Right to carry

murrifags btfu, stanford says the right to carry doesnt work

news.stanford.edu/2017/06/21/violent-crime-increases-right-carry-states/

Other urls found in this thread:

nber.org.sci-hub.io/papers/w23510.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_control_method
wearechange.org/u-s-supreme-court-says-no-license-necessary-to-drive-automobile-on-public-highwaysstreets/
youtu.be/ILSiVO3dDYg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

The rise in violent crime is the reason many States have passed right to carry laws.

>Crime rate was 7% higher than if the state didn't adopt the laws
>Data was derived based on hypothetical statistical models and not actual data
Worthless clickbait. Faggotry expected of an EU flag.

stanford can lick my sack and get plugged when i cum on their campus

This

Stanford Law Professor John Donohue’s analysis shows that violent crime in RTC states was estimated to be 13 to 15 percent higher – over a period of 10 years – than it would have been had the state not adopted the law.

>than it would have been
>implying

>right to carry laws.
no such thing, as there can be no law against me bearing arms in the first place

we live in america

ignore the fake laws

Cities with high concentration of black population has more crime. I wonder why

YOU SAY 'NO' TO MY AR-15, YOU FUCKIN' PRICK! YOU AIN'T GONNA ABLE TO SAY 'NO' TO ME WHEN I GET TO YOUR HOUSE, YOU MOTHERFUCKER!!

The bill of rights is a list of negative rights, you freedom hating imbecile.

"doesn't work"

Yeah it does. It's not like the gun stops working because somebody else didn't see it.

Original paper:

nber.org.sci-hub.io/papers/w23510.pdf

>Le one post from this user

probably all the hate crimes and oppression they face

Do you suggest arming myself with a sunny disposition?

Rape and assault is always better when you make the effort to enjoy the experience, huh?

Maybe don't put yourself in a position to get raped if you don't want it, you degenerate whore.

>fake left wing study

Prove it.

Maybe because right to carry states have more niggers and mexicans in them.

California was used as a control for Texas, though.

>Take Texas, which passed RTC laws in 1996. Donohue’s comparison for Texas came from combining data from California – a non-RTC state – and Nebraska and Wisconsin, which hadn’t pass RTC laws at that time. By weighting the violent crime data from these three states for the period from 1986 to 1996, he produced a synthetic crime rate similar to Texas’ crime rate in the 10 years prior to adopting RTC laws.

>Donohue then projected the synthetic state’s crime rate for the next 10 years and compared it against Texas’ crime rate post-RTC passage. He performed the same analysis on the 33 states that enacted RTC laws over his data period and found a strikingly consistent picture.

Can we try to get the left to coin the term "fake laws"? Please?

We would need to find a good topic to insert it into.

>law abiding citizens carrying firearms magically cause criminals to commit crimes
LOL

>implying broadening the right to carry doesn't put guns into the hands of more criminals

no shit, what does this idiot donohue have a crystal ball or something? stanford should have its accreditation revoked if this is the caliber of work they're doing there.

>does this idiot donohue have a crystal ball or something?
Almost. He has the synthetic control method.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_control_method

States with more blacks*

Good thing they have the right to carry and protect themselves.

...

Commiefornia needs to be forcibly seceded from the rest of the US at bayonet point.

but what if they shoot back?

i dont get what you mean by "it doesnt work", we want constitutional carry nationwide, so more right to carry states are working, violent crime is just a fucking sideshow

Haahahahhaahhaahaha Ok
T state with the highest gun ownership per capita and lowest crime

>California
>having guns

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
With exception to the niggers and spics killing each other California ain't got shit.

Which is just straight up bs. It's no mere coincidence that from the early 90's to late 00's heaps of states started issuing them at the same time violent crime started to plummet from a previously flat trend. I'm not finished the read yet, do they even mention that or are they dodging inconvenient facts to their hypothesis?

> “There is not even the slightest hint in the data that RTC laws reduce overall violent crime,” Donohue stated

Wow, that's rich.

I've never seen so much autism in one single picture

You think I give a fuck what Stanford University has to say about right to carry?

Watch me keep doing it, bitch.

Fuck EU nigger lovin' sand spics.

>implying RTC laws aren't the reaction instead of the cause
Take your epic \pol btfo thread and fuck off

problem?

Auto law

Once you agree your 'car' is a 'motor vehicle' you are subject to be held to commercial standards and require a license.

you can 'travel' in your 'car' with no license or permit. it's your property. take it anywhere and don't follow the DMV's fake deceptive laws

wearechange.org/u-s-supreme-court-says-no-license-necessary-to-drive-automobile-on-public-highwaysstreets/

>if you have a right to carry you become a crazy guy murdering at every chance

Has anyone ever tried just strapping it to the roof?

>the right to carry doesn't work - Moshe Shekelstein

Gotcha

what are you talking about?

>lighter
>nothing to light
cool

there's a walmart every couple blocks, my man.

AHAHAHAHA IS THAT A TACTICAL EDC FIDGET SPINNER?

You should spin that handgun around your finger instead you fuckin' geek.

Well if you live in an open carry state, then if it's outside of the vehicle then that wouldn't require a CCW, right?

Sup Forums may not understand, but this REALLY is a 'fake law' so let me explain.

the supreme court says you can drive your car whenever and wherever you want. they can't stop you from using your property on the roads.

the DMV invented new laws concerning 'motor vehicles' so the state tricks you in the moment to agreeing you are driving a motor vehicle, so they can get you in trouble for commercial laws. like for taxis, delivery, mailmen, etc.

hope that made sense

>Cities with high concentration of black population has more crime. I wonder why

because retarded liberals outlawed their favorite hobby cockfighting

You don't carry that

there's no such thing as an open carry state. that's a fake law that would be unconstitutional to follow.

all land in this country allows its free men to bear arms.

That pooor Glock...

If you're going to do a red dot, don't do it the poorfag way, get an RMR cut, faggot.

>a liberal college says guns aren't useful

Opinion disregarded.

I think there is such a thing as an open carry state. My state law confirms you can open carry.

Even if that study were true, it wouldn't matter. Rights are rights regardless of potential negatives associated with them. Would you say free speech doesn't "work" just because people use it to shitpost on a Siamese fish sauce fermenting forum?

i do sometimes, mostly carry this

Yes let me know how this one works out for you Mr. Amibeing Detained.

Spend $30,000+ on attorneys fees arguing through several levels of courts vs. get a $25 fuckin drivers license. Hmmm.

they don't have to confirm it. that's the deception. you could always do it.

You know wonderful cities like Chicago banned guns without permits (which you had to be a politician to get), and we both know how wonderfully safe that city is. Least the supreme court overruled that, so at least you can legally protect yourself from thugs now.

Yeah, I'm sure fake laws is gonna go over real well with the state police officers paid by the state to enforce these laws. Tell me how it turns our for you.

imagine for a second if someone shot the author in the face.

youtu.be/ILSiVO3dDYg

wrong. I have the supreme court case number I can share with the officer. The exact precedent. This isn't anything nebulous, it is fact set forth by the supreme court.

Just like the Constitution confirms we have a right to bear arms, my state confirms we can open carry.

Perfect? No, but it's the same idea.

My car is not registered with the DMV because I am a free man.

Whelp i guess bill nye better get on the case of having our rights ammended.

They don't have the authority to confirm or deny your right to carry.

wow kill yourself

It's nice to have a document, but be careful what you worship.

Your rights are immaterial, they do not exist on this plane. You seize them with might and force of will.

>Spend $30,000+ on attorneys fees arguing through several levels of courts vs. get a $25 fuckin drivers license. Hmmm.

if more people had balls nobody would have to pay anything, they would shut down the DMV and all those miserable people who work there would feel much better about themselves being jobless

>They don't have the authority to confirm or deny your right to carry.
That's a matter of debate. I'm just saying my state has it codified in state law confirming that we can.

>They don't have the authority to confirm or deny your right to carry.

they are likely to illegally fuck with you about it

why?

What kind of fucking faggot carries cross draw? This isn't a detective comic or a western movie. Fuck off with that shit. I refuse to click your link because your image is garbage and is probably filled to the brim with Brady Bunch Marxist-Jewish propaganda.

What does that piece on the end of the barrel do? I thought supressors and revolvers didn't play nice together

It's stanford, man. That's nigger shit.

Hope it doesn't come to that mate.

Hope and pray.

Is that...Is that a rape whistle on your keys?

I would argue that it has already begun.

jew propaganda

no, its the key to my musically locked apartment

looks like a flute. But either way it will be stopping any sex from happening.

And the officer can still cite you for anything he wants dude, no one gives a fuck about your magic number.

You're gonna go to court, and you're gone get convicted, and you can take time off work and waste all your time appealing to higher and higher courts, or you can stfu and pay the god damn ticket.

Don't you think that if there were some magic precedent that rendered tickets void that every lawyer in the country would be foaming at the mouth waiting to charge everyone $500 to give them the "Magic number" too and get them off? Or are you really so autistic that you think you're the only one who has figured this out in America.

This sovereign citizen shit is hilarious, I literally fall asleep sometimes to videos of these idiots getting rocked by cops who don't have time to play roadside lawyer.

I've been stopped. Nothing happens.

I have got a warning.

Works well enough here in Maine. Thing is the nigger population is small, that might have something to do with it.

checking four times over.

If it gets there, then it gets there.

If more people had balls 99% of our problems in society would be resolved already instead of people waiting on daddy government to solve their issues for them.

so what's your premise. no one will ever have balls?

sounds like a nihilist post. (useless) so tell me why I should care?

10/10

It's too light themselves on fire for being such a huge faggot.

Probably because the cop didn't want to deal with your autistic screeching.

Let me get this straight, you drive with no registration at all (how did you get plates then), no drivers license, and assuming no insurance because why would you have that if you don't have anything else, and when you get pulled over the cop simply gives you a warning?

This is a LARP from some kid who probably doesn't even have a DL cause he failed the DMV test three times and then went home and read more crackpot sovereign citizen rambling.

You're an idiot dude. If this were true, no one would pay registration, no one would pay their traffic tickets. I love how you honestly think you are so intelligent that you've figured out a law that thousands of lawyers before you must have just simply overlooked.

>too

no plates

warning was for not signalling. I claimed I did and he just didn't see it. So I got a warning.

My premise is that convincing 200+ million people to wage war against the DMV is a lot bigger task than just paying your fucking registration like a neurotypical person.

"If we could just find water on another planet then we could ship it back here and not even have to worry about water!" Yes, true, but instead let's focus on the water we can actually see, you fucking space cadet.

I don't expect it. I'm smart so I do have a vision for the future of the police state, but it's not that.

also I don't believe in space. you called me neurotypical, but then you use a normie metaphor. get with it.

DMV isn't it. It's the state. Who holds title to the vehicle?

I thought it was supposed to be common understanding that if you just put on makeshift plates indicating "private vehicle" that everybody understands what that means, just like if you need to drive a farm vehicle down the road with proper markings.

Californians have billboards that advertise for people to call for a free consultation to get rid of their ticket instead of paying any money, exactly what the guy is talking about. You're a moron

>I don't believe in space.

You win.

Is Sup Forums letting this fucking shill slide this topic? Holy shit.

SAGE

All I'm saying is there are a lot of fake laws that people allow themselves to be bullied into following.

These are deceptions, and if you're smart you can navigate through them.