Anarcho-capitalist thread

Since they have added the flags option I see a lot of people using it.
Good to see this.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MYXhOT1ZMEg
youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc
youtube.com/watch?v=57UBuxnicOA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I think we outnumber the Nat Socs, which includes some unironic stormfront fags, but mostly LARPers.

Sup Forums is an An-Cap board.

I'm not really an ancap but I have to admit it's as sexy flag.

Sup Forums has always been edgy libertarians trying to trigger leftists with swastikas.
come visit us at /lrg/, youll become an ancap in no time :^)

Never forget that Sup Forums was originally a libertarian board

>Be anarcho capitalist
>Have laws
>No longer anarcho
>Dont have laws
>No longer capitalist

Really makes ya think!

Ancap is pure insanity and anyone who unironically thinks that it would be a good idea needs to get their heads checked.

Money talks. If you can't into free market you simply can't compete and deserve to die.

>I think we outnumber the Nat Socs

MFW

I miss the days of AnCrap Sup Forums to be fair.

Fuck commies

...

TAXATION
IS
THEFT

Has the Bitcoin bubble burst yet? :^)

hey try googling the term "anarchism" before making retarded statements about it, alright bucko?

...

just post the original quote

>tfw i know ancap is the best ideology possible
>tfw i know that first we have to preserve the white race if i want this to ever happen
>tfw only a fascist state could achieve to preserve our race and stop the dysgenics state of our countries

...

ofcourse Sup Forums is an ancap board. Sup Forums is the pinnacle of the free market of ideas on the internet. we came here for freedom and privacy, these values happen to be important in anarcho capitalism aswell.

testing

you're in the bottom-right square of the political compass, so this is a-okay with me. yep, you're all better than communist/fascist/natsoc fedora guardians by far.

>libertardians, i.t.t.

lol no

Fuck off

kys

(((ayn rand)))

nice argument kiddo

Fuck off Pedo bear.

>pol is a sodomite board

No. Hell is for ever.

Serious question: How would an ancap country/society defend itself against a military invasion?

You're so cool, bro. How do you restraint this much edge?

It won’t. However AnCaps don’t care about their nations.

Everyone who thinks the state will just stop growing needs to get his head checked.

so are yall cool with confederates? we've got guns and good food! (and muh states rights)

well... shit

Why yes I am just shamelessly bumping to see what the flags look like, thanks for asking.

it has to you retard. the state cannot be infinite in a finite world.

What IF the child consents tho?

If you call yourself a “fascist” and support laze-fair economics you need to read/lissen to some theory. Fascism is more than just nationalism and dictatorships. youtube.com/watch?v=MYXhOT1ZMEg

Burn this shit.

Voluntary forming of an army.
Invading an ancap country should be hard tho because everybody owns guns and there is no government structure to overtake.

There’s no rules in AnCapistan.

trips I get fucking trips with a fucking recycling flag. Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the waves... yadda yadda

Without a state there is no country. If there’s no country what is there to defend. Also what about the people who’re to poor to afford a gun?

mental fucking breakdown

>He doesn't have a McPocketNuke™ 9001 "Looter-B-Gon" Shrugger Edition from AtlasCorp®
There are a number of ways it could be done. With the state of modern weaponry (nukes), it's questionable whether invasion as such is even a viable tactic anymore. If you take that out of the equation, voluntarily formed military organizations could do it. The fact that many countries (e.g. USA in the 19th century) got by perfectly fine with only volunteers for defence purposes, proves that conscription and force are not necessary to form a highly competent military. The usefulness of hordes of conscripted grunts drops as technology advances. In addition (and most importantly), any invader would face the partisan resistance of every single proud property owner he tried to TREAD on. Think 'a rifle behind every blade of grass', except with probably something heavier than a rifle.

Wow you got me.
So it will stop when it encompases every aspect of your life, awesome. Even the most limited form of government will grow at one point in time because someone somewhere will call for regulation, insulation from reality or subsidies.

Ehh Bottom right, so close enough.

this thread has autism

glory to der Staat :^)

Violation of prenegotiated contract of carriage.

I'm libertarian right.

Free market ftw

>no rules
>what is contract
>what is social conditioning
>what is basic fucking decency and ethics
What stops your pic from happening in real life on international waters? Nobody has jurisdiction there. So why don't ship captains declare themselves pirates and enslave their passengers?
Oh, yeah, because they're not fucking insane and would be arrested/ostracized from society forever if they tried.

shouldn't you have to declare the terms before they guy gets on the boat (fulfills the contract)?

Whoops

Wars require lot’s of money to fund. This money comes from taxes. Also chemical weapons can be used to crush partisan resistance.


>Implying a big government is bad.

Property owners could get together and defend their boards together, you could call that a country.

If we look at western civilisation today even the poorest man could afford a gun if he wanted to. Also people could be hired as soldiers and you could pay them by providing them with a gun.

Nah, you don't.

AnCap are okay in my book

No contract was signed. Also the free market erodes all social barriers. Why do you think gay rights started to advance at the same time the New Deal was scraped?

Libertarianism is retarded. I went through a phase where it was considered pretty redeemable, but not with the modern problems of the day.

Leftists will always destroy libertarians in America, wherever any debate can be had. That's a sad fact, but idpol means leftists btfo of libertarians every single time.

>Libertarian says that all people can have freedom and equal rights
>leftists get feminists and minorities to "positively discriminate"
>makes argument that libertarian system is full of systemic racism and sexism
>the target demographics fall for it without even thinking about it
>leftists get the black vote, point out that libertarians aren't "defending" (aggressing) their interests
>leftists promise free gibs to young people in college
>vaguely mentions reparations
>taxes raised through the roof to cover the gibs
>can't break the NAP yet
>surrounded by ideological and racial opponents, the severe declining population means free gibs loving minorities run the show now. They identify with their own people
>libertarians still think they don't have their own people because it feels racist and they're too good for that
>regressives finally feel it's time for full communism. The outnumbered, overtaxed, and regulated libertarians are finished off one by one, as they historically have been in communist states.

If that happens, you’ll no longer have anarchy.

*gets killed by kikes*

correct, thats her name

>population and technology grow
>GNP gets bigger somehow
Woah....
B...bbased gommunism??!

>Implying a big government is bad.
Ok I am part of the big government now. I can do what ever the fuck I want because I am the government.
>Be my slave and pick cotton

wew nice,

>canadian roleplayers thread

Kill yourselves

What part of 'voluntarily formed military organizations' didn't you understand? If some people are willing to sign up to risk their lives to defend their freedom, even more will donate funds to the cause. In WW2, millions of people bought war bonds, donated metal, grew their own vegetables, etc. Because they believed in defending themselves, and realized it couldn't be done without cooperation.
>Implying a big government is bad.
You literally want a government that can monitor, control and convict you for everything you do or say at every moment of your life?
Kek, changing the subject because you got btfo

Why do they have 'Pirate' AND 'An-Cap'? Same thing, no? I chose pirate because I'm an 1337 (elite) haxxors (hacker) that torrents his obscure music. Torrenting??? You might have read about it in the last 'Wired' magazine.

Yes you do because the getting together is voluntary.

Fuck off gookmoot

Long live Vulnavia

Eventually companies will simply play the role of the oppressor so I don't understand what these muh freedums charades are about.
Large companies, much like the state, don't care about the individual and would like to control him themselves.

Voluntary is the key word here, fellas. Voluntary exchange....the point I was getting at in my last post.

>play the role of the oppressor
buzzwords. either I have the right to disassociate or I am having my consent violated

>Anarchist
>Capitalist

lol

A worthy get

This 100%.
youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc

Was opposed to globalism Zionism and central banking.

Were Australian aborigines Anarchists?

why can't you people plant your standard on freedom of association? property rights and freedom of speech are weak positions. if you can seize freedom of association you've literally won the world.

...

Couldn't huge corporations become de-facto states with territories and armies?

>be natsoc
>try to understand a complex political ideology
>fail miserably
>blame Jews

Wrong. The creator has weaved natural laws into his creation. If you really think we exist in a universe we were suffer an eternal process of shitting and eating each other as life forms you are sadly mistaken and probably are a fedora shit skin.

youtube.com/watch?v=57UBuxnicOA

Ironic, considering that NatSoc will literally never happen in America.
>inb4 Yurop
No one gives a shit about that Middle Eastern shithole anymore.

>Communist
>Human
lol
No, private property anarchism is the most advanced political structure and depends on a huge foundation of philosophy, ethics, culture, etc. No savage culture respects property rights, because they don't really have the concept of production (property is that which you produce). They may not have a state, but they certainly do have tyrants - one for every tribe or village.

Not today, pendejo cappy.

*hides innawoods*

At least now I know the triggering potential when saying that all ancaps and lolbertarians are just deluded autists

yeah you're fine
I also like minarchists, even if they're retarded
we want liberty.
don't let the narcissism of small differences stop us from working towards a mutual goal
leave that for our great grandchildren.

>Every bootlicker in this thread:

Hello. Mom and dad never loved me during my growth years, so in order to fill this void in my being I need to exert my internal problems onto other human beings by participating in slavery called "government".

I actually care about people so much I think they should be required by gun point to help fund roads! So they can get to work of course...

I care about roads so much, that I'm going to completely ignore the fact that a clandestine guild of dark occult, child raping, baby eating, blood drinking, satanic, psychopathic, elite group of men that run the world and its politics through blackmail, murder, gematria, and drugs. Besides, current system does such a great job of taking care of them anyway. I've never seen a pothole in my life.

Ancaps btfo!

Glad to have the AnCap flag, just so long as Nu-ancaps assimilate with pol-ancaps, see you all in the next /lrg/

>haha, you are just dumb, you don't understand my intricate political philosophy

>have autism
>be ancap
that's it

lolbertarians and ancaps don't understand how contracts work

hahahaha

Wait, isn't what you said right only if it means he's wrong?

I mean, couldn't it be that he succeeded, and that's why he's blaming Jewish history?

You've basically presumed correctness, without explaining how you're right and he's wrong.

>call someone autistic
>this is somehow an insult even though all the great geniuses in history were and half the billionaires in the world are autistic

>depends on a huge foundation of philosophy, ethics, culture

Nowhere has ever survived on the above without extreme coercion. It seems like getting any form of Anarchy to work would be akin to herding cats. How would you even begin?

>Chains of capitalism
Fucking communist, try living in Poland dickwad, we're under around 40-80% socialism and it hurts a fucking lot.
Anarcho-capitalism means no state how can your head not comprehend this?
Fuck off and give me an argument
Actually agree, but I hate the majority of your movement because they're filthy blamers of capitalism and socialists.
White nationalists are ok in my book, socialists aren't because socialism will lead to decadence of white people.
Agreed, I saw some faggot speaking about racism with an ancap flag, fucking faggot.You want to argue with me? The rules are we have logical discussion.

The never ending story.