Why is a polygamous society bad, exactly? Open relationships can be good

Why is a polygamous society bad, exactly? Open relationships can be good.

It simply does not work. No real man wants to share their woman.

One man having four wives means three men with no wives. The only way to fulfill the basic biological needs of those three men is War and Conquest, the taking of women from outside of the society.

Polygamous societies historical dont survive.

Why?

>70s
>hyper-autist works hard in high-school in hope to get a qt gf some day
>hyper-autist nuclear scientist working at nuclear plant
>he gets a wife and has a turbo-autist son (current day)
>son realises that all the women flock to the same man and are shallow as hell (instagram etc)
>quickly gives up on any hope of ever getting a gf and dedicates his entire time to playing games and maybe even smoking weed
>suddenly society is missing 200,000 skilled workers in the technical sector
>projections show that the nest 10 years will see a need for 500,000 highly skilled technical workers, which will not be available at all
>meanwhile stacy and lacy are busy sucking Chad's cock, who studies law and lives well

Autists and "nerds" run infrastructure/medicine etc. If their incentive to work hard goes away, were fucked.

>Why is a polygamous society bad, exactly?

because it destroys civilization.

"Beta males" withdraw from society because they have no stake in it...

Chads don't contribute to society because they are too busy fucking all of the women...

And women don't work at all, except in useless air conditioned office related busy work positions.

>Oh you're back from school early today Jimmy?

>Well, while you're here. Meet your second dad, Larry. He'll be coming over regularly to hang out with mummy.

>Oh also, tomorrow your uncle Brad is coming over. Not your real uncle, another one of mummy's 'friends'.

>Don't forget to do your homework!

Tell me what this kid is going to grow up like.

...

>Why is a polygamous society bad, exactly?
If only 20% of men have wives, children and sex, then the other 80% get extremely upset and violent.

>polygamous society
read the op retard

>then the other 80% get extremely upset and violent.

Why do you think porn videogames and weed are so popular mate?

If there was no entertainment/stimulants, then yes there would be violence.

Name one that survived and prospered

... You don't think there's going to be violence in the immediate future in western society? That's a very, very naive belief.

>Open relationships can be good.
Citation needed
Or rather what is your criteria for good?

>Why do you think porn videogames and weed are so popular mate?
>If there was no entertainment/stimulants, then yes there would be violence.

We have those things + monogamy and we're still on the cusp of WW3 with a suicide bombing and a mass shooting every other day.

You are an idiot if you think weed and videogames is the answer to this.

Polygamy goes hand in hand with nymphomania.

Aside from what people have already explained with non-progress, you can't love all people the same way and via.

You mean a literal beta uprising?

Get real. There will be a big war long before that to thin the herd.

>We have those things + monogamy and we're still on the cusp of WW3 with a suicide bombing and a mass shooting every other day.

Suicide bombings in the USA every other day?

Dont be ridiculous.

As to school shootings. That has more to do with single motherhood, school bullying and easy access to legal firearms than anything else.

Youre an idiot if you think that gaming and porn being the #1 and #2 biggest entertainment sectors in the world are not directly a result of the hypergamy of women.

Plus the soon to be complete legalisation of recreational cannabis, since alcohol is rarely ingested on your own anymore.

Polygamy means one man, several women.

It can work but that mean you have several men who'll be bachelors forever.

While it's all fair and games when they are in their 20s, they might become a tad frustrated when in their 30s.

Eventually, someone is bound to become violent.
Expect an increase in homosexuality, rapes, assaults and murders.

>Not your real uncle
dropped

Degeneracy

You happy your mother's a slut

>While it's all fair and games when they are in their 20s, they might become a tad frustrated when in their 30s.

The bottom of the barrel omega males do that.

Real beta males with decent middle class jobs will simply go to 3rd world countries and bring back a wife. (might not work in the long run), but these men arent stupid, theyre simply pathetic.

Eventually one of those men is going to have to look after her baby.

But some people say "user, they are using contraception"

Then I just think, "well if contraception is the only factor as to why polygamy should be socially accepted, why not incest too since they aren't looking to have children.

Fact is, it's disgusting and weird and just hurts the people involved in the long run.

Polygamy leads to a situation where the upper bracket of men control nearly all the women. The men below the upper bracket then either organize into a violent band and go conquer some other places women (Islam) or totally check out from society, leaving it to die by slow decay (NEETs). Monogamy is a social technology that evolved specifically to fix this problem.

>You mean a literal beta uprising?
No, I mean a big war. The US has already started to Balkanize, the constituencies of the rural states want nothing to do with the coastal cities, and the city folk want nothing to do with the rural. Both sides feel that the electoral system fails them. There's a massive cultural divide between the blue and red states that's growing at an accelerated rate.
Here in Australia, the vast majority of people you talk to will agree that they'd like to see literally the entire government and all members of major political parties lined up against a wall and shot. That's not hyperbole, we genuinely want all our politicians dead.
There's even a secessionist movement in Sweden.

The West on the whole is a kettle slowly boiling, weed and video games or not.

A woman with multiple men is a whore.

After how badly the boomers/Cuckbull have fucked your housing I don't blame them

>Suicide bombings in the USA every other day?

So you don't have an argument, you're just trolling for the sake of wasting everyone else's time. Genius move there.

How?

Nothing will come of any of those delusions you speak of, since the smartest men (alphas) all become part of the system, where they make sure to avoid exactly what your describing, which is why I wrote that there will be a global war long before that.

Rorschch

Did you not proof read your own comment?

Sad

So your solution to have a working polygamous society... is to have it surrounded by several monogamous societies ?

Just teasing, as you pointed yourself it's not viable.
But you get the idea.

Selfish man are not real man.

>their woman
The woman doesn't have a owner another than herself.

If you don't want more than one woman you're not a real man.

Next time just leave your geoflag, the UN thing is way too good to be true. Nice try though

This. Monogamy was a necessity for organized society. Part of the social contract. Chaddery has lead to the dissolution of that part of the social contract which has lead to countless sexually frustrated men. Do you think the Muslims with 10 wives are the ones blowing themselves up in market places?

>open relationships

being a fucking cuck is bad

That's completely contradictory. In order to fit into the current system you have to be a beta cuck.

>working polygamous society

No, obviously Islam will take over from within. That goes without saying.

Same in the US. Traditional Mexican culture will take over aswell.

so what your saying is that social media, networking, and internet in general did this?

Polyamory is just a fancy name for 'fat chicks who want to be sluts'.

Your opinion is like one of those mentally retarded idiots who thinks if 10000 jobs are replaced by robots in a factory they can all just move up and become CEO of the same 1 factory.

>In order to fit into the current system you have to be a beta cuck.

By "system" I mean literally part of government etc. Not just a drone in a desk job.

Can I get I am a fucking cuck for 500 Alex

How is your comment relevant to anything being discussed here?

>was it autism?

This is all systemic and the result of female voting patterns and how they relate to female evolutionary psychology you dumb shit.

Literally it will not get fixed until women stop having any say at all in politics. And with all the beta cuck bluepilled vagina worshippers out there such as yourself the only way that is going to happen is with the outright islamization of the west.

To get one of those jobs you either need to be a vagina, a tranny, or a gigantic beta cuck. The public sector is the primary motivator of diversity garbage.

Polygamy is good for establishing a developing, bare bones society in order to build up human capital.
>See Salt Lake late 1840s, early 1850s
Polygamy isn't good for maintaining an already established society where production of human capital is over the need.
>See Warren Jeff's and modern FLDS "Lost Boys"

>Literally this much of a fucking brainlet.
As long as there is female hypergamy there will be sexually frustrated men.

No.

>The contraceptive pill
>2nd wave feminists invading jobs in education
>single motherhood
>no fault divorce where the mother gets the kids 90% of the time
>alimony
>technology like facebook and later tinder
>urban anonymity
>lack of social shaming
>destruction of the nuclear family
>hedonistic lifestyle replacing traditional ones (hobbies in women are non existant)
>lack of quality education
>less and less traditional roles for men
.
.
.

Look the good side, you'll had carnes asadas and piñatas :D

And how is that different from what Im saying?

ask your wife's son if he agrees with it

Because then Woman get all the reamining power as they have a household of Hot guys who fuck them around the clock and ANYONE with even the slightest imperfections will never ever get laid again

also,

>being a fucking cuckold

literally take your own life.

>muh r9k
KYS.

Pretty sure you just violated a law leaf.

Go be a cuck elsewhere

Please change your flag, United Nations posters tend to be intelligent; you are not. You are nothing more than a cuckold.

Heterosexual monogamous relationships are the only purposeful relationship as their goal is not pleasure but rather long-term family rearing. Therefore, all other relationship arrangements and 'sexualities' are inherently undesirable and hence bad.

r9k is the biggest cesspit of vagina worshipping beta cuck brainlets. If you want to have an adult conversation you have to face the uncomfortable truth about women. They are literally garbage in modern society now.
>I'm not a baby machine
>I'm not a vagina for rent
Well everything else a woman can do statistics suggest a man can do better. Sorry women. You devalued yourselves. You are literally worthless now.

>Correction
>Less than Worthless
The average vagina costs society 150,000 dollars over its lifetime.

Relative poverty of the individual causing societal unrest.

>in a open marriage.
>both of us realized that most marriages end because someone cheats
>both of us have full-time careers
>neither of us have time to fully take advantage of deal
>insecure people always tell us,"I can never do that"
>"I would get so jealous"
>people think we're part of weird sex clubs
>sit around the house most of the time watching tv shows
>have an open relationship experience maybe once a year
>married for over 10 years
>getting ready to have kids in the next year or two
>still just in love as the first day we got married

Because I'm lonely

I wont pay a single dime voluntarily to support another mans child. That is why a polygamous society would be bad.

>This faggot beta cuck actually believes his wife isn't fucking Chads left and right and not telling him while he struggles to score once a year.
>calls it "open relationship experience"
>by that he probably means prepping the bull for her.

I don't want other men fucking my girls pussy, which I lick and put my dick raw into

^cuck

Yeah, fine, but who raise the kids?

Is it true that most women want open relationships? Porn has skewed my view of reality. I unironically believe that everyone is in an open relationship. I see married women at work and think that they had a threesome with their bull over the weekend.

Polygamy doesn't mean open relationships you retard.

>that moment when you realise your kid has a different nose and chin from yours
how could you make sure it was your lineage you were raising friend?

It ends up with the chick getting all the dick and money she wants and all the guys just sharing the one girl when she "feels like it." She just wants to fuck whomever without consequences.

t. Bailed on a relationship with a chick who wanted us to be "Polyamorus."

She probably just needed space

My favorite part about the whole Macho men don't settle for just one woman meme is that all of those men commit suicide when they're alone later in their life.

It is absolutely impossible to ever reach true happiness as a human being when you dont have a trustworthy significant other. There's a power vacuum in your life that will never ever be filled with degeneracy

Jealousy. Also, this:

Prove that open relationships are good. In my eyes it is a rejection of the fundamental thing that makes us human - rejection of the unseen ethical and spiritual virtues of monogamous love. And for what?

Any man that commits suicide out of loneliness alone doesn't belong in the gene pool.

Name a happy open relationship in equal terms that ended up in marriage and lasted long. Do it.

Because the family is the foundation of civilization, which is why the very concept of 'family' is under constant assault.

If you have only one woman, this woman is surely betraying you. So, how can you call me a cuck?

>Being worst then a dividing kike or a nigger
In the oven you belong with the cucks and kikes.

If you have a woman she is not betraying you. If you have one instahoe or regular girl she probably does

If it wasn't illegal, and society didn't make it so damn hard(chicks get jealous rather than excited when you add to your pack).
I'd take like 4-5 wives.
You get a bit bored, but also they can specialize in things, like one might prefer cleaning while one prefers working a serous job or taking care of the kids in busy hours.

fpbp
abandon this stupid thread

Women are going to stray if you do not keep them in line. It is an unfortunate fact that life will teach you repeatedly until you get the message... these hos ain't loyal.

>white cuck

Clintons? They not happy though they evil

No way to pass on wealth from the father.

...

Yep hoes ain't, but there is some % of females who are smart and respect themselves enough to know that cheating is not worth it. It's hard to find those though, and they are often not as sexually atractive as you would portrait your future wife.

OP kys cuck faggot

>Issac Newton
>Nikola Tesla
>Wright brothers

How do you explain this? Scientists and engineers don't do it because they want pussy, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The greatest ones ever never even married.

He didn't mention geniuses. They are alone anyway. But you still need plenty qualified people to operate high technology machines. They used to be motivied by good paymant->having a nice wife and family. Noone is going to try hard enough for such job if they can just abuse social system take care about their looks and fuck another mans bitches. Noone wants to be a cuck, but it used to pay up beeing one. Since sexual revolution it doesn't so we don't reproduce.

FAG

OP is a slut

Hypergamy would become even worse, and if alphas get all the women, betas would have nothing to work for, and society would implode.

>Tfw want sex so bad may consider looking to open relationship couples

I've been beta for far to long

Your personal experience, although noted, is not indicative of the trend involved in open relationships.

See pic related. All your long-term goals have become sexualized because of excessive pornography use. This is not healthy.

Women only want this kind of arrangement if their hubby is a beta.

That delusion you describe as love, is simply there to give her stability and security of a relationship. Nothing more. women will still seek better genes outside this relationship if their hubby is a loser.

Seriously, if you actually had a bit of pride and knew women were hypergamous, you wouldn't be this stupid.

You're a failure.

I have a family member who tried this with his wife. He deployed and returned a year later. They are currently devorcing. It does not work. They were convinced it did. He's now regretting ever letting it happen. More than two people will create jealousy. Even in the most "enlightened" minds.

Yep. That dude seriously doesn't know about female nature and sexual strategy. I thought with the advent of the internet men would get enlightened, but a lot are still firmly plugged into the matrix.