DRUMPF TRAVEL BAN BLOCKED

AGAIN!!!

HAHAHAHAHHAHHAHA

PRESS S TO SPIT ON DRUMPF FOR BREAKING HIS PROMISE!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MmWJMuC_Jx8
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Off yourself, Mike.

>Mr President I think you should stop tweeting it's not going to help your agenda

Gorsuch

>trump broke a promise because obama stocked the court with judicial activists.

drumpf fails again because he hates the fact that the constitution says every person has a right to be an american because borders are just manmade lines on a map.

>9th circuit

Greatest Democracy on Earth

6 out of 10 9th circuit judges are registered Republicans. Stop defending him

why even have a president and congress if the courts can just decide everything for us

its almost as if the president has the constitutional right to regulate immigration and the unelected unappointed judiciary is overstepping its bounds

>banning people based on nationality is just and fair

this is nothing more than a simple-minded knee jerk reaction.

Is 9th circuit same as the supreme court? CBA to google.

>9th Circus
As if this was a surprise. Everyone knows SCOTUS will be the final authority and we have Gorsuch now.

pepper your angus for loads of it

No, the 9th circuit is retard land that even companies avoid.

/r/prematurecelebrations
gorsuch

>don't take him at his word, take him at his feelings
t.trumpfags

Were you the Grab driver that raped their passenger?

Your "art" sucks. Thanks for chasing away all our good drawfags, bitch.

6 out of the 10 judges were Republican appointees. Another failure for Trump because he can't shut up

Dumbass shouldn't tweet.

now it goes to the supreme court where these lower courts will, AGAIN, get BTFO.

all these lower courts are doing, is losing credibility.

>the unelected unappointed judiciary

oops
>There are currently 179 judges on the U.S. courts of appeals authorized by Congress in 28 U.S.C. ยง 43 pursuant to Article III of the U.S. Constitution. These judges are nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate.

...

It's like they want the 9th circuit to be disbanded and reformed.
>80% of decisions are overturned
>still keep going

>The courts will support the travel ban this time, says increasingly nervous Trump supporter for 9th time

Obama banned people based on nationality, if "banning people" means preventing them from entering the US

What's it like being a shitposting manchild?

This is the first time Trump has possibilities in the Supreme Court with Gorsuch

Trump is like a teenager boy trying to have sex with a catholic qt raised by strict parents.

Daily Reminder

the United States courts of appeals is 1 step below the Supreme Court
the court of appeals is split into 11 different courts, each with its own part of the US that it works in

>Having such a poor understanding of that statistic

Of decisions from the Ninth circuit that were reviewed by the Supreme court, 20% were affirmed, 19% were vacated, and 61% were reversed.

However, only 0.15% of Ninth circuit decisions are reviewed by the supreme court. So 99.85% of Ninth circuit decisions go unchallenged.

Banning people from failed states that can't or won't confirm who is a citizen and who isn't is perfectly fine

Is that the famous 'WINNING'?
why did Sup Forums push for that clueless President?

best sex ever, though

t. israelite

>courts

one court. the supreme court. and they will side with trump.

the lower courts are irrelevant in this case and are a temporary roadblock. once the ban passes the supreme court, it will set solid precedent for further, much harsher, travel bans. and those the lower courts will not be able to stop because they will be overruled.

the democrat machine is going to die because we are going to stop travel from all brown countries, and it's all because they wouldnt stand down for 6 muslim terror countries.

lefties eternally btfo. goodbye voting bloc. by 2020 the US will be back over 75% white, and climbing.

>Laughing at the only man doing something about terrorism

We know who to blame when the attacks happen and its not gonna be trump.......

youtube.com/watch?v=MmWJMuC_Jx8

>6 out of the 10 judges were Republican appointees
you mean easily bought neocon shills

>implying most terrorists aren't US citizens who get indoctrinated over the internet

all you need to be a terrorist anymore is a car and a knife, you end up doing as much damage as you would with a gun or bomb.

Too bad Trump doesn't have to listen to these fascist judges. His authority supersedes theirs.

He was trying to be transparent about this, gave everyone a chance to get with the program, or out themselves. Now is the time to take off the kid gloves.

>not using named DC

S
dumb old fat man, literal moron

Got any statistics to back up that cartload of bullshit?

Yes it is just and fair for the citizens of your country you retard. This country was fully okay with and actively banned more than half the world from immigrating to this country for 2 centuries.

> The ban was only 90 days
> The Time period is already over
> Any person has had over 1/3 of a year to get into the country now
> The banned countries barely had any immigration with anyhow.

The only thing this would do is strengthen the executive order powers, which conservatives chimped out over during obama's term.

Also why doesn't Trump go through congress? He has majorities in both houses.

>His authority supersedes theirs

This could not be more wrong.

You are a baldfaced liar.

>We lost 80% of the games we played.
>But we only played 10% of the games we were schedule for
>Therefore 92% of our games weren't losses
>We're a great team!

>Implying the travel ban would actually do something about terrorism

Some reminders:
There is zero evidence that current US vetting procedures are inadequate
There is zero evidence of an unmet need in our national security that would be fixed with the travel ban
There are no examples of terror attacks that would have been prevented by a travel ban
Attacks by muslims on US soil are committed by immigrants who have lived in the US for many years or second generation muslims

In short the travel ban is a piece of knee jerk legislation based on rhetoric with no evidence supporting the rhetoric. I'll also remind you that when the DOJ tried to appeal the block of the first travel ban, they were asked to provide similar evidence by the judge overseeing the appeal, and were unable to do so.

Hmmm... U.S. citizens? Did they happen to be Muslim? Did they happen to recently emigrate here from a Muslim majority country? Hmm just like how most of the terrorist attacks in England are just caused by English people!

OHHH STOP TWEETING. Trump's tweets are his #1 presidency's killer. What the hell is the guy doing?
I bet he is going to complain about it on twitter later on.

Hold on a second.

Why doesn't Trump just keep signing executive orders (with essentially the same text)? There is no law against signing more executive orders with the same text. Just keep issuing the same decrees. Sure they will keep blocking them, so you issue another and another. If anything it's a political statement.

How about we just keep everyone out of our country and stop trying to legitimize communism? Faggot

>tells me I have poor understanding of that statistic
>goes on to make the stat even worse because he doesn't understand stats

I'm assuming this isn't from the supreme court or it would be spammed everywhere

i know it's bait but it still makes me mad
so have a (you)

>arguing the obvious

Daily Reminder

(((((((Republicans))))))

Who the fuck said life is just and fair?

Mate it's not what it does or doesn't do that concerns me. It sets a precedent and shows how weak the presidency has become. Any attempt at defending the borders will be shot down, if even a measly temporary travel ban can't get passed.

There are no examples of terror attacks that would have been prevented by a travel ban
Attacks by muslims on US soil are committed by immigrants who have lived in the US for many years or second generation muslims

I am going to assume you are baiting, because this is quite the fuck up in logical thinking.

>unpopulated wilderness

Only the major cities matter.

9th Circuit is reversed 85% of the time.

Looks good for Trump at SCOTUS.

>The text is constitutional but we don't like what you've said so it's unconstitutional
Hmm these rulings really make me think

If you do something about terrorism, you lose

We can't vet people from those countries, because those countries are failed states with zero infrastructure for identifying people and handing over records.

Holy fuck you liberals are not only idiots but suicidal idiots.

>by 2020 the US will be back over 75% white
this is the burgers version of superpower 2030

Which is why we just need to ban any muslims coming into the country and make life here unlivable for them.

>presidents have banned foreigners for decades before this
>it's a legitimate power the president has
>keep blocking it

to be fair, it wouldn't have worked very well since it excluded Saudi Arabia and the vast majority of islamic terrorists are all funded and deployed by the terrorist monarchy of Saudi Arabia, followed by Pakistan or some other mudstan country.

Barely anyone lives in that red bit you fucking incompetent neet.

Thats why the electoral college exists you fucking retard, so the degenerate state of California doesn't control our elections

>Also why doesn't Trump go through congress? He has majorities in both houses.
So that he can expose the rats hiding in our legal system first.

droompf is finished

just in time for more cultural enrichment trucks

he'll be vindicated if anything happens on july 4th

Next you're gonna try to say that a nationality-based travel ban is racist

cant he just make a deal

>Dem appointed judges blocks Trump policies

WOOOOOOOOOOW IT REALLY MAKES ME THINK

we must ban cars and knives!

>paying more for only a tiny improvement

Think just a little bit harder. It means that when these people immigrate, they are vetted and cleared. Radicalization that pushes them to commit attacks happens while they are living in the US. It's a process that occurs entirely within our country. This is not something that can be stopped through changing vetting procedures or blocking travel.

the 9th has WAYYYY more than 10 judges you fucking dipshit

you totally don't sound like a spineless fag.

now you are starting to ask the jewish question.

>the president has the constitutional right to regulate immigration

So long as he or she does not violate the Constitution. The President is not above laws, and certainly not above the supreme law of the land.

The Judiciary is a check on the President's power, and there is ample evidence that Trump's "travel ban" is designed to keep Muslims out. That is a violation of the Constitution.

By English citizens who were born there, yes, actually.

Wtf. They ruled on what was said after the fact. Is this real fucking life?

>Implying vetting relies on the infrastructure of the country an immigrant is from

Potential immigrants are vetted for 2-3 years by the state department and every single intelligence agency.

This. The left doesn't seem to understand legal precedent - if he didn't get it to the supreme court, it could always be overturned later on.

If the supreme court sides with the travel ban, it gives Trump a free pass to ban any country he likes, and it couldn't be overturned. Mass detention of banned nationals and deportation back to banned countries would be perfectly legal.

Obama kicked out 2.5 million - does anyone think America is suddenly going to change this policy?

the constitution does not apply to foreigners, especially ones not even in our borders.

>with Gorsuch

Gorsuch is not going to ignore the evidence of an anti-muslim animus just because he's conservative. Judges do not rule according to party lines.

won't the supreme court just overturn it?

>9th circuit

did anyone actually think this wouldn't happen?

yeah, unelected, did we vote for them?

>there is ample evidence that Trump's "travel ban" is designed to keep Muslims out. That is a violation of the Constitution.

No it's fucking not, it is entirely up to the executive to decide who and how many, or none at all.

>Arming the puppetmaster of ISIS is fighting terrorism
Top kike

YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON
THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT APPLY TO FOREIGNERS
WE CAN BAN LITERALLY ANY NATION, FOR ANY REASON, AT ANY TIME
WE BANNED THE FUCKING KRAUTS AND JAPS WHEN WWII WAS GOING ON
I'M PRETTY SURE THERE WAS FUCKING ANIMUS FOR THE JAPS WHEN WE WERE PUTTING THEM IN LITERAL CAMPS YOU FUCKING SHILL
KILL YOURSELF.

It applies to the United States of America, which means the Constitution prevails. The ban is not banning people from entering Canada, for example.

You didn't vote for your President, the Electoral College did. Otherwise Hillary, who got the most votes, would have won.

Not a direct democracy, remember sweetie? It's a Republic ;)