Is this true? And if so, did (((they))) do this to these men?

Is this true? And if so, did (((they))) do this to these men?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0Ugk348jStc
youtube.com/watch?v=gRvMPc1KuJQ
blogs.ancestry.com/cm/12-people-who-missed-their-trip-on-the-titanic/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Morgan_(of_Dderw)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

It's possible. The timeline checks out.Titanic sank April 1912. Federal Reserve created December 1913.

(((Iceberg)))

Are you retarded? Titanic was a fictional movie.. Do you really think Dicaprio and Winslet really drowned in the ocean? AHAHAHAHA!!!

...

Also when the Federal Reserve was created they introduced the income tax.

There is no escape

Jews will continue their meddling for centuries to come until people look back on us in 2000 years and see the fall of Rome with no real understanding of "why" it fell, destined to repeat the same mistakes.

It took 1000 years for a Hitler to come about. He was our only hope.

Elbert hubbard died in the sinking of the Lusitania, he also opposed the monetary system.

youtube.com/watch?v=0Ugk348jStc

RMS Titanic never sank, she was scrapped 1937. Ship that was intentionally sank was RMS Titanics sister ship RMS Olympic, that had been badly damaged in collision with HMS Hawke. White Star Line just did shoddy repairs to Olympic and swapped the ship with brand new Titanic as proper repairs would have been really fucking expensive and they couldn't get full insurance coverage for the damages. By pretending that brand new ship sank they got everything out of insurance and still had a brand new ship.

Nah

RMS Olympic collided with Royal Navy cruiser HMS Hawke that was designed among other things to ram enemy ships and had reinforced bow. Royal Navy investigated it's own accident so White Star was responsible for accident and that also reduced what kind of insurance compensation they could get of it in case of expensive repair or scrapping essentially brand new ship.

youtube.com/watch?v=gRvMPc1KuJQ

What's more interesting are the people who were supposed to be on the Titanic maiden voyage, but cancelled at the last minute due to various (((reasons))).
blogs.ancestry.com/cm/12-people-who-missed-their-trip-on-the-titanic/

Why did so many men die on the Titanic? I thought this was a patriarchy. #notinmylifeboat

then where is the Titanic or what was its fate? Awful hard to conceal something that big without people seeing it and thinking "gosh, that's the Titanic"

kek

shitty meme. "would be worth 11 million" gives a pleb reader nothing

>Astor died in the sinking of the RMS Titanic during the early hours of April 15, 1912. He was among the 1,514 people on board who did not survive.[2] He was the richest passenger aboard the Titanic and was thought to be among the richest people in the world at that time, with a net worth of nearly $87 million when he died (equivalent to $2.16 billion in 2016)[1].[3]

>and was thought to be among the richest people in the world at that time

Update it and try again, as the thought is good. Death by a thousand cuts

Ships were on same dock before "Titanic" departed, Olympic was being repaired and Titanic being outfitted. They could have swapped the ships on night with small crew. Just swap all the stuff like furniture, silverware, restaurant menus and so with ships name printed on it and repaint or swap names on hulls.

There were rich people on a luxury cruiseship, what a conspiracy

All three names sound very jew-y to me anyway

You soft in the head? The Olympic and the Titanic are sister ships, they're essentially identical.

>"would be worth 11 million"

It literally says 11 billion.

>The Titanic had two other identical ships that nobody ever talks about
>They pretty much were as unsinkable as advertised

hmmmmmmmmm

i really hope you're being retarded ironically

>You soft in the head?
wouldn't be Sup Forums without slinging an insult at the start of your post

OP's picture says billion. not million. Please finish learning to read before shitposting, you illiterate sub-human baboon.

Same deal with 9/11 & Enron. Had to happen.

This.

One of them sank from a single mine explosion, user. Even with the "improved" watertight door system they updated after the Titanic sank.

yadayada. you know I meant billion shitstains. and billions are nothing compared to the sums of today, when we are talking about what really was the richest man in the world.

>It was finally excavated in 2008
>It turned out to be carrying as much munitions as the germans said it was, making it a perfectly valid target to sink in the first place
>Most britbongs clung to the lie that they weren't pulling that shit until the last minute
>Last year, ((((they)))) salvaged the telegraph machine
>Mysteriously lost it

How deep does this rabbit hole go?

This. It was an intentional wreck, although completely botched. They intended to damage it and evacuate to a nearby ship. The massive death toll was a horrible mistake.

>baby's first conspiracy theory

Wouldn't be Sup Forums without people like you displaying a basic ignorance of history that makes these kind of discussions effectively impossible.

Back to Jekyll island.

could be, people who fuck with jews, will die, take Hitler for example

A Welsh-American Banker (Morgan) killed some Jewish opponents of the Fed.

>Captain, Ice(((berg))) ahead!

Underrated post

>wouldn't be Sup Forums without slinging an insult at the start of your post

Sister ship can mean two things, most commonly ships are of same class. Basically identical with very minor differences like different antenna rigging or something, maybe bathrooms on some decks in bit different places. Less common case of ships being referred to as sister ships is that two or more ships operate as running mates, run same route into different directions.

Pic related. Four sister ships. One had interesting case of acute homosexual an hero in 1989... killing 46 shipmates. That is according to NCIS. Independent inquiry found out stuff like powder bags from WWII and unsatisfactory munitions handling methods.

Making insane properties was much harder back then and inflation was almost non-existent back then.

>This. It was an intentional wreck, although completely botched. They intended to damage it and evacuate to a nearby ship. The massive death toll was a horrible mistake.

It is horrible what small navigation and communication errors might do.

Titanic-Olympic swap is one few conspiracy theories I see as plausible. White Star Line was economically in dire situation due to massive investment in three xbox huge Olympic class ships. They built 'em with massive loans. If Olympic had been repaired properly she might have been on docks for couple years and probably entire third of the ship from the aft would have to be dismantled and rebuilt.

very old britsh joke made here, it was funny then

Winslet survived the drowning and went to on be an old whore who threw a perfectly good necklace into the ocean.

Many of those guys were Jews and didn't like the idea of a central bank. The Morgan family traces back to Wales.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Morgan_(of_Dderw)

I've heard this before but by the time you converted Olympic to match Titanic (Exterior features and interior) you would have spent more time and money than you were saving.

They are not identical and they can be told apart.
Look at the windows on white superstructure. They are very different arrangements and layouts. There are other differences as well.

>I've heard this before but by the time you converted Olympic to match Titanic (Exterior features and interior) you would have spent more time and money than you were saving.

Few exterior steel plates and interior tweaks are pocket change if keel or other major structural members of Olympic were damaged in the collision. Late 1880's protected cruisers like HMS Hawke were designed to ram enemy ships as basically no one had any idea how combat with modern warships would workout. It was still considered viable naval tactic at dawn of big gun battleship era.

>They are not identical and they can be told apart.
>Look at the windows on white superstructure. They are very different arrangements and layouts. There are other differences as well.

Those are things that majority of passengers doesn't necessarily know. Crews and dock workers can be bribed or intimidated to shut the fuck up. Their livelihood was very much tied to financial viability of White Star & Harland and Wolff, both companies were connected at hip due to investments made into Olympic class liners.

Once it's globally on the news you can pull it off, a few would have seen the photos anyway.

...

>Icebergs are a government conspiricy
wew

kek'd. Thanks!

It's much more complex then that. Some features inside were different as well:

-Olympic had two open promenades for passengers to walk down, Titanic only had one (enclosed) while where the second would have been was converted into more staterooms and a French-style cafe.

-The location of the Turkish Baths were different on the ships. Olympic had two electric baths, Titanic only had one.

-The bridge wings (pic related) were different with Olympic's being flush if viewed from the front, Titanic's extended over the side to allow better visibility. Olympic's were altered later on in her career.

-The ships had different furnishings at different parts throughout.

While it's true you could pretty quickly cover up the last one of those and put down new carpets, and few people would notice unless they were extremely familiar with the ships, you could not disguise everything in a short amount of time.
Differences of internal layouts are still visible on the wreck today. ROVs have been to the wreck of Titanic and gone in the staterooms of the most wealthy passengers, which would not exist on Olympic because it would have been open space for the promenade.
The ships were not switched and the theory relies on people believing they are identical, which is probably why some insist on believing it since they do not know any better.

holy shit

...

Have someone compared it to the Cameron pictures of it?

Cameron sneaked the whole conspiracy on Titanic.

Define the purely objective term "ignorance" within this context. These discussions are entirely possible no matter what the level of "ignorance" is that you or anyone else perceives. Discussions stem from anything if you're intelligent enough to bring anything worthwhile to it.

i...itcant be real,everytime i try to look away the dots just dont stop connecting...:o)...
maybe Sup Forums is right