CANADA YES!

...

Other urls found in this thread:

lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-ontario-passes-totalitarian-bill-allowing-govt-to-take-kids-from-c
ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479&detailPage=bills_detail_the_bil
ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479
quora.com/Is-there-physical-scientific-proof-that-Jews-were-gassed-to-death-in-Nazi-concentration-camps/answer/Damian-Graves
youtube.com/watch?v=TpK1gf-rw5s
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Canada is fucked
big news indeed

The Canadian government wants your children to become infertile!

This is retarded. Cite the part of the law that enables the government to seize children from parents because they oppose transitioning children. Protip: you can't.

I am so fucking glad that those aristocrats in Ottawa couldn't point to my province if their life depended on it. Fuck the federal government.

Quick rundown: Dyke Premier Wynne has just passed Bill 89, which allows for Children's Aid to seize your kids (biological/adopted/step children) if you hold anti-LGBTQ/binary gender/anti-gay marriage views and place them in LGBTQ gay-couple homes (friendly reminder that 40%+ of gays are pedophiles). Muslims/Sikhs are exempt because the bill is worded to consider the child's "creed".

“Even before Bill 89 was passed, but immediately after its introduction in December, I learned of several Christian couples who were turned down for adoption on account of their deeply held religious beliefs about traditional marriage and human sexuality,” he told LifeSiteNews.

>TORONTO, June 1, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — Ontario’s Kathleen Wynne Liberals have passed what critics describe as “totalitarian” Bill 89 on the last day before Queen’s Park adjourns for the summer.

>Pro-family advocates warn Bill 89 gives the state more power to seize children from families that oppose the LGBTQI and gender ideology agenda, and allows government agencies to effectively ban couples who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children.

>Children’s Aid agencies now have “a type of police power to bust down your door, and seize your biological children if you are known to oppose LGBT ideology and the fraudulent theory of ‘gender identity', if for instance, some claim is made that your child may be same-sex attracted or confused about their ‘gender,’” according to Fonseca.

>“We already see similar tyranny happening in other jurisdictions, such as Norway, where the main child protection service there, Barnevernet, has been involved in numerous high profile seizures of children from traditionally-principled families,” he added.

lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-ontario-passes-totalitarian-bill-allowing-govt-to-take-kids-from-c

>Bill 89
ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479&detailPage=bills_detail_the_bil

Look here

Children being scared shitless from being removed fom their parents due to opinions on people they didn't even think about.

this isn't going to backfire at all in the long run

look here:
It says,
>Cite the part of the law that enables the government to seize children from parents because they oppose transitioning children.

It does not say,
>Cite a hysterical opinion published by a crazy Christcuck website.

>breitbart

HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE ???

Canada is ruled by psychopaths.

Sikhism doesn't prohibit homosexuality tho. It's not a shitty abrhamic religion.

Canada STOP IT!

How do nations end up being ruled by complete idiots!

Praise Trump

...

...

74(2)(e)

With the destruction of consent, and the special status children were given in regards to consent to protect them, it's only a matter of time before pedophilia is legal.

Good work faggots, LGBTP indeed.

ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479

74 (2) A child is in need of protection where,
(e) the child requires treatment to cure, prevent or alleviate physical harm or suffering and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide the treatment or access to the treatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to the treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996 and the parent is a substitute decision-maker for the child, the parent refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to the treatment on the child’s behalf;

>yfw when the penectomy pill hits

>(e) the child requires treatment to cure, prevent or alleviate physical harm or suffering and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide the treatment or access to the treatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to the treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996 and the parent is a substitute decision-maker for the child, the parent refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to the treatment on the child’s behalf;

Not the guy you're replying to but how does this mean they can take your kid if you hate trannies? I don't follow, am I just retarded?

>Implying Ontario = rest of Canada
Ontario is a SJW shithole

Frankly I expected better from Orville Redenbacher

Good on canada. Anyone should be able to do what they want with their body. Fuck what the parents think.

You're a leaf, so you are tarded

i guess if you deny the "treatment" (ie hormones and puberty blockers) for a "transgender" child it automatically means you are transphobic

>Anyone should be able to do what they want with their body. Fuck what the parents think.

Is that why they get placed with LGBTQ couples? To broaden their horizons and give them a choice?

No. It's tantamount to brainwashing. Individual choice has nothing to do with it.

>Anyone should be able to do what they want with their body. Fuck what the parents think.

That is right... let the 2 year-olds decide their own fate.

The definition of abuse and withholding of treatment they use is extremely vague so the government can literally pick and choose most cases if they see fit.

take the ultimate red pill
quora.com/Is-there-physical-scientific-proof-that-Jews-were-gassed-to-death-in-Nazi-concentration-camps/answer/Damian-Graves

I'd assume even if the kid would like to be handicapped the parents would stop them from running in front of a car.

Just because a child has a stupid idea it does not mean the parents have to condone it.

Oh, so does that mean 11 year olds can consent to sex now?

See
Also chekt

What I just quoted was just the dick chopping section of the bill.

74(2) deals with all the various cases of when a child is deemed "in need of protection"
74(3) deals with the "best interests of the child" and includes the catch all 74(3)(c) that the lib SJW judges will use to remove kids from "White Supremicist" homes, and they will (see pic).

Best interests of child
(3) Where a person is directed in this Part to make an order or determination in the best interests of a child, the person shall,
(a) consider the child’s views and wishes, given due weight in accordance with the child’s age and maturity, unless they cannot be ascertained;
(b) in the case of a First Nations, Inuk or Métis child, consider the importance, in recognition of the uniqueness of First Nations, Inuit and Métis cultures, heritages and traditions, of preserving the child’s cultural identity and connection to community, in addition to the considerations under clauses (a) and (c); and
> (c) consider any other circumstance of the case that the person considers relevant, including,
>LITERALLY any fucking reason^^
(i) the child’s physical, mental and emotional needs, and the appropriate care or treatment to meet those needs,
(ii) the child’s physical, mental and emotional level of development,
> (iii) the child’s race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression,

This law is purposely written vaguely and religion is removed and replaced with "creed", which is not EQUAL to religion, but includes religion. One legislator defined it as "the core principles of a religion". Anti-LGBTQ/transgender views are core parts of Islam, Sikhism, etc, but not Christianity. This is the exemption for Muslims/Sikhs etc. Wynne used that word on purpose like that, she is a lawyer after all.

damnit meant

Long overdue.
Seriously

All hail Trudeau the cancer monk

>in recognition of the uniqueness of First Nations, Inuit and Métis cultures, heritages and traditions, of preserving the child’s cultural identity and connection to community,

Yet they refuse to acknowledge the same concerns for whites.

Fuck that. I'm saving money to move out of Canada.
I really dislike the totalitarian government.

>this shit is acceptable in the modern day
just burn it down.

>An equivalent to section 86 of the current Act, which prohibits Roman Catholic children from being placed in the care of a Protestant society, institution or family and Protestant children from being placed with a Roman Catholic society, institution or family, is not included in the new Act.

>is not included in the new Act.

It's literally a Christian hate bill. That line alone should enlighten anyone as to the context of the entire bill, which legislators are bragging is the biggest piece of legislation they've ever brought into law (it amends 40 laws/acts and replaces the entire former Bill 86 which was the act dealing with child custody, adoption, wards of the state, etc)

Remember Trudeau, is his explanation of M103: "to provide increased liberty for all by providing new freedoms [freedom from criticism] for some."

SJW want ONE thing:
the destruction of White Straight Christianity

Come on kek, will it

I say let it all burn

This is just sick.

penectomy: amptuation of the penis

>the penectomy pill has hit you
>plz post faces

>children
>consent
Those lines de facto legalize pedophilia

>treatment
>father is rawdogging his 5 year old son up the ass for anti-pedophilia treatment
>but its ok because the child consents

>mfw

Ironic as there's a push to ban sex robots

That litte dude and doggo seem pretty based

I honestly expected that kid to disappear into the puddle at some point

Time to convert to Sikhism.

I'm sure Sikhs would soon find themselves no longer excepted.

>pedophilia
But the child identifies as legal age!

>I'm sure Sikhs would soon find themselves no longer excepted.
Too peaceful a people,.

>"I'll keep watch, kiddo, do your thing."

fucking doggos are so based

>friendly reminder that 40%+ of gays are pedophiles
source? I just want to see it, I believe it

>Pic related comes up to you and tells you they identify as a 6 year old girl
wat do?

Have them adopted by an LGBTQ family.

>73%

>CUT MY LIFE IN TO PIE CES

>boy wants to try a dress
>sent to castration camp and reprogramming facility
>girl wants to play soccer
>YOU GO GIRL WOHOOOO #FEMINISM #IMWITHHER

Luckily that young 6 year old girl found a loving mommy & daddy to love her and give her kisses

>pic + vid related
youtube.com/watch?v=TpK1gf-rw5s

There is literally nothing wrong with govenment helping you get rid of the kids that went wrong. Just make sure you have spares.

>tfw you tried to warn others by acting as bad example but it backfired and they try to upstage you

Find yourself a gf that majored in psychology

Even if she's not 10/10, they're at least redpilled about these mentally ill degenerates degenerates

I don't know why I expected something else.

Holy fuck that is creepy.

Kill them all. No mercy.

so its just a shit religion

thanks got it

they're british, aren't they

They're from Toronto.

The law also makes it mandatory for citizens to report "child abuse". In particular, if someone in the public feels junior should have his dick chopped off, and his parents aren't letting him do so, you MUST report it directly to your Children's Aid Society

Duty to Report
Duty to report child in need of protection
125 (1) Despite the provisions of any other Act, if a person, including a person who performs professional or official duties with respect to children, has reasonable grounds to suspect one of the following, the person shall immediately report the suspicion and the information on which it is based to a society:
6. The child has suffered emotional harm, demonstrated by serious,
i. anxiety,
ii. depression,
iii. withdrawal,
iv. self-destructive or aggressive behaviour, or
v. delayed development,
and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the emotional harm suffered by the child results from the actions, failure to act or pattern of neglect on the part of the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child.
7. The child has suffered emotional harm of the kind described in subparagraph 6 i, ii, iii, iv or v and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide services or treatment or access to services or treatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to, treatment to remedy or alleviate the harm.
8. There is a risk that the child is likely to suffer emotional harm of the kind described in subparagraph 6 i, ii, iii, iv or v resulting from the actions, failure to act or pattern of neglect on the part of the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child.

oh, good. hope they stay there

>this thread
And to think I have a nephew that was born there.
Thank fuck he's being raised mostly down here so he won't be completely polluted.

9. There is a risk that the child is likely to suffer emotional harm of the kind described in subparagraph 6 i, ii, iii, iv or v and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide services or treatment or access to services ortreatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to, treatment to prevent the harm.
10. The child suffers from a mental, emotional or developmental condition that, if not remedied, could seriously impair the child’s development and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide the treatment or access to the treatment, or where the child is incapable of consenting to the treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to, treatment to remedy or alleviate the condition.

Ongoing duty to report
(2) A person who has additional reasonable grounds to suspect one of the matters set out in subsection (1) shall make a further report under subsection (1) even if the person has made previous reports with respect to the same child.

126 (1) A society that receives a report under section 125 that a child, including a child in the society’s care or supervision, is or may be in need of protection shall as soon as possible carry out an assessment as prescribed and verify the reported information, or ensure that the information is assessed and verified by another society.

They all do, thankfully.

The law allows for your social media accounts to be subpoenaed and examined to see if you hold any anti-LGBTQ+/White Supremacist views

>131 (1) The court or a justice of the peace may issue a warrant for access to a record or a specified part of it if the court or justice of the peace is satisfied on the basis of information on oath from a Director or a person designated by a society that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the record or part of the record is relevant to investigate an allegation that a child is or may be in need of protection.

>mommy, daddy, i wanna be a girl!
>okay son, but if you do that then the government will take you away and you'll never see us again.

This is a good thing, fuck bigoted parents . Racist and transphobic parents should NEVER raise kids.

The law not only takes your kids away for holding right-wing views (child abuse), but also can put you in jail for 2 years and fine you $5,000

>Offence of child abuse
(2) A person who contravenes subsection 136 (2) (child abuse), and a director, officer or employee of a corporation who authorizes, permits or concurs in such a contravention by the corporation is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years, or to both.

L E A F E D

a c t i v a t e i t

ohhhhhh

cannnnnnnnadddddaaaaaa

our homo native landsss

Fucking disgusting and abhorrent. The leaders of Ontario need to kill themselves.

true gay love, in all they sons commands

1984 tier

What about Muslims? Are they subject to this abuse as well or do we continue receiving special privileges?

allah keep our lands

I just moved to Ottawa and it's honestly peaceful and really laid back much like the northeast of the US

People here aren't even that bluepilled. I hope to hell it doesn't become Toronto 2.0

Diversity is Canada's Strength, eh!

what if the parents were muslim?
muslims holds anti gay views also, even more than Christian.
this gay judge need to be beheaded

> Criticize a culture who gives women the same rights as animals...illegal.
> Tell children they are not allowed to change their sex...abuse.

>what if the parents were muslim?

As long as they are not white straight Christians they are exempt

The man that wrote the sex ed. curriculum for Ontario & Manitoba was a jewish pedophile ffs

Pic related, only got 3 years for producing and distributing child porn

He was sitting beside Justin Trudeau at a Gay Pride Parade in 2013 just 1 week before being arrested and charged, pic related

lololol

Doesn't this mainly deal with adopted gay children?

There's no way it means they take your biological child out of your home for being anti-faggot - unless you're beating them for being a faggot.

Have you been downtown? It's a shithole
Somalis, Arabs and Africans everywhere, there's gang shootings daily

You must have just arrived yesterday

>Leave Canada for medical studies abroad
>Trudeau gets elected
>Gives away the entire Canadian gold reserve
>Beastiality is legalized
>Government can take your kids

Wtf, I don't think I want to go back anymore...

The irony of this post.

You get it!