It should be 100% legal to shoot someone in the process of committing a violent crime. Give me one (1) reason why not

It should be 100% legal to shoot someone in the process of committing a violent crime. Give me one (1) reason why not.

Other urls found in this thread:

usnews.com/news/best-states/washington/articles/2017-06-24/shop-owner-gets-8-years-in-fatal-shooting-of-suspected-thief
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's legal here. Tell me you live in a shit hole that doesn't value human life

I agree, I shouldn't get an extra charge for murder when I'm robbing the bank and I shoot the teller in the face.

It is and it's why we're # 1. Fuck everyone else

Same here, I just know it's not like that everywhere.

even if you're in some fucked up place with laws designed to disarm and kill you, no jury would ever convict you for shooting someone who is perpetrating a violent crime as long as you have any degree of credibility or evidence to present

Fat underwear NEET saves the day with gunz

It is in certain cases

I kekd at that amerifat chasing those robbers.
The stereotypes are true

was getting a hair cut and the hair dressers were talking to each other about how this guy one of them knew saw this guy stabbing a woman so he ran the stabbing guy over with his car, saving the woman and got a criminal sentence, cant remember what

should be googleable, Toronto

welcome to Canada

>Niggers just drive around random white suburbs and rob people in broad daylight

Agreed, Stand Your Ground

Pretty sure it was in south Africa.

>robber gets out of front left side
>car creeps forward
>that van
This isn't in America

"Oh...sorry I shot you, I could have sworn you were committing a violent crime"

>south africa is in america

You are wrong. If a person is harming someone violence is justified to stop them. Its shooting someone comiting a crime that isn't violent that is against the law. Like that lady that ran down the purse snatcher this week. The dude was a thief but she had no right to vigilante his ass. That is why she was charged with vehicular assault.

What happens when you're shooting someone to stop a crime, then some other armed yahoo sees you shooting at someone so he shoots you?

duhh!! someone else will see him shooting me and will shoot him

That's not why I started this thread but I do think that should be legal as well. Hell, the police department should write her a check for making their job easier.

Because I decide your laws and I don't want to be shot when I'm robbing your house.

IF YOU CAN; DONT TURN YOURSELF IN, IF NOBODY SAW YOU, IT DIDNT HAPPEN

Im cool with it as long as you dont fire into the neighborhood like a retard

That webm has freedom written all over it. Eurocucks and leafs will never be able to run out shirtless with a beer belly and fire shots at niggers and spics.

not for long, burger-friend

It's why we can't have nice things. Or if you do, make sure they're not visible through any windows. God damn niggers. When will republicans learn we Dems are doing them a favor by giving them places like Baltimore and Chicago as a Thunderdome. More like NiggerDome's. Nigger-DOM. NIGGERDOM.

>no euros in the thread
topjej

Give us a single example of where that has happened in real life... You watch too many movies and play too many vidja games.

you forgot flag related

Flawed.

This is the closest I'm aware of.

I also think it should be legal to booby trap the mailman but you don't see me ding dong ditching your courtroom.

because Minnesota is fucking gay

>Guy says something crude.
>Woman slaps him.
>Blow her fucking head off!

"Violent crime" is a bit broad, though if people's lives are in danger, deadly force is quite appropriate as far as I'm concerned.

>South Carolina CWP
>Stand your ground
>Castle doctrine

I wish a nigger would!

It is lawful duty to god, rather the legality of it becomes null and void. If anyone asserts legality then charge them with being an accomplice. drag them to the sheriff. As you cannot contract away our duty to mutual defense of life liberty and property. As legality is of contractual nature. and is overridden if it interferes with what is lawful.

>It should be 100% legal to shoot someone in the process of committing a violent crime.

I 100% support you OP.

Around blacks, never relax.

I carried a loaded shotgun around my house when I lived in Memphis.

Those fucking niggers will jump on you in a second the moment they think your guard is down.

Every single last one of those lazy mother fuckers should be shot dead.

It should be legal to kill niggers any time, any where.

...I see

>Memphis
almost anywhere else I'd think you were paranoid, but Memphis truly is a hellish wasteland.
Stayed there a couple of days once and the only thing of worth was the barbecue, the only maintained buildings outside the block or so of downtown were fried chicken restaurants, and there were billboards saying the cops were incompetent

Tell this to Chinks. They won't even help an injured person laying on street due to fear of legal persecutions, let alone kill someone for committing violent acts.

Communism is literally cancer. They turn humans into robots and zombies, nothing else.

Capitalism does that too but at least it gives you choice to choose your own path.

Legal professionals love nothing better than to make examples out of people in self-defense cases in order to advance their career credibility.. Make sure you know all dimensions of self-defense rules with a gun, but don't expect that to cover you when dindumama + her lawyer cries about how you were excessive in front of tv cameras

Yea but you have government sanctioned capitalism which means you can choose your own path but you don't know your wearing mandatory blinders and all the paths to pleasing destinations are in your peripheral vision.

>It should be 100% legal to shoot someone in the process of committing a violent crime. Give me one (1) reason why not.
only yurocucks think you shouldn't.

can we get more webms where people own criminals with guns?

Because you could mischaracterize what the violent crime is.

You stumble upon a man beating another guy, shoot him, come to find out he was beating up a pedophile that just tried to abduct his son. After chasing him down, they got into a tussel, and you just happened to show up while the father had the upper hand.

Ambiguity in criminal cases is nothing new. That's why they invented this thing called due process of law.

theres no good reason against this

you just shoot them both

>I use pedophiles to go full retard

if only there was a list of people who could be armed and form an army against the people blaming them for everything

..its not like anyone would be stupid enough to create such a list.... right?

Planet is full. We don't need a bunch of scumbags who think taking other people's shit is OK. World is better off without them.

Right. But by intervening in that example you are dispensing judgement. It's completely different if you're acting in self defense for yourself or a loved one.

Make it illegal to intervene if you are unaware of the complete situation. Problem solved?

>We don't need a bunch of scumbags who think taking other people's shit is OK

yea, I hate christians too

Umm... It IS legal?

Don't know, is this a trick question?

Okay. But the OP wanted one reason. I gave it.

Not even close to being the same scenario.

kys faggot. I hate you and I am a Hindu. Planet will be better off without people like you.

Big Boy comes out shootin'

>get jumped by two guys
>die
>"he was committing a violent crime"
>#2 backs him up, swears as witness

>le oh no, now we need more camera's to verify witnesses' testimony

implying i want more surveillance

Nigger how is that violent** CRIME?
God americans are so dumb sometimes.

in washington a mom and pop shop owner is going to prison for shooting (and killing) a nog goblin who tried to rob his store.

this happened right on the tail of his wife getting shot during an attempted robbery by another nog goblin about a month prior.

shop owner is getting 8 years in prison for defending his shop

>usnews.com/news/best-states/washington/articles/2017-06-24/shop-owner-gets-8-years-in-fatal-shooting-of-suspected-thief

There's nothing retarded about that scenario. You witnessed a violent crime, to stop it you used deadly force. It could have been a mugger, it doesn't matter.

"The rules are the same when force is used to protect another from danger.[1] Generally, the defendant must have a reasonable belief that the third party is in a position where they have the right of self-defense. For example, a person who unknowingly chances upon two actors practicing a fight would be able to defend their restraint of the one that appeared to be the aggressor. However, in many jurisdictions a person who causes injury in defense of another may be liable to criminal and civil charges if such defence turned out to be unnecessary." -Wikipedia Entry on Self-Defense.

This was all covered in CCW class.

Why would you SHOOT anyone in that situation??
Just break up the fight?
Deadly force should be used only when necesarry.

Assault is a violent crime you dumb fuck.

That's OPs statement. To shoot someone commiting a violent crime. I'm not the one begging the question.

she violated the NAP.

full rights to put a hole in her face

I wish I was this stupid.

Omg the NAP solves the woman problem. They can't overreact and slap a guy now.

Yeah technically but there's levels to this shit.
>Typically, violent criminals includes aircraft hijackers, bank robbers, muggers, burglars, terrorists, carjackers, rapists, kidnappers, torturers, active shooters, murderers, gangsters, drug cartels, and others

The stories I could tell you. I used to work at house renovation in the worst part of inner city Memphis, for the Jews who ran the local ACORN chapter there.

YES, but you should not PROLONG THEIR LIFE IN ORDER TO TORTURE THEM FOR WHAT THEY'VE DONE

JUST END IT

>violence is on a spectrum, there are no absolutes
Yeah we get it, you're a leftist

Which is why my post differentiated non-fatal violent crime from fatal violent crime. I'm aware commies suffer from low IQ and reading comprehension issues, but try to keep up.

tell some stories bro

Why even list that slap example though?

In Canada you have a duty to retreat even in your own home.

Retreat

where the fuck are you gonna retreat to Lieutenant?

This is simply not true.

In Canada self defence is justifiable defence to crime of murder.
If you are in your home and you have grounds to reasonably believe that an intruder is attempting or will attempt to harm/murder you (or anyone else) you are justified in using deadly force, including firearms

Because OP stated that it should be legal to shoot someone who commits a violent crime, and to provide one reason the statement wasn't correct. The example was to illustrate that "violent crime" is too broad a definition, as relatively minor offenses are still considered violent crime.

Do I have to explain this further with pictograms, charades, a feature length film... what?

That is fucking depressing, but it's what happens when you live in a liberal shit hole state

Stand your ground Law

Good Job, Randy Bobandy

>Mason was fleeing from the store when Kim shot him in the back.
>shoplifting
Yea sounds like someone over reacted. BUT FUCK LIBURALS AND FUCK BROWN PEOPLE.

Stand your ground is great as it provides the legal grounds for someone to neutralize a threat in the event of imminent danger.

Reason: Because you may be incorrectly assessing the situation and kill someone who shouldn't be killed. Think about how dumb you are; and that another 20% of the population is even dumber than that.

SPANAWAY, Wash. (AP) — A Spanaway convenience store owner has been sentenced to eight years in prison for fatally shooting a man he suspected of shoplifting.

KOMO-TV reports Kim told the judge Friday he accepted responsibility for his actions that led to the death of 21-year-old Jakeel Mason in March 2016.

Mason was fleeing from the store when Kim shot him in the back.

The shooting came a month after Kim's wife was shot and wounded during a robbery at the store.

Kim said in court he didn't have the right to "take Mr. Mason's life or anyone else's life" and asked the judge for permission to write a letter of apology to Mason's family.

You can't shoot a bitch as he's running away with some candy.

Guys what the fuck are these flags? I haven't been visiting very often lately, when did this happen?

how many chromosomes do you have?

It should be 100% illegal to have guns and 100% borders who don't allow guns or niggers. There fixed it for you. Such crime didn't exist once in Socialism, it's only capitalistic muh gun problems.

He said violent crime you retards. That's not shoplifting. It's having a gun or raping someone.

What about the stealing of food at gunpoint?

It's like you carefully picked several logical statements, and then said the exact opposite to create the biggest lie you could. I'd be impressed if it wasn't so monumentally stupid.

That's not protected under stand your ground or castle doctrine.

When a naked man is chasing a woman through an alley with a butcher knife and a hard-on, I figure he's isn't out collecting for the red cross.

Except that:

A) Socialism is fundamentally organized crime, B) You had plenty of black markets and gangsters in the USSR - particularly at the end, where the state failed to meet the needs of the people.

>implying anybody in Europe had rape and murder before Americans destroyed Socialism and imported ton of free trade niggers and guns
Capitalism:
a.) create problem
b.) charge money for problem
It's like the same story with American pills, niggers, guns, corruption, shrinks(that's another thing we didn't have). You do drugs because you are depressive and your capitalistic society is pure diarrhea, you steal because you don't have money, you are mentally ill because you have too many options. People don't need options of fail, they need solutions that work. We don't need your problems solving and brainstorming -19 IQ bullshit, that's for Christian retards. Government should lay down what works and nothing else should be allowed, either with pills or practical solutions like guns. There never was a case where guns worked, it's only your Jewish military industry that sells them. Out of 100 cases of your gang robberies, you only hit at most 5 times. And that's 100 gang robberies more than we had in Socialism for 50 years. Did i mention there were no gangs in Socialism, that's right, because gangs exist in shit-capitalism bullshit free land. Gangs and any kind of gathering of retarded church people were forbidden in Socialism. So standing on street and prostituting yourself like mother Mary would get you an instant pass to jail and we had police patrolling constantly, unlike you free man with your no go zones and scared to go outside in park at night. Oh you already scared at mid day in no go ghetto zones, ain't you free man.

If there were black markets in USSR how come there was no AIDS from needles? That's just your liar American propaganda of rewriting history. Socialism doesn't has money abroad, so it checks every cent of its own money, there is impossibility for money to come from illegal lands or any product whatsoever, unless you want to sell it for free.

Capitalism is the worst system ever created except for all the other systems before it.