Greatest nazi redpill of all time

>-Germany was screwed over at the end of WWI (which Germany had won) by the treaty of Versailles
>-Hitler created over 6 million jobs in 2 years and made the greatest economy recovery in history

>-Jews made up 2% of the German population yet comprised over 50% of media, 70% of judges, and nearly 100% of the banking system
>-Hitler was compassionate towards Jews for example agreeing to let them immigrate to Palestine with all of their assets from 1933- start of WWII and arresting Germans who participated in Kristallnacht

>-Poland started WWII by killing 58,000 ethnic Germans living inside Poland
>-Hitler proposed a 16 point peace plan to avoid war, Poland refused to even look at it, and Britain refused to publish it because the British citizens would find it fair and side with Germany
>-Russia and Germany invaded Poland together but the allies only waged war against Germany

>-270,000 Jews were killed in concentration camps as reported by the International Red Cross (mostly from allied bombing and typhoid)

Which red pill was hardest for you to swallow?

Other urls found in this thread:

wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/wrsynopsis.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland
gen.lib.rus.ec/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Faurisson
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Sunday_(1939)
youtube.com/watch?v=3C-KHt9vi5k
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

More proof the invasion of Poland was justified
wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/wrsynopsis.html

the biggest redpill is that the nazis are still in hollow earth and were the first (in this cycle of civilization) that build flying saucers

Sources please.

Are you the kraut that makes those Antarctica threads?

>-Germany was screwed over at the end of WWI (which Germany had won) by the treaty of Versailles
Oh please, Germany was even harsher to the Russians. Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.

yes, but mods are assholes and delete them or move them
so i kinda rolled back and make now threads once a week or so to stay under the radar and make mods now draw special attention to this.

Look at all this unsourced Nazi propaganda disinfo lmao you lost get over it

You lost too
Look at the state of your country

The best justification for the invasion of Poland is simply the fact that the western provinces and the corridor were German. 100% culturally, historically, and otherwise.
The treaty of Versailles was a shameful act of dishonor, the Germans had full rights to retake their rightful territory.

What was stupid though, was believing the Soviets would actually help them against Britain and France.
Fuck. The. USSR.

The war's been over for 80+ years now fuck off

>Which red pill was hardest for you to swallow?
That the Bloody Sunday (le poor oppressed 58 gorillion germans) you're talking about took place 3 days after the invasion, not before.

It's absolutely hilarious how stormfags spergs that leftists have somehow knowledge-resistant minds.

The stupid thing wasn't signing the treaty with the USSR in the first place. It was breaking it.

>stormfags
Oh shit it's the Polish conspiracy theorist who thinks the Germans evacuated Warsaw and burned it down during a rebellion (which is why the only witnesses are rebels)

I have no clue what you're talking about. But I got used to it already lol.

Mate.
The USSR violated it first, the whole point of the agreement was the Soviets would invade at the same time to force the Brits and French to say "fuck this" and disregard their alliance.
Probably wouldn't have happened that way but if the Soviets had held up their side of the bargain WW2 would have been VERY different.

Is this true?

Yes.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland
They delayed their invasion for 16 days. Gave enough time for Britain and France to react by declaring war in response and then went in themselves.
Britain and France didn't declare war on the Soviets because of that "fuck this" attitude the pact was made to use but never did.

I'll read up on it. What I meant was the pact with the USSR as an ally. Which he broke when he invaded them, did he not?

Well as far as the NAP went yeah the Germans broke THAT first.
Still a huge debate going on about whether it was justified DESU I think cancelling Sealion/bombing industry instead of RAF bases and bailing Italy out in Africa and the Balkans was what broke Germany in the end.

And by that I mean if they had focused on taking out their biggest threats before dealing with the Soviets it might have gone a lot better

gen.lib.rus.ec/

aaaaaaaaaand /thread

They don't call it Weimerica for nothing

...

>Ideololgy

The D-Day invasions were necessary to prevent a Soviet conquest of Western Europe

This is what happens to people who write sources against the narrative.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Faurisson

>1 post by this ID
>when you google the statistics all you get is older Sup Forums threads
I like Hitler as much as the next Kekistani, but don't do shit like this dawg.

I think the only real redpill from ww2 was the fact that it was not a simple good vs evil fight, and that all sides did atrocious things. Sup Forumss obsession with Hitler is actually pretty silly considering that despite what you said in the first part of your post he screwed over Germany pretty hard, it was much worse off then after WW1. I mean Prussia had been COMPLETELY destroyed, yes he did some progressive and intelligent things but at the same time he made MANY simply stupid military decisions. For example he could have easily turned the people of the USSR against their own government as many people were dissatisfied with communism, but instead he treated Slavs as sub-humans and as a result had to deal with not only fighting the communists, but literally fighting all the Slavs of eastern Europe. Now I know this isnt the place for a moderate meme-less post like mine but pls is just my opinions.

How does Hitler making dumb military decisions contradict any of what OP said?

Dr.Mengele will treat all obongo insurance subhumans for free

Honestly, I had no trouble accepting germany's innocence in the war.

It was harder for me to realize that america was an inherently evil nation that has only served to further jewish goals.

Coincidence that a central bank was formed in 1913 in US, when all of europe was bankrupt and was able to loan them money so they could kill eachother in higher numbers?

Friendly reminder that income tax exist in the US to this day to pay interest to that very same bank.

But it was essentially a race, right? between Germany and the Soviets, they both wanted as much land as possible, so they were both going to invade and take what was theirs, and the faster you invaded the better, because it meant you would end up with more land.
I thought that the NAP was signed to prevent Soviet and German disputes over land after the Soviet and German forces collided in the middle of Poland.

is this why Patton was on the western front?

Meanwhile you lend lease the Soviets all their trucks? It does not follow.

Fucking leaf. Actually it does because OP is painting him as greatest leader of all time and that he dindu nuffin. Yeah not so much. I especially like the fact hes trying to say Poland started the war with Germany. Yeah that massacre was real, but it took place AFTER Hitler invaded Poland. Hitler was the aggressor, its pretty simple, but at the same time yes Britain and France didnt declare war on Germany to defend Poland, they just didnt want Germany becoming a superpower.

go to /his/ with this, dead serious.

> le repill
Why killing germshits squatting on your land is a bad thing. We're soon going to be doing the same btw, eat your heart out.
> also 6 gorillion
Lmao

Why should we help Nazi Germany who is stronger then the USSR and would probably win the Eastern Front with US aid/support when we can help the USSR keep the eastern front fighting going, weakening both nations. At the time of the Lend-Lease I dont believe the Allies thought the soviets would make such a comeback. But strategically it makes sense, keep both enemies fighting each other.

>Which red pill was hardest for you to swallow?
None. By the time you stumble upon each of these facts, by reading WW2 history, you're usually kind of expecting them by then. For me it all started by reading Patton's biography. The things he was thinking before his car "accident" were basically that "we fought against the wrong enemy", and that the entire war was being done to put the Jews in power everywhere. The minute he realized this, he died. There is so much fucked up shit to learn about international politics during that war, especially about the Allied countries. I can't ever feel proud of my country's role in either of the wars ever again.

No the Germans legitimately thought the Soviets would be friendly and the Soviet diplomats helped the delusion. Even the peoples of the two countries for a time were friendly and thought they were the two big red states in the world.
It degenerated pretty fast as the war came on.

Your reasoning is sound but I think Hitler's idea was that the Soviets were the bigger threat, not the British, because he correctly assumed that Britain would be unable to launch a land invasion to recapture France at this time. This was before The US joined the war. Even with the US helping, Normandy was still a very close and very costly battle, the allies came very close to losing a battle that they 100% needed to win.
Hitler probably wanted to take on Britain after defeating the Soviets, which would have made sense since a full out war against the UK would mean leaving his naval army vulnerable. (He would have to end up losing a huge amount of naval power fighting the UK's fleet) The soviets also had a powerful Navy, and submarines.
I don't know enough to say what Stalin would do against Hitler, if he would broken the pact or not.

Can I get a rundown?

>fucking lead
Oh hey newfriend

OP said that Germany was fucked in Versailles, that jews had massively disproportional influence in Wiemar, that Poland treated its native Germans (on land that should never have been given to poland) brutally and that Hitler tried hard to avoid war that Poland was clearly provoking.

The post I replied to didn't respond to any of that.

>The best justification for the invasion of Poland is simply the fact that the western provinces and the corridor were German. 100% culturally, historically, and otherwise.

That is just a sort of hindsight propaganda. Hitler was rightfully paranoid of his generals and some of the German elites. He also despised some of them from the first WW1 and considered them cowards for giving in.

>Poland started WWII by killing 58,000 ethnic Germans living inside Poland

source, I doubt more than 1/10th of that number were actually killed.

Have the hardest redpill:

Hitler was an idiot.
Had he cleanse the jews smartly, like Stalin, under the whole "enemy of the people" premise, we wouldn't have muh 6 gorillions argument.

Even moreso, Jews in Israel would be seen as another breed of terrorists blowing shit up.

Also, instead of attacking cesspool of degeneracy that was USA, he attacked USSR which was on it's own tracks to dejewication through Stalin's purges.

Hitler fucked things up by starting a war that not only he could not win, but he lost, effectively locking all the nationalist/fascist movement out of the mainstream.

Faggot did everything wrong and I unironically wish he would have been killed before 1940 and replaced by... for example, Speer.

Its true but the massacre didnt occur til after Hitler invaded Poland so its taken out of context. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Sunday_(1939)

Yes, they tried to assassinate him multiple times. I would be paranoid too. You're not sure who to trust.

>Poland started WWII by killing 58,000 ethnic Germans living inside Poland

Bloody sunday occurred AFTER the invasion began. Try again, faggot. There are plenty of reasons to sympathize with the Germans. This ain't one.

Well, he's already started lying or talking out of his ass.

(which Germany had won)

You can't blame him krauts are predisposed to destroying white nations.

Also in my original post I never said OP was completely wrong or wrong at all, I simply said what think is the biggest red pill from ww2 and then my complaints about Hitler.

>Its true but the massacre
Wasn't even a massacre. It was paramilitary group who fired on Polish soldiers and weren't expecting them to return fire

The plan was to bash over 3R with USSR, bombing the survivor into oblivion. That's why murricans helped both sides, profiting hugely from that, making them into superpowers.

Not having enough Nukes and Stalin being prepared to go up to Gibraltar, if necessary, screwed the plans of allies and, ironically, moved the degeneration date to 45 years later.

Innocent civilians were killed not just paramilitary so yeah I would consider it a massacre. Was it behind the invasion of Poland? Nope.

I don't understand why killing foreign sponsored terrorists and criminals is a bad thing.

Ok that's fair. You said "The only redpill" and I inferred that as calling the OP bullshit,

I was under the impression that it was a series of attacks and targeted killings, leading up to and during the German invasion. That violence against German minorities in Poland had been common for years.

You're right.
I seriously doubt Hitler wanted to invade Britain at all though. Ernst Otto Remer claimed Hitler revered Britain greatly and when generals in the west gave calcs regarding how costly and difficult crossing the English Channel would be he resorted to air raids and suing for peace. Hell in Mein Kampf he spends a fair bit (I think the chapter prefacing the beginning of WW1 and the state of the German allies and enemies) about how Britain would have been the best ally for Germany to have and all that.

>implying the Germans even tried to cleanse da j00s
Get out of here, conspiracy nut.

Yep I dont believe any of the allies thought that the Soviets could make such a massive comback/counterattack. I mean you could predict that the soviets might stop the German Advance, and even push them back, but in 1941 at the beginning of Barbarossa it would be pretty hard to predict a Soviet victory and complete German destruction. So I think the thought was "hey if we can stall the soviet defeat or even bring the eastern front to a stalemate that would weaken both out enemies."

...

Sup Forums is always right

yeah bro hold on i'm going to type this 50 letter gibberish ass megaupload url lol
get a life
nerd

>gibraltar
Madman would have caused the complete and utter collapse of the USSR finishing that campaign.

Shit, someone invent a time machine!

Its very hard to actually see the extent of violence against German minorities prior to the outbreak of war but in my opinion I think Hitler exaggerated it and used it to turn public opinion against Poland, I think the real reason Hitler wanted to invade Poland was to take back German territory lost in WW1. But who knows.

...

Yeah, good point. The Brits are anglo-saxons, after all, so no doubt he respects them.
Why are they so good at war though, the Brits? Hitler took France in six damn weeks. He almost defeated the soviets, a country vastly larger and with much more soldiers than his own. He almost conquered an entire continent but couldn't invade an island nation of tea sipping limeys?

>tfw this alien/hollow earth/nazi schizophrenic fake news conspiracy theory probably has more truth to it than the fakepills in OP

Yes Hitler wanted Britain as allies but I dont think he was that much against invading them, I just think he thought he could defeat Britain with only the Luftwaffe.

This frog just took a big bite out of the burger.

Why was Hitler attacked by all good goy nations at the same time?

youtube.com/watch?v=3C-KHt9vi5k

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program

11. Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes.

12. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in

property and blood that each war demands of

the people, personal enrichment through a

war must be designated as a crime against

the people. Therefore, we demand the total

confiscation of all war profits.

18.We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

...

>>tfw you post on a board where everyone hates you. Where people gather from all over the world to discuss how much they hate you, but you still post and you posts aren't even good. Ever.

What

we know your game, kike.

>$0.05 has been deposited to your account

I'm surprised you T_D faggots aren't spouting shit about how NatSoc "isn't who we are" here at Sup Forums. Now fuck off to your faggot hellhole.

Why did nobody in Nazi Germany realize that nuclear weapons are the real deal until it was too late? Were they doing too much meth?

>-Poland started WWII by killing 58,000 ethnic Germans living inside Poland

Yeah sure becuase we had the most modern aviation, navy and army equipment possible, we provoked them and they stood no chance to our blitz strike that took half of their country in less than two weeks.

It is self-evident our plan has worked, no?

nazi retards dont get they killed millions of slavs poles russians and other non combantants and that dont include rapists and other shit same goes for russian army which had no control and where worse all retarded war for illuminati

>WWI (which Germany had won)
nice delusion-pill