> But muh China!!!
America has twice the carbon emissions per Capita of China. I know some of you dumbfucks hicks are pretty slow judging by the quality of your choice of leaders, so let me make that more clear:
The average American is more than twice as responsible for climate change than the average chink
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
carbonbrief.org
youtube.com
belfercenter.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
And there are five times more chinks than Americans. Therefore China as a whole is much more responsible
>The average American is more than twice as responsible for climate change than the average chink
The average American is worth 5 chinks and 10 leafs. So we're ahead of the game.
It's also important to note that China produces a hell of a lot more than the Americans do. The Americans don't need to heat their houses, they don't need to produce chemicals, electronics, plastics etc for the rest of the world like the Chinese do. They're just wasting it because they're such lazy, fat pieces of shit that they have to take their big, crappy, inefficient cars everywhere they go. Americans are the fucking worst. They're literally destroying the planet by being fat pieces of shit. Their laziness has no bounds.
>2013
>US is going down for 5 years
>Russia is going up for 5 years
>China is ramping up for 10 years
Got a chart from this year?
using your logic africans should burn baby burn, considering there are like 50 countries in there each entitled to a usa amount of emissions
we're getting closer to the correct answer
>china produces 11 million kilotons of Co2 every year
>US produces 5 million
>HURR DURR US IS REALLY TO BLAME
Fuck off, nigger.
>Per Capita
Fucking idiot.They have a bigger land mass and more population.
Sometimes it's hard to tell. Are burgers retarded or just willfuly ignorant.
Can we ban every Canadian IP?
I honestly don't think I've seen a good leaf post in my entire life.
How do we stop the developing world? When they finally catch up, we'll be way past fucked as far as emissions go.
kill yourself shill rat
>per capita
Sneaky little kike. What is the population of China? faggot
nah, that last one you linked is probably very close to the correct answer
yes an average US citizens emits more than a country bumpkin rice farmer. America sincerely apologizes for it's citizens being to well off. You really don't know shit about the issue if you are pulling these stats to argue.
Why are you not talking about the rest of the greenhouse gases lol, because China produces 30% to the USAs 15% of greenhouse gases.
They should. When they industrialize they'll stop breeding like rabbits and get a semblance of civilization.
The good leafs are being washed out by the dems
I wonder why World Banks' data stops at 2013??
Really activates my co2 emitting almonds
CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGIST
FAGGOT SHILL
You do not live in a truly sovereign nation you euro trash shut your mouth and keep trying to steal our money.
How about this burgers:
Stop buying made in china
2016 data please?
>How do we stop the developing world?
16 tons is an amazingly small amount for an entire country to put out. Thats the weight of like a medium sized delivery truck. A Semi weighs 40 tons.
The total weight of the atmosphere is 1,162,556,043,264,000,000,000 lbs.
Divide 32,000 lbs into that.
a piss in the ocean.
you do know china hasnt been measuring theyre populace for some time
theyre renowned for lying about their emissions
Guess you should have read the tearms and conditions before ratifying the deal burger. It's good to know the world is finaly waking up to the unreliability of the USA.
now it's settled
Isnt it funny how almost no media give a single fuck about climate shit until Trump said he wont show up in that thing
>carbon emissions
nice meme
carbon isn't a pollutant
if you make it a pollutant and allow the government to regulate it in any form then you've given the government power to regulate everything
Leaf, just stop. China is an environmental basket case. Plus we don't care. The Paris deal is a scam. We pay the 3rd World to pollute, most of the money will be pocketed by tin horn dictators, they will cheat, and only the suckers in the west will drag down their own economies. Fuck off thank you.
I like memes!
show some hespect
ARe you talking about the Paris Agreement, because it was unconstitutionally passed by the king limp wrist with the 2/3 consent of congress. We never had the chance to as a country.
Virtually no amount of carbon emissions by humans matters.
en.wikipedia.org
Found the Hongcouver chink defending the homeland.
The only reason you show up lower than anyone is because there are over a billion of you slime.
Where is the proof that carbon emmissions of humans has any affect on the climate?
per capita
population of China = 1,382,710,000
population of U.S.A = 325,120,000
keep crying bitch nigger desu
I'm sorry you don't like the way representative democracy works.
>per capita
>china has 3 times the population
Are you trolling or just this retarded
97% of scientists agree, mumble mumble mumble, you're an idiot, mumble mumble
>pollution is heavily tied to industry
>b-buh per capita!
Just ignore China's billion rural farmers diluting their numbers.
>derp derp derp
Op BTFO
>America's emissions per capita have been decreasing since Bush took office
Why do we need the Paris Treaty again?
>per capita
But in all seriousness, lets just put aside all the mercury and lead and arsenic and cadmium that the Chinese dump into their farmlands rendering their food inedible. Instead lets focus on the real killer, the CO2 that people breath in an out every day that does absolutely nothing but nourish plant life.
Where is the evidence of these numbers? We all know Jewggle is a fucking shill company. You think cause Jewggle says 16 metric tons that that's just it? No questioninv? Jewggle also says 90% of American inventors are/were black...
Faggots like you question nothing and then demand we recognize "SCIENCE!!!"
Science is the idea of questioning things
>Implying the solution isn't going to be an American Reich keeping the "developing" hordes from ruining the environment with fire and sword.
Resource wars and/or WWIII: this time there actually is a Holocaust will happen if 1/2 of the liberal belly aching about climate change is real.
The one child policy has already demographically killed China, so we just need to keep their peasants in the dark and stop making products in their nation and wait for the 1 woman per 10 men to lead to 9 angry men and civil war against the communist party or a massive population collapse. Either way, self cleaning commies.
The pajeets need to get into a nuclear war with pakistan
Middle east needs it's 10th crusade
Sub Saharan Africa needs Afrikaners again, Chinese ones if necessary, and a severe reduction of negroes.
The future if climate change is as pressing, rapid, and dangerous as (((climate scientists))) have been saying since the 60's with the idea that we'd be in another ice age by 1990 then the future isn't wind turbines (that kill birds) it's eugenics.
I would just like to remind everyone that the scientific academia relies on models that do not include correct amount of carbon outlet through bedrock via hydrothermic processes because it is not known accurately. Thus these models are not accurate as we do not know how the total amount of carbon that is coming into atmosphere.
Pic related but that is not me.
>carbon emissions
Who cares?
The only thing that actually matter is dumping chemicals and trace chemicals still present in emissions
Can't believe the amount of people defending US by falsely claiming that India and China are doing nothing to prevent climate change.
Did the big oil or Breitpart hire a army of trolls to spread this bullshit?
How can Americans be responsible for something that isn't real?
Don't you have a refugee to suck off?
>per Capita
That doesn't mean shit.
nah, by nationality
1 american = 10 chinese = 20 indians
hence, china and india are overpolluters and need to be culled
The Chinese aren't doing shit because that entire race of bug-like chinks believe culturally that if you can cheat and get away with it it's the other guy's fault for not catching you. India is still having a hard time getting it's peasants to stop shitting on the street.
Fpbp check mate tree huggers.
Why do people think that this agreement would change anything?
If you believe in and want to stop climate change-be the change you want to see. No one else would do shit about it regardless.
...
But shitting outdoors is part of their culture.
> But muh America!!!
The USA's energetic efficiency is close to the world average. Canada however is one of the worst.
Pollution / country / capita are bullshit measurements, it's emissions per gdp that counts, otherwise efficient economies will look more polluting than they are.
China's idea of recycling is throwing computer towers into a pit, lighting them on fire, then having some kids pick out the silver, copper, lead, and gold from the ashes.
Waste disposal is burning it in a hole. They have even done this in the US after opening now closed "waste disposal" companies citing "it's what we did in China".
Ignore the billion rice twice a week chinks who still think mao is the chairman in rural China and the per capita emissions for the industrialized population would be several orders of magnitude higher than any western nation. Mainly because they do not follow international or even their few internal environmental standards.
yeah and it's going up, Murica is going way down.
Could be a bait, but americunts can be that retarded
Stay salty that you're stuck with the bill for bribing poos to stop burning tires for warmth while the Muslims are going to establish the caliphate of France once macron surrenders to them.
You'd have unlimited free energy if you could just harness how hard Charles Martel is spinning in his grave.
>America has twice the carbon emissions per Capita of China.
But we are talking about COUNTRIES, you lying little faggot, not individuals. Here is the graph you OUGHT to be showing if you weren't a Jew-shill propagandist.
using your logic, if china broke into 5 countries, then made a CU equivalent of EU; the problem is magically solved
>per Capita
bullshit metric to measure carbon emission
>being mad that the US tax payer isn't going to fund your bullshit feel good program that will cost trillions and the most optimistic projection is reducing global temperature by 1/10th of 0.01 degrees by the end of the century.
china and eurocucks can eat shit
>using your logic africans should burn baby burn
Seems like high carbon footprint technology. But yes they should start working at reducing their numbers.
And yet their gdp per capita is almost 10 times less than america's. Where does all that gdp go to, I wonder?
Yes, it is the industry. People live like shit so that the government can keep spending more and more on industry including coal factories.
>China has 5 times the us population
>Only half of China is urbanized as opposed to 82% of America
>China lies about their emission levels like they do everything else
Have fun being stupid.
how much of that chinese contribution is from carbon intensive industries being supplying the US
Cry more bitch
they are a country by manchildren for manchildren
explains quite a lot when you think about it that way
...
This numbers are utterly pointless in the world of the global trade.
youtube.com
global warming. A scare industry worth an annual $1.5 trillion has been built on the notion that anthropogenic CO2 is responsible for unprecedented and catastrophic changes to the world’s climate. Yet the scientists promoting this hypothesis are a fairly small, closed shop who validate one another’s work in a process which has been nicknamed ‘pal review’ and whose response to criticism from dissidents is to bully them, smear them and have them denied access to mainstream science journals.
No, then the peoples republic of developed China would be unbelievable super polluters as the hundreds of millions of people in rural China no longer obfuscate how ridicoulsly destructive China's complete lack of manufacturing standards is compared to any other industrialized or industrializing country.
belfercenter.org
>About twenty-five percent of China's carbon emissions are caused by manufacturing products that are consumed abroad. These, so-called virtual emissions, which are "embodied" in international trade, lead to China having the world's most unbalanced virtual emissions trade with its emissions associated to exports being 8 times higher than its emissions associated with imports.
Since the EU is its largest trading partner most of the carbon shame goes to them, with the US in second place. So total, yank products may be around 7, 8 % or so.
>He fell for the "carbon dioxide is bad" meme
>It's not their fault because you buy things
Well by that token, it's not our fault because they make things so cheaply that we can't afford to make them ourselves in an environmentally friendly way.
>malaysian education
The logic is that using per capita emissions is ridiculous when talking about a country that has serious population problems.
You suggest nation states be all treated equal as if it's impossible to measure in terms of land mass or economic output
>per capita
so all those poor rice farmers living stacked ontop of eachotehr helped you make an argument?
>Save the rain forest guys
Ok cool I hear plants love co2
>No stop you're killing mum plants
you do know that energy production makes up for almost the entirety of CO2 emissions, right?
they can relocate the energy plants anywhere they want within the union
(hint: the EU already does that, where do you think the news of X country has 100% renewables/ zero carbon output comes from)
>America has twice the carbon emissions per Capita of China
like that fucking matters, chinese live in a confined space that is like 2x2 meter, its not a good measure
pre-answered for you
also, pre-answered for you
no need to be PC on pol
Also, who said they are allowed to spam the earth with 1.2 billion copies of themselves? They want to be four times more numerous than Americans, this means they can only use one fourth of the resources per capita for an equal footprint.
>measuring emissions per capita instead of people working in certain industries or per product created
i bet Africa has great emissions per capita too.
that's what happens when your people breed like rats and only a few actually produces shit.
This is not at all my logic.
Can't believe retards like you are trying to make America out to be worse than China or India based on per capita emissions disregarding that they have 5 and 3 times our population with only 50 and 30 percent urbanization respectively in comparison to our 80 precent.
Essentially with only a small portion of their country even responsible for those levels, they manage to just barely be under us by dividing it out over 5 times the population.
>supplying the us
They are made in china. I don't have any power over chinese environmental policies
>per capita
Fuck off
>I don't have any power over chinese environmental policies
yes, you do
don't buy
shut up jew
China accounts for 20% of the emissions recorded in the Paris agreement. The USA accounts for 17%.
Per capita is misleading because a lot of china is still very poor.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Measured by gdp, you can see that China's economy is one of the least efficient in terms of how much pollution is required to produce a dollar
Look up global greening
>research global greening
Look up global greening
>research global greening