How do you explain the paradox of right-wingers being right but at the same time...

How do you explain the paradox of right-wingers being right but at the same time, they are less intelligent than left-wingers?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/dBehg
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092984/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie#Nobel_Prizes
ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter5.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The better universities are the craziest in general. High IQ leads to more stupid ideas for some reason.

That and progressives are probably less rational to being with.

How do you explain the paradox of left-wingers being intelligent but at the same time, they want to import less intelligent people?

How do you explain the paradox of leftists being cucks who, at the same time, should be intelligent enough to know that not ejaculating inside of the girl you're being cucked by does nothing to spread your own "superior intelligence" genes?

footsoldiers. nothing more, nothing less.

What exactly are "right wingers" right about? Or are you just going to use examples of extreme left wing rhetoric that a vocal but only minute fraction of people believe and characterize everything 'left wing' with that as proof that they're wrong?

Right wingers (in the U.S.) have higher average income. Being more successful means more to me than left wingers supposedly being more "intelligent." Also the left wingers are more intelligent meme is solely based off college degrees, which as I said doesn't show success and doesn't even show general intelligence with how much retard degrees there are.

Being "higher educated" doesn't mean you're not susceptible to propaganda.

If I sit in a school about why fish are bad and should all be killed for 4 years, I'm probably gonna come out of there yelling about how fish are bad. While normal people will realize I'm full of shit.

The paradox is that both sides are equally stupid and are convinced of their own superiority while the Jew sneaks off with all the money during the fray.

That unrestricted immigration is harmful, that trannies are mentally ill, that feminism today is stupid, that Islam is infact not a feminist religion, etc.

idec if this is a shill post, this is funny

Public education is very left-wing, for various reasons. The two sets which escape the indoctrination are the non-academic which don't go to college, and the very intelligent which (usually) go to college but can resist the pressure for conformity.

The sweet spot for modern western universities is about the 110-120 IQ range - "clever enough to get into university; stupid enough to believe what you're told there."

Once you get to the right-hand edge of the bell curve, you usually find opinions polarizing - you get a mixture of extreme left- and right-wing opinions - but certainly the overwhelming left-wing preponderance disappears at that point.

>less intelligent than left-wingers

Based on what evidence?

What i don't get is concidering the left are so intelligent why are they so incapable of showingit?

They have dodged out of almost all discussions and rely on pop culture icons to push their agendas.

In what way is it intelligent to support unproductive labour instead of whipping them into shape and pointing them to productivity?

The American left are just a bunch of consumeristic brats and their handlers. They are this but for the super rich leizure class, who bait them into attacking each other.

>they are less intelligent
sauce

PRAISE KEK

It's not a paradox and in most cases, it's not true.

Less intelligent people who live the hunter/gatherer lifestyle are less dependent on the state.

>That unrestricted immigration is harmful
Ok, the left doesn't say otherwise. Obama deported more illegal immigrants than any other president. The "left's argument", the one shared by the people who actually live on the border, was that a physical wall like the one Trump is proposing would be a ineffective boondoggle that wouldn't stop human trafficking across the border.

>that trannies are mentally ill
This isn't a left vs. right position. This is 'the entire psychiatric establishment' vs. your personal prejudice.

>that feminism today is stupid
Is that really a "right wing" position or your own personal opinion?

They also have the quirks that come with high iqs also I think they look at the bigger picture more often neglacting practicality

Wisdom of the crowd. You dumb fucks aren't as smart as you think you are.
Saged

You wouldn't be left wing if you could research your own received political opinions.

It's pretty much how the right emerges: lefties picking up a book.

Also, the monetization of memes to sell to the socially inept is very clever, no?

if your comparing professors higher the iq tend to be liberal because the tend to have more novel ideas views
but I think overall republicans are higher than democracts

>Ok, the left doesn't say otherwise.
Yes they do, you shill. They do so in the US and they do it in every single country in Europe.

In the US you can see tons of articles "BOOHOO look at this poor foreigner who got deported".

>This isn't a left vs. right position. This is 'the entire psychiatric establishment' vs. your personal prejudice.
The psychiatric establishment thinks that someone who wants cut off a leg, or an arm, is crazy. This is understandable, but if that person instead wants to cut off their dick and get a pair plastic tits, they are apparently completely sane. Is that right?

>Is that really a "right wing" position or your own personal opinion?
It's a sane persons opinion. Feminists today wear a veil and say it's a part of feminism. They are crazy.

They have to be smart to justify the mental gymnastics to themselves.

If you're going to heap your own strawman about what the 'left believes' and tear it down then, yeah, you'll be right every time.

They don't get as many likes on facebook or wear trendy clothes, some don't even use hair gel.

Also, I rarely see a right winger wearing a nice healthy pair of black rimmed glasses

Point out the strawmen. Do it.

>right-wingers
>being right

There is no paradox

Having black rimmed glasses means you must read alot and basically only trendy young college graduates wear them. Go to a Starbucks and see for yourself, then go to a NASCAR rally and compare whose wearing glasses and whose not and who has hair gel and who doesn't and whose voting for whome

I've always seen Marxists as much smarter than your average Starbucks-going hipster liberal who are basically smug centrists

Most of these KEK boys and Trumptards are not right wing. White nations have gone so far to the fucking left that they consider centrist right wing people as far right.

Your very first point, that "[the left doesn't believe that] unrestricted immigration is harmful", goes against the REALITY of what the Obama administration actually practiced. How do you reconcile the record number of deportations under Obama with that idea?

Was Obama not 'really a leftist'?

This is spot on.

>the actions of one man equals the actions of one group

Is Obongo the whole left for you? Are you trying to argue that the left in the US(and the neocons) did not push for more open-borders? Because they did, you dumbass.

Pro-tip: There is a world outside the US, dipshit.

What kind of nonsense is this? You think every left wing person is an unread tool? Are you that naive?

No, I'm pointing out that there's subtlety involved in a complicated question like immigration and you've reduced one side's opinion to an extreme point that only a vocal few actually believe (i.e. a stawman).

It seems as though the only argument you can defeat is the one you purposely construct to be torn down.

According to you, dumbass. For you what Obongo did apparently was all the left did overall. Fucking idiot.

A lot of weak-minded autistic betas with nothing going for them are subscribing to extreme politics because they think that it makes them more masculine. Also participating in a small group with strong beliefs makes you feel like you're involved in a community and have friends.

See: large amount of T_D faggots posting about how they never had friends before they started sucking jew dick

not memeing, do a search on reddit

>right wingers are right
>but more stupid than the left

Lets just leave it at them being retarded.

Obama changed the definition of deportation to include people that just get caught at the border. He hardly did any actual deportations at all, and most of the ones he did were people from Europe and Asia.

I actually agree with this. Some of the more intelligent posters I see on Sup Forums tend to be Commie or Full blown Neo Nazis.

Maybe intelligent people are more prone to radicalization. I'm pretty average so I couldn't tell you. I just know I've seen people from extremes that have made very compelling arguments.

The world is full of people who are smart enough to see why they don't have to strictly follow tradition but not smart or experienced enough to see why the herd should follow it.

So you're sticking to your strawman about what 'the left believes' to avoid cognitive dissonance.

Except national socialism is right.

Unsurprisingly, you don't seem to understand anything at all. Must be tough for you.

While right-wingers are right, right-wing ideas are easier to understand, and thus easier for idiots to adhere to.

Women too. Women see way more easy to radicalize than even beta males. They just go with what is popular in the environment they live in.

A lot of movements just seem their base as a bunch of heads that lift their cause so followers probably do want to belong to something. That's why Sup Forums is the best no matter what side you are on, you can find like minded people here but it's anonymous so there really is no social appeal or pressure forcing you to join anything or think anything. You can walk away from Sup Forums anytime you want.

Intelligence is mostly measure by your ability to absorb and retain information. Mist degree programs are about reciting back concepts rather than application. Hence smart people are good at repeating back indoctrination programming

An honest explanation:

> Leftists are more likely to attend a college/university than conservatives.

> College/University education typically consists of subliminal messaging/brainwashing techniques.

> Cultural Marxism has destroyed the lefts ability to make rational decisions.

While leftists might become "educated" more often than conservatives, they lack what is actually called "common sense". Because conservatives don't typically go through the Marxist brainwashing seminar known as "the college experience", they tend to retain their common sense. Why do you think leftists are trying to make college free so everyone can attend their annual brainwashing seminar?

On the flip side of all of this, I do find it rather odd that college educated conservatives tend to move towards STEM related fields, rather than "art" fields like liberals. Perhaps this has something to do with it pertaining more to facts than feelings.

>Intelligence is mostly measure by your ability to absorb and retain information
Not really. It's not just memory.

The timeless universal truths of human nature are more obvious than not.

I'll say the national socialists are some how easier to discuss shit with while the leftists tend to be more eccentric and emotional during discussions.

I disagree with a neo nazi and he'll keep debating me until I admit I'm wrong or I win. The commies tend to just assume you're a nazi the moment they find out you don't agree with them.

This is just from online experiences, in real life I rarely meet anyone who describes themselves as a nazi (It's understandable in the climate) and the commies scream.

>The timeless universal truths of human nature are more obvious than not.
To whom though? Those universal truths aren't universally recognized.

>the left uniformly believes "x" because I say they believe "x"
>what? how am i stawmanning?

Your counter-point was:

>HURR DURR OBAMA DID SOMETHING ELSE

Do I really have point out that the leftist parties/progressives push open-borders in every country in Europe? That they do the the same in the US? You can argue that there is not such a big push over there, but they are doing it.

I went to one of the top 3 Canadian unis (won't say which one but they're all crazy sjw infested so it doesn't matter) and I've gone through a commie phase, a nazi phase, hell even a phase where I was sympathetic to radical islam for a minute. Now I'm just soft left with some nationalistic views. Point is university settings isolate you from the real world and make radical ideas seem like an attractive form of rebellion, especially if you're bored and angsty have to much time to smoke weed and trapped in a climate where radical ideas are not only accepted but encouraged.

>You can walk away from Sup Forums anytime you want.

>leftist parties/progressives push open-borders in every country
No, both sides pushed for increased immigration. On the right by business interests and on the left by bleeding hearts. The only organized groups that are anti-immigration are fringe in every country.

University clout is based around the appearance of being smart. The smartest students rise to the top and groomed by the professors, who were in turn groomed by their professors and so forth all the way back to 1890s socialists who fellated Marx's corpse to appear intelligent to their peers.

IQ is an indicator of life success, not the ability to avoid peer pressure or reject norms. Left wing ideology is very much a norm in the humanities, and there is much peer pressure surrounding it.

Sure you could fake your way through it, even become a professor and join a department, but still enjoy being ostracized and possibly fired for thinking "obtusely". This is no way for an adult to live, and in a way, many academics are not adults. They have never fully separated themselves from an institution such as a university nor the ingrained habits of ostracization of peers over minor disagreements and petty popularity contests that most leave behind by their early 20s. They, on average, have never truly known true scarcity or struggle (having to eat ramen for a few weeks and not having enough money for weed doesn't count - as it is not just their own scarcities that count but how the scarcities of others affect the attitudes and actions of those AROUND them), and thus cannot conceive of the reality of how the policies which they espouse would be carried out in real environments, with real scarcity and real discrimination.

To wit, they live in a bubble.

And they are the authority figures for the intelligent 20 somethings who come on here and reddit and argue on their behalf for their ideologies - while lacking actual life experience themselves or ever having had to face true diversity of opinion - or be in the minority of opinion.

So with regard to the lefties on here, they either grow out of their bubble, or find a new one which helps maintain their ideas or in a lot of cases get their bubble popped when reality hits - then they join us.

>No, both sides pushed for increased immigration. On the right by business interests and on the left by bleeding hearts.
That's not both sides. The "alt-right" is not backed by big busines.

>The only organized groups that are anti-immigration are fringe in every country.
Anti-immigration parties are no longer in the fringe. Have not been in a long time.

That is not to say the liberal/left(I mean real liberal,. not the American political partisan version of the term) idea of material fulfilment will automatically make someone a better person or a society better.

Ask yourself, if you were given a million dollars today would it make you a better person, or more or less moral? If you're really thinking and being honest, the answer is no.

The fact is your are a product of culture in addition to material things. For human to be happy and productive he requires meaningful labour and a supporting culture, that is rewarding to him and encourages and allows reproduction and connection to community.

Only fascism hits on all of these areas.

>How do you explain the paradox of right-wingers being right but at the same time, they are less intelligent than left-wingers?
Let me guess, a study at some left wing university showed that?
archive.is/dBehg
It's not the right wing that are against setting standards for who gets too vote, it is the left wing.

>Trusting RooshV-autists

Have mind Facebook tier sheep.

Many if not most high IQ people tend to fall in love with thinking. Imagining they can solve everything with enough of it. This is probably the reason for so many NeoCommunists

T. Retard. Fucking dumb cunt.

I'm a guy. But come, RooshV, and RoK? They are a joke and wrong about almost everything.

And men and womens average IQ is about the same. There might be a difference of a few points, but that's it.

Some of the dumbest people I know are leftists.

You are not a guy. You argue like a woman you dumb cunt. Just stfu. Be quiet. I already skimmed most of your posts. Lying dumb fucking cunt.

What am I wrong about? Point it out.

Still doesn't change the fact that there are basically no women with genius level IQ.

Lefties are guided by cuck-feels.

IQ won't help them.

>What am I wrong about? Point it out.
>I'm a guy

repeat what is told to them by "professors" = smart

>lefties
>looking at the bigger picture
lol

The same way I explain how Sup Forums is white supremist But made up entirely of shitskins

Joooooooos

Men have a wider distribution in IQ, but what most people don't know is that the biggest reason there are more great male inventors, scientists and so on, i because of differing interests. Men are much more into STEM subjects than women.

Feminists do try to push more women into STEM, but it never works. Wormen aren't wired like that.

Liberals have a bigger anterior cingulate cortex which detects and appraises social responses

Conservatives have a bigger amygdala which detects dangerous threats

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092984/

>i because of differing interests.
Name one great female scientist or philosopher dumb bitch.

hillary clinton!

>intelligent
>can't refute any argument with legitimate evidence
>can't support any argument with evidence
>almost all arguments are based on emotion
>emotion not logic
The 2 aren't lining up, at all, I call bullshit

Marie Curie. I know there aren't many of them. Still, you seem irrationally angry, and seem to think I'm a woman for some reason.

>hillary clinton!
IT WAS HER TURN!

he thinks you're a woman cos you're swedish

It's not a paradox at all. The mental gymnastics required to maintain left-wing views are impressive.

They are stupid lol
see

street smart > book smart

Honestly, from what I read he's overly angry at women. I'm somewhat angry at Swedish women for being so dense and irrational, but that guy takes it to another level.

Autism

If you spend thousands and thousands of dollars on a college degree you are forced to justify everything that was taught instead of questioning everything. If you question it, that means you wasted all your money and you are a slave to debt for no reason. That's to difficult to accept for many people. So it's just easier to believe that everything which was taught must have been 100% correct.
A big fancy education that keeps you from thinking for yourself.

A pattern puzzel 'on/off' takes longer for the intelligent to figure out.

>Marie Curie.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie#Nobel_Prizes
"In December 1903, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded Pierre Curie, Marie Curie, and Henri Becquerel the Nobel Prize in Physics, "in recognition of the extraordinary services they have rendered by their joint researches on the radiation phenomena discovered by Professor Henri Becquerel."[21] At first, the Committee intended to honour only Pierre and Becquerel, but one of the committee members and an advocate of women scientists, Swedish mathematician Magnus Goesta Mittag-Leffler, alerted Pierre to the situation, and after his complaint, Marie's name was added to the nomination." Marie was the first woman to be awarded a Nobel Prize."
She won it with her husband and her friend you dumb bitch. Try again.
>Still, you seem irrationally angry, and seem to think I'm a woman for some reason.
You are a woman.
Name one great female scientist or philosopher. A woman who won a nobel prize with the help of her husband does not count.

ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter5.html
"This makes them incapable of taking a purely objective interest in anything, and the reason for it is, I fancy, as follows. A man strives to get direct mastery over things either by understanding them or by compulsion. But a woman is always and everywhere driven to indirect mastery, namely through a man; all her direct mastery being limited to him alone."

>Extremely stupid (moderately stupid (40%): right wing
"My country is right 'cuz it's mine."
"I know right and wrong because of a Holy Book."
"My way of life is the best because I like it"
>moderately intelligent (40%): left wing
"all people have the same equal rights, and should live equal lives."
"we need to use the money the rich are hoarding to solve systemic problems"
>extremely intelligent: (>10%) right wing
"Economics are the primary influence over quality of life, and demographics are the primary influence over economics. Certain groups always perform well in large numbers; others always perform poorly. There must be some kind of separation."
"Heritage is, whether or not anyone knows it, the only reason that anyone is motivated to do anything at all. It was said that blood alone turns the wheels of history--take care not to interpret this as meaning bloodshed, because it actually means self-interest in spreading and preserving one's own bloodline, culture, and people. No one wants to be extinguished, and when push comes to shove, we all fight not to be."
>genius: approx 1.2% UNKNOWN
[EXAMPLE NOT FOUND]

So there you have it. Liberals are MOST of the SOMEWHAT smart people, but FEW of the VERY smart people.

Well you're right that there are more retarded guys than retarded girls but pretty much every single girl is stupid.

Just means were winning, the lemmings and idiots have historically leaned left. Just because they have realize its a bad idea to be leftist, doesnt mean they are our friends, or even representative of anything except stupid lemmings in general.

So some undesirables seek to hop on the bandwagon, who gives a shit? Not me.

>Honestly, from what I read he's overly angry at women. I'm somewhat angry at Swedish women for being so dense and irrational, but that guy takes it to another level.
Bla bla bla. Name one great female scientist or philosopher. Marie Curie is out, she needed the help of her husband and his friend. C'mon, name one.