When scientists figure out the genome and identify preferable traits(regarding IQ for example) voluntary eugenics start. They'll harvest ~10 eggs from the woman's ovaries, inseminate them with the man's sperm, identify the most preferable embryo and let it grow to a full human. This should eliminate most of the arguments for racial purity for preserving a high IQ population. Of this happens, will you still promote purity with aesthetic and historical arguments etc?
Personally, I'd find eugenics like this morally questionable but once it starts happening people will likely start doing in en masse.
Parker Foster
This will never happen.
Andrew Gutierrez
It'll likely happen within the next 10 years.
Brandon Robinson
How much for 180 IQ Aryan eggs ?
Julian Young
>en masse
Please show a realistic way 'en Masse' can become a genuinely significant number vs the world population of several billion people.
Not happening anytime this or the next century.
Evan Reed
not if (((they))) are concerned.
Aaron Hill
Eugenics are banned because it is Nazism. Are you Hitler?
Cooper Anderson
it will happen only in china faggot, they do experiments on every kind of living organism. Souless hellspawns
Kayden Russell
seems safer and less likely to result in botched genetic monstrosities than actual gene editing.
Colton Mitchell
lol they can even price it out by how big the sample is
10 egg $$ 100 egg $$$$$ 1000 egg $$$$$$$$$$
Christopher Long
>Souless hellspawns If there is one thing i like about the chinks,it's their lack of immorality. They don't care about humanity as they are getting focused on getting the job done.
Isaac Davis
>it's 1935 all over again
Ryder Howard
China and some other Asian countries might do it in a large-scale, not the West though. We will lag behind a decade or so atleast imo.
Gabriel Wilson
>I WAS SUBSAMPLED OUT OF 10000 EGGS YOU 10 EGG NIGGER
the new form of racism
Christopher Carter
eh. better make some robots first.
Brody Morales
so, a couple problems with this scenario
1) if you took ten eggs from the woman's ovaries, the resulting embryos would all have very similar IQ's, as IQ appears to correlate most closely between mother and offspring, not father. this means only certain women would be allowed to breed in the first place - which, y'know , actually isn't a bad idea in general.
2) in your scenario, identifying the "most preferable" embryo doesn't make sense unless you inseminate the 10 different eggs with different sperm.
even more likely is that you identify a man with desirable target traits, and a woman with desirable target traits, you cross check to make sure there wont be any recessive traits leading to congenital disease, and then you breed several offspring from them.
this is less "eugenics" and more "human husbandry" and I fully support it.
Aaron Rodriguez
its already doable for things which are easily tested for like congenital diseased. its not even that expensive. its only a matter of time before they identify the genes associated with intelligence.
Oliver Perry
>This is less "eugenics" and more "human husbandry" and I fully support it
People shit on husbandry in general as if the entirety of our continued existence hasn't been humans making certain animals fuck other animals to produce certain traits.
Noah Long
>its only a matter of time before they identify the genes associated with intelligence. A few hundred have already been found. Maybe that's enough to get started?
Juan White
>>unless you inseminate the 10 different eggs with different sperm >implying anything else is even possible >>this is less "eugenics" and more "human husbandry" and I fully support it. >distinction without a difference
stop trying to hard to sound intelligent, kiddo
considering there could be thousands its probably not worthwhile trying to select for IQ yet. anyone who can afford it should still do it purely to eliminate congenital disease. theyve also got superficial things like height and eye color mostly figured out. we gattaca now.
Hudson White
Actually this. Many traits require more than just specific genes, they need right enviroinment on top of that. Basically, large parts of human population possess genes related to both positive and negativie traits which never show themselves due to circumstances.
Dominic Clark
>>unless you inseminate the 10 different eggs with different sperm >implying anything else is even possible
from different men, you mongoloid. thought that would be implicit to most intelligent readers.
>>distinction without a difference
quit being an idiot, kiddo.
Eugenics and Husbandry carry dramatically different connotations nowadays
