Do you believe in a free press, Sup Forums?

Do you believe in a free press, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4bXjAE6b5xA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I believe in a press free to engage the president in a no-holds barred cage match in HELL IN A CELL

Yes I think the first amendment is a whole is incredibly important and should be upheld

The press is free to be retarded.
The president is free to humiliate them endlessly for it.

Of course.

I want to see CNN destroy itself

trumps connection with the wee and McMahon is the only thing that could be close to Ted the rats cruises redemption arc.

Trump learned so much from Vince. he is the world's greatest heel and I love him for it. a wwe hall of famer in the oval office.

>Press
>Free

All the media companies being owned by the same few international interests isn't really "free" if you think about it, user.

Yes, unless their lying.

The (((press))) is free to lie all they want.
The people are free to call them out as liars.

Get fucked, liberals.

"the first amendment" is a liberal code word for "the right to spread fake news". The only free speech we need is speech that praises Trump.

/thread

i believe in non-partisan news

The press can print whatever they like

And the president can tweet whatever he likes in response

I believe in a bunch of overpaid professional liars who have used the power of image to push the world over the edge of the abyss.

I disagree but I respect your opinion

Yes I do. However, what CNN is doing isn't free press.

That being said everyone has a right to believe them or not. Most people don't.

do you even know what the first amendment is? It doesn't mean you're free from consequences for lying for years

Yes. I want the press to continue to agitate and stir up animosity between the left and the right, to the point that we have a civil war.

I don't know if there are any laws against irresponsibly riling low-intelligence people, but there shouldn't be. We're long overdue for a major chimpout, both sides absolutely hate one-another, what we have now doesn't work at all, and I for one would enjoy seeing dead liberals. It's what they deserve for destroying a society.

Only for media personalities with proven integrity like Mean Gene Okerlund

yes.

I think pretty much every post here has nailed it already though.

Having a free press is not the same as ensuring CNN exists in perpetuity in liu of market pressure.

paid shills should be illegal. then you'd be out of a job.

Yes I do it allows you to State your opinion freely without the fear of government intervention CNN does give their opinion on Trump all of which granted or negative, but guess what pal that's what the first amendment allows it's called freedom of speech they're allowed to criticize the government as much as they want or would you please like to name a lie that they've told.

You earned today's Presidential Bowl of Cereal.

no

you still butthhurt hillary lost, cuck?

youtube.com/watch?v=4bXjAE6b5xA

Yummy

This.
Society needs a enema to remove the many layers of corruption the globalist power has created to protect itself. Only once that is done will we be free to look at how we can safely prepare memes for people to view without poisoning them and without the production of memes falling into the same hands that produce or hold money.

You have to go back

Um, hello? I don't know what sort of box all you drumpftards have been living in, but his actions on social media have embarrassed the country. Literally every celebrity is condoning his behavior and asking for his inpeachment.

It's only a matter of time now.

the constitution protects people from the government, not people from other citizens

Low IQ, dumb as a rock, psycho donald tweeted from the official government account

so...

>waah, I hate him because he want's to end the first amendment, so I want to end the first amendment.

you're fucking pathetic.
only a liberal could do these kind of mental gymnastics

It's actually "a unicorn".

>condoning
Means literally the opposite of what this retard thinks

In theory it should be free...but it gets strange when an ethnic minority with a longstanding, deeply held hostility to the majority runs it all...While at the same time having a primary loyalty to another country half the world away.

The press is not functioning, you can call it 'free' but it is working freely and aggressively counter to the interests of the people.

>Um hello
Read thisGoogle it
Um, hello. Neck yourself.

he's not silencing the press -- he's just fucking battling it, it's not complicated

Wah.
Wah.
Wah
Nobody fucking cares and we all want CNN to just fucking die.

Did you type this during a rollover collision?

lol

This.
To counter freedom.
There power is massive. Clothes, music etc are just the obvious examples of how easily memes effect behaviour.
Politics is downstream of culture, culture is downstream from MSM and MSM is downstream from (((big money)))

You'd only be embarrassed if you gave a shit what low IQ normies think. Most of us don't, that's why we take pleasure in fucking with those that do (liberals)

sadly accurate
violins.wav

>inpeachment

>Literally every celebrity
kek.
underrated subtlety flying over new fags heads

Stay focused and answer the question please.

Do you mean like a small, rootless international clique owning all the popular media? Hmm..

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from social consequences.

It's a double edged sword, it's about time they internalized that fact.

If I were Trump I would bypass the media and use social media to get the majority of my information out. Fuck the msm

It should since we already force people to interact with fags and niggers

well I geuss if every celebrity calls for his impeachment its only a matter of time.

I wish I was a smart liberal too.

>Do you believe in a free press, Sup Forums?

Absolutely...

I also believe that subliminal advertisements have been illegal for about 20-30 years.

I'm looking at YOU, CIA.

I like it in theory but in practice free media tends to promote opinions that I am opposed to so I'd say nah fuck it

Does the free press have standards that they need to be held to?

You're a imbacile if you didn't realise MSM was only there to deceive and control society.
They are very careful about telling flat out lies because it's all recorded and can get brought back up at any time (but they do lie), though all the time every hour of the day they are deceiving and manipulating their viewers, which doesn't need any flat lying.
You don't deserve a sensible answer like the one I've just given you as you as below contempt you whining little gutter muppet so now you've had your big moment and fallen flat on your face you can fuck off and never come back.

Post your face when you realize that the gold tinted windows on Trump Tower blocks electromagnetic voice to skull...

And the walls of the white house do not.

*you are below contemp

What's the point in calling it 'free' if the reporters have to go along with the narratives which are basically the political opinions of some rich jews?

It might be worth taking the time at this moment to mention that the smith-mundt act was repealed with the 2012 AUMF.

This means since 2012 it has been 100% legal for any agency within the US government to publish, leak or otherwise promote "propaganda" within the united states.

This is the real reason they need MSM

>t
I'm going to bed.
Hope I wake to civil war brought about by MSM lying themselves to death.
>MSM are lying about fearing violence
But their lies are changing reality

I believe in a body slammed press

Trump should sue cnn and ABcdgaf heads in defamation lawsuits. And donate the proceeds to the wall.

I'm truly sorry that I'm not some paranoid cuck but I thank you for attempting to answer my question.

>This means since 2012 it has been 100% legal for any agency within the US government to publish, leak or otherwise promote "propaganda" within the united states.
>This is the real reason they need MSM

This post contains truth.

And the CIA is TOTALLY exploiting this fact when they hired Correct The Record to "Counter Russian Propaganda"

which means shit on this board and all pizzagate investigations.

I believe in the gorilla press

I believe in them being freed of their heads

Underrated

I disrespect your agreeableness about agreeing to respect anons opinion, whilst disagreeing with it.

Is it frosted with salt?

>what we need is speech that praises trump
Sorry, free speech does not work that way.

I believe in whatever Putin did to NTV, almost live.

Maxine, is that you???
Condoning means they like it.
'Inpeachment'...only Auntie Maxipad says that one..

What would the consequences be for this then?

Oh, that's right, impotent bitching on social media.

slander =/= journalism

Slander: the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation.

It's also not protected by our first amendment.

When CNN, WaPo, NYT, and MSNBC stop broadcasting fake and uncited stories i am sure the dust will settle between them and the WH.

>celebs support a plan
>its gospel

gl in 2020. you will need it.

Yes, a free press is necessary to ensure that news is given to the masses so they can stay informed.

Also the press needs to be held accountable if they are not doing their job properly, recently it has been Trump calling out the press when they are blatantly lying (Such as the Russia bullshit with CNN) and what not.

Though honestly, we as citizens of our respective nations should be holding the press accountable for their dishonesty and lack of ethics if that is what they are participating in, because the ones who suffer the most when the free press is not doing their job properly is not the people in power but rather the citizens to whom are being lied to.

bump

Only if they don't make money off it.

Continuing:

They sell a product, which is news.

Us, the people, should have reasonable expectations that it's the truth, not misleading or manipulative, and has no agenda (whether bought or ideological).

Hence, they shouldn't be bound to free speech. That should only be for citizens in public and private and who don't make money off it.

>The Press
During most of history people established themselves as the official source of information over others.
Freedom of Press meant that people had the right to use The Printing Press to take those Establishment sources down.
That was literally the entire concept of Freedom of Press. The same applies to all advances in technology.
HOLY CRAP DO PEOPLE HAVE IT ASS BACKWARDS.
Those who set themselves up as official sources of information are not "the press" they have twisted language to make people forget. Freedom of Press is freedom to use any technological means to compete and take down other sources of information.
"The Press" It's the Printing Press stupids.

bump

you should probably spend ten seconds on wikipedia disproving yourself. It was a direct response to british censorship and has nothing to do with competing tech.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution

We don't have a free press. We have a series of propaganda agencies which occasionally report news.

I believe in a free prez

Where does the holy Wikipedia say that it's not about the printing press?

It just means the freedom to print really. It's not like a journalist can just do as he or she pleases. That's why we have investigative journalists. Boy, you don't see them anymore.

not if that press employs or is owned by even a single kike

That's not how free speech works, /r/the_donald

I believe propaganda should be illegal, for the same reason deceptive advertising is illegal

MSM "Journalists" have become propagandists and should be prosecuted for their crimes