Yeah, some folks are born with a silver spoon in hand, it ain't me or you, and it might sound unfair but think about it: If a man were successful, should his success be taken away from him? Is a parent not entitled to provide for their children, in the hopes of having a better start, better opportunities, and to achieve more than their parents ever could?
There is NO family, NO person on this earth who would disagree. The leftist shits only spout this garbage because they're miserable garbage who failed at life, and look at those who succeeded with envy.
Let's not even go far: We've all heard the story of Bill Gates, of that dude who made Walmart, of Steve Jobs making Macs in his garage back when Apple just started......look at it this way, if you were one of those people, if you were one of those who worked hard and succeeded, would you want some liberal dipshit who fell for the liberal arts degree meme, saddled with student debt, almost no understanding of fiscal responsability, to take away what you earned for yourself just because "you're rich"? I guaran fucking tee you, if any of these starbucks sipping hipsters were Steve Jobs, they suddenly wouldn't be supporting redistribution of wealth anymore.
Capitalism enables the smart, the cunning and the willing man to earn from the sweat of his brow, sure you can say it's not always ethical or reasonable, that it has corrupt practices, but the other alternative is to force everyone in an equal state of misery (see: USSR and soviet satellite states), and EVEN THEN, the party officials and their families get to live in luxury while their hard-toiling """"comrades""""" wait in breadlines.
You're just envious that they were born in luxury, but if it were you I bet you wouldn't want to give up all your fortunes in the name of equality you commie piece of shit. And HURRDURR BUT THEY SIT ON THEIR GOLDEN ASSES ALL DAY is not an argument, if they did their fortunes would be squandered.