What do you think of the youtubers promoting pedophilia? Should they be allowed a platform?

What do you think of the youtubers promoting pedophilia? Should they be allowed a platform? youtu.be/uQekTexEXz0

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/WuLXS
youtube.com/results?search_query=webcam video from
paulmaupome.wordpress.com/2017/06/02/made-that-way/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

of course they deserve a platform
with a trapdoor under them and a rope around their necks.

/thread

No. They should be tried for their illegal ways and to seek help as to reenter society as a normal member who doesn't prey on the weakness of children.

FP definitely BP.

kek

What like everything on YouTube isn't already promoting some kind of bullshit

Wish she'd been around to fuck me when I was 12.

Kek holy shit

Seconded.

>Should they be allowed a platform?
Fuck you. Free speech.

Couldn't have said it better

It's... it's over already
/thread

fpbp

Looks like she makes vids about really, really basic bitch topics and mixes her legit psychopathy and fetish for kiddos in where she can in small amounts. It's like a 20:1 or 15:1 ratio of generic shit vs pedo/psycho talk.

Notice that she's dressed like Steve from Blue's Clues to make young kids trust her

I'm curious how you fine folks feel about two 13 year olds having consensual sex. do you believe that the boy should be punished? if so how severe should the punishment be?

this

Just came here to post flag really

When I saw her fashion sense I thought of that piece of shit movie Danny Di Vito made called Death to Smoochie. It was about people who run kids shows and Edward Norton was in it as this guy who was a kids show character. It made me think of his character. Fuck this gives me the creeps.

I did stuff with girls my age when I was about that young. No, I don't think they should be punished. People who want to fuck kids should though.

But user: the inbred genetics of your family wouldn't have spread if your ancestors followed this.

why? because they "pervert" or "deflower" the child at such a young age? why does it matter the age of the transgressor? your daughter is still getting fucked well before her time.

I don't get the double standard, gays and pedos are practically the same.

archive.is/WuLXS
What should be done about people uploading child pornography to youtube?

>before her time

What? I don't have a daughter. If I do one day, she won't be going to public school and won't be exposed to degenerates like me. But even then, there is a difference between two young people learning about their bodies and some pervet wanting to fuck a 13 year old. On top of it being amoral, it's illegal.

>that thread

We need to spread it. People are still in the "elsagate" paradigm when we have actually uncovered so much more.

why is it wrong for the adult to fuck a 13 year old but its ok for a 13 year old to fuck another 13 year old? is pedophilia only illegal because you think its gross? that sounds like what they used to say about gays. I just want you to present some kind of fact based reasoning as to why the scenario should be illegal.

youtube.com/results?search_query=webcam video from

You're a good man for making that thread user. I will try and get that out more later tonight. I don't want to ask plebbit for help but holy shit, anything at this point to stop those twisted fucks.

Exactly this. Homosexuals are no different from pedophiles and saying otherwise would be defending them.

A 13 year old isn't mature enough to make those decisions. Especially when it involves an older man with a predatory nature, potential social, personal and health risks involved for the incredibly young and vulnerable girl. The law is better the way it is for this reason because it provides them a necessary layer of protection against such risks that they aren't prepared to calculate.

Honestly pedos and ephelios(?) should have gotten more rights and social acceptance than gays.

Biologically speaking, we are more in tune with nature than them.

At least you can knock up a cute girl. Can't do that with a hairy ass.

Are you trolling or legit?

>A 13 year old isn't mature enough to make those decisions
>potential social, personal and health risks involved for the incredibly young and vulnerable girl
>layer of protection against such risks that they aren't prepared to calculate

all of this applies to a young girl having sexual relations with her peers. she can still get impregnated, contract an STD, pervert her thinking for the rest of her life, damage her social status and so on.

this is about what I figured I would get but at least you weren't a belligerent edgelord so congrats on that.

No, it shouldn't be a crime if they're both below the age of consent. But if one person is a full-grown adult, they should be thrown in jail.

>
all of this applies to a young girl having sexual relations with her peers. she can still get impregnated, contract an STD, pervert her thinking for the rest of her life, damage her social status and so on

I never denied this possibility, it's just statistically much, much less likely for a boy her age to pose as much risk as an older man in every regard.

shut the heck up, pedo freak
>paulmaupome.wordpress.com/2017/06/02/made-that-way/

Let people love who they want. Sex isn't harmful, it's literally what the human body is designed for.

It's not wrong to humanize pedophiles, just as long as it's crystal fucking clear they can never act on it. Same as rapists. I'm talking about real rapists here, not 'I was drunk and I regret it now """"rapists""""'. They should have support groups, contention, but also a vigilant eye on them.

Tbh, I don't hate them. I just feel sorry for them.

do you think the kid will ever be attracted back to whomever they are with? That is my question.

Also, everyone should have a platform. Are you a leftist or something?

Because I certainly don't think they are capable of that thought yet.

I don't think pedos care desu. And if they want to, they rationalize it. That's why they don't understand why even degenerate libshits find their "preference" disgusting.

Exactly my thoughts.

>A 13 year old isn't mature enough to make those decisions.
> risks that they aren't prepared to calculate.

Ha and an 18 is mature enough? Hell have you ever met a woman, there is no such age where logic takes over and they become capable of rational decision making.
In their early teens they should be married off to a land owning responsible male who can make logical informed decisions on their behalf, because by your own standard their is no appropriate age for them to fuck

>there is no such age where logic takes over and they become capable of rational decision making

No, but we do our best. And 13 is too young.

>In their early teens they should be married off to a land owning responsible male who can make logical informed decisions on their behalf,

Why would that be ideal for you? You'd just want to toss her to the side when she matured and started to look less like a kid and more like a woman anyway.

>because by your own standard their is no appropriate age for them to fuck

When they are married, to a non-perv. Ideally well after the age of 13.

When the first post is indeed the best post

...