Define ''white''

Define ''white''.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothrop_Stoddard
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_fire_of_Smyrna
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_genocide
hri.org/docs/Horton/hb-foreword.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

lil pink dicked cuckbois.

european
this is why custom flags were a mistake

Kill yourself, kike.

Kike? No I'm not. I'm just asking a simple question. If I was a kike I'd post that version of this picture where one of them is ''superior''.

People of European decent.

BEADY

Do you think the guy in your picture is not white?

White people are those who don't tan but turn red and get blisters in the sun like the brits or the irish.

Anglos are not even human

Every color combined.

White, not off African American, native American, middle Eastern, European, or Asian decent.... In other words who cares... Fuck your race baiting

Anglos Italins, and Slavs aren't white

How is this simple question ''race baiting''? I didn't say ''X are not white''. I'm asking because there are a lot of people on this board who think only people with pink nipples are white, people with dark eyes/hair are not white, south Europeans, Slavs are not white, only north Europeans are white etc...

Like this guy for example.

You albino cave monkeys are a bunch of sensitive cuckold bruh. Keep crying white boy why don't you file a police report while you're at it

>murrican
>melting pot child
>decides who is white and who is not

But it works every time. :^)

You'll never stop them from arguing about who is really white.

There is no genetic or scientific definition, so they will endlessly argue.

>JIDF thread
sage and report all kikel threads

pink dicks are sexy af

Good thing this isn't a ''YOU'RE NOT WHITE!'' thread :^)

Mr. Fidget Spinner flag is right.

Fuck the Rothschilds, and fuck jewish "people"

People I like

I stand by it

Not you

White = European

Now fuck of Kike

white is a useless term because it's too vague and people can change the definition of it to suit their argument. be more specific. if you mean europeans as a whole then say europeans. if you mean a specific european ethnicity then use the name of that ethnicity.

Reminder

Do you ever ask other people to define what they are or do you only ask white people?

>Define ''white''.
A White person is a human being of solely native European ancestry; or a human being who, if they have non-European antecedents, is nonetheless of a physical and genetic makeup that is within the range typical of people of solely European ancestry; or, the child of two Whites.

Not really.
Role playing was always a possibility through proxies and depending on the timing and type of custom flag, it could serve as an indicator of untrustworthy people.

In the end, the actions of the individual are what will identify their true convictions. Some posts are simply too damaging to the enemy to be considered to be anything else but genuine.

To put it simply, the only way to "complete the look" will be to pro-actively aim to damage the enemy. If people aren't damaging the enemy then the shadow of doubt is upon them.

It's a win win situation.

Something you'll never be

So? I'm sure some black people don't consider somalians "black" because they have caucasoid features.

European

If you're not a cuck you're not white. Cuckoldry is the last stand of implicit white identity.

>t. kike

there was always roleplaying through proxies

I'm European so according to a lot of people in here I'm white.

Slide thread. SAGE.

>white cuck SEETHING over the fact that he can't Ad Hominem anymore
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

...

Anglos are whiter than Germanics

No, being ashkenazi jewish does not make you white.

Pure European descent excluding Turkey.
This is how "White" has been defined since the 19th century, all memes aside about Irish, Italians, etc... racialist scholars have always considered them white.

Nah I am not a jew. Not sure what even makes you think that since I didn't call anyone non-white. I thought the picture in the OP was funny.

That last map is absolute retardation desu

I stand by it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothrop_Stoddard
>Theodore Lothrop Stoddard (June 29, 1883 – May 1, 1950) was an American historian, journalist, eugenicist, Klansman and political theorist.

>Stoddard authored over two dozen books, most of them related to race and civilization. He wrote primarily on the alleged dangers posed by "colored" peoples to white civilization. Many of his books and articles were racialist and described what he saw as the peril of immigration. His most famous book was The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy in 1920. In this book, he presented a view of the world situation pertaining to race and focusing concern on the coming population explosion among the non-white peoples of the world and the way in which "white world-supremacy" was being lessened in the wake of World War I and the collapse of colonialism.
Stoddard's analysis divided world politics and situations into "white," "yellow," "black," "Amerindian," and "brown" peoples and their interactions.

>Stoddard argued that race and heredity were the guiding factors of history and civilization and that the elimination or absorption of the "white" race by "colored" races would result in the destruction of Western civilization. Like Madison Grant in his The Passing of the Great Race, Stoddard divided the white race into three main divisions: Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean.

>Some of the predictions that he made in The Rising Tide of Color were accurate, not all of which were original to Stoddard or predicated on white supremacy. They include Japan's rise as a major power; a war between Japan and the US; a second war in Europe; the overthrowing of European colonial empires in Africa and Asia; the mass migration of non-white peoples to white countries; and the rise of extremist Islamism as a rival to Western civilization because of religious radicalism. (Stoddard was Anti-Islamic and would publish the book The New World of Islam in 1921.)

The Turkey part is questionable but other than that it's pretty accurate I think?

United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964

"I know it when I see it."

The Turkey part was accurate for 1920.

The Turks engaged in massive ethnic cleansing of their Greek population during the 1920s, including the sacking and burning of Smyrna one of the largest cities of antiquity, prompting American Consul in Turkey (and witness to the atrocities) to write his redpilled anti-Turk book, "The Blight of Asia".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_fire_of_Smyrna
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_genocide
hri.org/docs/Horton/hb-foreword.html

...

Larping is fun right guis ;^3

thanks mods le based kekistan xddddd

heh
stupid goyim

>Anglo
Hmmmm

Define European.

define "slide"

Caucasian via skull shape

None of those maps fit together. You fail to create a compelling category.

Pink nipples.
Post your nipples and we'll diagnose your murky genetic history.

fpbp

They fit extremely well, T*rk

White-majory and East Asian-majority nations have higher IQs.

Higher IQ nations are wealthier, except for those that suffered under communism.

In fact the linear regression (r^2) between IQ and GDP per capita gives us a figure of 0.695 which makes IQ the best predictor of a nation's wealth in the long term.

> suffered under communism.

Would not effect IQ.

If being white means I'm a cuck, I'll have to put a sticker saying such on my work boots.... Something another race seems to lack

That's not what I said.

You can't read and interpret a high school-level sentence. Thanks for playing.

Look at the maps you posted. My claim was that they don't fit together.

They fit together with a 0.695 correlation which is extremely high for a single causation.

I'll translate for your roach brain: 69.5% of a nation's wealth can be explained by IQ.

Explain Saudi Arabia's wealth then.

Oil, falls under the remaining 30.5% of causes, retard.

>Brazil
>White
Pick one

>Define ''white''.

European + Christian.

>The middle and upper class fleeing a nation wouldn't affect its IQ score

You mean 30% of their wealth falls under oil or that their wealth can't be entirely explained by your IQ-Wealth relationship?
If former:where does the rest come.
If latter:Your theory is useless. I can fit anything to wealth at % 70 percent degree.

Define black

Europeans and most Arabs. Hate on muzzies all you want. They're white.

I think you might want to evaluate some of those (((Anglos)))

>their wealth can't be entirely explained by your IQ-Wealth relationship?
No single factor can explain a complex situation such as a nation's wealth by itself. There are multiple causes: economic policies, political stability, natural resources, IQ and others.

Of all of these, IQ has the best correlation, meaning IQ is the strongest factor, not the only one.

>I can fit anything to wealth at % 70 percent degree.
No you can't.
Show me a higher linear regression or fuck off.

>slavs
>white

>45%
>white

Again, I stand by it.

Global carbon emissions.
Those that pollute more are wealth while those that pollute less are poor.

So original. Bravo. Be proud of yourself. And if by 45% you mean US, you're a dumb kike shill.

Where is my leaf !!!

European, without being visibly hybridized. Greeks were blonde and blue eyed. Not all modern Greeks are white. Some are.

There is no confusion among non-larpers. Only kike shill thread sliders like OP pretend to be confused.

Show me the graph.

Also, that would be a Spurious Correlation, since there is no proven causative link there. If anything, pollution is the effect and wealth is the cause.

Or, in other words, 7/8ths European blood.

sage

They are Germanic you retarded fuck

You're on a site where "Nordic" has been conflated to mean "the entirety of Europe". What exactly were you expecting?

not being a genetic abomination

wow i had no idea ukraine was so poor

semen