Uhh guys?
Projectile spotted
Wyatt Long
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Logan Stewart
>yfw Alex Jones was right
Owen Ward
Thats a nice shoop
Jack Ward
Connor Martinez
just nevermind this thread who cares xD let's talk about alt right LOL
Xavier James
>when you get a lousy cubical assignment
Wyatt Watson
Is that the only footage of such angle?
Charles Morgan
>i-its not a shop!
Lincoln Butler
that i can find, how it is in this guys video? not sure. i'd have to ask him.
i didn't make the video
Dominic Davis
Need more 911 evidences
Ryder Ramirez
Are you talking about the plane engine that landed in Murray street?
Isaiah Torres
what's the run down on this? surely debris can turn in to projectile when a jet slams in to a building.
Jacob Morgan
Never shit-post ever again
Owen Roberts
That engine is not on the airplanes. It's a plant.
Israel attacked the USA on 9/11, The proof: youtu.be
Sebastian Ross
what about this ID that was found near the building.
Parker Ortiz
>projectile spotted
Its just the passport that belongs to the terrorist
Cooper Barnes
hmmm havent seen this before
Dominic Hughes
How do you know it landed in Murray street, did it knock the street sign down or some other coincidence?
Jose Rivera
how does he keep getting away with it?
Michael Collins
That engine is in fact the best evidence the planes that hit the towers were not the flights we have been told they were. The parts don't fit the engine models they should.
It was not planted. Or they'd plant the right kind.
Hudson Hernandez
So something was wrong though. How could they possibly not know what planes hit the tower?
Nolan Clark
>Israel attacked the USA on 9/11
Hey there Akmed.
Ian Cooper
>a 480x270 gif of the event reviewed in 2017 is going to suddenly blow the 9/11 case wide open
Are your parents proud of what you're doing with your life?
Tyler Price
there was different reports of people seeing like grey military type jets, not commercial
Jaxon Ortiz
I know it landed there because of all the video and photographic evidence. Besides hitting the pole, it also hit the top of the 45 park palace building.
Owen Smith
It's just a scared bird, go back to sleep user.
Luke Anderson
And that's the point. If that engine doesn't belong to the type of plane that is said to have hit the tower that can only mean one of two things.
Either it was planted there.
Or a different type of plane hit the tower.
Evan Gonzalez
It could not be planted because there is enough evidence it landed there. So I'll go with the other option. The planes could have been decoys remotely controlled.
Evan Garcia
Those are two different parts retard.
>cooling duct
>cooling duct assembly
Sebastian Evans
Hudson Jenkins
thats a plant, nice try
Jack Bell
That's literally the same picture in video form.
The cooling duct and the cooling duct assembly are different parts. That is why they have different names.
The JT9D-7 and the JT9D-7R4D share the same cooling duct assembly part. They share a lot of parts. They are, in fact, from the same family of engine.
This is why you shouldn't mouth off on shit you know nothing about.
Carson Morgan
America knows the 9/11 myth is bullshit.
youtube.com
Logan Howard
It's probably just James, the window washer.
Owen Edwards
...
Alexander Peterson
yup
John Bell
Daily reminder that CGI planes theory is a dead end and it always derails (intentionally or not) all '911 inside job' discussions.
Tyler Gutierrez
...
Christopher Davis
>The planes could have been decoys remotely controlled.
The plains were remotly cotroled.
youtube.com
March 2001