Libertarianism is not anarcho capitalism

Libertarianism is not anarcho capitalism

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8vMypCinkRk
youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc
youtube.com/watch?v=MShXEiA-1RI
youtube.com/watch?v=5DcA1TtaP_c
youtube.com/watch?v=kzIRG525l6s
youtube.com/watch?v=RmtuCzKy83U
youtube.com/watch?v=jShp4mc8i-A
youtube.com/watch?v=4gkofwYnJXc
youtube.com/watch?v=jHPwAEW9E4w
ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4029&context=flr
archive.is/yK8Uo
politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/26/ben-carson/fact-checking-ben-carson-nazi-guns/
firearmtrainingstore.com/about-us/blog/did-hitler-ban-guns/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_liberalism
davidduke.com/my-awakening-chapter-24-the-jewish-role-in-immigration/
youtube.com/watch?v=rRrCGwx_noI
youtube.com/watch?v=Hg9hhQ8K4a0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Legit

Anarchy is for children

anarcho-capitalism is shit, but still a lesser evil than national-(((socialism)))

Libertarianism is for retarded children too.

True

are you an anarcho-capitalist or a national-socialist?
so i can know if we should explain why you're wrong or throw you out of a helicopter

>Anarchy is for children

True, and stupid ideologists which will never amount to anything.

Libertarianism = realism but you never push an ideology a full 100% because that'll never work. Seems like a really hard concept to grasp, both on the left and on the right.

We elect a government/council to do shit like organising roads for us.
We voluntarily pay for the service with road tax (in the UK anyway).
You dont HAVE to pay road tax, only if you want to use public roads.

A real libertarian government is not supposed to rule us, its supposed to organise the shit we cant be bothered to do, to make our lives easier, like you would pay an accountant to manage your accounts

>ITZ ALL SO-SHULL-IZM
stahp with this meme

Is political correctness the same as correctness?
>no, of course not that's silly.
Is social justice the same as justice?
>no, of course not that's silly.
Is national socialism the same as socialism?
>YES OMG OBVIOUSLY IT SAYS THE WORD

youtube.com/watch?v=8vMypCinkRk

This, checked and kek'd

...

Why? Any reason for this bait?

>McTomahawk detected
Get your priorities in order son.

youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc

ITT residual statism and bootlickery

Take the hoppepill, boys

It is still almost as retarded, though.

Look I like you Nazis hell of a lot more than most, I just think we disagree on some things, and don't pretend it's not socialism when it is

It's worse

>Libertarianism is not anarcho capitalism

No. You're their useful idiots. They let you smoke dope and count on you to vote their interests in return.

As long as you pick the right side on Day of the Rope, we can calmly debate our economic strategy differences afterwards like decent HuWhite men should.

Having a white nation is what matters most to us, the economics of it are a side issue.

youtube.com/watch?v=MShXEiA-1RI

neither exists, both are meme ideologies just like "real communism"

anarcho-capitalism is the true liberty

Anarcho capitalism doesnt secure liberty. It just transfers power from the state to multinational corporation. Aka the corporations become the government, but you cant elect them.

Libertarianism should transfer power from state to individial

>131153598
Youre an idiot. I seem to spend more time debating anarcho capitalists at the moment than people from the left. How cam i possibly be their idiot?
How can you have liberty if you dont have roads, lets be honest.

I made a hard turn from ancap to full on Nazi and don't even know how it happened

I prefer national libertarianism

We can gas the kikes AND keep our guns :^)
youtube.com/watch?v=5DcA1TtaP_c

Can I shoot kikes I bought with my guns?

I don't know how you'd get on the Socialism train from AnCap. Market fascism, national Libertarianism, or NatCap is better.

>don't even know how it happened

Because you want to be with a group so bad, but you don't want to be with a group where you actually have to defend yourself with proper arguments. So you end up being a meme of yourself.

Nice Guy National Socialism is based

>Liber-niggers still think it's okay to post here
Go back to /r/the_donald you dumb faggots. Your underage larping is not allowed here.

>don't know how it happened
Sounds like you got your priorities in order. Race matters, economics are a side issue. I wouldn't mind paying more taxes or w/e if they went towards helping MY people.

youtube.com/watch?v=kzIRG525l6s

>national libertarianism
wtf is that?

Libertarianism is nothing and everything at the same time. Libertarianism is a vague term that requires you to explain exactly what, in your version of libertarianism, the state should do. No 2 libertarians will ever agree to everything.

If you're a libertarian, but you're not interested in pushing the boundaries of state removal, to see how little the state could be before society starts tearing itself apart (if ever), then you're not convinced about freedom, all you want is a good slave master.

You got me there. Plus I got really tired of dealing with shit degeneracy that I have to get backlash for because the majority of my country are people who either have been cucked out of being proud of what their ancestors have done, or are burning patrol cars screaming REPARATIONS

>infighting
We don't need this shit right now. Both Libertarianism and Fascism work well in a white ethnostate.

We can settle our differences after we hang all the kikes, niggers, fags and commies on the day of the rope.

Ancap is a fucking meme

Like fuck.. at least natsoc and stalinism are actual ideologies. There is none of that with ancaps.

I feel you brother
>tfw I was born in Chicago

My parents & grandparents grew up pretty damn poor, but they grew up in a WHITE America....and that made all the difference. The average blue-collar Americans of that time were much happier, stronger and overall better than anyone I know IRL today.

youtube.com/watch?v=RmtuCzKy83U

Nationalism
Libertarianism
Go figure

Having strong border controls doesnt infringe personal liberties of home citizens.

Likewise, you dont have to have a centralised currency and a central bank to control your borders

I just took parts from different ideologies i liked and made my own

Making new ideology names is funny

Radical ethno blairism
National paleo-conservatism
Unreasonable centrist
Liberal ethno-collectivism
Traditionalist Automomo-Conservatism

>born in central Texas, surrounded by so many spics and niggers my nickname as a kid was Snowball

>I don't know how you'd get on the Socialism train from AnCap
You know you've been brainwashed when 1 word can make you abandon all ideologies. Marxian socialism = prussian socialism like Spengler described it.
>Market fascism, national Libertarianism, or NatCap is better
It is in no way better. It only cares about money and not about the people .

who says it is?

Marxian socialism =|= prussian socialism like Spengler described it*

A lot of people

Quite often i get left wing idiots go "aha! Youre an ancap! Road memes LOL!"
Then i have to explain to them the difference

The main problem with this ideology is that it has no NATURAL philosophical defenses against (((them))).
>if "freedom" and "profit" are the only goals, then hiring cheap 3rd world labor is incentivized
We were essentially this before the early 1900's.
YOU may understand the importance of race, but your children or their children will grow accustomed to an easy existence, and they will open the gates for the sake of "freedom" just like it happened before.

youtube.com/watch?v=jShp4mc8i-A

Socialism breeds weak people and it is inherently immoral. Why do you want your countrymen to be enslaved by a welfare state? What happens when (((they))) subvert it?

(((they))) can't get in.
That's fundamental to NATIONAL Socialism.

>just like POLITICAL correctness is primarily about "political issues"
>or SOCIAL justice is primarily about "social issues"

What are some natural philosophical defences against (((them))) that national socialism has and national libertarianism does not?

Dude, I know that it's not Marxist socialism. Why assume everyone who is opposed to "Nordic" "volkish" or "Prussian" socialism is just ignorant. I still think it is every bit as garbage.

obviously genocide

All it takes is one successor to your leader to fuck things up and you are ruined, the people have no recourse because you signed it away. The problem is that a strong central government and a welfare state make it entirely possible to go against the interests of the people without any resistance.
The government should fear the people.
Genocide all you want, the NAP doesn't apply to non whites and race traitors.

>all you want is a good slave master

Same deal for ancap. "Company store" ring any bells?

Because the majority of your adherents care primarily about the economic (libertarian) bit, and only afterwards do they worry about their own people.
>we had a similar problem at the other end with the National Bolsheviks/Strasserists (the ACTUAL socialists)
>they wanted to rob all the rich German gentiles
>had to give em the ole' long knife

National socialism = for our race
That's all that matters.

You have conflicting interests = profits & race.
Once a few people sell out the race for the sake of maximum profits, the whole (((cycle))) begins again.

youtube.com/watch?v=4gkofwYnJXc

>Socialism breeds weak people and it is inherently immoral
And capitalism doesn't breed weak people? In Germany every man aged 18-25 had to spend 6 months in labour service preparing for war. Anyone who is 35+ and lived in former soviet republics know what I am talking about.
>Why do you want your countrymen to be enslaved by a welfare state
They are not enslaved especially when they aren't paying for niggers to have children.
>What happens when (((they))) subvert it?
They don't exist in a perfect society.

>people have no recourse because you signed it away
I have no idea where this meme comes from. People always have a say in their government.

>The problem is that a strong central government and a welfare state make it entirely possible to go against the interests of the people without any resistance.
If it goes against the interests of the people, the people will revolt. If bringing in millions of minorities strokes the ego of the people then its not against the interests of the people.

Anarcho Capitalism is PREMIUM Libertarianism

wholeheartedly agree. libertatians have become a kind of shameless poaching racket for fiscally conservative social liberals who didn't get the memo that dems are the new puritans

i feel obliged to side with the pope on this one, famsquad

The people have much better recourse under National Socailism than we have now.

If we had a fully WHITE nation who cared about each other, then I could take up arms against tyranny knowing my neighbor would have my back.

In our society, the govt. doesn't have to do a damn thing to control me because my neighbor is the ENEMY. He's as likely to break in and rape my kids as he is to be on my side.

You are putting the cart before the horse.

youtube.com/watch?v=jHPwAEW9E4w

Great, then we can make one big retarded family

Why not just have national socialism, which then leads to libertarianism? We need to unify and give up some stuff to get our house in order, after the work is done we can transition

>Inb4 that's appeasement you cuck
>Inb4 the state will never relinquish power

Let's say for the sake of argument that we pull a Pinochet in America. Some people have to die, some NAPs have to be interrupted, but once our borders and people are secure ethnically, wouldn't it be better to transition to libertarianism at the point? I mean, that's natsocs biggest issue with 1776 right? Is the race thing? If we take care of that, could you at least concede that libertarianism is better for the people overall domestically?

Comparatively a society that promotes responsibility and self-reliance should produce stronger people than a society that promotes parasitism.
Socialism effectively subsidizes weakness.
That depends on whether or not we have guns. I don't know how most National Socialists think about gun ownership but Nazi Germany didn't exactly promote an armed citizenry.
I would be okay with this.

It appears we need eugenics then.

>Nazi Germany didn't exactly promote an armed citizenry
What are you talking about? Hitler gave the people more rights to guns.

Source?

No it doesn't. I learned a trade and became independent of company stores. Capitalism allowed me to become free.

As long as we remove the nonwhites first, we can debate the pros and cons like reasonable white men.

I think your system is doomed to repeat the cycle, but at least we can actually have a civilized debate about it and agree to appropriate checks and balances once the foreign interests and their pets are gone.

ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4029&context=flr
enjoy

thats a fucjing retarded quote tbf

>a society that promotes parasitism
I already explained how wrong that statement is. Don't listen to modern neo-marxist socialists like Berney that appeal to college kids. With more social benefits for example mothers with (white) children came more responsibility. You had to learn how to shoot, apply first aid and generally to be prepared for war. There was a nationwide boy scouts organisation. There was much more but I can't be bothered to list everything.

>flag
Opinion discarded.

Second paragraph from the bottom. Not exactly the source you're asking for, but it dispels the myth that Hitler was for gun control.

also here is a salon article about it
archive.is/yK8Uo

They took guns from the Jews, not from the German people obviously.

politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/26/ben-carson/fact-checking-ben-carson-nazi-guns/

>inb4 (((Politifact)))
>I know, but they don't ALWAYS lie

firearmtrainingstore.com/about-us/blog/did-hitler-ban-guns/

Spotted the cuck with nothing to fight for

Post your address so I can rend your boipucci, since you have made it obvious you won't resist

wtf I love national socialism now.

>John Stuart Mill vs. some guy who chooses the Recycle flag on 4chinz

top zozzle

Both the Allies and the Comintern made up their own version of the story to scare their population. Americans probably learned how authoritarian and orwellian the goverment was while the USSR pushed the "slavic subhuman" narrative for which there is no evidence still.

>>if "freedom" and "profit" are the only goals, then hiring cheap 3rd world labor is incentivized
It's not, most 3rd worlders are lazy and useless with an avergage of 80 IQ, now with all the automatization they're more and more useless

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_liberalism
Pretty old ideology, but it's getting traction again. Nye Bogerlige, a very young Danish party has gained a lot of support very quickly, and could be labeled national libertarian.

No, any kind of socialism is for the people at the top of the ladder and eventually leads to economic catastrphe. Read some history about pre-WW2 German economy, cause it seems you think it was going well

I always think if the "state" was libertarian, the people living in that state would be AnCaps. But you can't have an AnCap state.

Cause he knew without a war they were fucked, the socialism programs and central steering completely fucked up the economy

If you think non-white immigration to America is going to stop you're wrong. Jews have been pushing for this since the 20's and they finally got what they wanted in 1965.
>inb4 da jooz
Read The Culture of Critique
davidduke.com/my-awakening-chapter-24-the-jewish-role-in-immigration/

tell that to our farmers who hire spics willing to work for $3/hour rather than mechanizing.
Don't need a high IQ for tons of menial shit.

>vid related
youtube.com/watch?v=rRrCGwx_noI

That's true. Libertarians are statist cucks mostly.

If you love animals more than people and love nature then Hitlerism is right for you
Strictest animal welfare policies of any government ever and the Aryan race is closest to nature so we should be defended a long with our nature

I would say your hesitance stems from your distrust of a truly free market to actually regulate itself. Which is understandable. I lack evidence at the moment cause I'm a filthy phone posting scrub, but I assure you that once the undesirables our physically removed from our society, a free market ethnostate will not only be the easiest to manage, it will also be in the best interest of the people. Social mobility would be encouraged by market expansion. Obviously our efforts need to be directed at securing our interests planetarium, while encouraging those in certain social strata to join extraterrestrial colonization efforts. Both our causes main enemies are stagnation. Stagnation is what breeds degeneracy and, even worse, monopolization.

If you love animals more than people and love nature then Hitlerism is right for you
Strictest animal welfare policies of any government ever and the Aryan race is closest to nature so the blood should be defended a long with our nature

...

Anything related to liberalism is bad but in the modern world of outright marxism I guess that's a tiny step forward.

...

>Anarcho capitalism doesnt secure liberty. It just transfers power from the state to multinational corporation. Aka the corporations become the government, but you cant elect them.
literally mental babby

Anyone who says they like animals better than people but doesn't support Nazism is a faggot liar

>Cause he knew without a war they were fucked
It was the opposite. They were fucked without a war so they geared the economy towards war.

Oh, that's easy. It's because you lack character and integrity.

Autism is not a retardation.

>not about the people
>about the people
>the people
kys you r-selected parasite

That's what i said, lel...

He fucked up the economy and needed something for it not to pop

Day of the rope for all who place the shekel before the nation.

Throwing people out of Helicopters is fascist as fuck m8. Pinochet was a fascist who slowly loosened up, not a lolberg who transcended politics. He literally wore the same outfit as Hitler, but used grey instead of brown.
>his soldiers had an edited nazi salute

youtube.com/watch?v=Hg9hhQ8K4a0

An caps:
>real capitalism has never been tried
Anarchy would never last, nor would real uncorrupted capitalism