Hello Sup Forums, I've been doing brief research on the holocaust for the past couple days. Do these argument on both sides sound correct? What information should I add or be aware of?
Holocaust revisionist arguments:
>Fred A. Leuchter, well known revisionist, scraped samples from gas chamber walls in Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Lublin.
>From examination, the gas chambers had questionable structure, such as ordinary doors/windows without seals and large gaps between floors/doors.
>Attempted gassings would result in the Germans dying themselves because the gas would easily leak out and kill them.
>No equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings. Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers. There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.
>He did not find any significant traces of Cyanide in all the rooms. Cyanide would prove that gassing occurred.
>Zyklon B, known to be used for gassings, was simply a lice killer and had no deathly affects.
>Not a single Jewish dead body has been examined for proof of these gassings/killings. There is no evidence these bodies really existed either. Attempts to examine the bodies have been restricted.
>There was an inadequate amt of industrial facilities and insufficient fuel to cremate such a large amt of corpses.
>Simple math proves it would be impossible to gas 6 million Jews at such a quick rate.
>Pictures of bodies are fabricated to psychologically manipulate the masses.
>The pictures prove they were not gassed or starved to death. If they were gassed, they would not be emanciated. If they died of starvation, they would have swollen joints and stomachs.
>Israel and others benefit from the holocaust in many ways. They receive billions of dollars of reparations from America. The holocaust covers up and justifies acts of the allies and Jews as well.
(Cont.)
