore that every amenity in their own life comes from your people. they feel entitled to your wealth because your ancestors were better than their ancestors.

>I don't know
refer to you nipple-gripping mouth breather

They're a bunch of faggy people by your own admission. That doesn't mean you should tolerate them.

If I don't need to be an asshole to them then I shouldn't. Why, what do you think?

Potatoes don't accept intolerance, so tolerance is fake.

You avoided the question again. Do you consider treating them well to be a virtue? If so, why?

and individual piranha are just little fish

I just answered your question and now you are avoiding mine.

Nobody disagrees you goof, the issue is they're bringing the fight to you. I guess you never "need" to do anything, you can just die off. But Sharia is coming. White minority homelands are coming. You will be victimized for your skin. Prevent it.

Used to. All the intolerance from the cultists has thrown that out the window, though.
I'm a former Prog. Dem, nigger, and your kind has taken for granted the gracious invitation extended by our parents and grandparents and started speaking badly about me based on my sex & the color of my skin.
Now all the shitskins can gtfo. Islam is a cancer that will destroy the West.
And YOU, personally, are responsible for my current attitude, Nigger.
Fix the problem members in your community or you can all gtfo. America will once again be a white nation. Every day you don't act that goal comes closer and closer to reality.
Sort yourselves the fuck out, and be quick about it.
saged.

Why would they do this? What's their endgame? Why do you think they want anything different from life than what you and I want?

>If I don't need to be an asshole to them then I shouldn't
The question was: "do you consider treating bad people well to be a virtue?"
Your "answer" is literally not an answer.

The second question was: "If so, why?"
"What do you think"? is literally not an answer.

Try again, please.

Toleration implies not approving of something but choosing not to do anything about it.

What did he mean by this?

I'm white.

>splitting hairs with my answer while refusing to give one of his own

>What's their endgame?
Sharia law and everyone to convert to Islam.

There is an excellent southpark episode that might be easy enough for you kids to understand

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_Camp_of_Tolerance

Also tolerance is tolerating something you can't stand but may be necessary. If you're just playing virtuous games like the lefties and accepting any retarded shit for fear of not being virtuous, you're a coward.

The answer is acceptance and that comes from actually understanding the problem.. not just accepting the veiled lies these people make up to make themselves feel good.

>blatantly avoiding the question and lying about it
Do you consider it a virtue or not? All you have to do is to say "yes" or "no", and then explain why you chose that answer (instead of avoiding it by asking me questions).

What do they actually get out of that, though? Why is that a motive?

Because they think they'll get 72 virgins in heaven and are following their stupid religion.

Kek why do you feel like you get to make the rules for how a Sup Forums conversation goes?

good men don't tolerate wickedness

this

Tolerance of evil, and acceptance of evil is not a virtue.

An example of this would be..

If some cunt thinks he's a racing car and he's not a racing car it's tolerance to understand the mental disorder or circumstances.. and acceptance to allow it because it has no real harm.

Blindly tolerating and advocating for acceptance of lies aka the gender disphoria spectrum would not be.. virtuous

>shifty evasive little Jew

treating other people well means holding them to account, for their own good and for the good of others

letting people sin puts them on the path to destruction, as well as those around them

Side question: Would you guys have liked Bernie if his policies applied to whites only and he was anti-Islam? Honestly curious.

Tolerance is not a virtue

Should Jesus have tolerated the money-changers in the temple?

I think tolerance is a virtue but it can get you betrayed.

Some anons seem to go eww gross at all kinds of things that's probably none of their business or obsess over win lose situations and accuse whole categories and think it's an argument

and that's very sad.

> why do you feel like you get to make the rules
I'm not making any rules. I'm just pointing out the irrefutable fact that you did not answer the question. It's a yes/no question, and it doesn't ask about whether or not you should be an asshole "when you don't need to" (as if that even means anything, and isn't in itself a copout from specifying what the exceptions are). The reason you're so afraid of giving a straight answer is that the moment you do, you lose the argument. Thanks for playing.

No. All commies and pinkos should be sent to the gulag desu.

Fuck & No. A handout is a handout, and those receiving handouts are niggers, regardless of race.

I could say you lose because you won't answer me. You're just being stubborn.

...

remember what hitler said about arguing with Jews?

if you "tolerate" sharia, then you set yourself up for destruction too

do you tolerate intolerance? if not, then you're a hypocrite

you only "tolerate" bad things, in fact. the worst of the worst

modern leftism is a dead end

degeneracy attends destruction throughout time

leftists on the wrong side of history

traditions (traditionalism) exist as such because they are continuously selected, because they work

>Tolerance of evil, and acceptance of evil is not a virtue.

neither is blaspheming against the holy spirit and prejudice can make people do that.

It's a gateway to downward spirals. For example, when you tolerate faggots then it opens up possibilities to tolerate other sexual degeneracy, like how there's a push to normalize pedophilia. They'll always want more, so it's best to give them nothing.
>And destroy them instead

Because look at our society and see what tolerance has gottten us.

>I could say you lose because you won't answer me.
You can say whatever you want, but very clear that you're desperately trying to avoid my question, because it demonstrates the absurdity of your position.

This isn't tolerance. This is emotionally, blindly, following an opposing viewpoint. Don't come down around here with wide swinging bullshit. State exactly what's very sad or fuck right off.

Fuck NO, this Kike Shill and his humpback would get laughed out of saudi arabia. The free world would laugh at him , cucks love this guy

The answer to your question is really simple but you're not answering anything of mine so I see no reason to just allow you to steer the conversation any way you see fit.

Tolerance is a code word for white genocide.

Stop white genocide. SAY NO TO RACE MIXING! 1488

Israeli user is correct. and we all already know the answer to the question. It's revealed in the OP

leftists are intolerant of people who have moral standards

you're not tolerant. you're just degenerate

>white genocide
What does this meme actually mean? Just because other races are reproducing faster than white people doesn't mean there's a genocide going on. It's very sloppy and careless use of the word tbqh.

see

>if you "tolerate" sharia, then you set yourself up for destruction too

What if Muslims think western law is more sharia than wahabism and daesh etc. a bit like tolerant religious people think people with other religions can be righteous?

>The answer to your question is really simple
And yet you're avoiding it for the 7th time or so.

>you're not answering anything of mine
I don't consider treating bad people well to be a virtue, because I don't see a reason to. Now answer the question and explain your answer.

Can you please tell me what degeneracy means in this context?

White genocide is when the European gene pool is contaminated by non white DNA. For example, have you seen mulattos? Light skinned black folk with ape like features and frizzy hair. Yeah, pretty cruel to give birth to a child with identity problems.

>What if Muslims think western law is more sharia than wahabism and daesh

western law is degenerate as fuck

legalized pornography
legalized gambling
legalized no-fault divorce
legalized abortion
legalized adultery
legalized gay adoption
etc.

>tolerant religious people think people with other religions can be righteous?

mostly religions share a common moral foundation. religions are a vehicle, not the source, for morality

Cool, thanks. That wasn't so hard was it? :^) The answer to your question is yes. Kindness is an end in and of itself. I mean obviously if you have someone who's literally and tangibly harming others like a thief or rapist or some shit, they need to be stopped.

That is literally and figuratively not genocide. In fact since you're talking about reproduction, I could argue that it's basically the polar opposite of genocide.