Mixed generations can lead to pure individuals

I've seen many Sup Forumssters saying n% white shouldn't reproduce, which I find a massive mistake, only behing to Varg's nonsense bullshit of brown hair meaning less white.

Anyway, proceding to the discussion:
We know our genetic pool is a combination of dna from our father and mother. We also know even identical twins share differences in their genetic composition, which leads us to the next question:

Can a mixed genealogy lead to a pure individual?
When we take a look at 1st generation biracial children, the result tends to be the same for everyone: 50% each, but if you breed a mixed individual with a pure individual, the results drastically change.


Now: practical experiments:
I have seen 3 children of the same mother and father having different physical features.
Mother was a mixed native american, daughter of a pure native american and a white blue-eyed brittish man.
The father was an italian descendant.
The first girl has brown eyes and dark hair. Skin pigmentation: mediterranean white
The second girl has blue and partially green eyes, skin is whiter than 1st girl, also she appears much more european than the 1st girl.
The third child is a boy, with brown skin, Yes, brown skin, being son of a white man with a MIXED woman. He has dark hair and looks much more native american than what the 75% european genes would make us think.


This leads me to the conclusion: depending on the dna inherited in the gene pool, you can purify a race with mixed individuals. 2nd child of my example may be whiter than a german man who had an asian ancestor 5 generations ago.


Observations: example has been seen in similar ocasions, with asian male and white woman, native americans and whites, but not with black and whites, for this case I have not witnessed the gene pool phenomenom, but pic related should enlight the case

Other urls found in this thread:

i.imgur.com/XZE2jUs.jpg
i.imgur.com/LF4Opd0.jpg
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

So basically Maxwell's Demon but with white alleles instead of hot particles

more cases:

i.imgur.com/XZE2jUs.jpg
i.imgur.com/LF4Opd0.jpg

actually this is just 1st year genetics you are talking about, and its a matter of odds, what you are saying is true but the likelihood of it happening is so low it may have NEVER HAPPENED EVER.

genes do not blend they are kept in certain probabilities, but you can essentially treat them as if they did for racial purposes. and remember its just just a specific probability of getting genes, there is also recombination that causes even greater amounts of mixing, thats why race mixing is so bad. its essentially unfixable

The National Socialists did it the best. They also made exceptions for these rules, although it was rare.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws

Not unfixable

I live in the melting pot, america 50 years ahead, and I can tell many whites have 1 grandparent or great-grandparent, and many of them show no evidence of mixing at all. Some do, but the majority shows none.

one of the smartest guys I know goes to med school with me and he has 1 native american great-grandmother, his father side is german and the rest of his mother side is portuguese and italian. A true blending of europeans with a spice of native american, and the man has an IQ of 155. If you tell me he shouldn't breed with a white woman you are delusional.

Would need more examples, I remember a thread way back maybe a year ago that went into genetics and how the whites or rather lighter skinned people will actually win out, wish I had saved the archive

what i mean is the probability for two half whites to have a white child, namely. it's more likely if they are only first generation race mixers i guess. but remember that pale skin is not whiteness.

ok lets say two half whites are having kids and we want to know the odds of them having a fully white child, it would be a two in four chance for every chromosome assortment, and that 23 times.

so (1/2)^23= 1/8388608

so there is a one in 8.3 million chance of that happening, thats without factoring in recombination which drastically decreases the odds, but that is much much harder to calculate or estimate.

i personally advocate for the treatement of all individuals that are 50% non white or more as subhumans. it prevents purity spiraling and makes everything simple. we know who our friends are and who our enemies are.

sage jew threads

In the melting pot I haven't seen 1st generation mixed breeding and having a pure offspring, usually it needs a mixed and a pure individual, working within the 70% and above purity margin the chances of having a pure child skyrocket

Also, may I point it that none of my encounters were with part black individuals, no one who looked 100% white had black genes, but they could have native american, asians or arabic

Blacks are the most nocive to the white race when it comes to mixing

that dad looks alpha as fuck

I thought the Nuremberg Laws only listed jews

Based leaf

pic related ginger mulatto leaf that posted here once

...

He shouldn't breed with a white woman.

On another serious note, where was his IQ tested? Which test was used? Who administered it? I've taken actual IQ tests administered by both Mensa and private psychologists. The people who throw out IQ scores like 155 are delusional at best and lying at worst. Online tests don't count.

well thats disgusting.

indian mouth and beard genes.

middle eastern facial phenotype, looks like adam sandler for fucks sake.

same here

the one drop rule doesnt apply anymore when theres less than "one drop".

he sould be with another that's like him

Phenotype vs Genotype

Come on OP, this is high school biology at the very least...

one drop rule is why many whites are afraid of nazis, we must gain the trust of our slightly less white breatheren. anything 51% white or more is a pure aryan god, 50% or less is scoundrel vermine.

a high IQ woman?

im not saying that the one drop thing is bad, but illustrating my point in that someone who doesnt look white aka one drop rule can have a child that isnt black when the "drop" is not present. Of course like says, there are expressed genes vs supressed genes, dominant and recessive and he may very well have a kid that has the usual issues where his father didnt, depending one whom he partners with.

a mixed race woman

Mensa, he even has a membership. Guy scores straight A's and I'm sure he will be the one of the best neurosurgeons in america. He looks as white as any german or swedish guy today.

so you say we must throw away a great genetic potential because 1/9 of it is not white?
do you really think the white race is so weak? i just posted numerous examples of why it is not

guys is like 75% white, not good enough to breed with a white woman?

>throw away
you can't throw away what you don't have. The only person person throwing anything away would be the unmixed person. Also, it's selfish to put a kid through that.

how is this even a question? obviously no.

You're an abstract type of nigger. Black enough that you're not white, but not black enough to be eligible for fucking my big tit, white wife. You serve no purpose.

so only 100% white cock for white pussy?

this is lunacy, literally 18th century broscience

Picking race over IQ, the biggest intelligence indicator we have today.
You probably have a mixed genealogy too, but since it has passed maybe 5 or 6 generations since then, you consider yourself pure
And you aren't wrong
If you put a bottle of coke in a galon of water, yea, the water will go black
but if you put a bottle of coca cola in an olimpic swimming pool it won't affect the aspect at all

>Picking race over IQ, the biggest intelligence indicator we have today.
Fuck off supremacist scum. I just want people to exist. This isn't about who's better, it's about a people staying a people.

don't take /pol seriously

>You probably have a mixed genealogy too, but since it has passed maybe 5 or 6 generations since then, you consider yourself pure
I'm mixed race.

the canuck is right thou
he should be with someone like him.
same values, similar IQ, similar life style, same culture (which is more important than race imo)

"pick iq over race!" wrong. IQ regresses to the mean; if two genius white parents have a baby, most likely it will be IQ 100 (the white average). Same for two imbecile whites, or any other race. Picking an individuals iq over their race is short sighted and detrimental. Not to mention all of the harmful psychological and health problems mixed race children have.

probabilities user
there is a higher probability of two high iq individuals of having a high iq kid

so you create a mixed people composed by 1/2 mixed. 1/4 mixed, 1/12 mixed.
great country, sounds like mexico

Wrong. Intelligent individuals lead to intelligent offspring. Have you never met someone who went to harvard? Their family always has intelligent members

My IQ is 132 in a mensa taken test, my father is a very smart man and so is my mother. Also, I am pure white since my family came to brazil after ww1, and yet, me, a pure individual, score lower than an 1/8 native american white man

That is how you pick on a personal level , not a societal one. You can not follow policies on the basis of IQ (which is pretty retarded to begin with).

Black people have no Neanderthal genes.
Mixed race babies have Neanderthal genes.
Adding in the Neanderthal is what makes non Africans different. Adding it to mixed race babies actually whites them.

>we
>wuz
>native
>Third child is a boy, with brown skin
your mom cheated retard

The jews have an average IQ of 113 points, many times they mix with intelligent goyims and have an intelligent offspring

jews are the living proof IQ passes on to the following generations. How many stupid jews have you met?

Everyone has an IQ of 155... smells bs.

You're completely right.

so you create a mixed people composed by 1/2 mixed. 1/4 mixed, 1/12 mixed.
Did I say this? No, I said people should look for people who are like them.

whites are only good because their genes are good. as long as she is 51% white or more, shes fine to fuck if she has good genes imo. there is no need to throw away perfectly good genes just because there is a small amount of non-white genes with them. we can always sterilize everyone at the bottom of the barrel in a few hundred years to cut away the slack.

we have to remember how mongrelized the white race already is, and also how rare 51%+ white people there are that are worth fucking, relatively few. and once we win the race war and expunge all the inferiors it just won't matter much, however having bred will still matter. and remember that by fucking them you are halving the a mount of non-white genes that are there.

but most importantly is that there is no easy way to determine when to cut off who we consider white. sending someone to africa for having a nigger ancestor ten generations ago is a huge gift to africa. like what percentage do we use? 1% 10% 20?

i say we just use half, easy to remember, and easy to justify

...

It's the Neanderthal genes I'm telling you

okay mate, and if a white man has 15% of a different race he shouldn't breed with whites?
yes, breeding mixed with pures will ultimately lead to a pure offspring

depends on how the individual looks and performs in intelligence tests
one drop rule always applies

Agreed.

Agreed

and you can strengthen them by diluting a mixed individual

I feel like you missed my point.This is still not sufficient to gurantee social cohesion. I'm not some kind of LARPER advocating for a true ethnostate, sterilization etc, but a level of homogenity has to be achieved. Otherwise you will soon be met by identity politics, racial discrimination, forced quotas and so on. Only difference is, you will now be met by either more problems, since you would've incorporated IQ in the basis of identity.

Of course, keeping the "good" racial minorities is prefered, but it is still pretty dumb to use IQ as the basis of identity.

Das rite

I understand you, I was simply debating those who said 3/4 of white isn't white anymore even though the individual definitely looks like an european

3/4 is still considered mixed in my oppinion. As I mentioned in just because someon has a white phenotype, doesn't mean he is genotypically white.

Again, this is mostly an issue that comes up in demographic statistics, there are much harder challenges that Europe is facing.

>Can a mixed genealogy lead to a pure individual?
No. Fuck off monkey nigger. Quit trying to shit up the white race.

>ITT: faggots that actually take this bait
How many of these threads are you going to make?

Are you trying to tell us that you are white?
Aint gonna work.

>File: C-xHRv-W0AIEJZv.jpg
all dem milk jugs

Pure as in containing the typical racial traits of your race? Yes eventually, after several generations breeding back to the superior race and of course, good rolls of the genetic lottery to remove the lesser racial genetics. But it's like cleaning up a bad oil spill. Eventually, nature restores itself, but the mistake was to spill oil in the first place.

asinine ignorants filling Sup Forums with imbecility

thanks for debating, gtg