Should sex and/or marriage between humans and animals be allowed?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/
youtube.com/watch?v=_VKWLC87Uzw
hooktube.com/watch?v=_VKWLC87Uzw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Yes, but sex should only be allowed after marriage.

Marriage is a contract between a man and woman to gain legal and financial advantages when having children. Anything else is just frankly fucking stupid and unnecessary.

Marriage is something christian. The holy bible would not allow this heresy and mysogony.
Ban all interracial and gay marriage

Marriage is a social construct so it means nothing. If a man and an animal are in love no one should forbid them doing what they want.

Marriage has existed long before Christianity, bucko

picture unrelated

But user, marriage with niggers is already allowed ...

Traditional marriage in the leading cause of autism these days. It should be banned as danger to the public health

But what about the animal's rights? How can we know that it consented to the sexual act? There should be made laws for that two, maybe a social service for sexually abused animals too.

This question gets funky when Chimera's/Human Hybrids are involved.

archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/

youtube.com/watch?v=_VKWLC87Uzw

No, because they can't consent.
>kys

>unarchived VICE
Use hooktube so they don't get views

hooktube.com/watch?v=_VKWLC87Uzw

No need to consent. Animals are just property. They have no rights. Do you ask for consent when you fuck your inflatable sex-doll?

Not on my property and if you do that shit best believe i ain't trading with you

They might consent if they seem to like it. You may like it if you try too. Who are we to judge?

No, because an animal cannot consent.

That's retarded. I'm not exactly advocating for fucking animals here, but pretending that body language is exclusive to humans is idiotic.

If a dude can fuck a mare and not get his pelvis crushed by a hoof kick, then the horse fucking consented.

You can't marry your property.
A marriage requires a vocal agreement, you need to sign documents, etc. An animal can't do that. It doesn't have the mental faculties, and it isn't a legal entity.

no, marriage is something white
>Ban all interracial and gay marriage
i say just ban all nonwhites and faggots from earth so we wont have to worry about it

Exact same argument as with kids. The laws exist to protect animals, if you want those abolished, you clearly show your hedonistic, abusive intention. So no.

>A marriage requires a vocal agreement, you need to sign documents, etc. An animal can't do that. It doesn't have the mental faculties, and it isn't a legal entity.

Sure, but an animal can certainly consent to sex. You never seen a pair of neighborhood dogs going at it?

It's just a very silly argument.

yes, in Canada

and after obtaining the consent

Definitely not. Do your really want more campy parades where the m.c. is shaking live chincilla poms poms and getting sucked off by a sedated weasel?

Let the necros marry instead. Their parades would have cool customised hearses like pic related and understated, subdued gothed out women and men all dapper with formal attire looking like the Aadams family or Bela Lugosi.

Definitely not. Do your really want more campy parades where the m.c. is shaking live chincilla poms poms and getting sucked off by a sedated weasel?

Let the necros marry instead. Their parades would have cool customised hearses like pic related and understated, subdued gothed out women and men all dapper with formal attire looking like the Aadams family or Bela Lugosi.

This is what I mean. People who would willingly shit on animal protection laws to fuck them, and claim to be concerned of the choice and welfare of the animal. Such a flawed stance. By simply keeping it in your pants, animals could be protected by these laws, but no, abolish them because no actual women want me.

Eh, personally I don't have anything against beastiality.
My dog fucking hates it though.

...

sex yes, marriage no.

animals are property.

Op you should be gassed for just asking that question
Remove yourself please

Did Marina's only come in that dark yellow/charteuse color?

Certainly he was making a slippery slope argument and not really seriously arguing for xenomarraige. We're pretty far gone if I'm wrong.

Gays will often bring up the consent red herring to justify their practices being sanctioned but continuing sanctions against sex with animals. But I can't just find some stray teen get her spayed and shots up to date and keep her as a pet or cut off some of her hair to make a sweater. The point is with animals consent is neither defined nor an issue.

The point I'll make if he wasn't is any proscription against theriophilia is just as arbitrary as found those in the third book of Moses, 1950s society or 1960s psychopathology texts.

Animals like dogs or cows can't feel sexual pleasure, is dogs can eyaculate that's isn't for pleasure, just for need

I don't think you understand. The blow up doll is not a living, breathing thing with thoughts and feelings. You're comparing two completely different things. Animals are not for you to "own" as property, but to serve a symbiotic relationship.

Because those dogs communicate with eachother, its a 2 way channel. We cant communicate with animals like that.

>muh animals

you are pathetic. animals are property to serve us, nothing more.
I am not going to fuck animals, but if someone wants to, his choice.

obviously not with an animal that isn't his own or in a way that disturbs the public order.

That's just rape at that point, what if the horse just has a concious (sp) amd just doesnt want to stoop the guys level and hurt him? Out of fear of getting killed?

Man why so negative? I just raised a question, it's not like I am a capitalist or a national socialist (which is the same thing).

Sex and marriage between 3D and 2D should be allowed, the wave of men marrying their waifus would piss off feminists so much, it would be wonderful.

As humans, we are animals. What gives you, or anyone the right to think that you can own a living thing? You are the pathetic one, sir. Thinking you're above the animal kingdom.

>Wanting to ban this

there is nothing more sickening than the betrayal of the paternal trust between a dog and its owner
This is true degeneracy for you folks

Did you know that the male bats in Canada wake up in the middle of their hibernation cycle to rape the sleeping females?

>What gives you, or anyone the right to think that you can own a living thing?

>muh reasons

>muh rights

there are none faggot. you are a sterile doubting faggot who has lost his instincts, his will to survive and to dominate. I base my claim on the established practice that predates your pathetic metaphysics by 10 000 years.

Sex yes as long as they are your property or the owner has allowed it. Needless cruelty however should be banned.
Marriage (civil partnership) no because that's stupid.

...

>Yes, but sex should only be allowed after marriage.

yep, it's really easy for any euphoria addicted bitch boy to claim a moral high ground to hide the fact that he just can't a single woman in existence to have sex with him.

>there are none faggot. you are a sterile doubting faggot who has lost his instincts, his will to survive and to dominate. I base my claim on the established practice that predates your pathetic metaphysics by 10 000 years.

>muh animal instincts
You proved my point. You talk as of your above the animals, but you act like one yourself. You merely haven't evolved enough to understand what I'm trying to say.

Resorting to vulgarity is a sign that you feel you have to defend yourself. Not everything has to be a fight. You're a plague to the human species. I feel bad for you and any friends or family you have. There is no reason to domimate, when we're all here to experience life. What gives you the right to take that away from others for your sole benefit? You are the cancer of the world.

You're right, and guess what? There is no reason to prefer continuing to live versus killing yourself, so you should probably kill yourself

If one has been given the ability to live, then one should experience that life to the fullest. Not maliciously, but in harmony.

Our society accepts owning and killing animals for food when there are alternatives or even sport.
You might not like it but that's how it is.
The fact we aren't legally allowed to fuck them is hypocritical.

fine. you can make a fetish out of your pet. I keep rabbits at home. when they die i butcher and eat them. same with my chickens. my dog never enters the home. i beat my dog when he doesn't obey and i give him a treat when he does.

>Resorting to vulgarity is a sign that you feel you have to defend yourself

t. sigmund freud. you realize where you are right? why would I even try to be civil? I don't know you, i will never know you and from what you post i can see that you are a whiny faggot who probably is a vegan and believes the earth is a living organism.

>Our society accepts owning and killing animals for food when there are alternatives or even sport.
That doesn't make it right. Just means we fail as a species

>beating your dog for not obeying
You're sub human. Your dog must have a shitty life, having to deal woth someone like you.

>dont know me, so I MUST be an enemy?
You really are sad. You're life must be the worst, thinking the worst of people all the time

>thinking im vegan, still resulting to vulgarities
Get of the house more, learn to enjoy lofe without dampening it for others around you.

Life* damm keyboard

Since when did somthing being "right" make a difference?
We are living in the real world, not some John Lennon Imagine nonsense.

That's grim. I just nursed a pidger back to health last month...

Absolutely not. But as things are going now that might be the next frontier of "civil rights". Maybe pedophilia too, age is just a number, if loli pussy was good enough for muhammed (pbuh) it's good enough for me.

Well if everyone stopped worrying about just themselves for once, the "real" world wouldn't be so terrible.

couldn't care less. He doesn't run away or doesn't fail his duties, so he'll be fine, just like the dog before him. he wags his tail and jumps up when I come along so I think he likes his master. either way, he does what I want and that's good enough. I get love from my gf not from an animal lel.

you come across as an obnoxious moralfag. combined with that flag and generic posts like "we failed as a species", "we're all here to experience life" makes me want to vomit.

I get plenty of time out of the house. thank you.

i always think pigeons are the best animals, they always look so good with their feathers and dont need to change clothes.

Yes it would and we probably wouldn't even exist.
Life is a competition.

That's how you see it, and that's also where you're wrong

>thinking has to only come from one place
You are the worst kind of person. No better than a radical muslim wanting to behead an infedel. I feel sorry for you.

If you have no morals, then you're parents did a crap job raising you. I'll just assume you don't have many friends.

Dogs are happy in the situation the other guy describes. Treat a dog with nothing but kindness and it will become aggressive, it's just their way, being subdued physically by their alpha is natural for them and they really don't give a shit about being hurt like we do. That said there are more effective methods than beating.

>thinking has to only come from one place

I don't understand what you are trying to say

you can assume whatever you want.

i knew commies fuked animals

>brony alert