Amerilards BTFO

amerilards BTFO

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Anyone with half a brain can tell you that aircraft carriers are great to bully little shitholes like Korea, or Libya, but are giant metal deathtraps, in a conventional war. They are the first to go, if China/Russia/India/USA start flinging shit.

>VERY fast missle flying at incredible hihg speed
Whats with that resolution?

ICBMs already travel faster than any anti-missile system, it's all about finding an interception trajectory

>britbongs can't into mechanics

>he doesnt understand the difference between nukes/silos with ICBMs and a fleet of shitty little cruisers equipped with these.

Aircraft Carriers have always been useless.

Aircraft carriers win wars, dafuq is this thread?

>he doesn't get the point

wew, missile interception is not just about the speed of the missile, it's about it's flying path

current anti-ship missiles are subsonic and fly only a few meters over the water so they can outmaneuver supersonic anti-missile systems

visit /k/ where you would get thorough explanation how is this just a vatnik larping or most likelly covered plan to scare burger population into spending much more money (((Lockheed Martin))) new useless and overpriced toys

they saved europe in WW2 the problem is they have become to relied upon to the point where we add more shit to make them important,but if we lose one we fud

>they saved europe in WW2

Burger education once again

The only war aircraft carriers have ever won was the Pacific War. In every war since they've been expensive jokes, they literally have to be protected by an entire fleet lest one sink and cost the government $20 billion. Also this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

The burger's favourite form of socialism.

Now add mach 4 to those missiles you fucking dumbass frog.

Thats the whole point. Any shitty little cruiser can now use unstoppable missiles which will take out a fucking carrier.

How are you not getting this?

>still failing for this bait

britbong newspapers have been spreading bullshit for years with fearmongering titles

also visit /k/ to educate yourself about anti-missile systems

Good thing two countries with nuclear subs will never attack one another.

>they saved europe in WW2
wat

Didn't you win that war by dropping 2 nukes on millions of civvies after your carriers got BTFO at Pearl Harbor?

US has Mach 25+. Beat that and come back. This is becoming a pissing contest

>it's about it's flying path
Those things can maneuver, no way they can shoot down something with a random evasive flight pattern.

>Haven't won a war since your own civil war
>Can't even win against a few 3rd world towelheads
>Shot Afghanistan to shit and let it fall into the hands of the Taliban

Your army is shit and you know it.

The point isn't to win. It's to keep fighting forever.

The military is a giant fucking jobs program.

None of the carriers were at pearl harbor

It should be faster than light because we don't even use lasers any more. That's all old hat.

Oh, is this the first time youre hearing about the Zircon? Thats cute.

go grill yourself you fucking retard

>France

How did Hitlers cock taste, or is my education off.

Is it faster than a laser?

no carrier was ever used in any european sea battle

Russia never starts wars with globalist swine looking for free oil. She just wins them.

>uses a rendering of a US hypersonic vehicle

>russia are our enemy
i wonder (((who))) could be behind this article

No your education is quite off. You're either underage b& or some old piece of shit who is minutes away from a stroke.