WHAT? YOU WANT TO KEEP THE MONEY YOU EARN? NOT IN MY COUNTRY!

WHAT? YOU WANT TO KEEP THE MONEY YOU EARN? NOT IN MY COUNTRY!

>earn

That fucking nigger uses all kindsa deductions on his taxes. People who like this guy, are seriously handicapped, and should be gassed.

>That fucking nigger uses all kindsa deductions on his taxes.
Which is his right, as is yours, you fucking stupid nigger.

WHAT? YOU WANT TO KEEP THE HOUSE HILLARY CLINTON GAVE YOU TO NOT GET ARKASIDED? NOT IN MY COUNTRY!

>earn
>people that just sit on interest rates are somehow good for the meritocratic process of capitalism
OP, you're a dipshit.

But he says people in the upper echelons don't pay enough in taxes. So why doesn't he just not take the deductions if he thinks people like him don't pay enough?

So you don't think loans should exist?

Oh you earned it? Says who? You sit on your fat ass in front of a computer looking at Wikipedia and Reddit, doing maybe 1 hour of real work per day, and collect your 60k/year. Fuuuuck off

I think capital gains should be taxed more.

Interest on loans is literally capital gains.

>earn

Profits earned without labor shall be siezed, Jew.

>Make College free
>Make minimum wage $15
>Implement universal healthcare

I kinda wanted him to win just so the economy can crash and burn and all these socialists will realize just how retarded their ideas really are

Yep.

Neat.

So where is the whole in this. If I buy five Rolexes and sell them off for more currency units, what's the difference between that and giving away five currency units and expecting six back?

>own yourself
>use your own body and mind to produce
>save some of what you have produced to invest
>personally carry all the risk of investment

At what point in this chain of logic does taxation become justified? And don't fall into a trap of circular logic saying tax is used to pay for common infrastructure, begging the question of whether we need "common" infrastructure in the first place.

nobody earns anything
either you can keep it in your bank account or you cant
anything goes

Brazil and Venezuela are proof that socialists never learn
Brazil is on tract to elect a commie and Venezulea's main protestors are just a different brand of "your socialism didn't work but muh socialism will"

It takes a solid 80ish years to cure socialism, and I'd rather not deal with that shit my entire life.

Few people are going to voluntarily pay more taxes. Secondly, Bernie Sanders has paid out of his own pocket to help his constituents.

>YOU WANT TO SPEND MONEY ON SOMETHING FOR YOURSELF? OY VEY RACIST!

>No Refunds
>Goy

>If I buy five Rolexes and sell them off
You've engaged in multiple transactions and provided a service of moving goods, namely goods that have a tangible, utilitarian benefit.

>we need "common" infrastructure in the first place.
If you want to get into a battle of whose more pedantic, nobody technically needs a house with all the contemporary conveniences of electricity, internet, plumbing, etc. In fact, nobody technically needs clothing, cars, roads, education, eat meat, drink alcohol, and so on. We can argue about needs and repeatedly move the goal post til the end of time.

You can't ask people to voluntarily pay more taxes if you won't do it yourself.

He asks people to vote for people to raise the taxes. That means that he indirectly asks people to voluntarily pay more taxes.

>WHAT? YOU WANT TO KEEP THE MONEY OTHERS EARN FOR YOU? NOT IN MY COUNTRY!
fixd

Tha tawp won pacent of tha tawp ten pacent of tha top won pacent of the top billionai class

Who's arguing about needs? Who even needs a single Rolex?

Sorry, explain it to me like I'm drunk. I was wondering more about trading in goods between person A to person B vs. issuing a loan to person A at interest.

I think it's an interesting question, particularly when the loaner of currency can loan currency he does not have, while the loaner of Rolexes cannot loan Rolexes he does not have.

"Others earn for you"

Commies clearly don't understand that solving logistics problems and incurring responsible risk deserve rewards.

...

>communist
>can't understand economics
Every time

He's still within the bounds of respectable, as far as income goes. He doesn't exactly get showered with tons of contributions and insider trades from industry, like the rest of the Senate.

This.

>solving logistics problems
It's a fucking commodity service, goof.
>incurring responsible risk
Which can be essentially eliminated, right along with your good boy points.
Sit down, Urkel. Your muh risk taking is antisocial and obsolete.

>anti-communist
>can't understand the nexus of politics and economy
Every time.

>No Refunds
>No Refunds

Pick one!

I honestly think Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders have the greatest meme potential of any presidential candidate. It would be really funny if one of them became president.

If Bernie stands for one thing its racial equality because he turned a bunch of whites into apes demanding gibs.