PRO PARIS ACCORD PEOPLE - PLEASE REFUTE THIS

You have a chance to convert a soul. I'm waiting.

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics/comments/6duvqg/what_is_the_most_politically_favorable_decision/di6bvby/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Bump

Pretty awesome summary. Nice find.

>it-it's a start in the right direction

Back to >>>r/eddit

stopping climate change actually costs negative money.

if liberals would stop eating enough to feed venezuela then we would have solved this problem decades ago and they would save money as well.

Climate Religion fags BTFO

Kill yourself beaner.

Honestly curious if anyone can refute this.

The whole thing is a (((globalist)))) cash grab

The ultimate green pill

I know this is actually useful but people here loves to bash reddit even when they are ok sometimes.

Kill yourself beaner.

...

This
Great find but kill yourself

if this is true then it makes the conspiracy theory of a bunch of tyranical elites going for world government to put humans back into a fuedal state without technology seem more believable.

...

My thoughts exactly. The scary thing is I can't even find anything wrong with that reddit post. Surely the ipcc realizes what would have to be done. Do they just assume no one will look into it deeply? Reminds me of alex jones talking about agenda 21 and how they want us all in tiny apartments in urban areas like prisoners. Maybe he isn't just memeing

How can you fuck up the alignment that badly.

most pollution comes from the clinton islands.

Those people cant fucking read dat good son

wow just got into a kikebook argument about it 5 minutes ago, this is dank.

didn't scientists say it's already too late to do anything

>ONE HUNDRED TRILLION DOLLARS TO LOWER EARTH'S TEMPERATURE BY A THIRD OF A DEGREE BY THE YEAR 2100

This kills the climate religion.

direct link 4 anons who want the sauce
reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics/comments/6duvqg/what_is_the_most_politically_favorable_decision/di6bvby/

Now fuck off faggot

Alex Jones is meming, but he's not JUST meming.

Agenda 21 It isn't going to come right out and say they want everyone living in commie blocks. But in the name of sustainability, by their standards, packing people into cities is better because it puts people closer to workplaces and thus they'd need less energy to transport people around with muh trains and subways.

The goal behind it is sustainability and land management for high density living and reducing energy reliance, reducing consumption generally, shelter for everyone, clean water, less pollution blah blah etc.
You can read agenda 21 yourself, jewgle for agenda 21 pdf. Some of it is fairly uncontroversial (like desiring clean drinking water) and some of it is commie shit.

They have been running different scams since like the 70s. All these automatons sopping it up makes it so obvious that religion is deeply biological.

This is what I don't understand

It's fucking posted right on their website how fucking inefficient it is

I have a better idea for a new environmental treaty. We pledge to dedicate all that money that would have been spent on promoting wind-powered bullshit to building new nuclear plants.

Seriously. Keep researching solar energy and power storage technology, but until they are reasonable alternatives let's just build more nuclear plants. Clean, safe, massive energy output.

It's called Agenda 2030 now user but the result is the same. They want to make everyone live in commie blocks packed and stacked along railroad tracks with no building standards and make 95% of land private where nobody can live. There's maps out there of the 'wildlands' they plan but I can't find it right now.