If Sup Forums denies the holocaust, how do you explain the Eichmann trials where he expressly admits to purposefully rounding up and later killing the Jewish people?
Holocaust denial
Robert Baker
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
vho.org
pastebin.com
twitter.com
Andrew Reed
by not looking
Jaxson Perry
denial =/= skepticism
Christian Lopez
The same way I deny the Cossacks did anything wrong.
Joshua Wilson
2nd time seeing this thread today.
Stop fucking shitposting.
Wyatt Gonzalez
(((eichmann))) no...I don't buy it merchant. No sale.
Ethan Hill
They were tortured and confessed ridiculous numbers to show it. Some claimed they had killed several million kikes from Bulgaria whose Jewish population before the war was barely some tens of thousands.
Josiah Rogers
stop with this threads u fucking shill the holocaust never happened plain and simple faggot
Aaron Jones
admission /=/ guilt
Matthew Wright
That's easy! I can make up stories too!
Like this one time at Nazi camp, we rounded up all the Jews and gave them showers! They were pissed! They had to start all over on being dirty stinking Jews from scratch!
We didn't even tell them the soap used was made from Jews!
Nicholas Robinson
Is there a source for the Bulgaria claim? If so that would be quite interesting.
James Wilson
None denies it. jews did die during WW2, everyone did it was just extremely exaggerated and distorted for war propaganda means.
David Cole, ----A JEW----
Did extreme amount of research on the holocaust and found out 90% of it was made up propaganda
heres a vid for new fags
youtube.com
Gabriel Rodriguez
You can't judge a people by the actions of Eichmann
Brandon White
The Real Eichmann Trial or The Incorrigible Victors - Paul Rassinier
vho.org
Jacob Lee
No one [rational] is "denying" (((The))) (((H)))olocaust™.
The problem historical revisionist (compare: the Zionist slur, "deniers") are finding, is that any enquiry into the goings on at the time (concerning said specific events) -- e.g., regarding the numbers that have been purported (and dis-proven) not reconciling with almost every pertaining claim and calculation made -- is SHUT DOWN™ and dismissed as historical ignorance, a besmirching of the Jewish victims of the time, and (the fan favourite) "ANTI-SEMITISM".
The fundamental issue remains unresolved: if (((The))) (((H)))olocaust™ did take place, and in the manner that has been cursorily penned into History's annuls, then there would not only be no harm in investigating the period further (using modern forensic means, for example), and would in fact re-enforce the narrative pushed by -- who are often fingered as -- Zionist propaganda channels.
The truth can only set one free... no?
---
>'He will win whose army is animated by the same spirit throughout all its ranks.'
--Sun Tzu, The Art of War (Attack by Stratagem, III:17)
Logan Williams
the victors write history, this case is no different
Christian Bailey
Maybe they edited out the shirtless man from the 'actual original'. I'm sure it was not 'proper' during those times. IF you think he was never in the original picture, then the picture is pretty poorly framed. A photographer would frame out that pillar.
Matthew Thompson
>make thread
>get 300+ replies completely BTFOing this bullshit
>make the same thread
>keep making it ad infinitum until people get tired of responding again and again
>"hurr durr no1 has any argumends :DD"
holohoax didn't happen. nice try, shlomo
Owen Lewis
Then why not just blur the offending parts? Why remove completely?
As for framing, was it a photographer or an army grunt with a camera?
Haven't looked into who took the photo.
Owen Parker
Second time I've seen this thread today.
Levi Fisher
>No one [rational] is "denying" (((The))) (((H)))olocaust™.
I deny the holocaust.
There is literally no evidence in favor of the Holocaust.