Bilderberg 2017

What Bilderberg Wants In 2017 / 2018
youtube.com/watch?v=EbFMnrPbAmU

Other urls found in this thread:

ia601404.us.archive.org/32/items/TheTrueStoryOfTheBilderbergGroup/The-True-Story-of-the-Bilderberg-Group.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=mN-by_41kcc
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

bump

No shits were given that day

Interesting, have a bump. Gas kikes, ban usury.

Did anything much come out about it? I haven't been paying much attention lately.

The video I posted has the most detailed analyses I could find about the subject

Very good, added to my redpill playlist.

If you're interested into fully understanding the history, power and role of this agentur meeting in the grand scheme of things, read this:

ia601404.us.archive.org/32/items/TheTrueStoryOfTheBilderbergGroup/The-True-Story-of-the-Bilderberg-Group.pdf

Ah, cool. I'll have a watch over breakfast. I haven't even rebooted my computer in like a year and everything just gets more broken as time goes on.

Thanks user, excellent material for the uniformed.

A bunch of names of powerful people attending, how war is likely on the horizon, possibly in iran.
If you knew about jewry, bilderberg, rotschilds and how trump is a puppet, it was pretty much just a summary of the situation.

He also went over how new names, mainly jews in the tech sector are likely to be powerplayers in the future, I agree that it is likely but my autistic powers are somewhat weak.

The video didn't really go into the medicinal field, but named important figures mostly in banking, tech and Us military, although the whole new world elite is very cohessive across all sectors of society.

>only on tjread about kikerberg at its annual summit
>5replies

Pol needs ro be collectively gassed
It has become just another shitpost board like /b

Topics

...

why are normies so blue-pilled about Bilderberg? they're such an obvious supervillain convention, any Marxist should be jumpin on it

Nah, Sup Forums did well during the meeting itself:

Jews won once again, friend.

>collectively gassed
No, Hans, please no more

Also, from the same channel:

youtube.com/watch?v=mN-by_41kcc

> →
>Luke Rudkowski of "We Are Change
>Kike
In that thread nothing of substance was discussed.

say it aint so

Notice how the media is acting like Bilderberg is OK with Trump? This is some reverse psychology shit.

Personally, I think this will have the most impact on our daily Sup Forumsack life in the near future.
Especially considering Theresa May pushing hard for extremely tight internet regulations under the
The Draft Communications Data Bill (nicknamed the Snoopers' Charter)
Because, terrorism....
Should sound familiar, especially to the American user's who lived trough 9/11 and its lies

The 'snoopers charter' is just England's version of the American:
>SOPA
>PIPA
>CISPA
>CDA
>DMCA
>COICA

I cannot keep bumping my own thread forever.
Sadly as pointed out Sup Forums has become Sup Forums-tier.
I have little hope this thread will stay alive.

Very good video so far OP. Please have a bump.

Good that you watched it user

I'm not sure what to read in to that exactly. What I think I'm seeing are two main trends:

1. Bilderberg itself is grappling with increasing obsolescence and the inevitable growth of a patchwork of newer circles of power.

2. Trump knows damn well about Bilderberg and has some of his people there, so obviously Bilderberg is going to be concerned with how it might adjust its near-term tactics around the reality of a Trump administration and possibly other lesser such upsets elsewhere in the world.

I think they are planning to attempt to steer trumps decisions in their favor and they also know the public lacks any trust in them so attaching Trump to them in anyway undermines Trump.

Well, I was hoping for more on what came out of the meeting rather than what went in to it, but that video was still a well-done analysis of the membership list (at least from a US perspective) and a good overview for people who might not know about Bilderberg.

man with pictures of jews and a rifle.jpg

>Russia in the international order
you just know it kills them not to be able to say "New World Order"

Based on this it looks like they are at least somewhat open to the idea of neo-liberalism going downhill. They at least don't have their heads completely in the sand.

The direction of the EU
- If they have any economists worth their salt at all they'll know the EU is fucked.

Can globalisation be slowed down?
- Of course it can. There is even data coming out now which shows the economies that grow the best are diversified not specialised and are the ones which retained their industry.
You can just whack tariffs on Chyna. So they don't buy US goods big whoop.

Jobs, income and unrealised expectations
- This is pretty much specifically how everyone was expected to prosper as a result of neo-liberalism and haven't, with unemployment way up, income way down. Wasn't supposed to happen that way, pretty straightforward.

The war on information
- You're right this one is annoying. They should absolutely leave information to be completely free, just fucking do the right thing so information doesn't turn people against you fucking fuck.

Why is populism growing?
- At least they're asking the question. Hopefully their answer isn't just muh Russian propaganda. I doubt it, at least Peter Thiel will tell them the real reasons.

Russia in the international order
- Hopefully this one is about integrating Russia into the international order in a good way. Russia simply doesn't like Europe because of ... neo-liberalism, if that's out the window there is an opportunity for good relations with Russia.

Kissinger's most recent book was, "World Order."

It's one of my favorite things watching them always trying to escape their own terminology. They're not "colored people" they're "people of color" you racist! It doesn't matter if your black or white, but you're fucking a white male! It's not global warming it's climate change, and why do you deny that the climate is changing?

>jews have high verbal iq
uh huh....

I suspect the issue they are worried about with Russia is the same one they've been for years and that I have continually brought up on Sup Forums because it's pretty universally acknowledged to be a question without any clear answer.

What comes after Putin? From their perspective of course the question is more like who can we put in who will want to join our global order? But I think the more honest question is that it's pretty dumb to think that Russia is going to want to walk itself off the plank in a great orgasm of suicide like the EU did, then how do you redefine world order in such a way Russia gets to assert independence as its sees fit rather than bending over for your gay orgy?