Your thoughts on monarchy?

your thoughts on monarchy?

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393355/Hero-Gurkha-handed-bravery-medal-Queen-said-I-thought-I-going-die--I-tried-kill-I-could.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

When properly limited by strong law and an effective parliament, it's the greatest and most stable form of governance in existed.

When not properly limited it's a countdown to implosion.

its a political system that can work
keeping a monarchy without the political system is pretty cringe though
They are basically just overrated celebrities at that point

I want to end it now.

The British monarchy have shown that they are willing to stand back and watch their country fall apart for the sake of diversity.

>When properly limited by strong law and an effective parliament, it's the greatest and most stable form of governance in existed.
What? (((Parliaments))) are what destroyed the West. Absolute monarchies with strong Estates are better.

But strong ethnic nationalism is a must, in any case.

It is the best political system in the history of mankind if it has a KICKASS monarch.

It is the worst political system in the history of mankind if the monarch is a retard.

And then you get an heir born who is stupid, paranoid, sadistic, or all three.

The American parliament (which is not subject to a constitutional monarchy) introduced degeneracy. The British Empire was many things, but nowhere near this degenerate, even in death.

Jesus is our only King.

monarchy is the best. but you also need to remove right to vote to all foreigners in all affairs. and deny jews and muslims in politics/law/education/culture/bank etc

Wait, what?
You want the commonwealth monarchy to end because it isn't enough of a monarchy for you?

Shouldn't you just want the monarchy to be strengthened?

Prophecy :

This summer leonor will grow breasts. This is the one.

having people rule over you because of their bloodline, can have a lot of repercussions

>green light to fap soon

DDDDDDDDDDDDD

>And then you get an heir born who is stupid, paranoid, sadistic, or all three.
It's much easier to overthrow him than a rotted "democracy."

We should secede from democratic society and create small, private monarchs united by trade. Citizens will migrate away from the worst monarchs in support of the better ones. Vote with your feet. The monarchs would protect its people from invasion, degeneracy and crime. Instead of welfare and socialist policies, churches will regain the responsibility to collect and distribute resources to the disadvantaged - a more accountable and efficient method due to the church's inability to rely on a fixed income via taxation. The monarchs as long-term owners will have a vested interest in sustaining their kingdoms, with the added accountability of the people's free dissociation. Confederations will eventually be established as kingdoms seek military protection. Some kingdoms will be very free and some will be dictatorial. Some will be small and some will be large. A variety is necessary in order to keep social interests separate and satisfied. There's no need for people to fight over laws or land if free association can be maintained.

Ancient relic of our dark past

Fancy Inbred Fucks

why do you need a centralized state to begin with? why can't people govern themselves indvidually and pay for their own protection?

Monarchy is shit, all "royals" should hang.
Except the cute princesses, they should be cloned and put in petting zoos so everybody can go and see them and give them headpats.
>implying a monarch gives a shit about the nation
Their only concern is themselves, the people are only a tool to maintain their position and keep power over their rivals.
No, don't say that, she will never grow breasts. NEVER

>Mountainjew

t. shlomo shekelberg

Hi Ahmed

What if inbreeding causes mentally decrepit monarchs

And if there were no need for either? That's the beauty of constitutional monarchy.
The monarch keeps the parliament in check, limits their corruption, makes damn sure they're working for the nation not overseas interests.
The parliament gives the common people some voice (essential in reasonable doses for long term stability), limits any truly useless parasite aristocratic types, and carries on through the occasional disaster child.

Again, it worked for the Empire before the Germans had one of those idiot disaster princes and burned down Europe.

Read the thread

Because I can pay some people more to takes things from that person. All the while people then pay me not to attack them and so I rule above them. Oh look another government.

>headpats
Like we'd fall for that pedo. You just want to rail them Muhammad.

Its gay. They should be guillotined and a fascist dictator should replace them.

This. monarchs wont just breed with random people and soon enough you'd have a Joffrey from GoT

The royalty is supposed to represent the nation. There's a reason why they can't vote nor express their political beliefs.

Decentralised peoples have had a tendency throughout history to be annexed by their centralised neighbors. Unfortunate, but there it is.

Nah, Poland already claimed Jesus as king and Mother Mary as Queen.

>oh man, he doesn't support the worst form of government
>what a jew
>not wanting to be able to go to the local princess zoo and give the cute little princesses headpats and feed them oats out your hand
Princesses are for headpats and feed kissing.
>The royalty is supposed to represent the nation
You be got a weird idealized view of royalty.

Further: American checks and balances system is an attempt to recreate this balance. Running into trouble due to political families beginning to develop and the over-politicization of the supreme court.

total shit, fuck it

Why the fuck I should obey to some faggot just because his parents, grandparents, were rulers?

I meant the British royalty in its current form. You should see the ones here, they do just about whatever they want.

>feed kissing
wut

Isn't yours that country where the king looks like some gymrat fucker? What a joke.

I like the monarchy. Worth every penny.
I love to see how the commies and liberals gets triggered every new years eve when the queen delivers her annual speech to the nation.

>your thoughts on monarchy?

better than demoncracy

Useless, the damage a single stupid monarch can do to a country far outweighs the positives of an enlightened one.
Still more functional than communism though.

someone raised from birth to hold a position of power, every day learning from generations of experience. not bothering with the irreverent and only focused on the security of theirn ation. doing what they were born to do.

then you get cunts with no care for the nation or its people doing whatever to hold their position in government
only caring about their ego and pension

If I were king I would risk it all and call for a deportation of all Muslims.
At least in Britain the monarchy still has the people backing it up. If the Queen said that all Muslims must convert to Christianity or get out, would the British people listen?
I bet Sikhs and Hindus would be the only ones trying to follow through this goal.
Bring in some gurkhas and they would be finished in a week.

1 gurhka could single handedly kill 30 armed Talibans even when he ran out of ammo.

Does anybody have a video of Princess Leonor speaking? I want to hear her voice. Why are princesses not required to make videos showing their cuteness to the people and telling them stuff?
Feet kissing. As in kissing the princess' feet as a sign of deference and mode of worship.
Don't you just want to bow down to her and kiss her feet while she calls you a worthless peasant?

>stand back

Prince Charles is bff with the Saudi royalty.

No more kings.

Being someone's son doesn't mean you'll do well in the same role as your father.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393355/Hero-Gurkha-handed-bravery-medal-Queen-said-I-thought-I-going-die--I-tried-kill-I-could.html

Japan had the most stable monarchy.

The Shoguns actually cared about Japan.

When Japan saw how degenerate the rest of the world was, they shut down their borders for hundreds of years until America sent Commodore Perry to force Japan to open their borders.

Back then, you had a lot of sons and the son who killed them all was expected to be smarted and fitter and more cunning since he survived the succession battle.

I can see the positive side of monarchy because it removes all the political maneuvering to get into power just to have power. You have a kid raised from birth and taught how best to serve his nation, and then placed into power when it is his time. He's wealthy and there's no reason to do shady deals to line his pockets with money at the expense of the people.

The only downside is I don't like the idea of a class system put into place. I mean with nobles who live the high life and have no purpose other than to consume and tell everyone how much better they are than them because of their birth.

she's already ugly which is weird because lolis tend to have qt faces simply by virtue of being lolis. she is already man-faced

>focused on the security of theirn ation
A nation is it's people. A monarch doesn't give a shit about the nation. To him the people could all die and he wouldn't mind except that he needs to use them.
>must convert to Christianity
What the fuck would that change? They'd still be foreign scum.

They're all old guys anyway. Furthermore we have plenty of them, 9 monarchs actually, for 14 of the states.

>Back then, you had a lot of sons and the son who killed them all was expected to be smarted and fitter and more cunning since he survived the succession battle.

A lot has changed since then. I'd rather have a larger pool of contestants for the leadership role than a single son of someone.

Also, do you think nepotism and corruption is going to be better under a monarchy?

institutionalized incest.
How can anyone be against that?

Take a deep look that left ones eyes and have one minute silence for mourning hairy wrist genes.
White Queen when.

That larger pool of contestants are going to say and do whatever they have to, to get into power. Enter the politician, who is pretty much universally understood to be a lying snake yet people have to vote for them.

At least under monarchy, you would know who is corrupt or practices nepotism since they would have a more limited pool so singling them out would be easier.

Meanwhile, a larger pool means having to shine spotlights on more people which diverts focus and attention.

And I'd rather be able to vote for any one of them than be bound to a single person who is to be leader merely based off the fact that his father was leader.

Hey, that's not entirely true. She's not as cute as she used to but shes almost 12, she's getting older. She's still cute just not as much.
Institutionalized (non-breeding)incest is good. Father/daughter is the purest form of love. What do you expect a man to do when his wife gets old and busted? Not fuck his daughters? Please.

>At least under monarchy, you would know who is corrupt or practices nepotism
Monarchy is nothing but straight institutionalized nepotism.

Yeah but sometimes it's just perfect.

yes I agree faggot. but mom son breeding incest is top tier.

incest monarchy's are best monarchy's

11-12 is peak age for qt

she already has small eyes+big jaw+big nose

>i want to _______ princess leonor

It's silly but people long for a King so it works if it's balanced out correctly.

I think representative democracy is the best government when the right prerequisites are in place, which right now, they aren't. Monarchy is completely outdated.

What the fuck Macri is doing in this photo

>mom son breeding incest is top tier.
That's disgusting, don't ever say that.
>incest monarchy's are best monarchy's
If we're talking breeding incest in the context of a monarchy it has to be brother to sister, like them pharaohs. Keep the blood the purest.
Worship

...

>It is the worst political system in the history of mankind if the monarch is a retard.
Not really, in that case the ministers and regent will rule and the king won't have any power.

swear fealty to

She's got a look like "goddammit, when I am queen in going to execute every fucking photographer".
Her teeth are so hot. Little girl teeth are so good.

Fuck the throne, my dudes.

>Father/daughter is the purest form of love.
Like Fritzl? You Germans are sickos.
No wonder you loose all your manly energy for fapping and then simple muslim can just beat you up, because you are faggot.

I unironically believe Princesses Sofia and Leonor will lead the West during WW3.

The thought that they will be married to some low-blooded globalist terrifies me.

>Her feet are so hot. Little girl feet are so good.
ftfy

Only organic true form of government

Only Leonor holds the title of Princess, she is the Infanta Sofia.
They'll probably be married to ones of their cousins.

>And then you get an heir born who is stupid, paranoid, sadistic
getting rid of a problematic monarch is easier than getting rid of stupid voters

they look whiter than swedish (((monarchy)))

Useless welfare queens.
Not different than niggers.
Just more expensive

Little girl feet are good but also i like little teeth, they really turn me on. Probably cause mine are all fucked up.
I like little girls with gapteeth especially, it's super cute and makes them look really kissable.
I could stare at a girl with cute teeth all day.

It always sparks a tinge of irony in my perspective when Americans actually support stricter monarchies.

The bloody Statesmen praising the Kingsmen.
Although I do have to agree on a more paramount position of monarchy control, but absolute does more often give rise to retards and ill offspring.

Even Frederick had gay undertones so he was somewhat mentally not-there.

>ITT: degenerate republican mountain jew rejecting the best political system

A politician's first interests are his offshore accounts (run by our Swiss friend here). He is only in office for a few years, taking the opportunity to line his own pockets as best he can. Job conplete, he departs to join a board of directors somewhere.

A monarch's first interests are the people. Their status is tied to the country. If it goes under, so do they. They are groomed to be rulers and role models from birth, and the high cost of living is the price paid for a government that actually cares, instead of one who profits off the nation before leaving it a shell of its former self.

Ours are French fucks and the queen is half Hur/Nazi german.

Sucks, should have taken some peasant from the countryside. Would have been 100x better.

Half huemonkey/Nazi german

A stupid cult. Man should only bow to God. The ruling class are nothing to aspire to.

Asturian genes, my friend.

We should find some old Vasa relatives from Poland.
Would be interesting.

>inb4 she gets blacked to be seen as a progressive monarchy

It's when she starts walking around in hot pants that we lose her.

I wonder if the an-caps ever realize that they're monarchists. An individual owns their land as personal personal property which they have full sovereignty and control over; they can physically remove people from their property if they don't follow their rules, and they can pass their property on to their children. Monarchy.

Constitutional, parliamentary monarchy is pretty retarded; real monarchy in the neoreactionary sense has potential, it would certainly be far preferential to democracy for whites at this time.

Stop saying such things bout my princess

Monarchy doesn't need to be hereditary. Nearly every successful corporation in the world is a monarchy, they just call the king CEO.

This, our real monarchy in Sweden is called Wallenberg.
Our king is a poor peasant compared to them.

>Monarchy doesn't need to be hereditary.
so just a authoritarian regime?

>medkit

>blacked
too late for that, she already has a taste for Iberian men
just look at her

There is exactly one absolute monarchy in all of Western Europe. One. It also happens to be literally the single best place on the entire continent. I would live in Liechtenstein over any other country in Europe without question. It makes even Switzerland look like Sweden by comparison on the chart of cuckoldry.

Singapore is also effectively a monarchy, and is doing great.