Political orientation

I find the perspective posed by the Libertarian Anarcho-Capitalism as best fitting for myself. I wanted to know your thoughts on it, both fortes and flaws.
For those of you unfamiliar with this ideology, it proposes a stateless society in which fundamental services such as police, healthcare and education, as well as others, are provided by the free market. The ethics are based on the Non-Aggression Principle and the fact that whatever crime has no victim is basically not a crime.

its perfect

>but what if the child consents tho

My thoughts exactly, I want people to point out what is wrong with it as I myself don't seem to successfully do so.

a child cant consent you dumb nigger

I like the idea of recreational nukes

I don't believe in spontanous order.
Otherwise AnCap is the best form of anarchy.

I don't see why people tend to think that anarchism promotes criminality. Protection is a basic human need, and a profitable one business-wise. There will be protection services for all people, regardless of capital, because the free market offers services to all people accordingly. That,and the natural essence of the NAP.

wut flag is dis

Libertarian in favor of closed borders and a white ethno-state.

I frankly don't believe that coercion is necessary to create communities of people who share the same values and have similar interests.
As long as they have means of defense against dumb wannabe warlords, I see it as self regulatory, thus leading to best results.

This is something I also find to be problematic in today's society and that is solved by AnCap, yet not exclusively.
We glorify freedom of speech, yet we also accept that being racist or simply not wanting to live with blacks/jews/whites/LGBTQs is immoral and somehow hurts the individual.
In AnCap, anyone is free to build his own surrounding based on preference.

if you dont give out money to everyone who comes theres no need for borders. take a look at early 20th century US - open borders, no welfare, and 90% white population (with slavery being the main reason it wasnt 100% white). the market regulates the population and only high IQ people can live among other high IQ people.

That kind of high trust society that libertarianism or Ancap needs comes from homogeneity.

Exactly. As long as there are minorites there will never be true libertarianism. Their reliance on gimmedats and willingness to submit to big government makes them incompatible with a libertarian society.

Piratism is the truest anarcho-capitalist state and the best ideology.

I think libertarianism can coexist with minorities, but only if the people who live alongside them tolerate them. Again, in anarchy there's no state forcing you to be politically correct, because fuck that, really.
White supremacists can create their own communities and people willing to live alongside minorities will do the same.

Haven't heard of piratism yet, care to briefly explain?

Sail the high seas.
Loot other ships to increase your wealth.
Have employees who live on your private property.
Kill the employees who try and kill you.
Kill the employees who don't make you money.
If the state tries to come and kill you you just kill them.

Its all guns drugs and McNukes for us here in ancapistan

The most enlightened philosophy.

So non consensual state aggression and authority criticism is straw man how exactly. I find it fair to advocate a truly free market considering that most if not all economic problems of today stem from government involvement in economy ( see Venezuela or whatever fucking socialist state).
Plus, your argument is a god damn meme, care to explain more?

The meme is pro-ancap

>I find the delusion posed by the Libertarian Anarcho-Capitalism as best fitting for myself.

nice bro

Fuck, misread it. Well, I guess I am defensive for this ideology and it's getting out of hand. Thanks for pointing out.

Delusion in what regards exactly?

Sounds autistic as shit, and like a bunch of autists would create a lousy society just to confirm to bs ocd-like principles.
Like Richard Stallman, only bad.

in regards to believing people could function with that much freedom. The average person should not have access to whatever they want. Libertarians would turn this Country into Somalia

Saying that the created society is bad basically means that people do not want to make money. If people demand high quality services, there will be people who will supply them because they wanna get fucking rich.
It's all based on mutuality, suppliers get money and people get services that are even better than government monopolies due to competition. If your business is shit nobody will buy from you, hence you go to shit fairly quickly.

Well, today's world functions as it does because people are afraid to commit crimes due to government coercion on one side and rationality and interest on the other.
In AnCap, not only is the coercion legitimate, through self defense, which also generates fear of intervention as people's interest is to protect themselves and their communities, but it also is more efficient, as there would be private security/military and no gun control.
In regards to Somalia, you can't say it is an AnCap society if it's creation is not based on fucking AnCap ideas. It's just a country without government and principles in which the free market doesn't thrive. By the way, who do you think led Somalia into this situation other than our beloved full-of-shit monopoly?

The constitution needs to be rewritten to be much more strict on what the state can and cannot do and borders must be heavily enforced. You don't need to throw out minorities, whites can exclude other races from their businesses and schools and when they try to form their own communties they will collapse. They'll either have to get their shit together and become civilized or die off in the gutter.

*Agrees furiously*