BASED

>basically of you're a terrorist, you may not deserve some human rights

Other urls found in this thread:

quora.com/Is-there-physical-scientific-proof-that-Jews-were-gassed-to-death-in-Nazi-concentration-camps/answer/Damian-Graves
m.youtube.com/watch?v=jSIbau4jdOE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>could
>may not

Fuck off you blue pilled idiot. Nothing will change. All the UK leaders are cucks prostrating themselves for islam.

We are in the middle of a war between Islam and Zion people get woke here and tell others
quora.com/Is-there-physical-scientific-proof-that-Jews-were-gassed-to-death-in-Nazi-concentration-camps/answer/Damian-Graves

>implying this will in practice only apply to the nebulouse term terrorists

Immigrants shouldn't have any rights to begin with.

>"we need to make harsh new terror laws"
>gets to pass said laws
>she lied, these new regulations are actually aimed at crushing nationals resistance to globalism and muslim immigration
Oh ok.

>Relax it´s just for "terrorists"
well that proves my theory that mass mass immigration caused terrorism is just a tool for elites to deprive us of every single freedom and human right we have.

Remember: a vote for mummy is a vote for a pat on the head

>May: ... and crack down on extremists even if they can't be brought before the courts

Reminder that this will be used against the native English who dare to question their own displacement.

Didn't Bush do the same thing? Tortured terrorists all day long at Guantanamo because fuck 'em

they'll sure stop when they read about this

Daily reminder that the only reason torture has regained a place in the playbook of white-majority nations is Jewish influence.

Fuck off, I'm not voting for this establishment globalist shill! Fuck the press and fuck you!

Gee, as if fake terrorists care about losing 'some' human rights, lol
As long as they have right to rape the host population and free housing, no requirement to work, lifelong rights to bludge and breed out of our muslim breed-mares simultaneously and a revolving door policy by kike judges any time they're found raping and eating host populations children and swans, muzzies are fine
So go hard May, you're really impressing us and frightening muzzies
not

slippery slope.

not this at all fucking faggot

they'll take away human rights for EVERYONE if they "get in the way"

...

>based
haha fuck off idiot

Inb4 patriot act v2

People are talking on the Internet about politics being full of trannies, and the hoaxing of the news. Police training drills reported as real events. I'd say its more to do with clamping down on that.

Animal Rights are for animals.
Human rights are for people.

Terrorists aren't people so this is a good thing. If you do heinous acts like these, you forfeit your membership.

>it's a patriot act episode

>may was always a globalist
>(((they))) handed her the reigns when Brexit passed
>thinking (((they))) wouldn't make the right look like retards for this

She's losing on purpose.

Are terrorists still animals cause last I checked you can't waterboard a puppy.

And being white = terror.
I see where this is going.

Those were foreigners. Foreign citizens technically don't have rights.

No, terrorists are nothing. They are scum and should have no rights at all. Soft approaches lead to more attacks, much like how staying silent causes a bully to think you're easy prey and will torment you for years.

Put the fear of oblivion back itno them, that not even Allah can save them from the pain.

Round them up. Close there mosques. Banish them forever. They are murdering and raping children in your country. Zero Tolerance

I don't see as there's anything as a "human right" to begin with, but is this woman off her rocker or is this actually improving her standing in the polls?

White countries

Remember, Remember....

m.youtube.com/watch?v=jSIbau4jdOE

exactly,

Do you idiots understand how authoritarian states are created? This has happened at least a dozen times in history, always in little steps like this. No excuse to be a complacent retard because "durr well i'm not a terrorist".

It's just so sudden, obvious, and brazen. I still can't come to grips with any explanation other than that she just wants to gtfo.

How can accelerationism possibly be worse for us? Our relatively libertarian societies aren't working for us, at least if our countries become more draconian there will be greater backlash against them.

is she like a sarah palin? everything i see about her is more and more retarded.

always. can never have too many hammers in the white genocide toolbox.

>A muslim country deciding who are terroritsts
nice one bongs

But if you give us money it´s okay even though you kill the citizens of my country.

>May playing the anti terrorist card.
>As if her track record of sucking up to muslims didn't exist.
>Still going to rape the internet.

Vote Corbyn and enjoy the cosy feels and salt.

Politicians are as crooked as the state allows them to be. Theresa is eroding away our human rights and laying the foundation for future totalitarian rule Trust me, you don't want that when Britain eventually gets a muslim Prime Minister.

But terrorism shouldn't even be on the map. Of course there's a big fucking problem with ISIS cells everywhere, and a vote isn't going to convince them to go home and repent. This whole thing is ridiculous.

What the hell happened to brexit, and if you do care to stop terrroism why is this not the fundamental issue?

>Wanting Corbyn to win
>>>/R/eddit

Can you name one time accelerationism actually worked?

But whatever. As long as you do your best to encourage the backlash, not the acceleration.

this desu

the UK is doomed

>see an article about that earlier today
>scroll down to the comment section, expecting the worst
>basically just everyone saying that citizen rights are sufficient and human rights are only being used as Trojan horse by hostile forces

Kek

Don't even know why human rights is even a debate.

If you decide to revoke or plan on revoking or support revoking someone elses human rights against their will then your own rights should be automatically forfeit. Terrorists, murderers, rapists, etc. Don't deserve these rights because they have taken them away from other people.

>But terrorism shouldn't even be on the map.
Yeah, great. But Theresa's only solution to this is to erase our human rights instead of tackling the problems at the source. Running our country like spinning plates, preventing danger right when it's about to occur instead of just eradicating the evil in our society from the source.
Trust in our own communities is eroding and an even larger police state is emerging as a result.

It's the difference between using disinfectant and slapping on a bandaid, and I do not trust that our rights will return once the problem is finally dealt with.

That's fucked up. She can't do that, trying to play God. Everyone is entitled, end of.

Corbyn's brexit will be much better for the country.
May is going to turn this country into a tax havens for her mates, and kill civil liberties and free speech with unnecessary laws, instead of admitting she fucked up by buttfucking the police.

anglos are the most cucked people on the planet

reeeeeee but that's exactly what we're trying to avoid BLOODY SORT YOURSELFS OUT DAMN IT EVEN WITH HALFWAY MAY YOU'RE SO CLOSE TO MAKING IT

>to be used against "extremists"

So basically anyone and everyone the government deems one.

>if you want to stop terrorism, you're going to have to be okay with it when we kock your door open at 3 am to make sure you aren't posting any islamophobic content on the internet that will make more peaceful innocent muslims feel unwelcome and radicalize

The Weimar Republic perhaps? I can't picture the state of the west getting any better without getting a lot worse first.

In Weimar you at least had social cohesion, a willing and capable labor force, and no Jewish central bank holding you back.

If the only option is to crash the plane then print out your doom paul memes so that you have a workable currency during a grid down situation.

Go away reddit

>Foreign citizens technically don't have rights.

That is pretty much what "human rights" are. They give foreigners a tool to force foreign governments into complying with their demands.

Doing my part for freedom.

This.

>Muslims rape 1400 girls
>pass laws banning protests
>Muslims blow up concert full of little girls
>pass laws censoring the internet

Saged

If you're going to try and pretend to support labour, it helps to not read their party lines verbatim.

Corbyn is a socialist loonitic that's going to raise taxes to record levels and crash the economy. He also said he'd rule out a no deal on brexit, letting the EU fuck him any which way it wants.

They're both completely shit, the only thing left to argue over is which is LESS shit.
Economic collapse or sliding towards a Draconian shithole.

>reddit trying to convert Sup Forums
>again

How often do they have to fail before they stop?

that law would never be abused....no...

i need more mummy shops

The problem is they can apply that to anyone they want. Now if it was just for muslims who were terrorists then that would be most agreeable.

I really want to have sex with Theresa May.

>i need more mummy shops
same.

we need a thread for more mummy shops.

Hey pollacks the british election is upon us help the UK out by bumping my thread and sharing the video on it to get people to back a hard brexit, blessings of kek and shadilay brothers.

The women in you're country must really be next level dirt for you to want that. I pity you user.

That's the general problem, yes.

On the one hand if you want Muslim cunts to be expelled you have to suspend some basic rights to get rid of them.

On the other hand, Sup Forums would never trust the government to not use those same tools on them later on (or exclusively).

So basically you are stuck with them forever.

That's true but still. I like her dramatic accent.

>The women in you're country must really be next level dirt for you to want that. I pity you user.

WOT U NO LIKE GILF THICC ASS?

GILF BUMP

Really laying it on the line hard isn't she
You MAY lose some rights
In fact, your free bus pass might be suspended for 24 hours

She wants to ban porn for fuck sake! She's insane not because porn is not degenerate but because she wants to even attempt to waste money and manpower on trying to do something this crazy!

Ha!

Alright, so I was correct all along about the odd sudden Corbyn support. Although I have to say the Sup Forums shilling overall has improved over the past few months. It used to be you could barely hold a conversation with the opinion pushers.

What was the law banning protests?

Can I get some sauce with that?
Thought it was London but could not find results

World citizenship is a contradiction in terms, for human rights can only be guaranteed by the nation state for its citizens within its territory. This is because the founding value of the nation state, much like the preferential treatment we give to our kin, is based on loyalty. It's citizens can claim their rights according to the loyal fulfillment of their duty to be and act according to the nation’s ideas on a meaningful and active citizenship. Which, much like our familial ties, means in ways that are beneficial to the unity of kin.

The same goes for the state that exists for its citizens and gets its authority from its citizens. If one understands the nation state as being founded on loyalty one understands that world citizenship, being loyalty to all, is in effect a loyalty to none and can be enforced by none. As such human rights should only apply to the citizens of a nation state within its territory, for only the democratic nation state can be held accountable for its actions by its citizens to the benefit of its citizens. No supranational or non-governmental organization can enforce rights or be held accountable for their actions by anyone but the nation state, they should thus never be put in a position of power or authority above any nation state and can and should be persecuted by the nation state when it's actions damage the authority or sovereignty of the nation state and the people it represents. Since the nation states ability to act is bound by its territory the nation state must have control of its borders, for it cannot be able to guarantee the rights of its citizens outside of its territory without damaging the human rights of the citizens of other states. For the same reason there must be made distinctions between citizens and non-citizens of the nation state.

The road to citizenship for non-nationals should be a long multi-generational process and should not apply to people that can't or won't revoke their citizenship to other nations. Since loyalty, which is the core value on which the nation state is founded cannot be shared. Double citizenship is thus also a contradiction in terms. The nation state should also be able to revoke citizenship it has given individuals and make stateless people who are not born and bound to its territory historically when they act against the laws or the spirit of the nation state, or act in ways that undermine the authority and sovereignty of the nation state - for rights are meaningless without duties and trust is given rather than taken.

This isn't necessarily anti-terrorist, it's anti-freedom for everybody. Don't let your hate blind you, this is bad news.

Exactly this.

This, obviously, you idiots. It's going to be used against us. Islamic terrorism is a drop in the bucket in comparison to the (((disruption of commerce))) that would result from a widescale uprising against globalism and multiculturalism.

Our human rights laws are shit, mate, and should be scrapped. We didn't even have them before '97.

Meanwhile in reality it will be
>Muslims rape and murder 15000 children
>2 months community service in a kindergarten

>Guy teaches dog to sieg heil
>Gets tortured to death for being an evil nazi

ignore that nonce

mummy is beautiful

I do not mean to understate the potential for untold death and suffering during such an economic collapse. It could make the Black Death look like a child's story.

However, were the worst to be avoided, the population by and large would suffer through a reset like it has throughout history and then get back on its feet. The economy is ephemeral and fluid. Mass demographic and ideological shifts are much less easily abated.

I believe it's the movie called Children of Men, which you weren't wrong about taking place in London.

Human rights don't exist.

and people say corbyn is a terrorist supporter...

.....you don't know history

You seem to have misinterpreted what I wrote. I agree with you. Destroying our gene pools and cultures in the name of making slightly more money for rich bankers is fucking retarded.

>for terror fight
Is this some new Mortal Combat shit?

And they will use these laws against anyone they perceive as far right not muzzies.

trips

>implying the defining of "terrorist" isn't a slippery slope

You do realize that one day, news/journalists labeled by the mainstream as "fake news" now, will in the future be called "news terrorists", right?