Is the Neanderthal DNA what separates whites and asians from niggerdom?

Is the Neanderthal DNA what separates whites and asians from niggerdom?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koko_(gorilla)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species_problem
britannica.com/topic/Cro-Magnon
youtube.com/watch?v=wzlU0Xypur4
youtube.com/watch?v=GhxqIITtTtU
archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

gorilla's dna is more likely

Whites don't have a monopoly of neanderthal admixture. All caucasians have it and slants have more than caucasians. all non-blacks or abbos have their lineage.

Neanderthals did have larger brains and red hair. Most whites have about 3% neanderthal DNA.

Niggers are not even part of the human species. They are of the family of the great apes. Of course that fact is very covered up now days.

I'm pretty sure whites and blacks can have fertile children though.
>niggers aren't part of the human species
>race-mixing will be the downfall of western civilisation
can't have it both ways faggot.

less human than niggers
no surprise there

neanderthals dont have the same amount of chromosomes as humans so it would have been really really hard for us to breed with them

> (OP)
> gorilla's dna is more likely

Horses can mate will mules...

Yes, embrace your true ancestors. We are your caucasian brothers, you are a piece of our blood. We can help you with your (((culture))) and solve your male education problems as well as any racial tension, if you agree to be part of our ancient customs which date to 12000BC.

Chechen cheking in.

>fertile offspring
>fertile
Are you saying mulatto's are sterile?

Maybe not the same number of chromosomes as you, but they are believed do have had the same number of chromosomes as a normal human

...

How would the world look like today had neanderthals prevailed?

Wolves, coyotes, and all breeds of domestic dogs can interbreed but they are not the same species

A paradise on earth, just as the Greeks described Hyperborea

If interbreeding produces fertile offspring that literally means they are the same species. Anything else is just arbitrary.

Not all donkeys are sterile. It just depends on the exact DNA.

But really, the next time you are talking to a nigger try and determine if you are talking to a human-being or just a very intelligent ape...

As AI comes on-line now we will realize that computer brians can easily match the nigger brain.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koko_(gorilla)

You know that's more probable than having peace w mud races on this earth

thats a big bear

Yes. Sub-Saharan Africans are the only group that has Zero Neanderthal DNA.

>have sliver of DNA from a group of humans separated from you for hundreds of thousands of years and most closely resembled modern day papuans and australian aborigines and had brain sizes identical to that of cro-magnons and other then-contemporary ancient humans

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSS

Also, there have been earlier back migrations into SS africa from Eurasia.

No

Cro Magnon and Neanderthal DNA separates us from Negroids. We are a mix of both Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal with

There are skulls they have found in Russia and Romania where the DNA shows the subject to be 1/4 Neanderthal and 3/4 Cro-Magnon.

There is no objective definition of species. You can find all sorts of exceptions to rules like "only animals that can mate and produce fertile offspring are the same species"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species_problem

>One common, but sometimes difficult, question is how best to decide which species an organism belongs to, because reproductively isolated groups may not be readily recognizable, and cryptic species may be present. There is a continuum from total reproductive isolation (no interbreeding) to panmixis, unlimited interbreeding. Populations can move forward or backwards along this continuum, at any point meeting the criteria for one or another species concept, and failing others.

If you are anal retentive like leftists are with "gender" then you will define "species" as little more than a continuum that has all sorts of differing rules, exceptions, etc.

Asians have about 20% more Neaderthal DNA than white people. It's the blacks who are missing it.

underrated

How can you tell from the picture though? It could literally be three feet high.Not all donkeys are sterile, all mules (half donkey, half horse) are.
All humans are very intelligent apes, and AI can match any human's brain.
Or is pic related an ape more intelligent than 99% of whites?

If only homo sapiens sapiens hadn't colonized Europe, we would have sky-palaces now and shiet. I know this because I'm 0.5% neanderthal and proud of my heritage. I demand reparations from the African continent for what they did to mine.

not exactly OP. its a factor but black people have flat hair follicles. no other race has them. even abos in australia which are basically black people dont have them or the extra dark people in india dont have them

its a proprietary trait. it occurred after homosapiens left africa. dont give me any out of africa is a lie shit. they are counting a neanderthal jaw bone in europe as ecidence of humanity starting in europe. you can tell by the teeth. neanderthals had flat teeth with striations on the tops kinda like some herbavor teeth or human version would be a mouth full of molars and no incisors or bicuspid or k9s

anyways it means they have splintered from the original version of humanity as well but not in a productive manner looking at averages

>had brain sizes identical to that of cro-magnons and other then-contemporary ancient humans

wrong

Neanderthals had larger brains than modern Australoids and Papuan people

You are thinking of Denisovans

Those cultures all depicted swastikas because they were all descendants of the original civilisation.

a pitbull and a caniche can have offsfpring. That doesn't mean that they are the same thing

>not exactly OP. its a factor but black people have flat hair follicles. no other race has them.

what are you talking about, negritos, andamanese, and all sorts of melanesians/australoids have the same exact hair

>even abos in australia which are basically black people

hahaha, no, they really look nothing alike

>anyways it means they have splintered from the original version of humanity as well but not in a productive manner looking at averages

So where does that leave abos since they have the glorious neanderthal admixture too? Or did denisovan ancestry (which has also been found in southern china and native americans) counterbalance it?

Yes, and RH- blood

I am by no means a leftist, but it seems childish to pretend blacks and whites aren't more alike than blacks and gorilla's because of muh feelings.

BLACKED

>>had brain sizes identical to that of cro-magnons and other then-contemporary ancient humans

Note I said THEN-contemporary, IE, back when they existed. Neanderthals had identical brain sizes to cro-magnons and other ancient humans. Which also includes australians and africans from around then. H. Sapiens Idaltu (found in east africa) also had a large brain size than modern Europeans.

It does mean they are the same species, dogs. Ecotypes ≠ Species

How can it be? Chinks don't look Neanderthal at all but many whites do

>impying black are pure

IIRC the gene variant for microcephalin which is critical to neurological development present in east asians and whites originates in neanderthals

Africans have another version which might explain Africa

You can mathematically plot out the genetic diversity between dog breeds, wolves, foxes, etc

I didn't say blacks were closer to gorillas

>Neanderthals had identical brain sizes to cro-magnons

No, they didn't

they had larger

but you can genetically analyze dog breed/wolves/coyotes to show they aren't the same subspecies

amuds had 1750 just saying

What's this book?

>subspecies = species
>subspecies are even a thing and not totally arbitrary
Kek.
Also, let me know when you've done the same for humans.

and you can do the same with humans

I'm sure there are loads of sub-Saharan Africans using 23 and me.

The estimates for neanderthal and cro-magnon cranial capacity are pretty variable, but are generally large and very similar to neanderthals.

britannica.com/topic/Cro-Magnon

>The brain capacity was about 1,600 cc (100 cubic inches),

1,400 CC's for neanderthals is lower than most estimates I've seen (also for cro-magnons). Tons of people alive today have brain sizes larger than that.

I mean I guess it's not entirely accurate to say "they were virtually identical", but there was no real consistent difference

That allele has never, in 12 years, once been linked to brain size or really any neurological variation. It's pretty retarded to think a few alleles could explain that anyway.

So you're saying blacks and south-asians are about as similar as south-asians and east-asians? Wew, huge difference my dude.

are humans the only species on the planet that doesn't have any subspecies?

(You)

Observe these examples of modern Chicago Negroes and try and tell me that they are human...

youtube.com/watch?v=wzlU0Xypur4

whites and asians know how to farm, africans don't.

The axes are different scales, so no.

Really REALLY made me think.

Exactly you retard.

Yes, neanderthal are seraphim, which is why you see 'neanderthal' DNA in every race except blacks

so is "species"

I'm not even sure what your point is

Every non Africa is more related to non Africans than to African.

look at the x/y axis ffs

A simple example of a common ape being more intelligent than a group of common niggers....

youtube.com/watch?v=GhxqIITtTtU

Where were the denisovans? Were they niggers?

The difference between blacks and south asians is about eight times larger than between south and east asians.

Ok, that was an inaccurate pic, but I'm still not getting the whole "resemble abos" part considering abos have far smaller brains

They were in South East Asia

They weren't related to modern Sub-Saharan Bantu Negroids so they wouldn't technically be niggers.

...

According to the current Science, Europe, not Africa was the birthplace of mankind.

That could change tomorrow, but that's what they're saying today.

Wether you're cherrypicking genes or individuals, it's still just cherrypicking.

a lot, we can see ads about that on TV

What's up with the Netherlands cuckery lately?

We're finally awake

>Random samples=cherrypicking

plz explain

There is a recent study on ancient south African DNA. One interesting thing they found is that modern south Africans have non trivial Eurasian input coming through east Africa. What this also means is that all those estimates of Neanderthal admixture in Eurasians that have been done might have to be recalculated since, considering how those methods work, they'd be based on the assumption that south Africans group are pure African and don't have any Eurasian input.

In particular, since this east African input is in turn related to ancient Natufians, a west Eurasian folk from the Levant, the result is that the Neanderthal admixture in west Eurasians compared to east Asians might have been underestimated.

So don't take those claims like "east asians are more neanderthals" as too serious. Same with estimates by 23&me and such.

To the fact that Europe is being invaded by Non-Whites?

>slants have more than cause Asian.
Asians have different neanderthal DNA than Caucasians.
An individual may have 2-6%. But if you pooled all the races together, you'd have a 20% representation of neanderthal.

Stupid autocorrect and mobile keyboard.
Not "cause Asians", Caucasians....

Earth was a Joint Colonization(Whites = Europe, Blacks = Africa, Asians = Asia).

Neanderthal's were one of many "Test Runs" to see if humanity could survive/adapt to the planet.

archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/

yes

I like this post. Gotta move to Netherlands and get a nice dutch woman.

His face when he read your post.

>subspecies
They're called commies.

>muh Tyson
There are outliers in ever set of vast data. Although I'd take a dumb white over a smart black any day because I will trust the dumb white and prefer his company to the threat that happens to be smart. Besides, we have enough white scientists and intellectuals that it would barely harm and greatly help us if the blacks were to disappear.

Tyson is a living meme, his academic career is mediocre, he is just good at public talking and making science look "cool".
Anyway, "african americans" are not pure Africans, a great majority of them IIRC has like at least 15% European DNA.