Why do muslims believe that Mohammad was the most perfect human being?

Why do muslims believe that Mohammad was the most perfect human being?
He did the most grusome, brutal and cruel things a human can possibly do. Just to name few, he tortured a Jew to find our where he stored his shekels and later married his wife.
He even cut off the hands and foots of a criminal and gouged his eyes out and let him slowly die in the hot desert.
I didn't even mention all the mass beheadings and rape he ordered.
He turned 1001 nights in 1001 nightmares.

He sounds strong

Unlike that faggot Jewsus and his gay pedo Church killing the West for the last 800yrs

>He did the most gruesome, brutal and cruel things a human can possibly do.
And they look up to him and try to follow his example.

>Killing Jews and criminals
I don't see what's wrong? Would you spare a guy like Jeffery Dahmer?

Because they are stupid as shit.

MOOHAMED IS A FALSE PROPHET

Galatians 1:8
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

>The Massacre of Verden was a massacre of 4,500 Saxons under order of the Frankish king Charlemagne in October 782.

shit wasn't all rainbows and your feelings back in those days.

I know, but a guy who claims to be the prophet of god should have known better

Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) said: “Whoever tells you that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to urinate standing up, do not believe him. He only ever used to urinate sitting down.”
Sahih al-Tirmidhi No. 11

Strange pic

Looks like Jesus with makeup on

How can any sane person follow a man like Muhammad who:
(1) let young boys watch him clean his private parts (Bukhari 1:4:152)?
(2) sucked the tongue of a boy (Musnad Ahmad 16245)?
(3) dressed up in little girl's clothes and women's clothes (Bukhari 2442)?
(4) slept with or had sex with a dead female body in a coffin or grave (Kanz al Ummal 34424)?
(5) was a pedophile (Bukhari: 5:58:234, 236; 7:62:64, 65, 88)?
(6) said to consume house flies (Bukhari: Vol. 4, Bk. 54, No. 537)?
(7) commanded to drink camel urine (Bukhari: Vol. 8, Bk. 82, No. 79)?
(8) admitted to having a devil (Muslim: Ch.14, Bk. 39, No. 6759)?
(9) confessed to being demon possessed (Ishaq: 106)?
(10) told false revelations (Tabari VI: 107, 110; Ishaq: 166)?
(11) encouraged adherents to lie and break oaths (Ishaq: 365; Tabari VII: 94; cf. Ishaq: 519; Bukhari: Vol. 7, Bk. 67, No. 427)?
(12) or sex with animals (Abu Dawud 38:4450)

Because there dumb sand niggers

>Sup Forums will actually eat up this shit and think it's all true

>Why do muslims believe that Mohammad was the most perfect human being?
They are grusome, brutal and cruel. Next question.

How does your country avoid the idiots in the countries around you?

Did you made a deal with da Joos?

All his clothes were always covered in cum. Aisha describes scraping the cum off and sponging his clothes before she would let him leave the house . She describes him going out with wet patches that she had sponged and were still wet.

Just sand nigger things

We are a pretty secular state compared to other countries around us thanks to our king

Yeah we did ally Israel and the US which is why we aren't in a shithole

Men at the age of 18 must serve in the Jordanian military
But that changed when we made a deal with Israel to stop the military serves for people when they reach 18 years old

The military serves used to help people to be able to be more disciplined.

It is all true, Bukhari is considered one of the leading Sunni sources.

No i's not.

some of these are just lying and the other is just out of context

SHOO SHOO AWAY WITH YOUR TAQIYA

Give me 100$ and I will

...

*blocks your path

Muslims worship him not because he was a good guy, but because they're fucking shitheads who wanna do the same shit he did. Fuck them.

And even without Islam all that things still happens in your shithole of a country

dahmer was a nice guy

Not to mention he was muslim

Sunni Muslims view this as one of the two most trusted collections of hadith along with Sahih Muslim

>No i's not.

bn al-Salah said: "The first to author a Sahih was Bukhari, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl al-Juʿfī, followed by Abū al-Ḥusayn Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj an-Naysābūrī al-Qushayrī, who was his student, sharing many of the same teachers. These two books are the most authentic books after the Qurʾān. As for the statement of Al-Shafi‘i, who said "I do not know of a book containing knowledge more correct than Malik's book," – others mentioned it with a different wording – he said this before the books of Bukhari and Muslim. The book of Bukhari is the more authentic of the two and more useful."

Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani quoted Abu Jaʿfar al-‘Uqailee as saying, "After Bukhari had written the Sahih, he read it to Ali ibn al-Madini, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Yahya ibn Ma'in as well as others. They considered it a good effort and testified to its authenticity with the exception of four hadith. Al-‘Uqailee then said that Bukhari was actually correct regarding those four hadith." Ibn Hajar then concluded, "And they are, in fact, authentic."

>Why do muslims believe that Mohammad was the most perfect human being?
Why do muds claim to believe that said paedophile-warlord-slaver got "the word of God" while wandering in the desert, over 23 years, and then flew up to "heaven" upon the back of a winged unicorn steed...?

>pic related

>believing anything Aisha says

He sounds like a pussy compared to Gengis Khan, I mean if you are going to worship someone for his brutality and his conquers at least worship the most accomplished at those things

one hadith said that if a fly falls into your meal with one wing, let the other wing into the meal as well because one wing contains the antidote to the crap the other wing has, not that you should eat it
(8) every human has a personal devil following him that tells him to do bad stuff. prophets included, but he said in the same quote that he purified is own one.
so yeah, bullshit

and I looked through the ones i didnt know now and you can judge yourself:
(12)" 'Asim reported from Abu Razin on the authority of Ibn 'Abbas saying:

There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal."

prescribed which doesn't mean its allowed. it means there was no executed punishment for it because none was retarded enough to do so. a portion of these are from tabari, which is not even a scholar

He's nothing like Jesus!

There's a difference, though. Mexico is a shithole because a majority of its citizens are human-sacrificing Aztecs and similar natural-born savages. When they come to America, they bring savagery, but eight times out of ten the drug dealers and rapists and murderers are inflicting their crime on other Mexicans, or on the equally-if-not-more savage niggers. The Middle East used to be civilized and prosperous, then Islam happened. And Islam is forcing its way into non-Muslim nations and leading to the mass extortion, rape, and murder of non-Muslims in once-civilized countries that have surrendered. Beaners are merely uncivilized. Islam is a cancer.

>it means there was no executed punishment for it because none was retarded enough to do so

That is ridiculous as an explanation

There are several hadiths about mohammed crossdressing with Aishas clothes, and drinking camel urine

>The Middle East used to be civilized and prosperous

Yeah I guess burying young girls alive and treat statues like gods is truly civilized in your eyes

Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.

So what should i believe?

Aisha is the daughter of Abu Bakr (he stole the successorship of the Prophet from Ali, the rightful heir). Aisha waged war on Ali (AS) .and to make herself and her father seem great and better than Ali and Muhammad she made up a bunch of lies about the prophet . The problem is sunnis venerate her and blindly believe anything narrated by her. literally almost every single negative hadith used aginst muhammad has been narrated by her.

The people who spread these Aisha schizophrenic tall tales always leave out the fact she was at war with the Prophet's family after his death when she made up all these stories in speeches during the wartime.

a source to this hadith?

If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal's penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.
Sahih Muslim - Book of Menstruation - hadith #525 - Commentary

It's ok, fuck as many goats as you want Ahmed

>f a fly falls into your meal with one wing, let the other wing into the meal as well because one wing contains the antidote to the crap the other wing has, not that you should eat it

this is what muslims actually believe

>Aisha schizophrenic tall tales

She got fucked by him when she was 8-9 years old, and he used to hit her a lot, no wonder she hated him

again, another aisha lie. the marriage was arranged when she was 9 and consummated when she was 20. Also, she literally slept with another man thats why he hit her

>the "weak hadiths" meme

Die in a conflagrant fire, you eisegesic, brain-rotten, mud moron.

Aisha was the Hillary Clinton-ISIS hybrid of her time. a nasty,nasty woman. Nothing she ever said can be trusted.

>again, another aisha lie.

Wrong. we have tons of other sources other than Aisha:

Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.
Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236

Being forced to marry at age 9 must have been swell.

He was one of the best men on the face of the earth.

You can't help but fall in love with him.

Al-Bukhari had related, from ‘Ubayd b. Isma‘il, from Abu Usama, from Hisham b. ‘Urwa, from his father, who said, "Khadija died three years before the emigration of the Prophet (SAAS). He allowed a couple of years or so to pass after that, and then he contracted marriage with ‘A’isha when she was six, thereafter consummating marriage with her when she was nine years old."

>Muhammad ibn Isma`il al-Bukhari al-Ju`fi was born after the Jumu'ah prayer on Friday, 19 July 810 (13 Shawwal 194 AH) in the city of Bukhara in Transoxiana[6] (in present-day Uzbekistan).[2][7]


Surely, we can believe the Uzbek intellectual born 200 years after the prophets death to know every minute detail about his life! He could just google it and write it!


Sunnis are a fucking cancer

Wait a minute thats sexist!!
Why the fuck does a man get killed but a woman gets away with it
>Shiites

Next, the Prophet… married Um Abdallah, Aishah, as-Siddiqah (the truthful one), daughter of as-Siddiq (the truthful one) Abu Bakr ibn Abi Qu’hafah, whom Allah has exonerated from above the seven heavens. ‘Aishah bint Abu Bakr was the beloved wife of the Prophet… The angel showed Aishah… to the Prophet… while she was wrapped in a piece of silk cloth, before he married her, and said to him. "This is your wife." The Prophet… married Aishah… during the lunar month of Shawwal, when she was six, and consummated the marriage in the first year after the Hijrah, in the month of Shawwal, when she was nine. The Prophet… did not marry any virgin, except Aishah… and the revelation never came to him while he was under the blanket with any of his wives, except Aishah
Ibn Qayyim Al-Juaziyyah

>Surely, we can believe the Uzbek intellectual born 200 years after the prophets death to know every minute detail about his life! He could just google it and write it!

Now wait a minute, these hadiths are very well studied. Bukhari had an excellent method.

Look up the Bukhari method:
The isnad, or sanad, is the chain of narrators. Since the narrations were passed orally from person to person, it is important to know who heard the narration from whom before themselves. So if Bukhari collects from Person D, he wants to know who person C, B & A were (of course the isnads are longer).

Adl,
This refers to the reputation of each Muslim sub narrator in the isnad. Each 'link' in the chain must be established first, then the reputation/character of each 'link' must be evaluated. If they were known as a pious, honest Muslim, then the narration passes this criteria; however if one (or more) of the 'links' was a known liar, or had doubtful character, then the narration did not pass and was rejected.

so he's a girl

>Surely, we can believe the Uzbek intellectual born 200 years after the prophets death to know every minute detail about his life! He could just google it and write it!

We can, I will explain:
The majority of the narrations in Sahih Muslim and Sahih Bukhari are narrated by Aisha herself. This places her as the 'start point' of the isnad. However let us take some creative license with who she told (isnad) and their character ('adl) so that we can better illustrate the point of Bukhari's criteria and the inherent problems with a 'telephone game' hundreds of years long.

If Aisha only passed the narration of her age onto 3 people (It's Aisha who tells us how old she is - hence "narrated Aisha"). The people and colored strips connecting them, in the diagram to the right, represent the different chain of narrators (isnad).

If there happened to be a chain that Bukhari 'caught' the end of (represented by the black strip in the diagram), that does not connect back up to Aisha, or there was a 'weak link' (an untrustworthy Muslim, represented by the red person in the diagram), then that narration would not be accepted.

So Bukhari goes to collect the narrations, and he finds 6 people who do not know each other, who report to him the exact same narration regarding Aisha - including all the details; i.e. that she was 6 & 9 when married and consummated.

>ibn alqayyim
>born 1350 AD in Syria and knew and related stories from people who lived in another part of the world over 700 years before he was born

Again, sunnis are fucking cancer, lies upon lies upon mythology upon lies, all perpetuated by Aisha and the various sunni dynasties that were fore-runners to ISIS. All mythology and lies to discredit the Prophet and make their false Idols Aisha and Abu Bakr seem like paragons of virtue

Look. you have sunnis, nice, you are 10% of muslims.

That means 90% of you religion is literally corrupt as you claim, thats a big problem, no?

Brain washing

Ever sect that they don't follow is wrong.

did ibn alqayyim also see 6 people who knew Aisha personally and heard the stories from them? Regardless, if Aisha were to say "grass is green" she would still be a lying whore
we are not the same religion. go throw their terrorist ideology at someone else's doorstep. our religin is entirely different than theirs, we have just had the misfortune of their blight on the Holy Prophets name, and the fact that their psychotic murderous ways translate to more earthly power which explains why they are the majority: psychopaths flocked to them like they do to ISIS today

>"The Prophet urinated in a standing position" Bukhary
OR
>"The Prophet never urinated in a standing position." Hanbel.

>Gaber Ibn Abdullah said, " The messenger of God prohibited a man from crossing one leg over the other while lying down on his back " Moslem
OR
>Ebada Ibn Tameem said , his father said that he saw the messenger of God lying down on his back in the mosque while crossing his legs." Moslem

>Sahih Moslem, Abu Hurayra said, the messenger of God said, "Do not drink while standing up, if someone forgot and did it, he should vomit what he drank."
OR
>Ibn Abbas said, "The messenger of God drank from the water of Zamzam while standing up...." Sahih Moslem.

And the best of all these hadiths
>Sahih Bukhary 97/24, 10/129 and comment on verse 68:42 "On the day of Judgment, God will open His leg and show His thigh to the Prophet."
"God will show His leg to the believers and they will fall prostrate."
(NO HOMO)
Should i even bother with hadiths?

Really makes you think

>We are a pretty secular state compared to other countries around us thanks to our king

[citation needed]

>Should i even bother with hadiths?


He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah: But if any turn away, We have not sent thee to watch over their (evil deeds).
Qur'an 4:80

If you do not know what the messenger said, how do you serve allah?

not all the hadiths are credible dude just don't bother reading them

Just read the ones that are 100% credible

Because the social construct of Islam is like socialism kinda - people get money from not working ...

This is one of the reasons the left likes it

>He did the most grusome, brutal and cruel things a human can possibly do.
Because of that he was the most powerful alpha man ever.

>Just read the ones that are 100% credible

the ones that Bukhari, due to the method I posted above : >128820463 , are legitimate

Our king isn't some Islamist fanatic

I wouldn't be surprised when the religious citizens find this out and rebel, just like what happened with syria too.

Well he should've made it more obvious like the quran
How can i find a lie from the truth?

answer me

>How can i find a lie from the truth?

I'm not a muslim, can't help you there, you have shias and sunnis bombing each other arguing what the truth is...

>Just to name few, he tortured a Jew to find our where he stored his shekels and later married his wife.
>He even cut off the hands and foots of a criminal and gouged his eyes out and let him slowly die in the hot desert.
>I didn't even mention all the mass beheadings and rape he ordered.
This is fucking why. Man was BASED.

>did ibn alqayyim also see 6 people who knew Aisha personally and heard the stories from them?

I am simply describing Bukharis method and using an example, not attesting to the methods which others used, but since Bukharis confirms others, it seems reasonable to assume the hadiths are accurate

>Shitskin detected.

We have even sunnis bombing sunnis(isis)

You have a giant clusterfuck of problems in the entire middle east and north africa, I guess believe what you want to believe, and what you think the truth is for you, no one else can decide that.

No Imam, Priest or any other person can tell you what the truth is.

Just if you do embrace a truth, don't be surprised if someone asks tough questions about it

these guys are simply delusional

Burgure pls that's not what happened

Assad started the civil war when he attacked a peaceful protest

They were protesting against the police for the bad treatment and Assad ignored the police crimes which made the Syrian citizens protest against him. Assad then send the army and attacked the protest which lead to the civil war

Honestly I would rather Assad's govrenment win rather than the so called fsa which is now isis