We REALLY need to get the racist Russian agent impeached!
We REALLY need to get the racist Russian agent impeached!
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
is this a porn intro?
holy shit that fucking picture
probably the only towelhead that has passed the 6th grade
>switched platforms
So now liberals pretend to have basic education
Yeah, And then they switched platforms AGAIN in the 2000's, ya dumb bitch. Seriously, I was with my Grandpa on a trip to a Fishing Place, and I saw these Mexicans picking Crops physically in the Sun. You know where I live? Washington. Blue State. Democrats.
>switched platforms
what does that mean? we dont have that here. did the 2 parties agree to take each others voters?
can someone American explain the switching parties in the 1960s meme
And yet abortion is literally the pre-natal black holocaust.
So does that mean FDR was actually a Republican?
Trump isn't a racist...unfortunately.
>switched in the 60s
FDR and Truman weren't conservatives.
She's partially right.
Resorting to 'the Democrats were FOR slavery' is an incomprehensibly irrelevant point when discussing contemporary politics and the clear change in direction of the party over previous decades.
Also, sage and
Nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger.
After the civil war I think it was two senator's switched that's it. In the 1960's there wasn't any big change in the parties. They just made it up so people didn't know that the Dems were the party that fought for slavery.
>bring in and enslave thousands of blacks
>open borders for millions of mexicans
>but we're the party of the people
Why is anyone replying to this?
sage
> switched platforms
wh-what? do they literally think both parties just decided fuck it, lets switch ideologies I'm bored with mine
It's bullshit.
The democrats blocked civil rights legislation and had a KKK grand wizard senator until the 90's.
MLK was a registered Republican and pro gun.
It's just that the commies figured out they could utilize the blacks to sow division around that time, so they're trying to take credit against all evidence.
look up some dinesh d'souza talks on youtube, he explains it very thoroughly
Every democrat ever: my head is too far up my own ass to see that the party now practices implementation of economic slavery
You see, in the 1960's, all of the US' politicians decided to pull a prank on the average voter and swapped the names of their parties without telling anyone. Just to keep people on their toes.
It's complete bullshit meant to act as a smokescreen for all the shit that the Democrats once backed, but now consider immoral. While each party has changed their opinions on issues over the centuries, there was no "switcheroo."
Kim K superstar
This is the biggest lie told in US History-- the Democrats never really "changed platforms". They just needed to do something about the Civil Rights Movement, so they signed the Civil Rights Act, which abolished Jim Crow laws, then passed massive entitlements for people who were poor to stay comfortable while poor (food, housing, healthcare), and so the black vote has been cucked for them ever since (96% of them still vote Dem).
>Politics switched at the end of the 60's, because the democrats realized their racist ways
>Except when FDR was in office, he won WW2, so we agree with his fiscal and economic policies because they mirror ours now
>But they certainly switched after the Civil War before FDR though
>But our ever division of groups to keep them in check, yelling appropriation whenever a group tries anything they should, isn't racism
Also remember:
- Lincoln was Republican
- Most of Woman's Suffrage was Republican (and pro-life)
- Most of the civil rights movement was Republican
I'd be ashamed as shit to be a democrat with their track record.
This factually be refutes the whole entire op post pic
Democrat switch video
And keeps blacks "on the plantation" with welfare programs instead of vocational education. It's funny how it's in their best interests to keep blacks poor and stupid, and that blacks keep voting for them.
ahh, the famous party switch...
>they switched platforms
except they didn't, LBJ only pretended to favor "civil rights" to control it and "have those niggers voting democrats for the next 200 years"
he succeeded too.
To be fair, it's not like the GOP is any better. The legacy pf Reagan's foreign policy started the global epidemic of radical Islamic terrorism. The USA govt generallly is bad news.
They never switched. This is democrat bullshit.
No Republican ever owned a slave. Except Grant, but he was a Democrat at the time.
Google D'Souza.
>Many other comments
Many anons already know this. Good.
Beautiful
Yeah I'm just saying own it. Dems are literally the Jim Crow party (still are) because they will go after anyone in their groups that doesn't fit the mold. Look at any black Republican that speaks against them. They are harassed, told they are representatives of their kind and literally called Uncle Toms.
Democrats still are racist, but racists with smiles now.
Can you name a single government on Earth that has been good news?
>Muh Putin!
criticize him too publicly and you'll go to prison or turn up dead. Russia has remained a very corrupt country under him.
>Muh Assad!
whether you believe all of them or not, Assad has for sure used chemical weapons on his own people at least twice. Even if you believe all of the other times are falseflags.
>Muh Europe
longest history of shit governments leading to shit wars and shit oppression.
>Muh Canada
lel....just lel.
>Muh China!
again, lel. + legalized economic slavery.
>Muh Latin America
2nd worst governments on Earth
>Muh Africa
worst Governments on Earth
seriously, where is a good government to be found?
What a dumb cunt
>all these cuckservatives recommending D'souza and acting like the civil rights movement was a good thing
That's irrelevant to the question of whether or not Democrats are the party of slavery. It's undeniable that they are.
Lincoln's biggest fault was not following through on his plan to ship the nigs back to Africa.
She probably still thinks America is a patriarchy, and that black people should get reparations for slavery.
Um, no sweetie. That is sooo 60's.
>Russia has remained a very corrupt country
Russia will always be Russia... doesn't mean it makes sense to support fucking Islamic terrorists just to bother the drunken bear
>Assad has for sure used chemical weapons on his own people at least twice
Assad's government is the Syrian government, and no Saudi/US puppet will ever be better for Syria
There is really no proof of these chemical attacks and I see no motivation for the Syrian air force to do it. Assad turned over his chemical weapons to the UN inspectors afaik. al-Qaeda and Islamic State would have far more motivation to use crude chemical attacks, considering the SAA was (and is) winning without it. But if fumes from a weapons plant hit by a Syrian airstrike cause people to choke, America and the Sunni Islamist rebels America supports insist it's a chemical weapon attack. When civilians choke in, for example, Mosul, from toxic fumes/dust left by a Western airstrike, there is half hearted condolences from the USA
Syria, Libya and Iraq are all hotspots for al-Qaeda, ISIS or both now because of the USA
>Europe
Some parts are far better than the USA, you should travel Europe
>Canada
I admit it's bad here
>China
We can agree on that too
>Latin America
>Africa
well yeah
>democrats before civil rights movement: segregationist
>democrats after civil rights: herd blacks into public housing away from whites, I.e. Still segregationist
The words may be different, but the results are the same.
Doesn't believe the Democrats are racist despite mounds of actual evidence, does believe Trump is a Russian agent despite no actual evidence. Sounds like you stopped after you passed the 6th grade.
using a random picture of a kardashian as a reaction image just proves your dumb af
like saying the nazis switched platforms in the 50s so they arent responsible for the 6 million jews anymore.
>had a KKK wizard senator and blocked civil rights legislation until the 90's
>promote welfare status for blacks to keep them under the dem party thumb
>not contemporary politics
you are out of your element here, clearly you are like 16 years old. Try to pick up a bit more knowledge before the next time you try spewing up online.
Hiding your replies.
switching platforms is convenient
>switched
kike lies
George Corley Wallace Jr. (August 25, 1919 – September 13, 1998) was an American politician and the 45th Governor of Alabama, having served two nonconsecutive terms and two consecutive terms as a Democrat.
>democrats were pro-socialism in the 30s
>parties switched platforms in the 60s
>democrats are pro-socialism in current year
explain
Jewish lies. Basically, in the 60s the Democrats changed strategy to get black votes and open the borders to retain power. There was no party switch.
JFK has his brother get MLK out of jail to try and get black votes. Nixon tries to do it as well but doesn't have the back room connections to judges to do so. A fair number of Blacks jump over to the dems because they still have a shitty quality of life, and maybe the dems will give them stuff. JFK is like holy shit this might just work starts up a push for the civil rights bill after being elected. Huge pushback from dems, until JFK gets killed. His death allows the bill to go forward even though more dems opposed the bill than supported it. Republicans being the party that freed the slaves vote for it. LBJ is sometimes credited with a quote along the lines "I'll have those Ns voting democratic for 100 years". LBJ introduces the great society turning the ghettos into vote plantations. Blacks turn Lincon's picture to the wall and vote dem ever since, leaving the majority stuck in the vote plantations to this day.
yup, fdr was actually a republican
That doesn't make her right at all. Her point has little do with that, stupid bong.
Lincoln's plan to ship Africans back to Africa was stopped by congress.
(((Congress))) meaning the mind blowing night at the theater?
Sure, but only because digging ANYTHING up that far back and pretending it says anything about their current character is silly. However they want to eat their cake and still have it too: America must apologize for slavery, but the democracts don't have to.
>switched platforms
it's a fucking myth used by dems to save face, look it up
>parties switched platforms in the 60's
>"I'll have those niggers voting democrat for the next 200 years."
>switched platforms
I hate how many of those faggots actually believe this shit.
>Parties switched platforms in the 60's
no they didn't, fucking ragheads don't know American history
Nice try, foreigner.
Don't post if you're just gonna randomly put words together.
>lmao they just swapped ideologies senpai
Zero critical thinking skills
Dems are always about power, control, and political expediency.
They opted to pay them to not riot for gibs
with our money.
Democrat party should have been abolished under Civil war 1
Bullshit. This shit has been going on since recorded history, atheist.
>things parties did in the past
I find that type of argument so repugnant. Why the fuck do I care what one politician from my party or their party did 50 years ago or even 5 years ago unless that specific person is the issue at hand?
It's like when someone attacks Trump's kid and the Democrats defend it saying people attacked Obama's kid. Ok but Obama's kid isn't the one being attacked right now and how does the previous action justify the current one?
What matters is the issues of today not the wrongs of the past.
So they teach kids in 6th grade that the parties "magically" switched sides so they can blame everything in Republicans..
Cute
>the democrats used to be republicans and the republicans used to be democrats. Derp derp.
Tell me more about how women's suffrage is strengthening the west...
Doubt this moron passed 6th grade because the Democrats are still pushing slavery and the oppression of the poor. Leave it to the muslims to try and bullshit their reasoning. Tell us more what it's like to be lesser than a dog, woman.
Everyone mentioned in that tweet is a fucking faggot. If there was a party that promised to enslave niggers I would vote for them in a heartbeat.
That's bullshit, Reagan didn't fuck around with the rag heads
SERIOUSLY YOU RIGHT WING RETARDS ARE SUCH FUCKING MORONS.
WHAT IS YOUR ARGUMENT? THAT DEMOCRATS ARE RACIST?
DEMOCRATS ELECTED THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT. HE WAS THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. HIS NAME IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.
WHAT NOW RETARDS
>The legacy pf Reagan's foreign policy started the global epidemic of radical Islamic terrorism.
You think radical islam started in 1981?
...
Read a book faggot. The Dems and Republicans had a meeting and agreed to switch platforms.
>stuff doesnt matter if it happened in the past
>the past is just spooks!
go to bed, sthriner.
Check out this fucking faggot, kys you liberal cunt
that's great leaf, you can post pictures like a big boy. That still not an argument.
Saying it with tits doesn't make it true.
The Democrats merely modified the implements of enslavement in the 1960s.
>passed 6th grade
>believed everything a teacher told me because she was a 'cool lady'
That sounds so legit I'm not even going to look into it further, I'm just going to #resist!
>Parties switched platforms in the 60's
If that's the case, why are the democrats trying to enslave the underclasses on welfare?
So if tomorrow a politician from the opposing party started supporting a law/position you really were for you'd oppose them because that party has done things you don't like in the past?
How about the KKK was founded by democrats
and how democratic legislature is purely anti colored people
>tfw this guy later got put in the watchdogs registry
Globalist radical Islam wasn't a thing before the fighters were armed by your government.
It doesn't matter, niggers and minorities will ALWAYS vote for MORE GIBS. Uncle Ben Carson is an exception.
Holy fucking shit. I knew this board has some fucking retards on here but I did not know it went this far. How the fuck can people deny the Southern Strategy and the realignment of political views that took place thereafter?
Absolute barmy. You Americans are fucking nut job hicks. God damn.
Goldwater, JFK and Nixon.
Basically the republican line was, we are going to get the government completely out of your lives black man, so you'll be free to do whatever you like.
The democrats said, we'll use the government to increase your status in society. Blacks have believed this is what the democrats are doing ever since.
It's worked great hasn't it?
>We REALLY need to get the racist Russian agent impeached!
regan is dead bruh
They didn't switch. That would imply the gop suddenly went in favor of slavery.
The only thing that happened is that the gop said:
"you're free now, we'll help get rid of segregation but that's it, you are free individuals now, live your lives."
The democrats saw that the gop was losing the black vote and jumped on the reparations train in order to keep influence. The reality is that most of those democrats pre_sixties were still democrats post sixties.
Nothing switched, the democrats just stole the ball when they saw the gop weren't going to carry it any further.
This 100%.
They were switching things up before the 60's actually. The main thing to pay attention to is the north and the south. It's always been a metropolitan liberal north vs a rural conservative south.