Pol BTFO for ever

What do you have to say, pol?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/0xUID/status/831156444821073923
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Yeah but they didn't do that shit repeatedly.

>What do you have to say, pol?

Muslims should be banned regardless of how many bombings there are.

Didn't the IRA target property, and not people?

But where are all the people? Why aren't there any dead bodies for all that damage?

But they didn't do that 4 times in a single day.

>One attack with a prior warning so people wouldn't be around and with an actual message/reason for doing it beyond "FUCK THE INFIDELS"
>same as nonstop rape, murder, and terrorist attacks without any warning all from one same group with no actual reason aside wanting to destroy the western world entirely

Yeah, and I think they warned about attack before hand, so that there were no human casualties.

The IRA never wanted to kill anybody, they just wanted to scare people off. ISIS and other terrorist in other hand wants to have a high kill rate.

And? Nobody died, what a stupid moron.

what happens when "small number" is in the many thousands and they may want to exploit a process which gives them a relatively comfortable life right next door to their enemies?

>we didn't ban huurrr dudrrrrr
actually people and governments used to react a lot more irrationally and violently than we do now to terrorism and attacks on nations/civilians

Yeah, not like the irish weren't being beaten in the streets for it

>IRA
>Basque separatists
>fighting for their homelands independence

comparing to
>muslims
>want to conquer europe

gee leftists sure are a special brand of retard aren't they?

The IRA wanted independence. Jihadis want the end of civilization.

I think only one person died because they gave a warning, There wasn't mass immigration of irish at the same time, Being irish didn't mean subscribing to an ideology that was completely incompatible with the west that calls for all infidels to be killed, you can have slave and can rape children.

the IRA would call ahead before they blew up their bombs so yea

>24 years ago
>0 casualties

Sensible

exactly. did the IRA want to conquer england/scotland?

why is the left so bad at analogies?

Don't remember ever hearing that they blew up a concert attended mostly by little girls.

and it was dealt with through military force

I'm sure you didn't go around saying it has nothing to do with the Irish or Catholics though.

You remember in 1920 when britain literally gave up 90% of ireland because of guerilla warfare and terrorist tactics? Maybe they should just section off half of Britain and give it to muslims now. Same old Britain being a little baby cuck bitch. They probably should have had tighter controls.

>tighten security and surveillance in northern ireland
>belfast gets locked down
>brits keep tabs to IRA till this day, as do the irish

And guess how many people got called "irelofobe" for criticizing IRA. Guess how many people were told to ignore the bombings.

The IRA did nothing wrong though

IRA were "fighting" for an independent Northern Ireland, not for Catholicism. Islamic terrorists are "fighting" in the name of Islam and want to establish a caliphate.

Operation Demetrius redux when?

Don't remember them doing this in the name of Jesus.

Yeah, but weren't the Irish treated like trash? I mean Muslims have gotten off pretty easy considering the government stands up for them.

>shows one event which happened during The Troubles
>"""forgets""" to mention the IRA was fighting for independence from the UK for Northern Ireland.
>"Foreigners from a different continent who have a far different and oppressive culture and seek to exploit our country should be treated the same as people who border us by sea"

>We didn't ban Irish people
I think they did tho...

Didn't britbongs illegally arrest and torture a bunch of micks after that?

Plus IRA sent a message beforehand where they will plant the bomb so it had minimal casualties

0 people died in that attack. The ira called in a warning 90 minutes early.

The IRA wasn't a small group, they had massive support in Ireland.

The British were violently oppressive to the Irish.

That picture is as wrong as it is possible to be.

The IRA gave warnings before detonations and were after property damage rather than human life

they are going to get nuked and cucks will crawl from the rubble and post this shit still

Its time we start removing double standards all around world...

The Irish are an ethnic group, most of whom are total compatible with our way of doing things. Islam is a religion almost utterly incompatible with the west, it's not just the terrorism, it's literally everything. To add to that there's also the fact that it literally tells believers to kill or convert non-believers, I don't remember the Irish trying to convert people into being Irish on pain of death

>What do you have to say, pol?

Read a fucking book. Picture related.

Don't remember the Irish cutting off people's heads

killing people is worse than breaking windows, no-one died in those attacks

The IRA wanted sovereignty for Northern Ireland, whereas Muslim terrorists want conquest of the West and the violent death of all who oppose Islam.

I don't see how they compare.

Actually, border controls between Ireland and the UK were non-existent before the troubles, but the UK responded to terrorism by sealing the border with their Army.

Saged.

>IRA called the british in advance and told them they gonna bomb the spot and waited untill they evacuated.

Totally the same thing

Not every irish person is an IRA member

but every islamist is a muslim

get out shitskin, that's a filthy bosnian muslim.

Yeah warned beforehand, still a couple casualties I think but they clearly weren't trying to target people

>IRA call in the bomb threat to minimise casualties in a political struggle for reunification, arguably a decent reason by western standards due to the values of self-determination, although at odds with the self-determination of Protestant Northern Irish
>Muslims don't, want maximum damage to either a) please their Jew god and pedophile prophet and/or b) THEY MADE FUNNA ME CUZ IMMA MUZLIM AN EAT HALAL BRUV

I mean, still total cunts, but at least they had the decency to call these things in.

But it actually was a small group of cunts. We're facing an enemy that has been trying to overrun us for 1400 years.

But we did travel ban and lock up all known supporters of the IRA.

Why don't we just give the cunts their own Israel and kick them out of the west.

The casualties were people who ignored the evac warning

This. The IRA bombings and its other actions didn't have "nothing" as the response, they're the reason why the UK has the most security cameras per capita in the world

>The British were violently oppressive to the Irish

HAhahahahahahahhahahaha

English people still talk shit about the Irish, still bash Catholics. England was able to approach that situation for what it was, a religious and colonial war against Ireland. That's why they eventually won.

They aren't doing that with Islam.

OP is getting cooked in his own thread.

The IRA called in a warning before that one.

Look at response to IRA: Military action.

Response to Muslims: Beg for another.

That irish aren't british either and should've been kept on their own island.

yeah but
>some irish people don't want to be british
>some irish want to/don't care if they are british

so you just kill the ones that don't want to be british, problem solved right?

I just posted this to get some arguments against this tweet. I don't even agree with the schnoz.

Fuck the IRA and fuck the Irish. Literal subhumans of the British isles.

IRA bombings were justified.

Ireland is for the irish.

All I wanted is to watch and enjoy mankinds technological progress, I wanted to see humanity colonize space, conquer diseases and aging, end hunger, create art and architecture, lower crime and suffering to a great degree, all these along with cool stuff like super gadgets and flying cars, instead we have radicals pulling progress down while "justice warriors" with a false sense of ethics protect them and force our governments to funnel more resources to goals that will have minimal impact to humanity's overall progress.

Somebody please just invent a dream machine already, so I can watch humanity flourish like I've always wanted.

Yes the IRA had a policy of warning ahead of time. Their objective was to damage property and intimidate, not murder innocent children

This

well leftist will claim they are both seeking revenge for military action against their homeland and faith.

Something that I would point out is that it is the "Irish" republican army, as in they were acting on behalf on one particular country. They weren't a multinational force of Catholics with no defined loyalty to a particular country or region.

If they just want to scream that white anglos do terrorist shit too, then cool. However, they aren't doing shit NOW, so maybe instead of virtue signalling concentrate on the people blowing shit up NOW.

Link for the people who want to argue with him:
twitter.com/0xUID/status/831156444821073923

The bombers gave an advance warning before the blast.

Everyone knew it was going to happen, and as a result the only person killed was a photographer who was there to capture the event, i.e. it was his own damn fault.

They're trying to get you to compare the magnitude of the attacks.

Don't fall for their kike-alike tricks -- that's not the real issue. The British government did indeed "ban" the Irish -- thousands of suspected IRA members were imprisoned without trial for years under "internment" in Long Kesh.

The British haven't interned a single Muslim. The most extreme plans even allegedly attributed to Donald Trump during the campaign didn't include anything like internment.

The British response to the IRA was far, far more authoritarian than anything being planned today.

>cunt

Ummmm, sweetie? That's very misogynistic and problematic terminology,ok? You really need urgent re-indoctrination right now, you need to have all that toxic masculinity and wrongspeak purged from your system, then we can talk, k?

Explains why muslims are so angry today because you bombed their countries and muslims people for 20+ years.

Makes sense.

This.
The IRA didn't want casualties. Furthermore, they were fighting for their own state.

The ideology of the Muslim terrorists is to "kill all Western men and take their woman and children as slaves". So this enemy is basically a foreign invasion that wishes to commit genocide. And don't think for a second they're joking. If they get enough power, they will do it.

If that time comes, there won't be any Muslim SJWs to protect whitey.

The IRA weren't targeting children's concerts in order to go to "heaven" you delusional toothpaste retard.

same as the japanese during ww2, it's a tested method that works. A harsh reality people just don't want to accept,

...

To a degree, and for some, it is/was but then other people obviously have their own agenda.

>IRA
>bomb property
>Islam
>bomb you

And that was a mistake the consequences of which we still live with today.

>they were fighting for their own state

I'm pretty sure the Islamic State want to start their own state too.

Yeah, which includes the entire world.

>This is New York, 2001 after a muslim suicide attack.

1. The IRA phoned people in advance to minimise casualties, muslim extremists seek to maximise them

2. We had internment camps for Irish people, I doubt any of those apologetics would approve of internment camps for muslims

Umm, sweetie? In the Queen's English, cunt is not a gendered term.

>ira is okay because they only do acceptable terrorism
seriously listen to yourselves. the type of terrorism is irrelevant. both did horrific things.

We let them move to out first world countries which are paradise compared to the shitholes they made for themselves.
Fuck you nigger.

Jihad is endorsed by the core religious texts and by the Islamic scholars in Sharia countries, and the attacks take place worldwide. Their organisations are huge in scale and televise brutal torture and executions.

The IRA was one group localised to the UK+Ireland, bombing a few buildings after usually phoning ahead for evacuation, and was condemned by the Pope. I'm not sure they can be meaningfully compared.

...

Well, they were fighting against occupation against the British government, just like the British should be fighting occupation against the Muslims.

Fighting for their Independence is a better description. IRA wanted independence in a land in which they were native.

IS conquers territory from others and aims to enslave and oppress the natives. It's actually the complete opposite of the IRA.

SomeBODY once told me that Islam's gonna roll me

I ain't the sharpest sword in the order

They were lookin kinda dumb with their fingers in their bums

And the scream of Allah on their lips

Well the attacks start coming and they don't stop coming

and they don't stop coming

and they don't stop coming

and they don't stop coming

and they don't stop coming

and they don't stop coming

Smart group of cunts organized a bigger boom than goatfuckers will ever be able to

And they had the courtesy to inform the police where the bomb is before the explosion

Except there were times they did kill innocent children. Just not ISIS scale. The IRA were dicks but nothing like ISIS.

Is it just me or do I see this post weekly?

IIRC, the IRA tried to limit civilian casualties.

Muslims want to maximize casualties.

...

IRA always called in the bombs before detonating to minimise casualties. That pic? Zero casualties.

They didn't target little girls because potato niggers aren't literal soulless pieces of shit lower than animals.

IRA wasn't about killing people, muslims are.

Usually that was because people didn't listen to the warnings. They warned before attacks because the point was to hurt infrastructure and the economy not people.

don't engage the tard

So ill-informed and stupid it hurts.

Yeah, so how did we treat the community these people came from again...