He's gonna lose the case because of this shit, you know that, right?
So umm
>tweets
>terrorist attacks all over
I wonder which one will the judges look at
No the Supreme Court has real judges that know that stuff is irrelevant to the actual case
He got his guy Gorsuch in the S.C. now.
>implying that wasn't the plan from the beginning
Force banning Muslims to be litigated in the SCOTUS to prevent any other president from stopping refugees via precedent.
Um. No. His fucking tweets have nothing to do with the written text of the order. There is no motive or intent in this EO to be prosecuted. This isnt a fucking trial.
Someone should tell Trump to calm the fuck down with the tweets.
Nobody puts baby in a corner.
That's not what judges do, they see if the intention behind the law is constitutional. They don't make decisions before something happens, only in response.
It's literally the most important part, he's revealing the real intent behind the law to them, which is all they care about, and a travel ban like this isn't constitutional. If he banned ALL muslims due to a real concern it could be justified, but because such a low percent of muslims do terrorism isn't not worth it (speaking from someone who studies c-law at a T6)
um no sweetie