OC

OC

Enjoy!

Other urls found in this thread:

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.at/2011/07/challenge-to-supporters-of-revisionist.html
youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo
ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#Etymology_and_alternate_names
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_War_Graves_Commission)
haaretz.com/jewish/news/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664)
reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-massacre-idUSL2750737720071027.
thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-wall-street-part-2/).
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Schizo please.

Shlomo pls

Thanks user greatly appreciate it

Hope you didn't spend more than 5 minutes on this LARP shit. It's an ugly mess with lazy sources.

Notice how the kikes have no argument against it and simply just throw out insults?

That's how you know the OP's image is good.

Great stuff, op. I might merge this with the original 21 questions for a massive 42 image.
Post this on 8ch if you haven't already.

cringe

...

Bump

Nice job, OP. I have a few of my own:

1) How much money did Steven Spielberg personally make off his movie "Schindler's List?"

2) If the Anne Frank story is a hoax, why did the storytellers give her a very revisionist death (transferred AWAY from Auschwitz, to die later of typhus in Bergen Belsen) rather than symbolically attributing this innocent life's demise to the gas chambers? Why needlessly complicate the story and diminish its climax? Unless of course, the story of Anne Frank is not a story at all, but reality which is told exactly the way it happened.

3) Why did so many Nazi officials carry cyanide pills with them? And why did they commit suicide upon capture by western Allies, often involving said cyanide pills?

4) Why did Hitler, Göbbels, Himmler and several other high ranking Nazis commit suicide, often even before capture, if they had nothing to hide? If it was merely because they were afraid of what might be done to them at the hands of the Allies, then was their belief in martyrdom as innocents so non-existent?

5) Why does the overwhelming majority of holocaust deniers today and in the past consist of civilians unaffiliated to the NSDAP rather than the once convicted Nazis themselves, or their descendants?

6) Even if Hitler and friends were right about International Jewry all along, how does it justify the mass deportation of Polish Jews, most of whom were poor, uneducated and in no way related to any rich Wall Street capitalists? How do you justify laying blame on an entire people, for alleged actions of a tiny few? Answering this question with a question (Japanese internment camps) is evasion and not a valid answer. Using a sensationalist newspaper headline (Judea Declares War on Germany) which even National Socialists themselves did not take all too seriously, to justify the incarceration of an entire people as a logical reaction, is also not a valid answer.

7) Speaking of, give us proper elaboration of exactly what evils the aforementioned Wall Street capitalists of Jewish origin actually did? Or are you going to attribute something as mundane as inflation or financial depression to "the Jew"? If you want to bring up Black Tuesday, the Wall Street crash of 1929, kindly deliver proof it was all organized by International Jewry.

8) And why on earth do you keep bringing a proposed (perhaps even partially enacted) economic boycott in 1933 as legitimate casus belli to incarcerate an entire people most of whom didn't even take part in it? Again, pointing out to Japanese internment camps is a classic example of whataboutism, rather than answering the question.

9) Regarding the deportation and forced incarceration of an entire people solely due to their ethnicity, given that you like to equate what befell the Jews in Europe to what befell Japanese Americans in the United States, and given that you like to lay the blame concerning the high mortality in the concentration camps to allied saturation bombing, how will you nevertheless explain away the crucial difference of Japanese Americans essentially relaxing in their camps while Jews were put to back-breaking labor and housed like animals in the German camps?

Does the pic have any significance?

10) If your hypothesis about Allied bombing destroying the infrastructure of Germany to the extent that it worsened the situation of concentration camp detainees when it came to supplies is correct, why don't you provide a SINGLE credible, independently verifiable case where a concentration camp's food supply was directly affected by allied bombing to the extent that for example the rail lines leading to it were destroyed, and therefore supplies could no longer reach the camp properly? I can wait. If you say Nordhausen, you lose, because that was firstly not a concentration camp (the Boelckekaserne was a Luftwaffe barracks/prison), and secondly that is not the subject of this question (allied bombing allegedly destroying supply lines to concentration camps resulting in lack of supplies, starvation etc.)

11) Why don't revisionists attack the 50-60 million total death toll of WW2 in the same way they attack the Jewish death toll? Can anyone break this number down to the sum total of all casualties sustained in all battles fought and how many civilians died in which city during which year? And if that's not possible, then why accept this number without much question while writing volume after volume of why only the Jewish death toll is a hoax and at the same time claim you aren't fueled by antisemitism?

12) Why are there no movements in the West to deny other genocides in history, such as the Rwandan genocide where 800,000 people were killed in around 3 months (that's 8,888 people per day!), or the Stalinist purges, the Holodomor, or Mao's Great Leap forward? How are all those death tolls historians provide accepted without question, why aren't almanac comparisons made, census data questioned, official documents alleged to be forgeries, eyewitnesses dismissed with a casual hand-wave and so on?

13) Given that you don't spend nearly as much time attacking the death toll of other genocides compared to the holocaust, kindly name 3 proofs, or even 1 you have that underscore the authenticity of other genocides in human history, which however remain elusive regarding the holocaust.

14) Since many concentration camps were equipped with delousing facilities, why does the Prussian Blue staining only appear in Auschwitz, Majdanek and Stutthof? Why dont Dachau or Mauthausen's delousing facilities show this coloration? Why isn't HCN = PB staining common knowledge among chemists? Why isn't there any chemist on the planet, apart from Germar Rudolf, who can theorize how much PB should form on a concrete wall per hour of it being exposed to HCN?

15) Prove to me that nowhere close to 3 million Jews lived in Poland in the years leading up to WW2, and THEN we can have a discussion about numbers.

16) When you repeatedly hail Fred Leuchter as "America's foremost gas chamber expert", I consider the "what came first - the chicken or the egg" question. Given that American gas chambers have been existing since the at least the 1940s, how is it that there were no gas chamber experts in the United States till this Leuchter showed up? Who designed, built, operated, and maintained American gas chambers? How many gas chambers did this "foremost gas chamber expert" Leuchter even end up building for the US?

The holohoax is a myth and even the ADL admits that 44% of youth don't buy it. Only baby boomers buy a giant lie built on widely disparate and contradicting stories (many proven false) and the idea that all physical evidence and the lack thereof should be excluded from the conversation on penalty of prison.

I still prefer to argue that internment was more than justified. I bring up the 1918 German communist revolution where 90% of the leadership was Jewish, kike Lenin and his kike/multicult bolshevik party murdering any halfway intelligent ethnic Russian/Ukranian after the civil war, Jew NKVD head Yagoda and his merry band of kikes famining 6,000,000+ European Christians around the Black Sea in the 1930's, etc. etc. etc.

17) If people's careers are ruined for questioning the numbers of dead in the concentration camps, why is it no longer claimed that mass gassings took place in Dachau? Why was there even a debate about it? And why did Auschwitz and Majdanek receive drastic reductions of the death toll? None of this was the result of Faurisson and friends' meddling, it was done without their involvement. So why weren't the people who did this incarcerated? In fact, if a worldwide Jewish conspiracy needed the holocaust to legitimize the existence of Israel, why would revisions like these even be permitted? Maybe, just maybe, there is a difference between legitimate revisionism as performed by level-headed scholars, and the time wasting activity that holocaust deniers like to engage themselves with and call "research", which is just an elaborate term for flat-out denial.

18) If the Treblinka ground photos show no criminal activity, what is the logical explanation for there being giant excavators digging around Treblinka, located in the ass end of Poland where there is no mining, no rare earths, no mineral deposits, no building projects, unless of course these cranes served a nefarious purpose, which is digging, or in this case, unearthing mass graves.

19) How can you claim Richard Krege did a legitimate archaeological investigation of Treblinka and found "the soil undisturbed", while at the same time claiming Treblinka was a transit camp where structures were erected and then dismantled, claiming all of this left behind no trace at all?

20) Why has Richard Krege still not published the findings of his report, the Treblinka and Belzec GPR scan? We have been waiting 18 years for his report....

21) HOLOCAUST DENIER CHALLENGE! If the Jews were evacuated "to the East" rather than being exterminated in Poland, what happened to them? Why didn't even one of them come forward after the war and tell historians they have got it all wrong? That the Nazis merely helped their family safely relocate from Europe to Russia? Prove one Jew had his clothes deloused in Treblinka, Belzec or Sobibor, given a hot bath or whatever, and then "evacuated" out of Reich occupied territories (rather than somewhere else within occupied territory such as Majdanek) via one-way train ticket into Russia! And while we're at it, here's another challenge of my own: PROVE not enough Jews existed in Europe in 1939 to be genocided to a tally of around 6 million in the first place! EARN BIG BUCKS!!!

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.at/2011/07/challenge-to-supporters-of-revisionist.html

22) If Bolshevism, Judaism and Zionism are the same thing, why did Winston Churchill differentiate between them in his letters after WW1? Why were Soviet Bolsheviks so opposed to Zionism? Why did Israel and the Soviet Union have such a troubled relationship? Why did the Soviet Union support the Arab states during the Six Day War? In fact, why are there many Jews opposed to Zionism and the Israeli state?

23) Why do you keep labeling Atheist Communists who did't care about the Talmud, Torah or even believe in Jehovah God as Jews? If Judaism is a race, why do you at the same time cling on to the theory that Ashkenazi Jews, the main target of your attacks, are in fact Khazars while Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews are not? Are Khazars a race now? Aren't they from the Caucasus region and therefore Caucasians? Make up your mind. And if you still believe in races, maybe it's time to pick up a 21st century biology book. Oh wait. You also doubt the legitimacy of modern science and think science is dead now since it has to conform to political correctness, don't you? You're a lost cause.

24) Describe to me how terrible it must feel like to wake up every morning knowing that you live in a world where vast amounts of academia and the establishment have conspired against humanity, and are actively working on the destruction of what you perceive as "your people" and "our values" and working towards the enslavement of the world and the creation of a World Government under the New World Order. Because this is what holocaust denial ultimately points to, isn't it? Don't deny it.

25) Have you seriously considered the possibility that you may, in fact, have lost your fucking marbles and you just don't know it yet? See Dunning-Kruger effect.

How about instead of blasting your copypasta garbage you prove your holohoax narrative. Again I rather argue the same case that this Rabbi makes, that Hitler had the right to wipe Jewry from Europe for their crimes.

youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo

But yeah i'll bite and since you're making the ridiculous claim you can answer the questions.

>1) Where did the 24,000,000lbs+ of ash go?
>2) Why on all of the aerial photos of the war are there no massive coal piles at the camps, massive coal trains, or massive coal mines that are surely required to torch 3k bodies per camp per day?
>3) How did IG Farben produce hundreds of tonnes of hydrogen cyanide from what in 1942 was their remaining chemical plant and why didn't they just use a simple ammonia/bleach combo which is far cheaper/deadlier than hydrogen cyanide but notably doesn't kill lice?
>4) Why did Germans use the most inefficient and costly methods available with the Jew when they had hundreds of state of the art industrial slaughterhouses and were low on fertilizer? Why didn't they make a nice Jewish paste to spread on the fields next spring?

I want to believe but it's so fucking hard sometimes. When you answer these i'll give you four more. I have twenty or so here that need answering.

It's some OC a leaf posted in a merchant thread a while back.
If you look closely, the inside of the pipe looks kind of like pic related

I hate nothing more than these inbred rats that fly goy flags and push their holohoax narrative on a board that knows 90% of the 1918 German communist revolution leaders were Jewish, that Marx the founder of communism was Jewish, that Lenin the founder of the Soviet Union was Jewish, that Lenins chosen successor Trotsky was Jewish and that Jew NKVD Yagoda, Stalins right hand kike Kaganovich, and Jew-Married Minister Molotov famined 6,000,000+ European Christians right as Hitler was coming to power.

Example. I could point out how affirmative action was a Jewish creation in both Canada and in the USA, how they were the driving force behind opening our borders, how the lawsuits that allowed near unrestricted abortion in our countries were both lead by kikes or hell I could lay out the thousands of hooked noses behind the drug/porn/tranny degeneracy they target our children with.. etc. etc.

Yet they pollute our board instead of cleaning up their cancer of a tribe.

Great questions. The only one i can answer is that hair (especially thick hair) weighs alot. 2000kg of hair could be just from 8000 people depending on how much sweat there is in it. Remember, the jews were shaven of ALL their hair in camps.

Newfag from the_donald here. Jews aren't bad, only liberal American ones. Israelis are cool. You're just some mudslime.

What did I do?

You don't get to make up a holohoax for the 23rd time with no physical evidence and shitloads of testimony that has been proven fake or contradicts other testimony that is presented as a fact. Nevermind the population statistics or why they would use an expensive pesticide instead of their hundreds of industrial slaughterhourses. Why aren't there any massive coal piles/mines/trains on any of the aerial photos?

I still believe the holohoax is just a diversion to hide/suppress the fact that kikes murders tens of millions of Europeans in the 20th century. I like to focus on all the people that believe Jews deserved to be wiped completely from Europe for what they did.

youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo

"We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish"
ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

>OY VEY
>sources
It must sting the Joo to no end that people don't believe their bullshit that they would come to Sup Forums and shill for their (((narrative))). Get fucked kikes.

>You don't get to make up a holohoax for the 23rd time
We've read the kike scroll and know about the signicance of 6,000,000. But this is the last i'll speak on the number, a few hundred thousand died at most, I much rather focus on what kikes have done to Europeans and what they are currently doing as we speak.

>and what they are currently doing as we speak.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion

>slaughterhourses

...

>MUH PICTURES HAHAHAHAAAAAHA

Your shitty ass meme claims the term holohoax was invented after the war yet your own kikepedia shows that is was in the oxford dictionary in the early 19th century.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#Etymology_and_alternate_names

What about the three people chiefly held responsible for the famine of 6,000,000+ European Christians in the 1930's? Jew NKVD head Yagoda, Stalins right hand kike Kaganovich, and Jew-married Minister Molotov? What about the 1918 (((commie))) revolution? Let's talk about this ratboy.

>Completely unsourced
Why do you dumb Jews still post this image thinking it will convince anybody?

...

Ah. I see it, now.

Also, this thread is confusing me. Is this some new double ironic shitposting, or am I too tired for this shit?

I also found out the other day that the only Canadian MP to be convicted of treason was a commie kike. I had a turk friend tell me about the "Donmeh" in the Ottoman Empire that were largely responsible for facilitating the Young Turks, and then their famine of millions of Greek and Armenian Christians.

I also had a Hungarian friend tell me about the kike Bela Kun and what he did to his people. Seems I learn about new kike crimes against humanity every other day.

I miss NatView. He would at least reply and not abandon the thread as soon as I showed up.

I don't fucking know... I think it's some muzzie who's head is in the right place, but can't properly post without showing his arab autism

>It's fine for me to post completely unsourced images, but not for you, dumb Jew!

I see you still can't comprehend why exactly you lost the war.

>Your shitty ass meme claims the term holohoax was invented after the war yet your own kikepedia shows that is was in the oxford dictionary in the early 19th century.

Look, retard, when you post a link you must consider a possibility that people would in fact click it and see that your claims are unrelated to it.

Then again, you wouldn't be a stormweenie if you could think one step ahead.

>Muh genocide olimpics.

It's funny that you managed to pick the exact three Soviet officials that had fuck-all to do with the famine,

>What about the 1918 (((commie))) revolution? Let's talk about this ratboy.

First prove your claims about ethnicity of every single person in your shitty meme image. No, posting more shitty meme images doesn't count.

When did I post an unsourced image? Very rarely do any 'nazis' on this site post unsourced images anymore. You holohoaxer Jews, meanwhile have nothing other than that single image to 'refute' our accusations of a hoax, and it's totally unsourced.

Nice job.

Of course, no denier would ever be dissuaded from his faith by facts, because people cannot be reasoned out of position they did not reason themselves into to start with, and they are specifically congregating here because here they can't be pinned to their words and don't have to put their online cred where their mouth is, but it'd serve as a nice stock response.

Hahaha what facts? Some Jews that said it happened?
You know there are literally hundreds of these holocaust disproving images floating around here. Who is truly the one denying facts?

>When did I post an unsourced image? Very rarely do any 'nazis' on this site post unsourced images anymore.

Nazi images are rarely sourced, images in this thread, including the one right above the post I've answered to, are no exception. "Source" is either a link that can be followed or a book name/page/code, you worthless slime. Simply making a collage of images that collage itself attributes to something does not make it a source and does not prove anything besides the fact that some scoundrels can use Photoshop.

>2) If the Anne Frank story is a hoax, why did the storytellers give her a very revisionist death (transferred AWAY from Auschwitz, to die later of typhus in Bergen Belsen) rather than symbolically attributing this innocent life's demise to the gas chambers? Why needlessly complicate the story and diminish its climax? Unless of course, the story of Anne Frank is not a story at all, but reality which is told exactly the way it happened.

that's a question you really need to ask Meyer Levin, since he wrote it. also, ask Mr Levin why he wrote it in ball point pen if he wanted the official diary writings to appear authentic to the period.

Good job OP. Sick of these tired 1488 retards and their stale shit.

Here's another fun question: Why won't Dennis Wise, aka L. Ron Dennis, creator of cringey "documentary" TGSNT, show his face?

Have you seen Lord Dennis' face? I haven't. Can't find it anywhere. What's up "Dennis?"

>You know there are literally hundreds of these holocaust disproving images floating around here. Who is truly the one denying facts?

I do not deny the fact that there are "hundreds of these holocaust disproving images" floating around. I just deny that they prove or disprove anything except the fact that some stormweenies learned how to use Photoshop and used that skill to spam low-quality memes aimed at dumb people unlikely to check their claims at the place where, even if someone bothers to argue seriously with them and debunk their claims, they can return and spam the same images in the next thread, no worse for wear.

Shekel +1

Assuming that Hitler started gassing Jews since day 1, that makes for 3,153,600 minutes.

6,000,000 Jews killed during 3,153,600 minutes comes out to 1.9 Jews per minute. That means Hitler killed roughly 1 Jew every 30 seconds. (LOL)

In Auschwitz, the most famous and biggest concentration camp, there are 15 crematoriums. According to Auschwitz survivors, Jews would go into the chamber, gassed for 15-20 minutes, then put into the oven.

It takes 1 hour to cremate a body using modern furnaces which operate at much higher temperatures than the traditional ovens at the camp. However, lets say that the ovens were operating at a level that we see today, that means it would take 1 hour, 20 minutes to gas and burn 15 Jews assuming they were all burned simultaneously. (Disregarding the time it would take for the gas to empty the chamber for the bodies to be transported from the chamber to the oven.) The elevators used to transport bodies were very slow and could only take up 7 bodies at a time with their weight capacity. However, for our greatest ally, we're going to assume that bodies were teleported instantly from chamber to oven.

That means 15 Jews were gassed and burned every 1.2 hours. That comes out to exactly 300 Jews every 24 hours (Assuming the gassing and burning of Jews was happening every hour straight for 6 years on an uninterrupted basis) the total number of jews killed would be 657,000 for those 6 years. The official Jewish story is that 4,000,000 Jews were killed at Auschwitz alone.

How can any Jew, Israeli, or Shill ever even argue this story when just simple math is enough to destroy the whole argument? Can any Jews respond to this?

Pathology results at the end of WWII indicate camp deaths were due to typhus. There is no evidence of poisoning by gas. For example, Dr. Charles Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps. Dr Larson told his biographer “never was a case of poison gas uncovered." (The Wichita Eagle, April 1, 1980, p. 4C.) 2. Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes for the outbreaks as follows: "Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that, homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ... Germany was in chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor, housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring such as few countries and few times have experienced." (John E. Gordon, "Louse-Borne Typhus Fever in the European Theater of Operations, U.S. Army, 1945," in Forest Ray Moulton, editor, Rickettsial Diseases of Man (Washington, DC: American Academy for the Advancement of Science, 1948), pp. 16-27)

3. Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, who entered Bergen-Belsen with British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that: "Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of diseases." (Disease killed Nazis' prisoners, MD says," Toronto Star, Feb. 8, 1985, p. A2.) 4. This lack of evidence is something acknowledged by Professor Raul Hillberg (1985 Toronto trial) and Adorno Mayer ("Sources for the study of the gas chambers at once rare and unreliable" Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?).

5. The findings that deaths were due to disease rather than deliberate extermination is consistent with Red Cross records from the camps and the British intelligence which had been intercepting German communications from 1942 onwards. In Volume II of his book British Intelligence in the Second World War, Sir F. Hinsley notes that British Intelligence was decoding the secret messages from Hoess, Camp Commandant of Auschwitz, to Berlin, which included his daily returns, and goes on to say:-- “The returns from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings." 6. Judge Edward L van Roden, one of three members of the Simpson Army Commission, appointed to investigate the Dachau Trials, reported: "all but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operation procedure with our American investigators." (American Atrocities in Germany” The Progressive, February 1949, p. 21f)

7. The six million figure itself seems to have been commonly referenced well before WWII. In 1898 Rabbi Stephen S Wise spoke of “6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism”. 8. Similarly, Don Heddesheimer’s book “The First Holocaust” which also documents post-WWI claims, reported in the New York Times for instance, that East European Jewry was on the brink of annihilation, regularly invoking the six million figure. 9. According to Ben Weintraub, The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism" Hebrew prophecies in the Torah require that 6 million would vanish before Israel could be formed. Tom Segev, an Israeli Historian, discussed how the figure is an attempt to transform the Holocaust into a state religion (The Seventh Million). 10. There are survivors from Aucshwitz like Marika Abrams who were unaware of people being killed by gas. On the other hand it was claimed at Nuremberg that camps like Dachau and Buchenwald were used to gas people. Those eyewitness claims are no longer accepted. Why the change??

still waiting for prove that all those workers are jewish, i can't find anyhting.

>why did you kill yourself when your enemies caught you? what could go wrong, it's not like they wanted blood
>the fifth amendment means nothing, if you don't say anything that means you're guilty
>attacking the man over the matter
>Spielberg's propaganda and appeals to emotion over evidence
>diaries meaning anything other than anecdotes and daily thoughts
>NSDAP only hated wealthy Jews and did not point out the inherently unjust relationship with the entire Jewish community, or the Jewish culture itself

>disproportionate Jewish control and representation means nothing.
>strawmanning internment camps being raised as justification for alleged genocides instead of realizing they're mentioned to outline the attack against the enemy of the state
>USA and German wartime conditions are equivalent so we can compare their circumstances near the end of the way together
Other than "waaa stop kicking us out again, anti-'x', NAXALT, etc., nothing of substance is raised beyond strawmen and false equivalences. Get back to me when the US is attacked from all directions, see if they care enough to feed POWs. Or ask yourself why the ethnic majority will rebel entirely against the minority ethnic group representing disproportionate influence in their own nation.

>holding opposition to standards of evidence you don't hold yourself to (show me a single, credible, independently verifiable case of mass excavations of graves of the deceased to substantiate the death toll put forth)
>allies never bombed or attacked Germany near the end of the war, resulting in any shortages of any sort
>post-war allied efforts to avoid starvation never occurred
>ignoring actual agencies responsible for tallying and estimating (key word) death tolls (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_War_Graves_Commission)
>inflating all types of genocides with one another
>assuming estimations equal absolute fact
Yeah, nobody accepts the Great Leap or other Communist genocides at face value because the death tolls are always estimations. Try finding an exact figure, it'll range from 10 million to 100 million. But the rollercoaster of gas is so well documented that you have to compare it to genocides using estimations and fallacious reasoning...
You're basically admitting to estimations, even though there was ample opportunity after the war to substantiate the death tolls (yet not, in your own words, "independent report" exists).

>complain about whataboutism
>hey what about other genocides waaaa you believe this so defend my accusation of your belief of it!
>Prussian blue staining=millions upon millions gassed to death!
>argument from silence fallacy (missing Jews=dead!)
>appeal to authority
Again, fulfil the burden of proof by citing your own standard of evidence, or admit to being a conspiracy theorist with no evidence to support your claims.

>admitting to the shortcomings of the "rigorous evidence that cannot be questioned... until it's proven false"
>still not citing "independent reports" of excavation of mass graves
>still making appeals to authority
Claims aren't proven correct just because person 'x' over 'y' says it. Besides, pushing beliefs onto your opposition is called a strawman.

Hey OP what's a good book that will show hitler's side of the story, or as neutral a perspective as possible? I've been reading through the holocaust handbooks, but those are more the science of how it DIDN'T happen, not what did happen and why.

>argument from silence fallacy (Jews not around=mass gassings!)
>holding opposition to standards you don't hold yourself (prove to me millions of Jews were gassed or shot if no mass graves of even two million can be found)
>semantics and denying the disproportionate Jewish representation behind the formation and implementation of Marxism in Russia
>Judaism=Jews; or, denying Ashkenazi Jews exist (haaretz.com/jewish/news/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664)

>appeal to majority (lots of people believe it=true!)
>a consensus in science means truth!
>ad-hominem
So, it's been "I have never read Mein Kampf or seen Jews in a negative light to understand why a nation would wish to expel immigrant Jews" (even better: you need to have Jews within your borders, we need immigration because....), appeals to authority/majority, "you dummy-head", "look at this belief, you believe in it, now defend yourself!", and (my favourite) one of the lot: show me "a SINGLE credible, independently verifiable case" of mass gassings and cremation. By your own standards of evidence, the Holocaust is over-exaggerated.

"Hitler's war" by David Irving is the definitive book for Hitler's perspective.

thank heavens for Nuremberg American lawyers, all this time we thought it was America who dropped the atom bomb but now we know it was really Germany all along! thank you for the truth solomon shekelmonger

>MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And certain experiments were also conducted and certain researches conducted in atomic energy, were they not?

>SPEER: We had not got as far as that, unfortunately, because the finest experts we had in atomic research had emigrated to America, and this had thrown us back a great deal in our research, so that we still needed another year or two in order to achieve any results in the splitting of the atom.

>MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: The policy of driving people out who didn't agree with Germany hadn't produced very good dividends, had it?

>SPEER: Especially in this sphere it was a great disadvantage to us.

>MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: Now, I have certain information, which was placed in my hands, of an experiment which was carried out near Auschwitz and I would like to ask you if you heard about it or knew about it. The purpose of the experiment was to find a quick and complete way of destroying people without the delay and trouble of shooting and gassing and burning, as it had been carried out, and this is the experiment, as I am advised. A village, a small village was provisionally erected, with temporary structures, and in it approximately 20,000 Jews were put. By means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 people were eradicated almost instantaneously, and in such a way that there was no trace
left of them; that it developed, the explosive developed, temperatures of from 400° to 500° centigrade and destroyed them without leaving any trace at all.

>Do you know about that experiment?

Regarding 6, the word "Sonderbehandlung" was a vague and varying word for a number of things usually not in the norm of daily schedules in camps, for example the delousing of prisoners, the fumigation of objects and clothes, the transfer of prisoners etc. The central sauna at Auschwitz with it's huge amounts of sanitary delousing/fumigation gas chambers was classified under "Sonderbehandlung". The word was also used in terms of executions via hanging and shooting. If that's seems weird, it shouldn't. The word goes back to the 19th century and can literally mean anything off the norm. The post-war world made the mistake of imprinting this word in the minds of gullible Holocaust cultists as exclusively referring to killings, and not only that, but MASS killings and euphemistic meaning for gas chamber killings. Just another one of those careless mistakes some of the Jewish academics did post-war that no one gave a fuck about until the Revisionists came along.

Read The Great Terror by Conquest. Here is one example: reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-massacre-idUSL2750737720071027.
That is how you properly corroborate a death toll. Read the text carefully. Note the massive discrepancy, from 30k to 100k. This is because events like these aren't really capable of exact examination and are prone to over-exaggeration/politicization. But we only know what is exhumed. The
rest is postulation. And by your own standards, it never existed.
To the point of disproportionate Jewish control of Wall Street and what that means for the gentile underclass (thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-wall-street-part-2/). The "Judea declares war on Germany" doesn't mean a literal war. It isn't sensationalist is the entire purpose is to levy their influence against individuals/regimes that they disagree with. They have power, so they use it. When trying to gloss the point away, you don't actually address why it was raised to begin with.
Even today, the majority of Jews aren't in the 1%, even though the 1% is disproportionately Jewish. This doesn't mean the ethnic citizenry cannot vote for the autonomy and sovereignty of their own state by any means: that is paramount, as the state operates for the ethnic citizenry, not the global population (Jews included). Besides, Jewish tribal identity is personified the moment you mention Jewish hegemony. That's the entire point: they are dual citizens on a spiritual and cultural level.

That doesn't really have anything to do with my point. The point I raised was to take note of the hypocrisy in berating whataboutisms when you make the same statements (if you don't think 'x' about 'y', then what about 'z'?), how Prussian staining isn't actually substantive evidence of millions who were gassed, and how an argument from silence doesn't necessarily substantiate your pre-determined method of extermination without some excavation of the alleged locations for mass graves. Oh, and also appeals to authority. Nothing to do with German nuclear programs.

Just in case no one has noticed this, this is not a Red Pill infographic, but an orthodox Holocaust cultist pic. Don't be fooled. It's more of the same already answered questions to give the allusion of lacking answers to some of the more meaty arguments.

how about deporting the jews to israel instead of gassing them

Regarding 7: It was camp policy (in fact I believe for ALL German camps) to introduce rigorous lice fighting measures with new inmates entering a camp. They were made to undress, take showers, have their hair cut entirely and given new clothes. This hair was sometimes stored and later used for some industrial component in (I think) U-boat manufacturing, can't remember. The reason why the hair stored AND the hair sent out contained cyanide traces from Zyklon B is because bundles of hair were gassed in the fumigation chambers for lice removal, then shipped out. Again, no extermination angle here. Try again.

Regarding 10: It doesn't matter if Auschwitz as a whole had a capacity to burn a million bodies a month. You're looking at this from the exterminationist view, in which everything is filtered through the falsely established view that crematoria, camps, disinfection, showers etc was euphemistic in nature and actually used for extermination in the millions. Liberate yourself from this nonsense. Originally, Auschwitz Birkenau was planned to hold up to 200,000 inmates! 200,000!!! And look at the date. September 1942. This was RIGHT in the middle of the huge typhus waves sweeping across eastern Europe, hitting Auschwitz hard, beginning in July 1942. Several hundred people A DAY were dying from this disease. And with it came things like yellow fever, diarrhea, malaria, typhus fever etc. Doctors were sent to Auschwitz in August 1942 to deal with this plague because the camp administration under Rudolf Höß was so incompetent. The decision to introduce bigger crematoria in early 1943 (March onward) in the form of Krematoria 2-5 was directly effected by the disease waves in Auschwitz. You need to get rid of more bodies faster, and be prepared. Auschwitz's administration never fully got control over typhus.

Regarding 13: Vergasungskeller refers to the small room inside the Crematory building used for the process of combustion for the actual flame of the ovens. It's used to power up the crematorium, with industrial gas mechanisms. Not extermination chambers. All crematoria had these small rooms labelled Vergasungskeller (gassing cellar). Try again. This is by the way the same mistake the Holocaust scholars of the 80's did, same with Jean Clause Pressac. Revisionsts tackled this a long time ago. On the subject of what it actually says on the Krematorium plans: For the room's alleged nowadays to be the homicidal gassing rooms where hundreds of thousands and millions are claimed to have been gassed, most plans refer to it as "Leichenkeller". Corpse cellar. A morgue storage room for corpses that have died of all causes, awaiting cremation. Not gigantic extermination chambers.

The conclusion doesn't logically follow, either. I can have a gun with as many bullets as I want, it doesn't mean I am guilty of murder. It's a convenient leap of logic not extended to other assertions, only those that confirm their worldview.

Regarding 15: I would be extremely skeptical of things like that. I'm not saying it didn't happen, in fact mass shooting did happen, but this particular letter sounds like a Soviet propaganda piece. You would have to be severely gullible to assume the gigantic propaganda machinery of the USSR didn't extend to faking letters of their fierce enemy Germany, then to be presented at trials for "proof". Don't fall for emotional propaganda.

Regarding 16: This is overdone. You don't need thousands of documents. There are a few central faked documents, letters and memos that did the job. Very few plants actually happened. Most of the physical written propaganda was done by the Soviet Union. Diary entries, like the diary of Kramer, were deliberately taken out of context (he was describing brutal sanitary measures, not executions), something that still happens today with Holocaust cultists.

Regarding 17: The central mistake of people thinking the Posen speeches are key evidence for gigantic pesticide killings is to mistranslate Himmler's words."Die Ausrottung des jüdischen Volkes" does not translate to "The extermination of the Jewish people". Ausrottung has many meanings. The best here would be extirpation, upheaval, uprooting, removal, destruction. He's referring to the insane policy of removing 95% of all Jewish people from Germany under evacuation, deportation. It's a general policy for the destruction of Jewish life in Germany.

Regarding 18: Same applies as above. German rhetoric at the time, certainly Hitler's, was very vivid and fierce. Vernichtung is not extermination. Destruction, extirpation and removal is what is meant. The removal of all Jews and Jewish influence.

>20 gorrilion
Where are your sources

Regarding 21: The same oath was required for a myriad of other operations, it's not exclusive for the Reinhard camps. The Reinhard operation was a partial looting operation, in which Jews to be resettled eventually in the east after staying a time in concentration camps were transited through the Reinhard camps of Sobibor, Majdanek, Belzec and Treblinka, had their personal belongings stripped of them to a bare minimum, had their valuables taken off (stolen), and were sent off to other camps. The stolen properties were given to the Reich, and any German who took anything from this loot was imprisoned or shot. Some of the Reinhard camps acted as a mix between concentration and transit camp. It's entirely possible that a lot of Jews were killed in these camps as well, though the method and victim numbers are ridiculous as with every other claim.

Denying the 6 gorrilian is bad okay

none of them seems to count as evidence of muh holohoax, shlomo

this definitely proves the holocaust

Thank you for these posts friend, nobody has said it yet but you're doing God's work. Planning to screenshot them to review in more depth later

Typical jew arguing tactit: when accused of something they accusing their opponent of that very thing to deflect

Gas yurself schlomo almost every anti holocaust image is sourced and if it isn't we demand a source on whoever posts it. You however have no arguments bc you're a slimy lying kike