Prove to me climate hange is a hoax

Prove to me climate hange is a hoax.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0
youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU&t=2066s
forbes.com/#6f6a35cf2254
lewrockwell.com/2015/03/walter-e-williams/global-warming-lies/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon–Ehrlich_wager
youtube.com/watch?v=ihnkZOEe378
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Prove to me its not

Fpbp

Sage OP

Octane turns into up to 8 CO2 molecules when burned in oxygen.
CO2 turns the ocean acidic and stores extra heat in there and the atmosphere.
As the ocean warms up, water molecules bump into each other with greater energy causing the ocean to expand.


Ice ages are not driven by chemistry, they are driven by the earth wobbling on its axis from gravatational interactions with other solar system bodies, its called precession.

Solar cycles do not match the data and the atmosphere is only 62 miles thick, the Great Barrier Reef is has dissolved in 2 years.

Climate change is real, makes sense from a mechanical and chemical standpoint, and is having measurable effects now as we speak

Not proof.

2000 scientists were given that survey

You know how many replied with an answer? Less than 200.

97% of 200 "scientists" agree

the climate is changing, but that does not justify massive government programs, and a global carbon tax and all that other socialist crap. It's all about money and power.

>climate is changing and will hyper fuck all of us to death if we don't do something to at least slow it down
>'lol doesn't matter'

fuck off you blackpilled cuck

>muh global warming
I guess the earth is round too, eh?

>hyper fuck us all to death
proof rooster

This is why pol is the dumbest board on this site

They'll ask for proof about climate change which is actually happening but they'll be ok with shit like "christ is coming" and "praise kek"

Your thread is shit. Have this OC instead.

>mexican intellectual

...

Free thinking women believes yaas slay

what causes the planet to go through ice age cycles?

That's not really how this works, but all you really need to do is look at the libtard solutions to know it's BS.

They're against nuclear power. Instead they want to tax white people and give the money to brown people, while allowing China and India to pollute as much as they want.

Anthropogenic climate change is real, that's why your country grows more poppy fields than weed now. Thanks for the fire heroin.

>integeration

God damnit. Dont save that one.

Precession like I said.

The earths axis slowly moves back and forth from a greater tilt to a lesser one.
When the earth axis is at a greater angle, larger portions of the poles have those sun-less winters, which creates a large ice sheet which then reflects a lot of the suns heat away from the earth once summer arrived in that hemisphere

How about the fact that we can't eat fish from the ocean without risking mercury poisoning? There's more to preserving the planet than carbon dioxide.

...

Aren't "measurable effects" proof?

The earth is getting hotter like climate change theory predicts?
If you wanna argue that, please keep my original statement in mind, we are one square 3 now, don't take it back to 1

m.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0
Whatch this. Huge redpill
Btw it's a semantics-game. The climate is vivid and changes a lot (talking about planetary history not human), so denying that the climate changes is wrong. That is one of (((their))) tricks. Hope i could provoke some thoughts.

>The only way to save the environment is to not only allow the world's biggest polluter to continue to pollute at the rate they are now, but to give them financial incentive to pollute even more
>97% of climate scientists actually believe this

This whole climate deal has Jews written all over it. Avoid!

Prove to me climate change is real.

Anyone know what they originally introduced this bullshit as.
Thats correct, global warming.

Global cooling, actually.

New York was supposed to be under hundreds of feet of glacier by now.

If I fart under a blanket does it get hot?

no but you seem get hot when i whip out a can of raid

>climate change
>not global warming

Good change in name, now you can claim anything fits the narrative. before it had to specifically a change in temp in one direction and now its vaguely anything that doesnt mirror what we once had. When it rained in june 3rd last year but not june 3rd this year that is climate changing. When theres fewer hurricanes than before thats climate change. They have shifted the goalposts to encompass almost anything and as such removed all criteria for losing. You cannot prove climate change is a hoax because climate is always changing.

This is where the leftits will say aha but dont realise that the issue people have isnt with climate change but rather crippling our industry, relying on expensive modes of electricity production that are unreliable in the hopes of reducing an amount of a supposed pollutant. What ever amount the west cuts its emissions to can and will be pumped out by china in under 30days.

Stop trying to stop climate change and rather adapt to it. Plant crops where new land will form. Move from where land is now becoming arid. Use the increased CO2 to help get new yields from our crops. Or you can just focus on supposedly slowing it down via wealth transfers which dont do shit

>climate change

LOL I bet you think the Earth is round as well, WAKE UP SHEEPLE

The government is also breeding half-shark half-human hybrids in underwater labs, look it up

This.
Everyone screams about co2 when there are much worse environmental disasters happening all over the world.

earths natural state is with no ice caps, they will melt naturally

In the mediaeval age, England was so hot that there were some fifty vineyards in the south of England.

In the Victorian age, it was so cold that people used to go ice skating on the River Thames.

The temperature today does not come close to either of these two extremes, and, if CO2 emissions were responsible for global warming, one would expect the mediaeval period to be the cold one, and the Victorian one, the hot one; whereas the truth is directly the opposite of this.

Also this shit feeds into itself. Government gives out funds to scientists for research. Government gets told by scientists how they need to levy new taxes and expand their powers to combat this thing they say is happening. Government continues to fund research in that area to continually expand its powers and scope.

>hey can i get a loan to study the wing shape of moroccan seabirds
fuck off
>hey can i get a loan to study the wing shape of moroccan seabirds and how it is affected by global warming
$$$$$$

With this in play how will scientists not keep pushing such an agenda when their funding depends on it. Hell ill tag on global warming on the end of my study on pacemaker lifespans if it means i get the funding to do it.

>(((science)))
>muh always showing just the last 100 years of data to scare the brainwashed zombies

global warming/climate change is an industry unto itself and they want worldwide "carbon taxes" on top of that. it is an insidious thing far beyond that even.

you won't understand wtf i'm talking about unless you look into these things for yourself. so, you can do that (takes effort)... or blindly continue to go along with their agenda. whatever.

did you know having ice cap is an anomaly? did you know that the earth has been ice cap free for ~90% of its existence? did you know by definition ice caps only exist during ice ages? did you know we are at the tail end of a CURRENT ice age now? did you know the caps extended as far down as missouri/kentucky just 20,000 years ago and have been receding ever since that peak? did you know the caps are going bye-bye even if every person on the planet disappeared 20,000 years ago?

THE OCEAN'S RELEASE *ALL ON ITS OWN* IS FAR LARGER AND MORE IMPORTANTLY *OUT ACCELERATING* MANS CONTRIBUTION

THE OCEAN IS RELEASING MORE DUE TO WARMER TEMPS (WARMER WATER = IT'S A FAR LESS EFFECTIVE C02 SINK)

IF HUMANS NEVER AROSE CO2 WOULD BE INCREASING AT ALMOST THE EXACT SAME RATE AS IT IS RIGHT NOW

THIS HAPPENS AT THE END OF EVERY ICE AGE

STOP BEING SO FUCKING GULLIBLE AND LAZY

LOOK INTO THINGS FOR YOURSELF AND STOP TAKING WHAT THE MSM, EPA.GOV AND NASA.GOV ETC. TELL YOU AT FACE VALUE, YOU LAZY SHITS. IT IS ABOUT POWER AND CONTROL.

ICE AGES AND PERMANENT ICE *ARE AN ANOMALY*

BY DEFINITION AN "ICE AGE" IS WHEN THE EARTH HAS PERMANENT ICE SHELVES

WE HAD ICE A MILE THINK IN CINCINNATI JUST 20,000 YEARS AGO

THE PLANET IS WARMING AND THE CAPS ARE METLING

THAT MEANS = MORE CO2, SEA RISE AND WEATHER PATTERN CHANGES

WE CAN'T STOP OR ALTER IT, WE WILL ADAPT JUST FINE

STOP BEING SCARED INTO TAX SCHEMES AND GLOBALIST POWER PLAYS YOU DUMBED DOWN ZOMBIES

...

So, the sun is responsible for global warming?

youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU&t=2066s

forbes.com/#6f6a35cf2254

This

"Climate change predictions have been wrong for decades. Let’s look at some. At the first Earth Day celebration, in 1969, environmentalist Nigel Calder warned, “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind.” C.C. Wallen of the World Meteorological Organization said, “The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed.” In 1968, Professor Paul Ehrlich predicted that there would be a major food shortage in the U.S. and that “in the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people (would) starve to death.” Ehrlich forecasted that 65 million Americans would die of starvation between 1980 and 1989 and that by 1999, the U.S. population would have declined to 22.6 million. Ehrlich’s predictions about England were gloomier. He said, “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.

In 1970, Harvard University biologist George Wald predicted, “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” Sen. Gaylord Nelson, in Look magazine in April 1970, said that by 1995, “somewhere between 75 and 85 percent of all the species of living animals (would) be extinct.”

lewrockwell.com/2015/03/walter-e-williams/global-warming-lies/

>my knowledge on environmental issues comes from watching The Day After Tomorrow

Obviously.

>Prove to me climate hange is a hoax.
The Bible doesn't mention it in the Book of Revelation.
If humanity was going to end through climate change, I think the Book of Revelation would at least mention it?
QED

This was literally the Paris Accord

AAAS ss IT'S REAL BRO

Consensus is the refuge of charlatans and con men.

97 agree that climate change is real.... meaning the temperate does change.

A very small fraction agree In AGW as the main driver of climate change. That stat comes from the same scientific study u reference in the OP

Wasn't it only 13 that were climate scientists that replied in the positive?

>GlobalChange.gov gives the definition of climate change: “Changes in average weather conditions that persist over multiple decades or longer. Climate change encompasses both increases and decreases in temperature, as well as shifts in precipitation, changing risk of certain types of severe weather events, and changes to other features of the climate system.”

Do they realise how wide a net they have cast? They have pretty much included any kind of future event in their definition so it will naturally prove true. What kind of madman says the sun will keep shining then brags about it tomorrow when it does. How people think climate isnt always going to change i cant comprehend

He's talking about an Earth Day in the mid 70s when they declared Global Cooling to be the problem.
They tried to float ideas to warm the Earth but couldn't come up with any possible way for humans to alter the Earths temperature.

Pay dembts, Paul.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon–Ehrlich_wager

Well, that problem's solved. On to FTL travel.

>muh consensus is science.
considering your whole premise is based on a lie I don't have to prove shit.

The reason the earth gets hot is the sun.

It's not a hoax... HOWEVER:

The red pill:
>Methane (CH4) has 20~25 times (*conservative estimate) the GWP (Greenhouse Warming Potential) of carbon (CO2)
- Methane comes from cows (flatulence / manure from rumination)
>Swathes of forests are continuously felled to make way for cattle grazing land (otherwise the natural means of GH gas absorption)
- Rearing a cow for slaughter, for 1 year, creates the same amount of CO2 as driving a family-sized car for 70,000km / 42,5000mi
>40~50% of agri-land is set aside for cattle feed (soy crops)
- When forests are burned (e.g., in Indonesia -- to clear land for palm oil crops), more CO2 is released in a 1 day than by the entire U.S. industrial sector for 1 YEAR
>Burning a domestic fireplace creates as much CO2 as driving a family-sized car for 365 days / 1 year
- When the permafrost of the Arctic tundras et al. melts (*already happening), million-year-old, incalculable stores of methane will be released
>Methane contributes more to global warming than all other sources COMBINED

Yet, these factors are hardly, if ever, mentioned in discussion relating to AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming)...

tl;dr -- All "climate policy" is a cash-grab. Even scientists know this. The reason it's allowed to proceed (and the farting elephant in the room is conspicuously ignored), stems from the same logic applied to condoms:
>if sex partners are 100% clean (of STD's), condoms increase the risk of STD contraction / dissemination by a factor of three(3)
>they keep schtum on this because it's already so hard to get plebes to use a rubber, that any such news would likely increased the disincentive to use them

>if the prole knew they would literally have to stop stuffing their gaping gobs with burgers (as well as abandon all CO2) to make any tangible difference, they'd do nothing.
>we are all already dead

Refs:
Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret (2014)
Meat The Truth (2007)
Life After Porn 2 (2017) (*re. condoms analogy)

Weather Channel founder BTFO the Climate Change Hoax
youtube.com/watch?v=ihnkZOEe378

>plant crops where new land will form
Except the opposite will be true because of rising sea levels. And you can say that they aren't rising fast enough for you to care, but that is moving the goalposts yourself, because new land will not be forming, existing land will be disappearing.

>weather
>climate
>the inability to understand the distinction

protip:
>KYS
>...and you family

This post is HOAX. There in no way to prove "hange" except by using a covfefe.

New land as in areas once unlivable may begin getting rain/warmth and become land that can be of use. Im not saying this will happen for sure but what i am saying is that the generic wealth redistribution model outlined by isnt going to work. The tactic currently used is global socialism dressed up nice.

Climate change is always going to happen and if no new arable appears and we lose islands and the like it doesnt change what i said about adapting.

The climate changes on a geologic time scale. Humans may be contributing to it but other factors are far more important. The extra CO2 in the atmosphere is good for plant life and crop production. We're coming out of an ice age which is why the planet is heating up at far slower rates than what (((they))) initially reported.

Climate "science" has been exposed for the shill fraud echo chamber woo woo that it is. Climate change is a political tool to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of a multinational elite.

Chicita-check

No discernible means exists to isolate the human contribution to climate variation. The only reasonable null hypothesis is that global climate changes are natural. Empirical evidence does not support the alternate hypothesis. The conclusion is that there is no statistical evidence to any convincing degree of confidence that human activity is a major influence on the climate. In fact the climate has changed little in the last 30 years (global averages). What make me laugh is that the standard error of the measurements is several degrees yet people worry about 0.5 of a degree. On top of that, top climate sciences, not those pretending to be climate sciences, repeatedly say that more carbon dioxide is not even a bad thing.