Redpill Books thread.
Post what are you currently reading and why should we read it too!
Im reading The Gulag Archipelago and it show the barbarity of the Soviet Union legal system and their treatment of its citizens.
You should read it because it shows that in order for communism to survive and establish itself millions of people have to be shipped in prison camps every year.
This is my next read.
Two Hundred Years Together
You can find a PDF English version here: my.mixtape.moe
This one is good
...
I heard good things about this one
Are Kant, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Wittgenstein all considered postmodern?
I think Neitzsche is. He kinda showed that religion is started to be less popular in society and that might lead an abyss. idk I might be wrong
Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike.
Perhaps one of the most profound books ever written. It bleeds patriotism, and the eternal struggle for freedom from Jews and Tyranny.
Was he a macon?
literally none of those are postmodern. Nietzsche was a precursor to postmodern thought though.
a mason? Yes. Our founding fathers were all masons and estotericists. It is there were you will find true peace, and you will understand just how important the struggle for freedom is.
Okay, I'm just confused as to why their names are on that book cover.
the ultimate redpill
Maybe it explains how postmodernism came into being
Quick rundown?
>Ayn Rand
okay lolbertarian tell us about Neil Peart
I just finished The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. I am now reading 200 Years Together by based Solzhenitsyn.
we are all going to die
...
The Rise and Fall is fucking long
Is it worth it?
Is it written with (((their))) narrative in mind?
Isn't this supposed to be one of the toughest philosophy book to read?
hmmmm so existentialism?
This book is in my queue for a long time
desu I just posted Ayn Rand because I thought it would bait a ton of people and this thread would get a bunch of bumps out of it.
That aside, I'm glad my high school English class required that book, because it at least challenged the Marxist narrative that some students face in college.
This is the most scientifically accurate treatment of eugenics and genetic engineering ever seen in fiction and even some geneticists have commented on the deep and sophisticated understanding of genetics that underpins the seemingly radical ideas presented in the novel.
tor.com
Mere Christianity is the redpill atheists refuse to swallow
Is this good?
It's not that bad, definitely tough but I think the difficulty is exaggerated. More people should read it and try to form their own thoughts without depending too much on other interpretations.
Not exactly. Existentialism is "existence precedes essence". Heidegger instead is trying to find THE essence of things, the most primordial of all of which is Being itself. He tries to find this by searching for the essence of Dasein, which is a primordial form of a person (without all the specifics that come with "me", "man", "the soul" etc). He finds that the essence of Dasein contains two basIc components. First, Dasein is an entity that is concerned with its own being. Second, Dasein is temporal eg is going to die, and this defines its whole existence.
>god is real because people are polite on the tram and also therefore the Bible is true
I was disappointed in this book desu, didn't help me when I was stuck in atheism
Absolute drivel.
Begin with the Greeks.
Second time around. Great stuff.
...
Quick rundown?
Yeah that one is on my list
Heidegger? Are you kidding me?!
Worth it. No, pretty (((them))), or at least their explicit influence.
Brave new world.
Strange that nobody posted it already.
...
this
In other words, Heidegger was incapable of understanding the neoplatonists.
...
I'm part way through Might is Right
...
...
...
Plato is a should always be the first red pill for a white man.
...
...
Is this book just a bunch of sperging out?
What's it actually about?
Also, the following vid makes me kek
youtube.com
This is in my queue
You have ti finish it, it's pure gold
>what are you currently reading
are you reading it yet?
Just realized none of you plebs posted it already. Shameful. Make sure you get the Ford translation for English.
Ayn Rand is unironically a really good entry level red pill to pull you away from marxism, but you then need another red pill to pull you away from such autism.
Islamic Dante's Inferno.
Dr Faustus, Prussianism and Socialism, and Imperium. Good stuff.
i just read this last week. it's very good.
it shows that postmodernism is a leftist philosophical/rhetorical tool to defend their (failing) marxistic ideology.
you'll develop a great bullshit detector for hidden marxist propganda after reading this book.
nowadays they're trying hard to question scientific achievements with their twisted logic by putting an emphasis on "constant contradictions" and "varieties of possibilities of interepreting our nature"...
David Bohm - Wholeness and the Implicate Order
>are you reading it yet?
I read it 15 months ago. The only thing that I disliked was the ending, but the rest is really interesting.
Its very good, and you should read it.
Thats the entire second chapter. The first chapter is a list of horrible news stories from the day. Pic related is also from it, theres other memes made out of it.
>literally none
Derrida is perhaps biggest and most influential postmodernist. foucault, Hegel... postmodernists
W
...
>Post what are you currently reading and why should we read it too!
I'm currently reading......this.
Also "Pawns in the Game" by William Guy Carr.
Rundown?
Also IIRC he had just finished it prior to his assassination. Its like his final words, the term "white power" might be stigmatized in your head, but its just fine for niggers to chant "black power" - and in our country!
Rockwell did nothing wrong.
Got sidetracked. Multiple pages of books from bookpack user.
Nietzsche was NOT a postmodernist for fuck's sake. He did, however, predicted postmodernist quasi-nihilistic bullshit. He was not a deconstructionist either. Fucking retards.
Honest question here, how much does that book touch on the kabbalah
...
not at all. Heidegger is trying to bring back the thinking of the Greeks and to get away from modernism and materialism
...
...
...
Jew bad
totalitarianism for dummies
TTD is pretty much mandatory reading for Sup Forumsacks along with MK. Hunter is a good one too, just remember, Pierce is not a romance writer lol. It will make sense as youre reading it.
Jew tries to kill Christian with Christian logic. Christians Jew the Jew out of his pound of flesh.
This is legit the greatest organization of thought ever created.
I found it so. Heidegger felt nothing could be discussed unless it was adequately defined, so there are endless passages where words and ideas were expansively defined. They would then have both ontological and "ontical" definitions that would have to be expanded on- THEN we would get to the topic.
Exhausting, but I did find it brilliant .
Reread this last week. It was pretty entertaining desu. I didn't understand it at all when I had to read in middle school because I didn't know anything about communism.
My nigga. How is it? I haven't gotten to Big Z yet but I plan to.
I'm reading Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley. It's not exactly a light read so I wouldn't really recommend it unless you have the patience and dedication to get through more than thirteen-hundred dense pages of history but it's been thus far an extraordinary read. There is much to learn from Quigley about the West and where it is headed.
That shit book shill for muh Snowball.
Better Stalin than Trotsky.
But better Mussolini than Stalin tho.
But better Medieval times than Mussolini tho.
Id suggest everyone in the thread, Sup Forumsack or Reddit or lurking cancer, whatever.. to read
The Fame of a Dead Mans Deeds by Robert S. Griffin, its pretty much everything of major importance for the last few decades, from Pierces point of view, with commentary by him etc... theres endless amounts of interesting facts that dont come up in regular discussion around here, and it gives you a good baseline of the recent history. Other people would suggest you read Mein Kampf first, but the stuff in FDMD should be known by everyone.
If you haven't already ready read it:
Yeah that's probably the most frustrating part of the book. He uses terms from page 1 that he doesn't define until I've 300, and he is extremely specific with his terms such that when he does explain them, he expands on it for several pages and sections and a bunch of twisted examples
Yeah it gets much better when the reader knows anything about communism or the russian revolution. Poor horse
>epub
Ew.
>Dude robots
Quigley is an interesting man user
...
I didnt make the list, its just a list of all the books the guy had made into meme packs, dumped.
The guy who made the ones like pic related. These are all the books as of like a month or 2 ago.
It's been many years since I read it, but iirc not much.
It's much more an explanation of their search for the origins of Freemasonry, and as such it's a great map for learning how to unwind decades or millennia of mistaken thinking or outright obfuscation.
...
Ultimate red pill.
Good book
Pierce was great but shouldn't really have ventured into fiction. Those books weren't too great. Pic related is a lot better written.
Not really redpill, more like "fuck yeah humanity" but Sup Forums should like it.
Just started this, what am I in for chaps?
I recognize all that lingo. That's a nice analysis, and yes he was. Just by reading him you can tell he was a brilliant man. I'm on the fence if he was really up to a globalist style government, though. I'll have to read more to make a more educated conclusion as time goes by.
You wouldn't happen to have the dl link, would you?
That was what I found difficult. He posits an idea or poses a question, then proceeds to define the words in that question for 50 pages. So long , in fact, that when he comes back to the original topic you've forgotten it.
He was the very definition of going down the rabbit hole. But I will say, I've never seen a more beautiful idea than when he speaks of dasein using concscience to call itself out of the theyself. That we have a built in mechanism that lifts us out of being thrown into an environment not of our making and being strictly enforced in its rules from day one. He had a staggering intellect.
this right here is absolutely fucking correct read it now
>portraying Trotsky as dindu
Yes I initially didn't like that either. Made it seem like Stalin was the only reason the USSR didn't work
I think it's a combination of Wells having a soft spot for the idea of communism and thinks Trotsky embodies that, and hating Stalin, and that fact the entire book is supposed to be from the view of the proletariat
Beyond good and evil
The will to power
Ride the tiger
Men among the ruins
The doctrine of fascism
The republic by plato
