Are nu-males a phenomenon that naturally emerged as a reproductive strategy by weak males...

Are nu-males a phenomenon that naturally emerged as a reproductive strategy by weak males, or is it a trend socially engineered to weaken Millennials so they don't rise up against their relatively lower quality of life? Nature or nurture, Sup Forums, what's responsible?

Other urls found in this thread:

encyclopediadramatica.rs/Nu-male
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Are nu-males a phenomenon that naturally emerged as a reproductive strategy by weak males
Yes.
>is it a trend socially engineered to weaken Millennials so they don't rise up against their relatively lower quality of life?
Yes, although their quality of life is quite good compared to the past.

>Are nu-males a phenomenon that naturally emerged as a reproductive strategy by weak males

Yes. While I don't like using /r9k/ terms for their blanket mindset, it's males who don't have the capacity to be "chads" but , at the same time, have some degree of social proficiency.

It's the same tactic used by those "m'lady"-type fedoralords except the strategy is actually somewhat successful for nu-males.

You're saying it's both though. I'm asking if them all looking the same and being progressive pushovers is a natural trend followed by losers who think this will get them laid, or if this was planned to keep young white males from rocking the boat.

Its too much comfort + too much estrogen + shit genes (needing to be a sneaky fucker) + ((()))

Please describe this phenomenon.

And the other guy is saying it can be both.

Perhaps some nu-males started using their combined hipster-style and outspolen progressive politics and it caught on as people picked up that it gained female approval. After that (((they))) started pushing the trend since it slots nicely into the agenda

Ithereise it could be the other way around, a trend started as a form od social control that caught on because tumblerite college slags apprived of it.

Right. It is undoubtedly a little of both since these people have to have a reason to follow the trend in the first place.
covers what are the most salient possible influences. The rising levels of estrogen is undeniable and alarming, for example.

What I'm asking, I suppose, is how much of it is socially engineered. Were the thick beards to compensate for insecurity over their masculinity planned in advance? I'm curious how much intelligence agencies plan to this stuff out or how much of it is noticing trends and jumping on them.

are they different from Dandyism or Fops?

Good question. They don't seem to be as concerned with high fashion. But perhaps they have the same sort of influences.