telegraph.co.uk
>“The ward where this fire took place is, I think, the poorest ward in the whole country and properties must be found - requisitioned if necessary - to make sure those residents do get re-housed locally.
>“It can’t be acceptable that in London we have luxury buildings and luxury flats left empty as land banking for the future while the homeless and the poor look for somewhere to live. We have to address these issues.”
Why didn't the cuckbot archive this?
>literally advocating for theft
Who the fuck is voting for this guy?
idk m8, communists?
Thieves.
Poor people with inferiority complexes
pakis
>"hurr lets scare away any potential investors and make london poorer because muh popular sentimemts n' fuck da landlawd burgeoise"
The cunt has no grasp of economics, better he wasn't made PM.
t. bootlicker
Every british kid that has a Tumblr account.
Corbyn is right though.
The majority of these homes are not lived in, they are literally laying empty. Many of the people who own these properties have multiple houses across Europe and/or the world.
The international clique owns these buildings and they are not used as homes - rather they are used as temporary domiciles to live in when they pop into London on business.
They literally sit empty 10 months of the year on average.
There is literally nothing wrong with the rich being forced to give up ONE of their many properties TEMPORARILY to help with societal needs and community cohesion.
>The majority of these homes are not lived in, they are literally laying empty. Many of the people who own these properties have multiple houses across Europe and/or the world.
>The international clique owns these buildings and they are not used as homes - rather they are used as temporary domiciles to live in when they pop into London on business.
>They literally sit empty 10 months of the year on average.
Uhh, so?
>community cohesion
>possible with a bunch of mudslimes
>Now watch as Sup Forums will step in to defend (((nationless aristocrats)))
...
>Be poor work starved Brit, unable to own a property due to rising prices
>Rent prices are through the roof, council tax is oppressive - you live from paycheck to paycheck unable to save up more than a few hundred pounds a month.
Meanwhile across on the other side of your borough are hundreds of mansionesque London townhouses that are completely empty.
The landlords of this country have been buying up FAMILY homes and turning them into 5 bedroom room rents for upwards of 300 pounds a month whilst they live off the massive profits and cream skimmed off the top so he can buy even more properties across your borough and beyond - even though he doesn't live in them.
I wonder, if this would be the case, and those rich people wouldn't agree and they'd rather demolish their homes, would your government build new housing complexes instead?
Many of them aren't even used for business, they're investments - but they sit empty in order to restrict the market and drive up housing costs.
Is it any different from the government forcing you to sell your house to them so they can use the land for some crappy road/railway?
except a globalist commie like Corbyn is absolutely in favor of this sort of international class
Aren't most of these vacant properties owned by rich arabs anyway?
LGBT
Women
Young
Coloured people
Including his own...?
In Kensington, it is 1.6% of the properties that are unoccupied. Do you think that 1.6% of properties is what is driving up the market? Or do you think it is the relentless number of people entering the country that is putting pressure on the housing market?
They'd find a way around it - the people who own London would rather see the entire country burn than see any of their precious investments be temporarily taken away from them.
So?
You can tell by the way he doesn't respect their property.
Seriously, when does Canada get banned?
What now J.K Rowling?
What percentage are for sale/rent at any given time?
They already stole the homes of the working class (ie Grenfell Towers) to house the invaders.
I'm all for forcing that bitch to take in a few somalis.
that stupid fucking bitch is so concerned about the housing crisis she bought her neighbour's house for £1million just so she could demolish it to have a bigger garden.
telegraph.co.uk
They wouldn't be making anywhere near this amount of fuss if they weren't all niggers and migrants.
They can't even identify most of them because they're illegal so have no dental or dna records.
>Globalist firms and capitalists destroy morality, family and advocate for multiculturalism and mass immigration
>They support the Left and suddenly a bit more radical Lefty comes to power, who takes equality actually literally
>pol defends treacherous capitalists
people are really dumb here. Why do you give a shit about rich globalists living in white neighbourhoods?
Im an american and I support this!
On a non related note: Rich people and business owners in the UK, come to america our government cant seize assets of non-criminals.
jezza corbs is based
Good luck finding that data - the 1.6% refers to houses that have been unoccupied for 2 years. Which covers buildings that are uninhabitable, elderly people that are in care, foreign owners and second homes.
How much property does Comrade Corbyn own?
I think the main issue is in the long term, if houses in london keep being bought by investors to sit empty as just a property then they probably will be repurposed by the government. No point having a whole city of empty buildings.
Its just the same as breaking up monopolies. That said, to say it like this sounds reactionary rather than a long term solution to the housing crisis. There are mansions which billionaires have upgraded to include sports gymnasiums and swimming pools in the basements. These are ordinary townhouses. The natives of this country will be priced out of these and if they can't sell them they'll be demolished because no-one will be able to even afford to maintain them even if the price collapses.
These investors are also foreigners. Don't pretend this is some liberal cuck trying to "help the poor" by attacking people who "work hard". These rich billionaires are foreigners, likely Saudi or Russian tycoons. I don't give a fuck about them and neither should anyone on here.
The Hindmost.
I did.
>people are really dumb here. Why do you give a shit about rich globalists living in white neighbourhoods?
Because they dont have to live with the decisions they make. IF they really though migrates were good, they would have the migrants live near themselves. Its HIPPOCRATIC.
Sure, take the properties.. After you pay the owners the fair market value (read: Not what the government thinks it should be worth, actual market value) in exchange for their property.
You know that the slimes will just destroy the homes or burn them down when they run out of swedish fish.
but why Sup Forums defends them from Corbyn? Let Corbyn do with those capitalists whatever he wants
well yeah, at least with a compulsory purchase you get paid something
Exactly. The rightful owner would never get their property back. It would be trashed within a week by the shitskins. The government would almost certainly grant them the house to them as well.
Law of the jungle now. You're only entitled to as much land and personal property as you can successfully defend.
>TEMPORARILY
>I want more kikes and Saudi terrorist funders living in my country
Neck yourself
That statistic is useless, then. If the property is occupied for ten days a year it is excluded. And you can't even put it in context. Classic kike misdirection.
Oh my sweet summer child.
open up your home and take in a victim of the fire, if your mommy will let you.
Yeah, because oligarchs buying up properties in London and leaving them a empty is really beneficial to Britain.
Kill yourselves.
The globalist swindlers should have their assets seized and redistributed to the native white population.
>temporarily
Tip top fucking kek and how do you suggest the government moves these people afterwards? You think they'll just move back into another towerblock
Imagine that alot of people voted for that commie. SAD
>The majority of these homes are not lived in,
>hundreds of mansionesque London townhouses that are completely empty.
>they sit empty in order to restrict the market
TARDS.
Only a useless statistic to someone who swallows the commie narrative that muh rich people. When in fact is the number of people entering the country is what puts the pressure on housing. Look at the names of the people that lived in that block - quintessentially British. If they had not come here for free gibs then there would be far more houses available.
>doesn't underline new build
Nice cherry picked misleading source
Also (((LSE)))
Here's my solution--
Provide an incentive for them to offer up their homes with an offer they can't refuse.
> be user
> know theft is bad
> stealing even to help people is bad
> stealing from people I don't like is bad
> but I don't like these people, and I really like these other people
> what amount of words do I need to say in order to justify this bad thing I'm about to advocate for
"requisition"
"temporary domiciles"
"nationless rich people"
"refugees"
that's the hard left in a fucking nutshell. you know what you're saying is at the very least, unfair, but if you have an axe to grind you'll say whatever you need to say to fuck something up.
>socialists are gonna steal
wew, who'd have thought?
t. would be happy to have the government force him to take in refugees in his own house and fuck his wife
>even though I lack the resources to defend this extra stuff I don't need or use, I have natural property rights over it all!
Thanks for the laugh
i'd rather burn it down than give it to some dirty savages
So if someone who owns the house comes back with a shotgun or his buddies with clubs, I'm allowed to decide who can use my house or not again?
Come on man. If they had to defend it they could because the could afford to employ a small army. The only reason they do not at the moment is that the law protects them.
Welfare rats, muslims, pakis, students etc
If you look at the election results map all of those that voted labour either live in student hotspots or places with out of control immigration.
Then it would become economically unfeasable to leave the property vacant
Isn't this literally the first fucking steps to communism?! What the fuck is wrong with the people?!!
Yeah it would be shame if refugees moved in next door.
Why aren't those residents live in the house of the London major? He will love the diversity and the "terrorism is normal under my rule".
So they have no room to put these people yet they want to keep bringing MORE into the country?
Communism is preferable to the White race dying out while globalist elites milk every last shekel out of a childless, degenerate atomized populace.
that's the point, corporate bootlicker
good goy, keep licking the feet of oligarchs! one day you might become rich like them, so long as you work hard for your boss Shlomo Shekelkopf!
Why - it entirely depends on the level of appreciation of the asset. You would then find businesses being created that offered the service to multiple owners bringing down the costs of protecting them. There are already businesses that offer this service for vacant buildings.
I did because I want a health care and for my kids to have a decent education.
Again... so?
Topkek
It's supply AND demand, not supply OR demand.
I mean I'm an envious fuck but that's his property. If you're a startving Brit then what the fuck are you doing in London? Anywhere else the rent and council tax are manageable, especially as a family unit.
>advocating for theft from kikes
Not kikes anyways.
All politicians say these things and when they get in power they will shit in your face. It does not matter who you vote for - the trick is to believe nothing they say that way you will never be disappointed. Corbyn has campaigned against the EU for his entire political career but when he could actually make a difference by backing Leave in the referendum - he suddenly went very quiet.
You do that one time just "helping people out" you'll soon have a hoard of the poor saying " where's my expensive flat?!" Burning down their own houses to get in.
>expensive flat
There's no reason that flat should even be expensive.
I don't mind that. Start with J.K. Rowling
Explain how having fewer people in the country would not relieve the pressure on housing.
It's not theft, we just want to get back what rightfully belongs to the people.
I don't understand why they place the dregs of society into an upclass area where they wouldn't be able to live without heavily subsidised rents to begin with. Any sane government would settle them in the outskirts and have them come by tube like normal people have to.
200,000 lay empty all year around.
Then how do you decide which people get to live closer to the centre or in the more picturesque areas of town - or do you just make everything equally gash so it is fair?
The 99% of your society that is utter trash.
>tfw the Tories are so insanely incompetent that they will usher to power Comrade Corbyn who will finally and utterly destroy the eternal Anglo forever
Payback for your betrayal of the Tzar, bitches!
Gb2 plebbit
That does not answer the question - 2 years of immigration would occupy all of those - then what are you going to do?
All Brits should be able to live there if they want to.
They already did decide, didn't they? From the list of missing people from the Grenfell Tower I deduce you get to live in Kensington on governement assistence only if you are a foreigner of colour and wear a hijab.
nice b8 - you got me.
They're doing the American thing where negroid projects are placed smack dab in the middle of affluent zones. This is the real Jew communist policy that's meant to increase diversity or whatever.
Yeah, well, most of the people of Grenfell Tower weren't even Brits.
Bit of reality for you buddy. Corbyn might of improved things for the short term by borrowing a shit ton of money.
When we can't pay it back it will be up to another government too clean the mess up and that will involve massive cuts again to try and get us back on track or the nation will starve.
Were struggling to get by atm as it is the last thing we need is some commie who thinks money grows on trees borrowing shit tons of money when we won't be able to pay it back.
kek - bonus points if you stand on the seat of the toilet while taking a shit.