Sup Forums Moderation Discussion

Hiro allows one thread per board to discuss how to make the board and moderation better.

Today's focus: anti-homosexuality threads
are they utter christkikery or not?

Other urls found in this thread:

Sup
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

WASTED

The only problem with Sup Forums are the roastie/sjw/faggot mods who come and shot down discussions that make them uncomfortable.

Sup Forums is about being made to feel uncomfortable.
Get fucked.

"homosexuality" threads are not politically-related unless it's about public policy protecting homosexualists against dirty religious/political extremists in the nation

OP is tripfagging, which already indicates that they think they're hot shit, doncha?

is this real life? why is this today's focus ?

it should be something like how do we encourage harsh debate to better shape the ideas and views of /pol with out resorting to reddit tier circle jerks

We are experiencing a very high level of oneposting and sliding today because there are a lot of big news stories.

the dirty anti-gay threads are constantly popping up
what is your problem?
you are presuming that use of tripcode implies that i am showing off, that i am prideful or arrogant
you are only a menace, as your other post affirms:
>Sup Forums is about being made to feel uncomfortable.
>Get fucked.
is that what you come here to do? to try and make other people uncomfortable?
Sup Forums.org/rules#pol

Got banned for reporting spiderman/yt thread. never posted in one

>protecting homosexualists
Read The Republic.

Don't talk shit about my waifu faggot

to further substantiate my assertion that the primary driving force behind the majority of anti-homosexuality threads is christianity, there's this interesting behaviour akin to "subtweeting" -- talking "about" other users in the thread without replying to them or naming them directly (e.g., "this tripfag is...") >protecting homosexualists
your english is poor, sven
are you accusing me of falsely "projecting" something or are you accusing another of incorrectly "projecting a belief onto a true reality"?
>Read The Republic.
why? i don't want to read your shitty greek garbage, you filthy retard

>Nazi
>not against homosex
>Civic nationalist faggot detected
>What about maintaining the family unit don't you understand
communist against homosexuality accusing me of something

>What type of person would you expect to be a mod
>Only beta faggots
is that your very wise opinion, shlomo?

Defending Sup Forums mods? Fucking sort yourself out

>Oh you are retarded
>Filtered and saged :^)
Sup Forums rule 2 global rule 7 Sup Forums.org/rules

LGBT threads in general are way too common. people claim that the issue is over represented by the mainstream media; yet the people who are constantly making LGBT threads on Sup Forums are doing the exact same thing. I saw 4 threads at once about a pro gay youtube video. The threads are almost guaranteed to be low quality and there are infinite "stories" about the issue to use as fodder.

Fair enough if it's about laws like the one Canada has recently introduced, otherwise the sheer amount of threads has destroyed this board. There are other such topics but this is probably the worst one.

but in fairness youtube has taken a leftist political stance and at least one of these threads is working to undermine there decision what would be the recourse ban threads about gay people ?

There isn't a recourse. it's what happens when you get so called normies flooding into Sup Forums en masse. topics begin to mirror the topics that are put out in the mainstream. And when you put shit in front of a mirror it still looks like shit.

true i do hate the fact that /pol isnt the 1st place that news rears its head /pol used to know about everything early i used to get excited by 70% of threads and now i am dismayed by 70% of threads i dont see an answer though

>/pol

Do you guys also have fosters?

Sup Forums should be a blue board. The users of Sup Forums consider pornography and hentai to be degenerate, and yet the board is flooded with pornography and hentai. If the users cannot adhere to their own principles freely, then they should consent to have their principles imposed upon them from above.

Not all of us whine and cry about "degeneracy".

...

I agree

>If the users cannot adhere to their own principles freely, then they should consent to have their principles imposed upon them from above.
I can't even what are you a fascist! Should ban you all KracKKKas

>oy vey watch out for the purity spiral

...

most of Sup Forums like to think they are 'redpilled'. the truth is probably only 20% are.

being redpilled would mean being able to recognize slide/wedge issues, like the LGBT one for example. i.e. instead of thinking about the LGBT issue in this way, the new Sup Forums has decided to become redpilled ON the issue, a slide issue (distraction from real politics). this is no different then how the media manipulates the general public.

to make my point more obvious, another example would be when someone makes a thread like:
"redpill me on milk"

christianity spawns nonsensical arguments
and is clearly nonpolitical

>Update
ye i take that on board its very true but the amount of change this lgbt is creating in society at the moment is quite interesting to say the least also raw milk is supposedly better for you but may contain harmful pathogens as it has not been pasteurized

i get what your sayin though but basically /pol has become increasingly retarded in an iq sense is whats happend

Ban Anonymous5 the larping faggot
Otherwise things are okay

i may as well just leave 4kike to the stupid mods and the filthy christkikes
i am sick of you all

like i said. Sup Forums is no different to the general public in how it is manipulated. you always need two sides to push forward an agenda. remember that governments can achieve more in 5 years of war than in 50 years of peace time. it's easier to pass a hatespeech law when you have a vocal opposition

another great political discussion on 4kike