> in 1880s was 1 in 50
>1920s 1 in 20
>1970s 1 in 10
>2000s 1 in 2
by 2020 the rate will be close to 80%
there is literally a silenced epidemic right now, which being ignored and side-lined by manufactured political hysteria: climate change and such
>it is 1 in 2 people. meaning 50% of the population
cancerresearchuk.org
ottawa.ctvnews.ca
Other urls found in this thread:
chelorg.com
independent.ie
health.thewest.com.au
nbcnews.com
independent.ie
drsircus.com
scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org
theguardian.com
who.int
articles.mercola.com
youtube.com
jaffememo.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtu.be
investmentwatchblog.com
en.wikipedia.org
theatlantic.com
twitter.com
The jews did this
It's just the unnaturally unhealthy lifestyles of North Americans, retard.
North America has the highest obesity rates on the planet as well.
Blame yourselves, not the Kikes.
You realize the death rate is always 100% anyway, right? The reason more deaths are from cancer is because more people are living to older ages where cancer is likely to develop.
We actually don't anymore, a bunch of islands and shit + mexico are more obese.
But "we" were fat fucks for a prolonged period so its now catching up
It's Mexico actually
>implying its just burgers
read the links
its europe and australia too
Detection of cancer improved. Be careful of using these charts to correlate any cause.
Chemtrail flouride in the water and poisoning the food of the poor with carcinogens and mutagenic GMO's also doesn't help
while they got people distracted about global warming and fugees, the greatest plague in history is ravaging white nations
cancer is sort of a full stop. because less people are dying to other causes, cancer is just getting the opportunity to kill more
We're still fat fucks it's just that the rest of the world is catching up and now several countries have surpassed us.
lifespan in US remained constant while cancer rates increase to 80% of the population.
>rising cancer rates in young adults, teenagers and even children
chelorg.com
independent.ie
health.thewest.com.au
nbcnews.com
wrong.
cancer cases expected to soar to 70% of the population the a few years
independent.ie
drsircus.com
>incidence of cancer at 1 in 2
scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org
theguardian.com
who.int
>More Younger Women Getting Breast Cancer
articles.mercola.com
If elites are culling the herds they're doing a pretty fucking shit job.
1. the chemtraill conspiracy theory isn't real
2. flouridating water doesn't have adverse effects, and has positive effects on dental health
3. GMO crops have no adverse health effects, in many cases the opposite, though there are some other problems with them that aren't health related
as for carcinogens in food, I don't know enough to comment on that
Kill the bankers before they kill you. Slice them up to torture them first though.
you are a damned idiot. read your own chart
hehe stupid goyim.
EAT MY MCFOOD
the only user with an iq itt
>life expectancy goes up by 5 years
>cancer rates go up 80%
????????????????????????????
>implying the elites failed at depopulating whites and importing fugees
jaffememo.com
They got a herd of nigger cattle
They got a herd of nigger cattle
They got a herd of nigger cattle
They got a herd of nigger cattle
yeah every year extra you live past 65 your risk of developing cancer goes up exponentially
first, it's not 80%, read the chart posted in this very thread
second, even if it were, as I said life expectancy is getting longer and other causes of death are either being cured or are less prevalent. If this were really a "culling of the herd", the total death rate would also be increasing, not just deaths from cancer.
Another good point is what said, detection rates have also improved, which means more deaths ascribed to cancer, and more deaths from secondary causes being attributed to cancer as well. In the past you might have just died from "pulmonary edema" with an unknown cause, but now they know you died of pulmonary edema caused by lung cancer, so that death is now counted as a cancer death.
looks like this goy wandered away from the flock
Its because before antibiotics people would die before they got old enough to get cancer.
It takes time to get cancer, with longer life times comes more cancer.
Also lots of plastics and industrial chemicals in America were never tested for health impacts, when public health regulatory agencies were established, they simply grandfathered things in.
There's lots of things we can do to fight cancer, but voting for republicans doesn't help anything.
>50% of people currently have cancer
K
Birth control is what actually makes a difference, and its cheaper than a big conspiracy too
Cell phone tower radiation, plastics and longer lifespans, probably more. Jews.
It's money in the bank baby.
en.wikipedia.org
My dad back in Canada just got diagnosed with prostate cancer and I've been looking into it. Not much on efficacy, but oh my God the money.
Cancer is one of the biggest industries in the world, and baby, business is booming!
Activate your cannabinoid receptors and your immune system as best you can. The doctors are no longer your friends. Stay away from them if you can. They're there to find a problem, not prevent one.
In the past month: My father got diagnosed with cancer, my neighbour's sister died from cancer, my other neighbour's mother got diagnosed with cancer and my wife's eldest brother just got a 3 day blast of radiation up in China because his cancer index was high.
I think I'd rather try to fight the cancer myself thanks, or not even know I have it. Cancer treatment is unbelievably horrible.
I'll take the big C thanks big Pharma.
Nobody is forcing you to stuff poisonous gmo sugary shit in your dick holster.
Normally i hate globalists and their scheming but in this case i really don't give a shit, only complete fucking retards eat their shit anyway and we will be better of without them.
>inb4 muh organic is a meme
like i said, i don't give a shit if you stuff your face with sprayed gmo shit.
...
run the CIA niggers over they glow in the dark
Yeah, this is another factor to consider. There are likely many everyday materials or pharmaceuticals that may be carcinogenic but it's over such a long term that it's impossible for us to have tested for it by this point - especially since the modern FDA and EPA are only a generation old. There are older people alive now that grew up without them, and many of our modern materials and drugs are just as new. It wouldn't surprise me if there's a long battle over the next couple of generations to have drugs re-tested and get certain plastics or chemicals banned.
Birth control and a working economy.
Africa would still explode regardless.
If you look at the chart and use your brain you will notice that the cancer rate spikes just as 6 decades have passed since the life expectancy stopped increasing rapidly. 6 decades is also the time when the people who were born into a time of increased life expectancy are getting old and dying from cancer.
Is American education really this bad?
You know that everyone will eventually get cancer assuming that nothing else kills them first, right?
This is to be expected. We're eliminating a lot of the other things that generally killed people before they rolled the dice enough times to get cancer.
Africa, if its people don't migrate en masse somewhere else, is going to experience a serious Thucydides trap in the next few decades. Their growth isn't sustainable. I just hope other countries have the brains not to act as their personal release valve and take in "economic migrants".
Coincidentally, I think this is part of why China is investing so heavily in Africa right now. They want to get in while the getting is good, then when food gets short and the economy goes south they leverage their position as a major exporter to improve their position even further.
What better way to take a goys life savings?
>implying its an elderly disease
about 40% of cancer cases are below age 60
This, also "cancer" is turning into a huge scam. Most "cancer" can be cured naturally and many times just by being more healthy. Also a lot of what they claim is cancer, especially in young people, is somewhat natural and goes away on its own. But the fear mongering generates revenue. The cancer industry is the real cancer.
Yeah, so that means 60% of cancer cases are above 60. Considering only ~20% of the population in places like Europe and the US (and even less in the rest of the world) is over 60, that's very disproportionate, and really sounds like an elderly disease to me.
Cancer has a cure and the pharmaceutical industries won't even allow it because there is no profit in it
The real problem is that, under our current healthcare system, there is a profit motive to keep people sick on all levels of the healthcare industry except for the consumer. Drug companies, hospitals, and especially insurance companies make more money when the population is unhealthy. These companies, along with the food industry, are propping up a corrupt FDA. Whether or not you believe in a conspiracy of this nature, you can't deny a strong profit motive, as evidenced by Obama when he let insurance companies draft our comprehensive healthcare reform law.
For-profit private organizations whose responsibility lies towards shareholders and not patients will clearly always work selflessly to develop a cheap, freely available cure for cancer, and won't charge the GDP of a small African state for it every year.
God bless big Pharma, our benevolent overlords.
>this is what you sound like
Which means 60% of them are not. 60 isn't exactly a young age mate.
By the time you hit 40 your body is already dropping to bits. Your blood production is so low that even blood donation charities tell you to hold back on giving it away. Half of your marrow has been converted to fat. The fact people can average around 80 years is down to the miracle of medicine combined with the tenacious will to simply persist until the last drop of blood is broken down by the body.
If dems want to win in 2020, find a candidate who will gut the FDA. Even I'd consider switching my vote then.
By 2060 150% of the population will have cancer.
But nah it's a combination of people living long enough to get cancer, not dying of other things and better diagnostics.
>by 2020 the rate will be close to 80%
80% of people are going to have cancer in 2.5 years?
Are you fucking stupid, why would you believe this?
right, enjoy your cancer by the time your 40. this is why whites are being replaced by "youth"
this is the answer
cancer is what kills you when nothing else does
the vast majority of people with cancer are old and were about to die anyway
if you live long enough you are almost guaranteed to get cancer, but who wants to live to be 150 anyway?
>You know that everyone will eventually get cancer assuming that nothing else kills them first, right?
Also back in the day people would die of "old age" or "the consumption" and doctors would not realize they had died of cancer
today we always know you died of cancer and what kind it was, back then it was just "dying"
so even if you tried to look at "how many people over age 60 died of cancer in the year 1900" you could never get accurate information and the numbers will look lower than they really are
% of people currently have cancer
>K
seriously what the fuck
Do you have any proof?
Not saying that it isn't happening,
but hasn't our ability to detect cancer also gone up?
oncology has always been shady. The cancer wards are like separate businesses within the hospital run by an outside entity, why is that? And the same few drugs used to treat cancer have been around for a very long time yet are still very expensive e.g. Cisplatin, Etopside, etc. I knew a guy who worked for the Oncology group around here, Northeast New York Oncology Hematology, it was owned by a bunch of wealthy Texas oilmen, why would a bunch of Texans own it. He claimed that not only did they own all these cancer centers but they produced the drugs the drugs themselves as some sort of vertical integration scheme. How come no other disease is like that?
also many cases went undiagnosed back in the day. I think our shitty diets are poisoning are bodies more than in the past but I don't think there is a sinister conspiracy behind it. Apart from greed and shekel grabbing.
Whites are being replaced by "youths" due to immigration. Most non-White ethnicities living in Europe quickly drop to a birth rate lower than the Whites by the 3rd generation.
For example Germany which has so many turkroaches has a birth rate lower than Japan and the UK which has cities filled to the brim with Pakis and Indians still has rural White as the population group that has the most children by sheer number and fertility rate alike.
What worries the Jews is that every immigrant they send to Europe damns their lineage within four generations. Their multicultural utopia has failed at every turn and now they are desperately trying to completely outnumber and destroy White countries so that even if all the immigrants disappear at least there are no longer any Whites.
Cancer is a very lucrative industry for the medical community. Not just chemotherapy but it's great for getting big donations for cancer institutes .. yeah .. hey .. we're busy curing cancer ... haha .. sure we are .. gib moar money plox
cancer? what do u mean?
you realize every other western country has obesity rates no more than 5% less than the usa
Chemo is extremely lucrative, but it is essentially worthless, and probably kills more people than it cures. Every person who pins their hope on chemo is a person who does not seek out alternative cures.
Chemotheraphy is really primitive medicine. Think about blood letting, or curing with leeches, or draining bile to get healthy, or drilling holes in the skull to remove the demons. It's on that level or superstitious medicine.
"Cancer awareness" charities are pure evil. Susan G Komen foundation copyrights the color pink and sues people trying to spread awareness using a pink ribbon. These "charities" pay their CEOs hundreds of thousands while producing nothing of worth. Don't get me wrong, nonprofit CEOs need to be paid a lot for the whole thing to work, but these charities don't do a damn thing worthwhile, they just prey on people's survivor's guilt.
the cancer epidemic is intentionally ignored as it culls the population as was historically intended
In 1971, when President Richard M. Nixon initiated the War on Cancer, the average person had a 1 in 10 risk of developing cancer in his or her lifetime. Today, that's changed – for the worse. The risk as of 2005 is 1 in 2.
this is the major cause of rapid decline in western populations
cancer is now as common as the flu, that is intentional. the existing cures for cancer are intentionally suppressed.
the great culling/poisoning orchestrated by CIA, CFR, etc has led to dramatic population declines. the genocide machine is being refueled by new immigrants to pack into the poison chambers
its all a scam.
Did you know that before 1973 it was illegal in the US to profit off of health care. The Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 passed by Nixon changed everything
>the law Nixon mandated also included clauses that encouraged medical providers to not CURE afflictions, but to PROLONG them by only treating the symptoms. There’s no money to be made in CURING sickness.
Is the health insurance business a racket? Yes, literally. And this is why the shameless pandering to robber baron corporations posing as “health providers” is such an egregious … and obvious … tactic to do nothing more than plump up insurance company profits.
the downfall of the American health insurance system falls squarely on the shoulders of former President Richard M. Nixon.
In 1973, Nixon did a personal favor for his friend and campaign financier, Edgar Kaiser, then president and chairman of Kaiser-Permanente. Nixon signed into law, the Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973, in which medical insurance agencies, hospitals, clinics and even doctors, could begin functioning as for-profit business entities instead of the service organizations they were intended to be
>this is the major cause of rapid decline in western populations
it's really not though
It's primitive, but it's not on the same level as bloodletting.
You have tumors - let's kill the tumors with radiation rather than cutting you up to remove them.
It's not exactly elegant, but it's also not worthless.
dying of cancer is like dying of old age
1 in 1 people are going to have it happen to them some day if they don't die some other way
average lifespan is increasing, how do you explain that fact?
>Did you know that before 1973 it was illegal in the US to profit off of health care.
lol no it wasn't
the death rate hasn't increased. There is no "culling" of the population, and the reason for population decline is a low birth rate, not high death rate.
consider the fact that cancer treatments have remained the same for 100 years using archaic radiotherapy and chemo
consider the fact that immunotherapy, cryoimmunotherapy have been around for over 100 years, but suppressed and avoided by medical establishment
consider the fact that the FDA setup red-tape and expensive phased clinical trials to delay and discourage new treatments
also it has been proven that diseases like cancer can be treated with a combination/cocktail of old common, cheap, repurposed drugs and other suppressed alternatives
while they got the goyim worried about the climate, they are culling them with cancer
Everyone food is poisoned as fuck these days m8. It's hard to avoid shit foods (basically everything from a store is shit, even the fruits and vegetables). You have to grow things yourself to not get fucked over
this
atmospheric nuke testing a great crime
Thanks monsanto PR team. What would we do without you
Stay away from doctors if you can. I don't need sick notes anymore, so haven't seen a doctor for years. Feels great man.
Going to get 'checked out' once in a while is like driving your car around to mechanics asking them to find a problem. It's foolish and you don't need it unless you need it.
Big Pharma finances medicine. Nuff said.
>the death rate hasn't increased. There is no "culling" of the population, and the reason for population decline is a low birth rate, not high death rate.
get out of here with facts
50% of everyone has cancer and is dying of it, this is crazy thread
when are they going to cure t1 diabetes? greedy faggots
Is it plastics?
I've also heard a theory that microwaves break down certain proteins in unnatural ways that our bodies respond unnaturally to.
>average lifespan
>1980: 73
>2016: 77
over 30 years its insignificant in proportion to the epidemic. the epidemic is gonna swallow you
Its radio waves, not food
Sell em a treatment. Never a cure.
Cancer treatments make hospitals and the pharmaceutical industries billions of dollars, why would they have any incentive to ever cure or find better treatments for cancer?
the oligarchs get the cures and live to a ripe old age. the plebs get the epidemic and get to panic about russia and the climate instead of getting cured
en.wikipedia.org
president Reagan's medical history, though guarded by privacy, reveals that he had skin cancer [ 1987 ], colon cancer [ 1985 ] and prostate cancer [ 1987 ] during his presidency.
"He died at age 93, and not from cancer. " [ Although President Reagan refused America's outdated cancer treatments, he did not share his cancer story with his fellow Americans. ]
>Rockefeller 102 yrs old
>Jimmy Carter 93 yrs old, cured of metatstatic cancer in 2015
>Gerald Ford 93 yrs old
>Reagan 93 yrs old, cured of metatstatic cancers (colon, prostate, skin) in 1985
>George Bush 93 yrs old
>Henry Kissinger 93 yrs old
>Charles W. Robinson 95 yrs old
>Robert S. Ingersoll 96 yrs old
>Andrew Marshall 95 yrs old
>Prince Philip 95 yrs old
>Zbigniew Brzezinski 90 yrs old
>over 30 years its insignificant in proportion to the epidemic. the epidemic is gonna swallow you
about 80 is as long as the average human body is good for user, what more do you want.
The average person lives well into old age, the average non smoking not fat person without genetic issues who does not die in a car crash probably lives to about 85
if cancer were killing everyone we would be living less long, not longer
1. that chart is a (((projection))) which are usually speculative and bullshit as with global warming
2. If you don't die from heart disease, which less people are b/c diet, then you'll most likely die from cancer
>life expectancy goes up 5 years
>cancer rates increase by 40%
who could be behind this?
Lets skew those statistics any way that looks good to us.
With the projected statistics for cancer in this country at 8 of 10 Americans will develop cancer in their lifetime
actually its intentionally under-reported/mis-reported as complications/suicides/over-doses. the authorities really dont want to cause alarm and public panic of the epidemic, they try to focus public panic and hysteria on oligarch issues: global warming or russia
One time I heard the head of the intensive care unit give a talk in which he bragged about how he had one of the lowest mortality rates in his unit. I went out to lunch with him, where he became a bit inebriated, and told me how he managed to get those statistics---by wheeling the dying patients out into the corridor where they died and didn't sully our departments record.
source on OP's chart: bullshitimadeup.com
eh, living past 75 or so is a meme. Even the richest people who get to live to 95 b/c medecine die sick and mentally ill in their hospital beds. Doesn't seem worth it unless you're a genetic fluke who can stay fit till 95 which is maybe 2 % of the population.
>With the projected statistics for cancer in this country at 8 of 10 Americans will develop cancer in their lifetime
if you don't die of old age you will probably get cancer if you live to 80 or older
that has probably always been the case except before about 1950 dying of old age and dying of cancer were basically synonymous
how would you even know if someone died of leukemia in 1800? They didn't have the tests to test for that
...
kek
people didn't get old enough to die of cancer because they died of the mumps and polio.
they want to live extra long to witness they chaos they help create
top marks.
pretty sure our cancer detection has stayed the same.
even if someone dies and nobody knew they had cancer, the autopsy would make it painfully obvious.
The science checks out
We literally used chemtrails in Vietnam decades ago and successfully extended the monsoon season. It's very very very doubtful that the CIA would just drop something with so much potential
>plastic
We have a winner. Widespread use of plastics became popular right around the rise in OPs graph. It gets worse the more they try to push plastic
theatlantic.com
>pretty sure our cancer detection has stayed the same.
lol nope
>even if someone dies and nobody knew they had cancer, the autopsy would make it painfully obvious.
again nope
not all cancer is huge tumors
if you died of certain cancers in 1850 there would literally be no way for them to know
>extended monsoon season
we can seed clouds and increase precip. We 100% can't "extend the monsoon season" b/c that would mean changing weather patterns that are thousands of miles wide in scale.
>t. atmosciencefag
>if you died of certain cancers in 1850 there would literally be no way for them to know
>1850
hows it feel to be retarded?
we're comparing 2000s and above you retard.
