LEFTIST IQ

Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left? Not SJWs obviously, but economic leftists (Marxists,Socialists,Communists etc)

Oscar Wilde, George Orwell, Albert Einstein just to name an extra three off the top of my head.

its the other way round ; )

this will be a beautiful thread

Because they are not right.

Yes animal farm was about animal rearing

Because high IQ capitalists are too busy making money, so you don't notice them.

Niggers with IQ below 65 are Leftists

Did you seriously skip reading Homage to Catalonia?

>high IQ
>low common sense

Niggers with IQ below 65 are Far-Left

Are they? Africans tend to be quite tribal and religious in my experience.

As a challenge to you, name some high IQ right wing people. You can do that with at least a few right? Or did the TV not tell you any when you were growing up?

inteligent people tend not to have prejudices against people who are different and think beyond base level tribalism

Mid-tier bait. You can do better.

>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?
Maybe its the ability to empathize.
There also have been studies that many of right wingers perceive any change as a threat and generally are hostile towards things/people they don't understand.
Couple that with the low education you have in 'murican rust belt and oooooh boy.....

Very smart people are detached from reality of 99% stupid people, they cant relate or project.

donald trump

There are a lot of intelligent white men.
The right-wing ones are making money

Niggers also vote left, but are incredibly stupid. What gives?

Because they can't or refuse to accept and understand chaos.

I know Ben Sharpiro skipped a few grades, but I read a lot of biography's of Chemists and Philosophers and there aren't many in the traditional sense of right wing.

A lot of these people tend to deal only in theoretical ideas and when taking it from a theoretical point of view marxism does look like an attractive ideology.

Unfortunately, reality is much less than ideal and human nature and general economical concepts like scarcity exist, so the whole idea always breaks down in execution.

Surprisingly most top nazis were high IQ

leftism includes people and right wing ideologies excludes people

people are much more likely to accept something that includes them than excludes them

Are they? I hear conservatives like Thomas Sowell say that, but I don't see much in the way of evidence.

Western nations/globalism is right wing economically

As a right-wing person who has been accepted in to Mensa. Myself.

Are right wingers making all the money? I would think Liberals would be the richest, looking at places like Silicon Valley.

Democrat =/= far economic left.

Einstein couldn't drive a car. Leftists- great in theory but hopeless when it comes to the practical world.

>liberal thinkers
>posts sartre
Wasnt sartre all about not being a retard and taking responsibilty for ones own existential plight? Sounds like the opposite of liberal degeneracy.

This. Leftists who are not detached (like aforementioned Orwell) are quite rare.

>Oscar Wilde, George Orwell
Really, those are you examples of higher intellect? Novelists?

How about Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh, high-achieving antisemites with Nazi sympathies?

Yeah and that makes him an ancap right?

>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?
Thats actually not the case the far left usually attracts the biggest idiots. The left and center usually have them not the far left lol
Also you have to look at the time at that point because what was then left is today "omg alt right nazi!!!!" the alt right today has more in common with the left in the past than the far left has today.

Is that relevant in context? In a much less industrial time and raised in Europe where cars are a lot less essential.

You should look at what they vote with their feet and not with their ballot.

Are these companies settling in socialist countries?

Very high empathy and the mistake of an intellectual that having knowledge in one domain makes you universally clever

the highest IQ individuals are physcists and mathematicians and computer scientists.

there is a lot of variance between them and very little bias one way or the other, so overall if you took the average they'd be centre.

it's only artsy people who have high verbal IQ but lack the capacity for precise, rigorous , logical deduction that are on average to the far left.

He was a Marxist.

Left wing ideas sound better and more empathetic if you're stupid and / or emotional. If two uneducated people one on the right and one the left have a debate it's going to sound like the guy on the right is an asshole 100% of the time. A leftist can get their retarded appeal to emotion "arguments" from the vast majority of media out there, but to effectively dismantle them the rightist needs to be versed in economics, the rhetorical tricks and traps all leftists use, and the morality of heirarchy. If not the plebs are going to be drawn to the leftist.

For one it can be said as a general rule, that high IQ right wingers often don't get attention because their upbringing to award them such a stimulated intellect puts responsibilities of work and family above literary or journalistic goals. Combine this with government regulation of academic sites like universities which naturally award pro-government rhetoric over any counter narrative ideas presented by right wingers and you can see how right wing thinkers are put at a huge disadvantage to propergate their works.

Secondly, a high IQ doesn't mean that one can effectively delineate bias, and the people you listed would have written in a supportive echo chamber of like minded "thinkers" who defined themselves not necessarily by the merit of their ideas but simply by their own school of thought, it's very stylish to be a nonconformist in intellectual circles and that doesn't require necessarily telling objective truth or else Marxism would never have left the coffee shops in Berlin and London where it was spawned.

Not that well read on Wilde but Orwell, while a critic of Stalanism, was still a through and through ideologue of socialism, and through his writings can be interpreted as sympathetic to Trotsky. Where do you think he sourced his inspiration from? the socialist English coffee shops? the Republican army in Spain? A single incorrect idea can still spawn very deep and thought provoking ideologies around it, and this is where these people's IQ was invested. The brain can be very skilled at deconstructing patterns, but if it accepts one un-truth, or is fooled by one lie, then the rest of it's thought processes are corrupted.

Then theirs Einstein, a man who plagiarised the general theory of relativity from several other scientists and got his Jewish friends to bend the rules to award him a noble prize even though he didn't qualify. The nepotism ran so deep that he was offered to be the first prime minister of Israel. Einstein is nothing but a messiah figure built up by a nepotist media and academic community.

Libertarians really believe that legalizing drugs and recreational nukes will be ok because they cant really relate to double digits IQ people.

This applies for Whites only:
>Far-left: 115-130 IQ
>Left: 100-115
>Right: 85-115
>Far Right: over 9000

Can confirm.

t. Memberof Thetripleninesociety

>As a challenge to you, name some high IQ right wing people. You can do that with at least a few right? Or did the TV not tell you any when you were growing up?

Come on, someones gotta know at least one!

How could a person declare accurately that the left has more intellectuals when you aren't familiar with a single right wing intellectual!

Yeah I read it and then you would know then that there was nuance to the term he wrote in that sentence 'as I understand it'

Most of them tend to be Auspies that are apolitical or liberal (same thing).

You're listing memes, especially pic related. The true geniuses were red-pilled (Leibniz, Godel, Kafka, Dostoevsky)

Guénon, Evola, Heidegger

Wtf do you want nigger?

Could it be that all the Holiday Inn Express staying liberals have been mis-educated by the marxist mass media, and have not in fact done their homework, have not in fact ever left the safety of their intellectual bubbles?

Maybe Left wing ideas sound better because they are. I haven't seen the Zombie economics work out so far.

Lastly it is important to remember that IQ=/=morality.
Since the death of god it can be thought that our academics have replaced priests as our moral guides. Just because someone has a mind which can process things better, doesn't not inherantly mean they can discern right and wrong better. They may be able to express right and wrong in a more eloquent manner which is beyond you, but that also means they are just as capable as expressing it incorrectly through whatever warped lens of ideology they focus their ideas through.

Id consider tesla red pilled in the sense that he dedicated every wake moment of his life towards creating a world better for the fellow man and ignoring women as " A true inventor puts his passion into his science"

>Nietzsche
>Heidegger
>Evola
That's three easy ones just off the top of my head.

politics is about people. ill take someone who understands people over an intellectual any day

Solzhenitsyn. You fucking normie faggots.

"Marxist media", you do realist Marxist ideas are in direct conflict with corporate profit? Companies lose a heap of their stock when they air documentaries on the exploitation of the third world.

Because they want to elevate and distinguish themselves from the unwashed masses by being as different from them as possible, so they adhere themselves to radical ideologies to show exactly how different they are. Leftists talk about the right voting against their own interests, but in reality they're implying that the right doesn't know what's best for themselves and that they're the moral and intellectual authority on all things under the sun. They're pretty much the epitome of edgy contrarians. They did it before Sup Forums made it cool.

Only if the retarded policies are ever enacted, which they won't. The social agenda of Marxism is completely aligned with the corporate agenda.

>economic
>Marx

but to your point, its narcissism. the belief that you are smarter than others and have a right to control them is something inherent in collectivism.

liberals have higher iq than national socialists, however libertarians have the highest iq

Because pseudo-intellectualism is celebrated in an age of decadence.

Of course radical centrists are at the peak of the IQ mountain

Democrats are on average center-right.

He was accused multiple times of being sympathetic to Stalin.

>"control them"
>left wing

James Woods is Mensa
old smelly bait OP

That's retarded. He was born before the fucking Benz Patent-Motorwagen for fucks sakes.

That's like saying you're retarded cause you can't walk on Mars.

I am fully aware that dumb people will destroy themselves when all drugs are legalized. All the more reason to legalize it

Its not, its just people who are high IQ will be successful in their fields. And people who go into academia and typical left leaning. All the high IQ right leaning people go into business. Its just an informational bias of who gets the most publicity.

>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?

Actually libertarians have the highest IQ on average, the (((media))) just likes to misconstrue this as "liberals".

>Oscar Wilde, George Orwell, Albert Einstein

Oswald Teichmüller, Henry Ford, John von Neumann

Hi IQ/functioning right-leaning people go into business and finance, and their left-leaning peers go into academia.

>Orwell
>Leftist

What the hell are you talking about?

You have no idea what you're talking about with Einstein. You most likely just read someone else's diatribe and know nothing about physics. E=mc2 is similar in form to an equation of Lawrence, but the implications of the physics ramifications are far more incredible than Lawrence ever conceived. Einstein also wrote 4 papers, including one on the photon quanta which is what he won for because it was the closest to being accepted by the community at the time.

He never disguised that he had built upon ideas of Max Planck and others, quite the contrary Planck promoted him, and the idea that he could somehow just repackage the ideas of the smartest people in the world and get away with it is only a fantasy to be entertained by the most imbecilic of morons.

high iq people are smart enough not to signal being right wing and get mauled by the autistic screeching leftist hordes

The Highest IQ individuals are Libertarians. The Leftists tend to be people of slightly above average intelligence who are aware of their lack of true ability and so seek novelty.

this is the thing--it literally does not matter how intelligent you are, if your idea is factually incorrect, it's a bad idea. Claiming that being paid a wage is actually the same as being stolen of because your made-up version of "Value" which cannot be tested empirically or defended logically says so, you're a snake oil salesman. Marx was objectively wrong.

The NatSoc leadership were all also very high IQ, some absurdly so. So what does that mean? Because the entire Nazi leadership were MENSA-tier does that mean that they're automatically right? No, of course not. I mean they're more right than Communists but their ideology is still categorically evil. All you need to know to verify that Leftism is empirically incorrect is to engage in basic epistemological debate with them. They have no answers that are not pure sophistry.

Unlike 90% of lolberts I don't actually hate NatSocs, I think at heart most of them are former Libertarians who got pushed too far and now want to go one step beyond Pinochet and literally impose their enemies' greatest fears on them by actually becoming Nazis. Rockwell was actually pretty spot-on when it came to markets.

>socialists aren't leftists

Africa is literally dominated by Socialist and Communist parties. They are religious--Leftism is a religion. The Nelson Mandela, the ANC in SA, all factions of the Angolan Civil War, Robert Mugabe, the Somalian government to name a few. Notice a common theme, aside from all being failed states or teetering on the edge.

Source? the only study I've seen of those results was testing for Autism originally.

Because those with higher IQ tend to be (or become) intellectuals, who are often utopians who live in their own upper-class bubbles, separated from the rest of society. Thus, they never encounter the reality or hardships of the common citizen and only see that reality through the lens of their own bubble's ideology - namely liberalism, socialism etc. Furthermore, intellectuals, who very often are upper-middle class or higher, rarely have to suffer the consequences of the failed political ideologies they champion, and thus find it easy dismiss and find an excuse for the plight of the plebs, often from biased sources that only move the blame to something else. Intellectuals might have the highest IQ but they're always blind ideolouges and only get their ideas from utopian litterature, not reality, while the common man is more pragmatic and realistic. High IQ does not equal the best ideas, but rather often the opposite.

This is probably to do with orwell being working class and having experience of life outside the safe space of the "intellectuals" who grew up mostly in gated communities.

yet all economists tend to lean right. i think the point is economics is counterintuitive and propaganda is rife so it's a particularly difficult field to wade through. people who become masters of physics or literature rarely have the bandwidth to go deep into economics.

its an expert field. we dont take physics advice from economists, why would you care what einstein says about resource management?

...

This. Orwell fucking detested intellectuals. Also his time fighting for the Republicans in Spain redpilled him on the dangers of communism after seeing it with his own eyes and after being nearly executed by them for his critiscism.

>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?
Anyone with an above average IQ realizes any form of extremism (left or right) is always doomed to fail. Ever wonder why the US has never had a single party in power for more than 2 terms?
You're a retard OP.

Pretty much anybody who wasn't a faggot could be considered right wing now.

Leftism is based in academia and is a student thing. Intellectuals tend to stay in academia, thus are eternal students. It isn't hard to figure out.

They don't, or are you talking about those masturbatory articles that say things like "Study: Left smarter than Right" ?
How many right wingers do you see waiting around for pollsters to ask them questions? Where do you find a concentration of right wingers?
The left is concentrated to the cities. Look at the election map. It's a false equivalency fallacy and those who think shit is this cut and dry are sitting at the wrong end of the bell curve.

High IQ people usually are detached from society because society and them don't understand each other, so they think we can all get along and whatnot.
People with average or somewhat high IQs are around people all the time, and they understand temptation, greed, laziness etc as constants of human nature. Those high IQ people that I mentioned think that we should get along because that's what is sensible to do, but they don't account that people gladly screw others for the benefit of themselves.
In short, you don't need only IQ to understand reality, you neec balls as well

>intellectuals, who are often utopians who live in their own upper-class bubbles,
They can simply afford to believe such ideas completely oblivious to the safety and the system which defined the reality they currently occupy, It's the ego in these people that also makes it impossible for them to ever admit they got lucky with circumstancxe instead always peddling myths of "muh hardwork" even when they simply inherited it all validating the idea that everyone is suffering due to their own failings when it's much more complicated than that. It's why when their ideologies surrounding things like mass migration fail they are so keen to blame everybody else for it going wrong rather than ever let that ego accept they are simply wrong about something.

>High IQ people usually are detached from society because society and them don't understand each other, so they think we can all get along and whatnot.

It's more a case of avoiding stupid people to avoid getting fucked over for someone else's benefit. That's how I feel about it at least.

lmao

Simple answer.

Left-wing ideas revolve around corporation and putting society above the individual. The result of this is advancement as demonstrated in the west.

Right-wing ideas revolve around individualism and giving people the freedom to damage the common good. The result is all the backward African and middle eastern society.

In short liberalism advanced society forward while conservatism regresses it. Makes sense that smart people would be liberal.

that's right , they also feel well wallowing in the narcissism of the left wheather it is virtue-signalling to show off their 'sense of humane justice' or just feeling superior to the 'poor fools' who aren't as 'lofty and inspired' as them

>total BS (also they can't self-aware what they doing, 'intellectuals', right)

>High IQ people usually are detached from society because society and them don't understand each other, so they think we can all get along and whatnot.
>People with average or somewhat high IQs are around people all the time, and they understand temptation, greed, laziness etc as constants of human nature.

No the High IQ people recognize the problems of society but realize that is no excuse to not act. Imperfect solutions tend to be better than no solutions.

It's the low IQ people that say " this isn't perfect so don't do anything."

>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?

They don't. Most people you meet with IQ > 150 tend to be political centrists. They do tend to be more altruistic in an "above the fray" type of way. If they're "leftist" in any way, it's because they have empathy for societal outliers. Understandably so, because "smart people" aren't generally welcome on either side of the artificial right/left divide.

They don't. You're cherry picking.

This.

Also a lot of extremely high iq people who don't apply that high iq to find economic success get frustrated by the idea of a society where the hardest working get rewarded more and vouch for extreme ideas like communism or socialism. In the case of scientists like Einstein, they rarely take an interest in politics beyond a basic level, and without proper examination the idea of a happy fun socialist utopia becomes achieveable.