What's Sup Forums's opinion on appropriating Alinsky tactics, particularly using an enemy's rules against them...

What's Sup Forums's opinion on appropriating Alinsky tactics, particularly using an enemy's rules against them? While I think they're useful, it seems like most institutions can ignore them and not face significant consequences. Legal-wise, these tactics seem to work much better, but that's only true when the person using them has Peter Thiel money. What are your thoughts?

Bump.

You absolutely have to know the enemy's playbook.

Implementing it has its time and its place. The key is to use it as a tool, not as a doctrine.

What does the right time and place look like, in your opinion? And should it matter more in a legal or social sense?

the book is literally just saying be a nuisance instead of being violent

I think it really only matters in a moral sense. All's fair in love and war, as they say. So if the opportunity comes up to make good tactical use of those techniques to achieve a particular objective, then that's fair game.

Kind of like how sometimes it's legit to help spread a rumor that you don't believe just for its effect.

worked for hillary right? i mean she was his magnum opus, his protege, his mona lisa

I've thought about it.

It's hard for conservatives to use the means in the book, because they generally do not believe the end justifies the means.

If you're playing by your enemies rules, they've already beaten you.

...

>reacting to meme triggers automatically
the goyim really are a slave race

>It's hard for conservatives to use the means in the book, because they generally do not believe the end justifies the means.

I'm not a conservative, but I have to disagree entirely with that, they clearly know how to play the game.

Holy shit, you really ARE a leaf!

I can never take this cover seriously because they use that fucking Sponge Bob font.

read this article
absolute must

jacobitemag.com/2017/06/14/political-violence-is-a-game-the-right-cant-win/

cantwell even talked about it recently on podcast AND in his speech

>trying to out-Jew the Jew

The only way to beat the Jew is to BEAT the Jew.

>what's the right time/place
I dunno but I routinely tell leftist fucks to stop being bigoted and racist against me every time I say something bigoted and racist.
t. Mulatto

No, he's right. If you make a field of battle favourable to your enemy, you've given him an advantage.

You would be a fool to not use it against them.

Then are we...
1. abandoning our moral code unto eachother?
or
2. paying unto others as they have done to us?

We are keeping our moral code and not abandoning it as a trade to use our enemies' tactics.

>it seems like most institutions can ignore them and not face significant consequences
Seems is the key word. Anyone who has reached a certain level has done so by ways in which others could not concieve, let alone track. They are just in a position that they can never be caught, now that their assets reach as far as they do and have been through so many layers of laundering.

nice try CNN
but i'm on to you

Keeping the moral code. The tricks only work if you want them to.

Take the Bowden path and just sweep it aside.

I ain't no CNN, bitch. I'm just not above playing dirty if the situation calls for it.

Is that SpongeBob font on the cover?

spoken like true a self righteous, fake news purveyor

I find the truth to be much more effective in general. But if, say, something like comet pizza comes along when the energy is high and the memes are making themselves at just the point when the soft coup needs to whack the neocons at the last minute, you can count on me to meme it hard for hours on end.

Besides, rampant child sex slavery is a real thing, even if maybe it's not happening in the basement of a pizza parlor. If that's what it takes to rabble rouse until we start seeing people strung up by the balls in the public square, so be it.