>In Europe, haplogroup L is found at low frequencies, typically less than 1% with the exception of Iberia (Spain and Portugal) where frequencies as high as 18.2% have been reported
> the designation "haplogroup L" is typically used to designate the family of mtDNA clades that are most frequently found in Sub-Saharan Africa
en.wikipedia.org
#BLACKED
Hudson Mitchell
Other urls found in this thread:
medicaldaily.com
twitter.com
Julian James
>South America Argentina 246 Corach et al. (2009) 2.03%
ARGENTINA IS WHIITEEEE
Noah Lopez
It could be Jewish blood
West Aasia Yemen (Jews) 119 Behar et al. (2008) 16.81%
West Asia Bedouins (Israel) 58 Behar et al. (2008) 15.50%
West Asia Palestinians (Israel) 117 Achilli et al. (2007) 13.68%
Caleb Jones
>frequencies as high as 18.2% have been reported
literally only 1 comarca of 33 people
Christopher Hill
Mitochondrial DNA is passed from mother to daughter you fucking retard, and they aren't the same regardless. There are dozens of sub-variants of MACRO-haplogrup L that are TENS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS APART.
Jayden Lopez
>mtDNA
But that means it was the nigger women that got bleached, not Spaniards getting blacked. Mitochondria only transfer from mother to child.
Justin Rogers
>wikipedia, controlled by who we all know lel
They dont tell you ofcourse that L mtdna it is not autosomal(admixture) and L markers have been found even in Norway, Russia and England. And no one knows their origin, probably it us much ancient
And in autosomal England, Norway, Spain and Portugal usually don't score any relevant ssafrican
Jayden Powell
They are much lower in the rest of Europe though(Greece 0.1%, Denmark 0.5%, France 0.9%), and Iberians do score some sub-saharan in autosomal tests as well.
Pic related is Eurogenes k8, the gradient is very similar to that of mtDNA L.
Jace Cox
That is not deep ancestry ignorant, that map can't separate north african caucasian alleles from sub-saharan ones.. because it is not deep -
If you wanna see deep with diferentiation you have to check k36 or k15 eurogenes.
that have much more samples that can separate real ancestry.
and of course in 23 and me no european scores those values
Hudson Thomas
>muh deeep!!
deep doesn't make something go away, it just means it is better mediated through a different population
the fact that at lower K it is assigned to non caucasian clusters and it is correlated with increased non caucasian lineages pretty much destroys your argument