IQ versus skin color

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Watson#Avoid_Boring_People.2C_UK_book_tour_and_resignation
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Tim_Hunt_controversy_at_WCSJ
frihetspartiet.net/dokumenter/Templer-Hiroko-Arikawa.pdf
racialreality.blogspot.com/2011/08/devastating-criticism-of-richard-lynn.html?m=1
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IQ_by_Country.png
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

nice trips, but how can a relation be negative? Also link to the study?

IQ has a heritable according to this of .5-.8
isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1169974.files/Bouchard%20McGue%202003.pdf

A negative correlation is just a negative slope of the best-fit line. No relationship would be 0 correlation (random scatter). The strength of the relationship is a function of the absolute value of the correlation.

Wait so im sorry im functionally retarded, what is the scatter graph saying again?

The darker the skin of a population, the lower their IQ.

Ohhhhhh, i thought it was saying the complete opposite

Is there anything else like this? Any more studies with skin color and IQ?

thats racists data, its okay to dismiss racist data

Why is Russia dark as Moortugal?

u must be a shitskin if u cant read a fucking chart, gtfo

Are you saying Frogs are smarter than me?

nah nigga fuck you i saw the negative subraction sgn thot it was a fuckin negative correlation

negative correlation means that as one value in increasing the other one is decreasing. The darker (more dark) the skin, the lower the IQ.

ooooo aite

Italy confirmed white

>nigga
>aite

Ethiopians confirmed retarded

Send sunscreen to Africa. They'll become the next powerhouse of scientific discoveries.

Honnest question but how do you determine the "skin pigmentation" part?

For example in that graph the skin pigmentation of Iberians is the same of that of Russians witch is the same of East asians

There are a lot of studies like this, though most of them never get published because the people researching these things are afraid of the backlash they will receive for publishing them.

fuck off you aint nothing boy real shit id fuck you up if you tried somethin real life tho like tryna atack me...

>Germany the smartest of the white Europeans
Glad to be a decendant, though sadly I'm sure their average has gotten darker and dumber over the past decade

Think of it as a melanin:IQ ratio

No, no other studies like it to my knowledge.

here are a lot of studies like this, though most of them never get published because the people researching these things are afraid of the backlash they will receive for publishing them.

Really? I've never heard anything about this, sources for any of this being true?

Quit LARPing as a nigger you faggot

im not a nigger, i dont attack random people on the street

Templer and Arikawa had three grad students judge the skin pigmentation, and they averaged the three together.

>quit larping as a PoC
>Brazil Flag

*HHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhUEEEEEEEEEEEE*

Itallians have the highest IQs in Europe

>white Europeans
Redundant m8

>All brazillians are niggers
>PoC
>Hides his flag
smdh tbqh familia

>calls me a PoC
>talks in ebonics unironically

Feels good to be white

If you just think a little about evolution, this should be a self-evident conclusion. Colder climates required more planning and the delay of impulsive decisions for future benefit (in order to survive winter). This environmental pressure selects people with higher IQ. Of course, lighter skin colors are more advantageous in colder climates as well. So just put two and two together.

Italy is even with Germany on the x axis of intelligence. And I said "white European" because the northern Euros are more White than the Southern/Eastern ones

Absolute value matters. The real value is relative to whatever is being plotted.

A slope of -.5 or .5 is the same, as it's the same distance from 0.

Skin pigmentation is derived from an environment. Colder climates with less sun have less pigmentation. They also require greater social skills for a community to survive. The opposite could be said about warmer climates with a wet-dry seasonal pattern. The type of climate that requires pigmentation to block harmful UV.

How does that explain Asian climates like Korea of China?
I think Japan has European level seasons and they pale af so it adds up

Almost like, there is a correlation between IQ averages and race. That can't be though, because in humanities and sociology my professors told me this was all bullshit. Some bigot tried to bring this sort of "science" up and was easily refuted by a strong POC. We had a big fight about this but we all agreed in the end that women's suffrage was the most important thing. Then everyone clapped.

What the fuck is more white?

>northern Euros are more White
Are you American?

I can't provide sources because there's no way of confirming it really. If the researchers keep their findings hidden then there are no findings to report on.

So in that regard it's hersay, however looking at the climate it's not that absurd.

Hell, look at what happened to James Watson, the dude's career got fucking destroyed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Watson#Avoid_Boring_People.2C_UK_book_tour_and_resignation

Same sort of thing happened to Tim Hunt when he off off-handedly suggested that men and women shouldn't work together too closley due to issues of romantic entanglement and women not taking critisim the same way.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Tim_Hunt_controversy_at_WCSJ

People in these feilds have to be very careful about what they say and by extension it's not unreasonable to assume that they would also have to be careful about what findings they publish. Especially if those findings happen to suggest that there may be significant mental differences between racial and sub-racial groups.

Korea is a temperate climate m8. China has like half of its land in a temperate zone as well.

Here's the paper if you want to read it yourself
frihetspartiet.net/dokumenter/Templer-Hiroko-Arikawa.pdf

wew lad, thats fucked! These scientists dont deserve that backlash for just doing WORK! WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!

This study used falsified data
racialreality.blogspot.com/2011/08/devastating-criticism-of-richard-lynn.html?m=1

At last I truly see..
Everyone below those lines are dumb niggers

kek

It isn't about the current climate but about the climate of the ancestors. Modern skin color is a measurement of the average ancestral climate, and the average ancestral climate determine's IQ. Koreans have a temperate climate today but in the last ice age they were living in freezing weather.

>India
calling bullshit

>a blog

Implying it matters among the educated.

Your source does not claim that the data is falsified, only it is unsystematic. IQ data has so many pitfalls that any universal system would come off as ad hoc. Wicherts et al. merely biased their data selection. The strong correlation of Templer and Arikawa effectively proves the data of Lynn and Vanhanen.

I don't know why you guys care, the CEO of Google is Indian, shit loads of Indian doctors. Makes this whole thing look pointless.

almost check'ed

...

Good point. It's worth noting that the earth was much, much colder when we were evolving.

It is true that Lynn's data selection isn't perfect and has flaws. Some of it may be his own carelessness while some of it may be simply because of the lack of good data in certain countries. However, the basic conclusion which is Africans=dumb has consistently been held up over many years.

It matters because we cant just take in thousands of indians, and we should be taking in less non white immigrants for this reason, unless of course they have rare skills that are needed in the US

Because most Indians are dumb as shit? They literally can't poo in a loo.

cold weather killed off a lot of the dumb pale people before the modern era. it's not like light skin MAKES you smarter, that's as dumb as the magical melanin theory.

>Thot
Lel

You think Indians are legit worse than Arabs? Arabs over Iranians?

Well what the hell does IQ mean of anyone can just transcend the average IQ and become a genius with the accessibility to resources.

Of course there are always going to be people who excel in every racial group. I'm sure there are even quite a few genius level abbos.

The reason that we see Indians as being super smart is because there's a fucking billion of them, LITERALLY, and we only see the best of the best normally because they're generally the only ones who are smart enough get the fuck out of the country.

These are not things that you should apply to individuals, but to populations in order to understand how those populations will function under certain conditions.

>anyone can just transcend the average IQ
No they can't. Only people who win the genetic lottery get to be above average.

You did read it did you?
Lynn did indeed falsify data. For example the IQ average of Equatorial Guinea was determined by a study of retarded children in Spain. He also threw out samples of high IQ blacks because he didn't believe it is possible for blacks to score that high. I do applied math. Don't try to fuck with me on this

IQ isn't infinitely flexible. It is flexible to an extent and you can improve your score, but only so much.

For example, you can't expect someone of average intelligence (IQ ~100) to hit 150 pretty much no matter what they do. In a similar fashion it would be unrealistic to expect anyone who's at or below 80 to ever get above 110. Meanwhile for most people at the 100 mark already getting above 110 would be trivial.

The problem is HOW dumb he claims they are. People with IQs below 70 have low testosterone levels and low fertility rates. Black Africans have hormone profiles consistent with IQ scores in the 80s range

Do you know anyone else who has done something similar, if this data is bad then?

That's a fair enough criticism, but desu nobody here really cares.

So you're saying the further along the graph, the more genius and less idiots there are in a population? I guess it make sense. I would just say that this graph shouldn't be referenced in every case because there are minority ethnic groups in some of these countries that are wildly smarter or dumber than the majority of the country.

Thats an interesting study from the blog, do you have any work on the heritability of IQ?

fucking sand niggers

Really made me think.

Good research on this is easy to find. Just avoid Richard Lynn. Try to look for studies that focus on specific genes. They are more rigorous overall

Was FDR really a socialist? I know he prolonged the depression by a decade and all. But was it socialism?

Its due to the fact that the resource allocation demanded for survival in colder climates in human past bred for intelligence and a greater understanding of abstract ideas. This is why nogs are shit with things like planning ahead and mathematics, in the jungle or desert if one area runs out of a food source you just roam like a herd of wildebeest to the next source (why they have better physical endurance) while colder climes often locked you in, you had to make clothes, store food, etc. This applies to caucasians and east asians, and lighter skin developed in correlation with intelligence. Civilization tends to pop up from population movements of ancestrally northern peoples. Essentially a form of Aryanism.

FDR had no ideology.

He just did whatever it took to be popular and acquire power. This means gibs.

He was but he wasnt jewish so the jews had him killed and made sure someone like him could never keep control for that long ever again.

He was the last person standing between complete jewish control, then the war happened and they had to give that up for a long time.

If you do applied math, then you know about removing outliers. The error of Equatorial Guinea was a blunder that Lynn admitted and corrected.

Yea, that's true. Though I would still like to see a large meta analysis of such studies that focuses on IQ, demeanor, and other such things that determines the propensity for those qualities and then determines where the genes are more or less focused geographically.

It would be cool to look at.

Also because the data isn't really accurate. The groups on the low end of that graph should be higher up than they are, if only marginally.

Pragmatic thank you user.

Doesn't seem plausible desu. Wasn't he already dying, albeit slowly?

Is this plotting skin pigmentation vs IQ within countries, i.e. light skin correlates highest with intelligence in Sweden, or plotting Countries according to their average skin tone and intelligence using a standard scale for both?

Richard Lynn is among the most cited researchers in the field of human intelligence. Lynn and Vanhanen are the only researchers who have comprehensively collected IQ data globally. Richard Lynn is denounced for ideological reasons, not scientific reasons. Molecular genetics has promise but it is not developed enough to be as informative.

Each average of each nation is a data point. The variance within each nation was ignored.

This isn't new research.

In a survey by Snyderman & Rothman in 1988 the majority of IQ experts willing to give an answer, said the Black-White IQ gap has a genetic component.

Yes, but the quantified correlation between IQ and skin color on the population level is "new" as of 2006.

Sauce for graph source?

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IQ_by_Country.png

Description
English: A map of "National IQs Based on the Results of Intelligence Tests" according to "Intelligence and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations" by Richard Lynn

Intelligence, Poverty and the Wealth of Nations (2009) by R. Lynn and T. Vanhanen

Alright, that's true.

This link is even more conclusive:
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf

The result of 30 years of research.
Not only Blacks have lower IQ than Whites, they have lower cortical neuron counts and cranial capacity.

At this point the evidence for a racially-based genetic component to IQ is conclusive. The only reason the science is not settled is politics and censorship.

But there are two averages represented by each nation's point, right? Wouldn't it make more sense to figure out the range of different IQ percentiles within a nation, then plot the high and low IQ populations of every country according to their average skin tone? Then you could see whether groups cluster in the high and low range of intelligence according to pigmentation.

There are some things I would question in Jensen's paper there. Such as the "higher" rating of mental health for east Asians, as it's well known that mental health issues aren't really taken seriously there and as such are under reported if they're even reported at all.

I think it is commonly that the ranges don't vary enough to be much more informative, but I agree that the variations in standard deviations of IQ among races and among nations needs to be better studied. It is often assumed that the standard deviation is 15 for all populations, but it isn't, and it can make a difference especially at the tail ends.

*commonly assumed

It really wouldn't make sense for the standard deviation to be 15 at the bottom of the spectrum, as if the average was actually 70 it would put those below the first standard deviation at 55 at which people can't realistically function without assistance.

>www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
Rushton focused on the Asians living in USA and Canada, so it may not be as much of an issue.

No dusky Singapore. 3/10

>It really wouldn't make sense for the standard deviation to be 15 at the bottom of the spectrum, as if the average was actually 70 it would put those below the first standard deviation at 55 at which people can't realistically function without assistance.
As far as I am aware, the standard deviation has to apply to the whole distribution, not differentially among portions of a distribution.

Taiwan isn't old world wtf

the IQ metric means at 100. that chart might be representing relative intelligence, but it is not representing the IQ metric.

>Taiwan isn't old world wtf
"Old World" are the continents of Asia, Africa, Australia and Europe, so, yes, Taiwan is in the Old World.

>the IQ metric means at 100. that chart might be representing relative intelligence, but it is not representing the IQ metric.
All IQ is relative.