No Step Snek

So what's No Step Snek's actual political philosophy?

My take is that it's something along the lines of Libertarian Nationalism. A very middle of the road socially right wing system.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsden_flag
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What if Snek is a spook?

spook is meaningless term

Yeah, and how would it even really be a spook anyway?

It's libertarian. I the US, you could say it's nationalistic.

sometimes refers to spies and also niggers

Libertarian Nationalism is the same as saying Conservative Republican. The nationalism is implied.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsden_flag

Libertarians today have more in common with AnCaps and AnComs than anything. They have no sense of nationalism. It's all about muh open borders and smallest state possible. They're hyper capitalist/globalist.

Its the NAP dummy.

Don't attach the NAP to Gadsden pls. It's too infested with leftist to matter anymore.

Hey not every Ancap is open border cuck. In a truly private property society the owner has rights to exclude anyone he wishes be it women, niggers, ayy lmaos or whatever.

Spooks are a spook

Don't step on snek is literally anti-aggression

I understand that, but I'm talking about the average. I'm an AnCap idealist, but reality just doesn't permit it. At least right now.

How the fuck are they close to AnComs?

I get what you mean, but the NAP crowd these days are too cucked

Open borders and shit like that.

>I get what you mean, but the NAP crowd these days are too cucked
Well that's their fault not the sneks, there's nothing wrong with the NAP

I'd describe it as protectionist nationalism, since it gained popularity when you betrayed your Anglo brethren in favour of independence. ie you weren't paying out to a foreign government while it imposes its will through finance and manipulation of media. Uniting against foreign interests.

You know that and I know that, and most people here could probably argue it properly, but I just don't want to dilute the flag that I have pinned to my ceiling.

Well I mean, if someone wasn't using us to pay the bills then not letting us have a say in how those bills were paid.

So tell them they're not real libertarians.

I wouldent say it makes them AnComs.The two ideals are different and is the philosophy behind the open boarders.

There needs to be a new name tbqh. Libertarian is too tainted. I usually just tag nationalist to it to describe myself, but that's too meh.

>Hey not every Ancap is open border cuck
No one on this board is an open border cuck, nazi larpers just use it to strawman people who aren't crypto commies like them.

my political philosophy is that your meme is shit

I call myself a voluntaryist.

Why didn't you just trust us :'(

why does snek not want to destroy government entirely

it means leave me the fuck alone

Trusting politicians and establishments is how the white world has gotten into the position it's in.

I have no problem with the government being destroyed but I'm also a realist that knows that's not going to happen so I'm gunna work with what I've got.

it means piss off and let me do my own thing

You understand that people can decide to collectivize as individuals for their own protection right? Don't be an autist level of AnCap there. I used to be there too, but I grew up.

>So what's No Step Snek's actual political philosophy?
Sup Forums is dead
too many rowdy newfags that don't know their ass from a meme on the ground

Was gonna post this exact thing.

I just wanna be left alone.Im getting farm land to grow some food.Ill hunt also.I wanna put up solar panels and all that jazz.I dont wanna have government needing me to ok with them.As long as im not endangering anyone,leave my alone.


DRIVING IS NOT A PRIVILEGE.

>wanting to actually have some political theory discussion
>gets called newfag

pic related.

Lol kids... NAP does not exist

Why not both, senpai?

>So what's No Step Snek's actual political philosophy?
What the Gadsden flag says: don't treat on me. From that phrase it should be clear what it is

I have a problem guys
Every time I start thinking about political shit and state interference/commies I start to involuntarily hiss like a snek, "sssss" through my teeth
Either I have developed some sort of pavlovian memetic reflex or I'm going full autistic

it's self explanatory
you try to walk on the snake, it bites you

>pavlovian memetic reflex or I'm going full autistic

Probably both desu. Have you tried suicide?

How they can not be in contradiction?

THIS

anarchy is just gift wrapping your land and possessions to foreign governments who don't have anarchy.

if anything, the absolute power of dictators and the ability to get away with anything is true anarchy of power.

Just watch Salo: 120 Days in Sodom

>that flag
saved

A less authoritarian version of NatSoc basically. The federal gubment isn't as powerful.

...

>absolute power of dictators and the ability to get away with anything is true anarchy of power.
What did he mean by this?

have another.

libertarianism isn't anarchy you meme loving fuck
government is a necessary evil to the lolbertarian

...

I'd say something Libertarian Nationalism or National Capitalism is correct. It's somewhat fuzzy but the common themes are that government should be outward facing, interfering with the lives of its citizens as little as possible and preventing other countries from doing the same.

For myself for instance, in a perfect world I would love global trade and open borders. However the world isn't perfect; the third world is full of short-sighted stupid people who would ruin this country if allowed in. The developing world (esp. China) is either so poor or manipulates their economy to undercut our labor.

Global free market only works if all markets are free, after all.

Gadsden flag thread? Have some rare oc.

NatCap you say?

Libertarians don't have a real political ideology, they are just misfits who want to do their own thing. They are like anarchists, they seem to make good points in times of really, really bad government, but anytime they've had the opportunity to actually implement some of their ideas in real life they fail catastrophically.

money and property are spooks

Something like that. If I was to differentiate between the two I'd say that (pulling from National Socialism being a totalitarian movement) National Capitalism would be the variant of Libertarian Nationalism for those who have come to believe that the west can't be saved through peaceful means. Revolutionary Libertarians, if you would.

...

those are the "libertarian socialists". Ignoring the fact that libertarian socialism is an oxymoron, they've recently become a major part of the libertarian movement.

Egoism is a spook

It's odd. I'm a libertarian but I want to repeal the 19th amendment. Like, I'm so reactionary.

My philosophy is that you can't legislate morality and having a government large enough to do such a thing is never a good idea. I want a very socially liberal government, but have the people themselves be very conservative and social norms back a hundred/hundred fifty years.

The 19th could be a reaction to the fact that female voters have a strong tendency towards voting for larger government, single mothers especially.

As for your philosophy it makes sense to me. You want a government that doesn't legislate people's lives, but you also feel that with social norms such as they are today a Libertarian society could not sustain itself.

The meanning behind "Don't Tread On Me" is quite easily inferred as "I'm not a cuck or a tool; don't fuck with me." I'm still ignorant on some political ideologies, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression it's commonly associated with libertarian nationalists, however, the use of the timber rattlesnake and the motto were not utilized for that specific purpose. It simply can be used for any redpill purpose.

>[nazis] don't have a real political ideology
>[nazis] are just misfits
>[nazis] seem to make good points, but every time [nazis] actually implement some of their ideas they fail catastrophically

It's beyond a tendency. It's just the way they're biologically programed. It's not to say they're all like that, but by and large they shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Nazi Germany actually did amazing things and it took the entire world being against them to destroy them. Just sayin

Not incompatible with what I said, I was suggesting the thought that may have begun making you consider the 19th amendment.

Though if we're discussing voting restrictions I am in favor of making it so only people who pay more in taxes than they receive from the government can vote. Not only does it restrict a say only to those who have an actual stake in the spending of taxes, but it also dodges the open accusations of sexism or racism that an explicit sex-or-race based ban would invoke.

I mean sure it 'just so happens' to disproportionately disenfranchise minorities and women but that is a side effect of women and minorities having been made virtual slaves to government handouts not anything to do with them as people, honest!

I'm in favor of tax payer only voting too. They're the ones paying for everything, they're the only ones that should be able to have a say in how that money is spent.

Idealistically, I perfectly agree with you.
Realistically, however, we'd need an authoritarian police state to instill and maintain such social norms for a period of time/permanently before this could work, which is what Nazis did for Germany.

Anyone, off topic but speaking of sneks, anyone on Sup Forums keep snakes or is that something degenerates normally do?

anyway* for second paragraph
fucking autism phone

Maybe because of how fucked things are these days, but people naturally weren't shit in the 50's and even before that except for some time in the 20's.

>voluntaryist
so everyone in the government should just be volunteers? fucking retard

At which point you could leave the 19th alone and avoid that entire argument because you've just disenfranchised the vast majority of women, both homemakers and single mothers anyhow, leaving only the relatively small pocket that is the successful career woman; too small a voting bloc to really be worth courting.

In fact looking up the numbers, if you make it NET taxpayers instead of just taxpayers, that is even taxpayers can be disqualified if they receive more from the government than you pay then statistically speaking only taxpaying women from about 50-65 actually make the cut and both before and after that they would not.

Well.. Yeah. They shouldn't be paid. It should be a service to the community and nation, not a way to get rich like it is now.

People were still shit it's just that niggers and women back then were still under partial control. Also your looking at history through (((their))) lense. The 20s was less degenerate than people think and vice-versa for the 50s.

I'd think things would probably be better naturally if every wave of feminism was rolled back. That's really the biggest tool of the kikes. Then take care of theimmigration problem and everything else that follows. I just can't trust a republic to maintain the state once the culture is cured, considering its vulnerability to be infiltrated in the first place lead to the shithole we have now.

No, not necessarily, but everything should be voluntarily funded.

Make it explicitly an ethno-state as part of written law and we won't need to worry about (((influence)))

>I get what you mean, but the NAP crowd these days are too cucked
phisicaly removing a bear or a commie from your birthday party is not a moral issue (NAP agression) but a technical issue

That gif would be much better without the words gun sounds on it. Maybe just leave don't tread on me.

This. It means stay out of my shit unless you want to get fucked up.

>My philosophy is that you can't legislate morality and having a government large enough to do such a thing is never a good idea. I want a very socially liberal government, but have the people themselves be very conservative and social norms back a hundred/hundred fifty years.

I feel the same. I don't trust the government to get involved in any kind of morality, because let's be honest about the type of people we're talking about here, but I don't want degeneracy propagated everywhere I look.

Libertarians kind of span the entire political spectrum, though, which I appreciate, because adhering too strictly to an ideology fucks everything up and has led to massive atrocities throughout history. It can also be good cover if you're trying to drop some red-pills on liberals without them immediately going on the defensive.

The "dude weed bro" guys have got to fuck off, though. I'm all for legalizing marijuana, but being a pothead isn't an ideology.

White kikes would still have influence and you know it. It was them that fucked the system in the first place. Banning judaism wouldn't do anything either; the argument is almost as faulty as banning guns. Jews would just keep their ideologies to themselves as many do now, but still do their usual funding and lobbying. The government needs to have some sort of lockdown to completely null any chance of infiltration, which is why the millenial/genZ lot here favor fascism and neoreactionary ideas.

>White kikes
Meaning? You get that these days we'd use DNA testing right?

It can mean many things to many people. According to antifa, it's racist. But any rational person who takes it at face value takes it to mean "leave me the fuck alone, or get bit."

...

There is none, were to high to think about one

It's not nationalist. It's just ultra libertarian.

>NAP

You are the faggots that ruined libertarianism. Libertarians were suppose to fight back and start sniping commies. That's what "Don't tread on me" means. Instead all they did was start blathering on about their holy NAP and turned into cowardly pacifist anarchists. You blew it.

Meaning Judaism is a ideology too and any sociopath with a high IQ can become a kike and get involved in the fuckover of society because of muh semitic supremacy.
Also, mandatory DNA testing would be an absolute hassle, if unrealistic or impossible to enforce, if you're talking about limiting influence. Shit, a kike could have a 100% anglo do all their dirty work, giving them the cash and orders.
You'd have to globally destroy the ideology into the realm of nonexistence before you might be able to run a republic or democracy. That includes ancient scripts, every book, anyone preaching the cult, every archived site, everything, and you simply can't without being a fucking god.
Reactionary solutions are the only way.

is Thomas Jefferson considered a thinker of the Libertarian school?

>he doesn't understand the nap because he's dumb
>he thinks it means pacifism

Read a book or two before trying to argue on the internet.

When was gadsen snake considered racist? Jfc, are things really this badly fucked anally?

>Read a book

HOLY SHIT! When did SJW start shitposting on Sup Forums on this level?

White people like it so it's racist.

I consider him one.

Snakes must be racist more if anything. The gadsen flag is a personification of the literal biology of a rattlesnake. (The rattling is a warning sign that literally means "don't fuck with me," which is why Christopher Gadsen used the animal in the first place, besides the fact rattlesnakes are only found in the Americas; most species endemic to the U.S.)

Maybe this is why liberal legislature tries to ban snake ownership so often too?

Getting paid to be a politician is like begging jews to become politicians.

>entire world
Germany was destroyed by a dozen kikes