Redpill infographics

redpill infographics

Other urls found in this thread:

weforum.org/agenda/2014/09/top-10-competitive-economies-latin-america-caribbean/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Source?

...

>le pirate cuck

Trump should just have the Treasury print United States Notes to pay for his infrastructure plan.

>United States Notes were issued directly by the US Treasury to pay for stuff.
>United States Notes were dollars that circulated along side Federal Reserve Notes.
>United States Notes exchanged 1-for-1 with Federal Reserve Notes by law.
>Federal Reserve Notes are issued by a private corporation: The Federal Reserve.
>The Federal Reserve lends Federal Reserve Notes to the Treasury/US Government.
>The Treasury/US Gov must pay back Federal Reserve Notes with interest to the private bankers/Fed.
>Borrowing Federal Reserve Notes creates enormous debts for the Treasury/US Government.
>Printing/spending United States Notes creates NO debt for the Treasury/US Government.
>The last president to try to print United States Notes was JFK. He was assassinated.
>Trump can have $1 Trillion of new spending on infrastructure with no debt!
>Yes, United States Notes are inflationary if you print too many.
>However, anything is better than being in perpetual debt to the private bank/Fed/hyenas.

...

...

>totally torch the economy because of something literally every economist agrees is good

...

You're not from around here, are you?

All Austrian school economists want to dismantle the Federal Reserve/Ponzi Scheme.

I don't have any images to add but the day I found out about your pic was heartbreaking. I've never been able to go back after finding out that piece of information.

...

...

You realize that if the bailout didn't happen, the whole fucking economy would have crashed down like a house of cards, right?

...

Ah, sorry, I meant REPUTABLE economists.

You realize that line you're regurgitating is how they sell the idiot public on transferring their wealth away from them, right?

Bullshit.
We needed bankruptcies of mismanaged institutions and discharge of bad debts to get to a healthy economy.
Instead we had bailouts of the criminals and the launching of a new debt supernova.

Anyone whose worldview actually gets changed or influenced by a fucking infographic is mind-numbingly stupid.

That said, have some fresh redpill.

You meant blue-pilled establishment economists who peddle the central banking Ponzi scheme fraud to a gullible, deeply in-debt public.

...

...

You realize it would have been the Great Depression again, right? Like, no question the bailout created moral hazard, but the alternative was fucking bread lines.
I'm confused, why are we posting examples of solid and reasonable foreign policy?

...

This, the vast overwhelming majority of those economists have never run any kind of business or done any kind of investing that involved their own risk taking.

Good
That's how you free yourself from kikes

>solid and reasonable foreign policy

Yes, we must kill the workers and peasants in order to save them. I finally see the light!

...

>it's worth thousands, maybe millions of people starving and being thrown out onto the streets because of my illusory jew nemesis that exists in my mind
It's funny because this is literally what every communist group in Latin America does.

But first, explain to me why American foreign policy needs to be dedicated to Latin American peasants.

/thread

These infographs are just shitty facebook conspiracy bullshit.
You need to explain every single step and aspect of your logic to reach the conclusion the image is trying to convey for it to be sufficient in information to be useful.
Quotes, claims, and pictures of rich people laughing isn't a redpill, it's just propaganda.

If it doesn't include sources and a clear explanation for the logic behind the claims then it is bullshit and so are you.

>You realize it would have been the Great Depression again, right? Like, no question the bailout created moral hazard, but the alternative was fucking bread lines.

Again, you're regurgitating the prepared bullshit line that's crafted solely to sell looting the country to the idiot public.

I'm confused, how does owning a business make you qualified to comment on MONETARY policy?

>You realize it would have been the Great Depression again, right? Like, no question the bailout created moral hazard, but the alternative was fucking bread lines.

No. We had the worst of it in 2009. The bailout was to enrich the bankster criminals.

However, we will get a Great Depression when the current stock market bubble pops, because we are now so much deeper in debt thanks to Bernanke, Yellen, and Obama.

Economy growing at 2% per year for 8 years. Debts growing at 4% or higher each year over the same period. This will end in catastrophe. It is so obviously unsustainable from a mathematical perspective.

Oh, wait, are you one of those people who thinks that government debt is the same as personal debt?
Not an argument

>It's funny because this is literally what every communist group in Latin America does.

There are very few communist groups left in Latin America and most of them have wide popular support.

>But first, explain to me why American foreign policy needs to be dedicated to Latin American peasants.

Yes, why should we focus on the masses of a country we're bombing to supposedly save from tyranny? It's all about big land owners, elite families, casino gambling, and the military aristocracy!

Good wageslave, you tell those commie scum.

>There are very few communist groups left in Latin America and most of them have wide popular support.
Like the FARC, the drug cartel hiding in the jungles that had to get the president to force a peace deal through because the people wanted to keep raping their ass?
>Yes, why should we focus on the masses of a country we're bombing to supposedly save from tyranny?
You've got your whiny platitudes mixed up, we do very little bombing in Latin America.

And my point was two fold: first that all those peasants are actually better off thanks to us, and second, AMERICAN policy is supposed to advance AMERICAN interests, not foreign interests.

Oh look! Another giant stock market bubble created by the Federal Reserve!

...

...

...

...

>implying FARC could exist without heavy support from the rural peasantry

what

>And my point was two fold: first that all those peasants are actually better off thanks to us

No they aren't.

>AMERICAN policy is supposed to advance AMERICAN interests, not foreign interests.

Well, at least you're honest about it.

...

...

What we needed was a bailout, then a complete smashing of all banking conglomerates. Local credit unions only. No banks across state/county lines, etc.

Decentralize where the money is and nobody gets too powerful. The problem is they didn't do that, so the bankers who took advantage of dumb fuckers with predatory loans, then let them default, got huge bonuses AND get to keep their jobs. Where they will do the same thing again and again and again.

The rural peasantry aren't actually that much of the country.

...

>>And my point was two fold: first that all those peasants are actually better off thanks to us
>No they aren't.

Cuz they're so much better off in Venezuela

...

...

>are you one of those people who thinks that government debt is the same as personal debt?

Please, enlighten us : )

...

Bolivia, Ecuador, and Nicaragua are all doing pretty good.

Turns out social democracy is a good thing when you aren't a fucking moron who builds your entire economy on literally one export.

Where's page 2?

weforum.org/agenda/2014/09/top-10-competitive-economies-latin-america-caribbean/

unfortunately that's the only one i have saved

>Trump should just have the Treasury print United States Notes to pay for his infrastructure plan.

>Create a new national bank (eg. BANK OF USA) owned by the taxpayers.
>Print new currency (eg. USbit or something)
>Pay off current debt to shitlords
>US still has debt but owes its own bank
>People responsible wiped off planet by Rothchilds.
>Revert back to old shit debt slave system.

are you going to sit in this thread with a straight fucking face and defend the federal reserve? and they expect us to believe shills arent here all day every day saying stupid shit like this.

>the whole fucking economy would have crashed down like a house of cards, right?
>like a house of cards

thats what happens when a ponzi scheme can no longer get enough new investors

>cuba is no longer blockaded and is on friendly terms
wow looks like your narrative just got BTFO

even worse Fidel Castro got all pissy about the terms being more friendly.
Which shows he really was just a commie asshole all along.

but Sup Forums will ignore that and pretend those countries are nice places.

Trump brought back the blockade, retard

That's not a redpill, you faggot. You couldn't produce one SHRED of evidence that the Rothschilds control a single, modern central-bank (let alone all of them). Theis is one of those things that you mouth-breathers repeat because you heard other mouth-breathers saying it.

I challenge you over and over again to produce a SINGLE piece of proof connecting the Rothschilds to the control of ANY modern central-bank. And I have yet to find a taker.

>being hard to deal with must mean that no one would wamt to fuck you over

Ok pall