Since Africa has so many of the world's resources

Since Africa has so many of the world's resources....

Shouldn't they be the worlds most powerful or richest continent by now? How can a country like Somalia with so much resources be fucking broke?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=N_VaIruoBigL
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse
youtube.com/watch?v=5CfXouIq-Mc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because niggers

/thread

1. missing intelligence
2. miss management
3. corruption

>inb4 bad genes

Rhetorical question threads are a waste of bandwidth. Or is this just another flavour of a nigger hate thread?

because black people are stupid and moronic. they're terrible stewards

Raw resources don't mean shit until you make something out of them. Africans never did, if you go far enough into the bush people are still living off subsistence farming and fishing.

Unlike other races, they never had environmental pressure to drive them to develop high time preference thus never bothered making the huge investment required to develop technologies to make use of those resources.

Low IQ lazy niggers.

Wow she's gorgeous.

whitey done came in and took away our magic melanin powers and fucked it all up

Sauce on op plz

Resources alone don't make you rich. Russia has by far the largest amount of resources than any other country on earth and it's far from rich.

Since we know that all humans are equal it's necessarily because they're oppressed. Since we also know that whiteness is inherently oppressive we can just put two and two together and realize that it's da crackas again.

somalia would probably be a nicer place with more money but they got embargoed so dabeers can keep their monopoly.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=N_VaIruoBigL

She's not for you, Akira.

Bantus evolved to be stupid but also incredibly selfish and violent on a personal level

In a way they are the perfect Randian individuals as they will kill anyone they meet for momentary satisfaction.

At the same time they usually for tribes run by warlords so they have a form if government albeit a primitive one

Africans we're originally smarter, see Khoisan people, who are the closest to what our ancestors looked like. Bantus however wiped out all non Bantus because they breed faster, matured quicker and we're better at being thoughtlessly violent. Eventually they conquered all of Africa

Pic related is prolly the only nog country that managed not to fuck everything up.

russia has a smaller gdp than italy, a cunt with no natural resources left btw

Mogadishu used to be very nice before it was given back to niggers that ruined it. Italians wasted a lot of resources building up the place.

...

an endless supply of commodities is no match for an endless supply of niggers.

t. retired mining executive

niggers

The only nog countries with any potential have a very small population.

USSR also sent the first man to space. They at least had something. Africa never did.

the whole idea behind colonization is to take those resources from the host country WITHOUT giving adequate compensation. Congo is still being exploited for it's riches and is a ;political and social wreck.

I'm gonna need a source on that. Especially compared to China and India.

Because of Resource Curse. Having lots of resources is a curse:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse

Why? Because if you have lots of resources, you attract resource thieves. Other countries will steal your resources, other countries will colonize you, invade you, etc, to steal your gold or oil.

So, to answer your question, how come Somalia is broke? Answer: because of White people. White people keep them poor. White people exploit countries like Somalia because of their resources.

They're lacking the most important resource- human resource.
Niggers are stupid as shit and lazy as fuck.

>The resource curse, also known as the paradox of plenty, refers to the paradox that countries with an abundance of natural resources (like fossil fuels and certain minerals), tend to have less economic growth, less democracy, and worse development outcomes than countries with fewer natural resources.

Wow. I never even knew Mogadishu was a nice place. It's like looking at pictures of the middle east during the Western years before they went full "mohamed."

Except when inhabited by smart white people

Most places where White people live have no abundance of resources. Most White people live in places filled with snow.

That's why White people had to invade, conquer, colonize, steal, and exploit. If they didn't do it, they'd die, because White people have no resources. that's why they're White, they live in snow.

They had tens of thousands of years, with absolutely nobody around and guess what, most of them didn't even invent the wheel or made it out of the stoneage.

Proper colonialism only lasted a few decades, between 1885 and the 1960s. Western countries sank a lot of money in building infrastructures and running a local administration that only really benefited a few corporations. Nobody can escape basic economics, if colonies were really profitable, we wouldn't have given those countries their independence back so easily.

This is either the worst bait or the dumbest post ever. Most of continental Europe is not filled with snow. It was harsh, swampy and extremly woody. Which people slowly transformed into some of the best land to live on in recent history. They aquired a technological edge and developed better societal systems BEFORE they could go on to spread out and conquer others.

Also by your logic, the Inuit should be exploring the stars.

A place becomes shitty when Whites decide to fuck the place up and make it shitty. Example in your pics, CIA admitted to starting the Iranian revolution, because of Oil.

Afghanistan, America decided to intervene and turned it into a warzone.

Why do White people do this? First, they invade a country, steal its resources, colonize it, or turn places into warzones, then they will make a thread and ask, "why are those places broke and shitty?" The answer is you. You White people are the reason those place are the way they are now. It's a fact. It's a fact that colonization happened. It's a fact that you intervened in Afghanistan. It's a fact that CIA admitted to starting the Iranian coup

>They had tens of thousands of years
To do what?

If you are drowning in resources, you didn't need to do anything.

They didn't need to do what Whites did in order to survive.

You are dumb. The point is most White people live in countries that are lacking in resources and raw materials. Why do you think the Vikings had to plunder and steal?

Why do you think Britain had to colonize countries? They need the resources and raw materials.

Don't average people in Iran believe in Sharia and shit?

>missing intelligence
>missing

You imply they lost it, or are somehow just entitled to it.

They arent.

It's still happening right now, only it's in different form. White countries need 3rd world cheap labor and sweat shops. That's why they are pushing for globalism.

you know the story about BP oil? and how it relates to the Iran coup

Oh boy. Vikings raided primarily BECAUSE IT WAS EASIER than to produce these things themselves. They however spent large ammounts of time on agriculture and other ventures including establishing trade networks and engaging in trade. You have zero idea about the groups you are talking about.

Britain did not HAVE to colonize, they did it because they COULD. Why could they? Because they massively developed and used the resources they had available. Because they moved away from subsistence production. Which lead to a population boom, freed up huge numbers of people and allowed them to spread out and aquire even more resources.

You are going out of your way to ignore that for tens of thousands of years Africans did effectively nothing, despite nobody being around to "steal their resources" and that to do so any group needs to have achieved a position where they can handily and easily do so to begin with. You are also ignoring groups like the Inuit who had even fewer resources, yet never ammounted to anything and did not what you claim they would've done.

What you are doing is talking away the success and victories of one group, while excusing the failures of another. Based on claims that do not hold up to scrutiny.

THATS BECAUSE COMMIES HAD IT ALL WRONG
WEALTH =/= RESOURCES
WEALTH =/= LABOR

WEALTH = PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY

fuck im so tired of preaching the same thing over and over and over and over and over
there is no wealth inequality, only iq inequality
there are no poor countries, only low iq contries
>inb4 that says a lot about serbia too
i know i dont fucking care i am just talking facts and truth here

people ignore the largest factor of quality of life: fucking intellect
cavemen had the same resources we do, technical knowledge is making all the difference in this world

wealth = doctors and engineers, not manual laborers, not raw materials

It's all about resources. And isn't Syria about resources too? Syria is a very shitty place right now right?

Look at the places in pic related. White people are responsible. you have the audacity to make a thread and ask why certain countries are broke or shitty. Look at yourself you are to blame.

youtube.com/watch?v=5CfXouIq-Mc

>Britain did not HAVE to colonize,
You're a retard? Do you know anything about economics, about capitalism? They need 3rd world resources.

Western countries will not survive without 3rd world countries. They need to exploit them in order to survive, even to this day.

friendly reminder that jared diamond is a hack

>cheap labor
Not at all. The "labor" in Europe is entirely useless. They bring in nothing of value and are in fact a huge cost factor. They're unemployable and only good as consumers through wealth redistribution to the benefit of a small group of large corporations
>sweat shops
Are actually doing. Have been for quite some time due to automatization. Then again, they were never in third world countries because said countries were to unstable and unproductive. They were situated in countries like China, Thailand, Vietnam etc. Whom are mostly developing nation with a somewhat useable IQ and work ethic.

Look at gdp per capita. Not shitty and carefully chosen comparison pics.

Those countries are and always were shitholes

I love how you cherry pick and take things out of context because you literally cannot build a coherent and proper argument in favour of your claims.

You claimed that Western countries lacked any and all resources, this is a blatant lie. You then went on to claim that the reason they managed to get ahead was due to stealing other peoples resources, which is once again a lie. They got ahead first, which allowed them to THEN go on and take other peoples resources. Thus they did not have to do these things before they managed to do so. They only did it afterwards because they could and to aquire even more resources for further cheap growth aswell as having places to invest said wealth in.

Then again, you are both cherry picking and ignoring huge swathes of what people are writing because you are incapable of giving a proper response. Space faring inuit where?

Imo there are poor countries with smart people.

Vietnam and Ukraine. Eastern and central Europe in general.

Communism stains us all.

>Vikings raided primarily BECAUSE IT WAS EASIER than to produce these things themselves.

Produce what? In order to produce things, like computers, iphone, cotton shirt, rubber shoes, etc, you need raw materials. Retard. You can't produce something out of nothing. You need to raid, steal, invade, colonize, exploit countries with abundance of resources.

And it's what White countries are doing to this they. They outsource cheap labor to 3rd world countries, they kill world leaders like Gaddafi, or try to remove em - like Assad - bomb their place - for what? You know what.

>Vikings stole phones, computers and rubber shoes from the poor natives
This feels like you aren't even trying anymore. Aside from pretty much claiming that Europe is the Northpole just ice and snow. Ignoring that it has quite a lot of natural resources, you are still not answering where the space faring Inuit are and how they ever got the edge in science, culture etc that allowed them to steamroll savages in the first place.

Or how 200 years of colonization means Africans couldn't develop a civilization in the tens of thousands of years prior, while sitting on all these resources.

>which allowed them to THEN go on and take other peoples resources.

Thanks for answering OP's question. Thanks for admitting White people are evil who enslave, kill, colonize, steal, cheat, lie, bomb, and "take other country's resources." Your words.

OP: Why Africa is so poor
You: Coz White people stole their wealth

troll 0/10 bait

I did not say Vikings stole phones. I said you need physical raw materials to make phones and cotton shirt. Are you saying the Vikings' land have all the plants in the world like cotton, sugarcane, and raw materials like oil, gold, silicone? You can't have all the plants in the world. Because of environmental factors like soil, weather, climate, and snow.

>Russia
>white
>practically infinite resources
>complete shithole

its because of management and corruption.

hurr russia isnt white
hurr russia isnt a shithole
get over urselves. korea has a higher gdp than russia.

Dude. Communism. The USSR did so much for the space race.

What would you think of South Korea if the Norks attacked and they are in poverty in the next few decades?

Like 2050 SK is poor, but we know they are capable of developing without resources.

Private western corporations control africa and the niggers ruling the shit show take bribes and let them

Oh god you're retarded. Any group that got ahead ended up vassalizing/conquering other groups around it. To do so however they first needed to get ahead. Which required a mixture of several factors, from IQ, to a certain level of civilization to being able to actually produce and manufacture the means to then go on and conquer others.

You are putting the cart in front of the horse, to build some absurd construct. In which any successfull group from Europeans, to the Atztecs, to Chinese have only achieves said success by stealing it from others. Who in turn following your logic needed to steal it from yet other people.

While any group that failed to capitalize on all their resources and opportunities, is never at fault themselves. Even if they sat on them for tens of thousands of years. It was only because someone else eventually took advantage of their idiocy and non developement and rolled over them. Which then retroactively rendered them incapable of ever achieving anything.

Africa is poor, because most Africans never developed the wheel, metallurgy, never made it past the stone age and remained completely stagnants for tens of thousands of years. DESPITE an incredible wealth of natural resources, a variety of great climates and the best opportunities one could ask for.

Silicone does not occur in nature you imbecile. They the same as everyone else did have gold. oil became only important relatively recently during the industrialization. We can keep continuing that as you constantly move the goal post and pretend "BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE X" ignoring that usually a substitute of one kind or another exists.

You are also wholly ignoring, how they ever managed to build armor, weapons, ships and various other necessities to even go out and club other people over the head in the first place.

Compare North and South Korea. Now think about the difference between these two countries. Now think what would happen if North Korea would remedy said difference. Would they instantly be on the level of South Korea?

Damn you're fucking stupid

Tråd

You got the sequence wrong.

Read about the fertile crescent, history of livestock, grains, rivers, discovery of steel. Countries who "got ahead" are the ones who discovered steel and made better weapons, which they used to conquer other countries with much more resources. But why did they discover steel in the first place and not the other countries?

Nothing to do with IQ but has everything to do with geographic location, necessity, and circumstance.

But those don't matter. What matters is OP's question. And you've answered it again and again, even tho your sequence of events is wrong. Answer to OP's question: Whites are evil who steal other people's shit. Whether they need to or because they can is irrelevant. What matters is that they do it, up to this day.

No, you're a retard.

>Whites are evil who steal other people's shit
You're just jelly because we do it better than you. Given the chance, brown people steal, cheat and murder just as much if not worse, they just lack the agency to do it right.

Everything that makes your life easier and more enjoyable has been invented or enabled by white men, expecting niggers or sand coons to spawn a technological civilization is like asking a chicken to fly.

Damn you're fucking stupid

You made Iraqi's, Syrians', Palestinians', Afghans', Africans' lives easier and more enjoyable?

You mean you made White people's lives easier and enjoyable by making brown and black people's lives harder.

(((CIA))) whiteys fault kys sub human

no idea, OP. No clue what keeps Africa from being a mediocre to okay place.

Quote unrelated.

Such rebuttal, much impressed

Hillary Clinton neo lib shill corporatist who would've flooded us with immigrants changing the demographics of this nation forever was acting on behalf of the white race? Man your stupid

I'm only using the rebuttal of your friend here: To make a point. That by calling someone stupid, doesn't make their argument wrong.

White people lives are not getting easier my friend.

Just read history of the White people. The many interventions of CIA. The colonial activities of Britain and other White countries.

(((CIA))) and yea they could do whatever they want in Europe I'm not there and your telling me Hillary was acting on behalf of the white race? Kys sub human

ZOP wars are a mistake but fuck those uppity mud people. They have no qualms murdering each other without us getting involved.

Whatever we did to brown and black people is a small price to pay for all the good shit white people have invented they benefit from. there wouldn't be half as many mudpeople if it wasn't for white science and inventions. Look at everything you own, practically everything you have was invented by a white man, you live in a white man's world, feel free to give it all up and go live in a mud hut anytime, you're welcome.

Africa could've been a colonial success if the natives had weak immune systems like the American ones.

Believes that muh white supremacy is real. Seems to be unaware of the fact the CIA and other agencies want the border open regardless of it changes the demographics of this nation so they can smuggle money and drugs, and this is on behalf of white people who are negatively impacted by shit like this?

When White countries were invading and colonizing and stealing from other countries, do you think their leaders were acting on behalf of the white race? It's more likely they're doing it for their own selfish reasons. to enrich themselves and their children. But the point is, people who do it are White.

What King or Queen invades a country and tells himself, this is for the White race. No, they're thinking, "mwahaha I'm gonna get even more powerful and richer. My children too."

Niggers

The Chinese tell them that straight to their face as they also tell them your resources are best in use by use and the negro sits down and humbles himself just like all those negro black panther shit posters on here dream of.

You're denying the wrongdoings of White people. Admit it, the colonizes were White. Europeans were White. Admit it. You're people are aweful.

Yea most working class people who get unwillingly conscripted into these affairs are white men.

But your friend here:
Disagrees with you. He says White people aren't responsible for any of that. Don't take credit.

Muh colonies. No hombre

What resources does Somalia have?
You might see them all as the same but they see themselves as diffferent tribes and want there own homelands. So there is probably going to be more wars and divisions sudan being most recent. Same problem with Ukraine

/thread
Back to lewdposting

>missing intelligence
>implying they ever will gain any at all
American niggers have the ability to gain knowledge and they are still fucking stupid.

Most of their resources are in areas no one wants to live in. People that work in those place to so in just a small amount of years to get a good amount of money and then leave

Because the white man came and enslaved people. They broke apart families and kingdoms while destroying culture. The white man doesn't care about who he leaves behind in the wake of his destruction. The white man is worse than the Jews. That's why whites hate the Jews so much, because they only see themselves.

Muh technologies and scientific inventions. No hombre

White American doesn't take credit for European colonies in Africa, still thinks the CIA is a huwhite supremcis institution that has helped change this country from 80% White to 60% just so they could smuggle drugs and money.

False.

They might not have been the best but they weren't shit holes. Now they are not even fit for shitting in.

I know all about the Jews.

When I say White, I include the White Europeans. They are your people, whether you like it or not. Unless you're not white. I view you as one people. You people's sins are your people's sins.

thanks to white people.

> muh native crafts

Not an argument

What if I kill you? Do those sins go away cause you think your clever by saying shut but your ignoring the actual (((white people))) in charge. JIDF when hezbollah kills you and your Wahhabist cronies I laugh that the last remaining Turkic/Europeanized genes in the Levant are destroying you.